Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter March 26, 2022

Influence of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles using red alga Corallina elongata on broiler chicks’ performance

  • Niamat M. El-Abd , Ragaa A. Hamouda EMAIL logo , Turki M. Al-Shaikh and Marwa Salah Abdel-Hamid

Abstract

Poultry meat is a great source of protein and provides lots of nutrients such as iodine, iron, zinc, vitamins, and essential fatty acids that humans require. The positive applications of metal nanoparticles (NPs) in the diets of various poultry species were studied, in relation to their metabolic, antibacterial effects on digestion and regulation of bowel function. This study was carried out to test the effects of fabrication green silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) of Corallina elongata extract and/or coating NPs with acetic acid on performance, immune response parameters and micro-flora population in Ross broiler. Chicks’ drinking water was mixed with bio-AgNPs (1 mM) and coating NPs with acetic acid for 35 days. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, electron dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and high resolution transmission electron microscope were used to determine the partial physiochemical characterizations of bio-AgNPs and coating ones. EDS analysis was used to determine the presence of AgNP in meat. Results confirmed that coating NPs with acetic acid reduced percentage of the micro-flora population, which were detected by VITEK® 2 system (BioMérieux, France) and identified as Pseudomonas orizihabitain 4211210040000210 and Sphinogomonas paucimobilis 5201210040000210. EDS analysis of meat chicks confirmed disappearance of Ag metals. Coating biogenic AgNPs with acetic acid on modulated intestinal microbial populations of the Ross broiler may be safe, and could be used as alternative antibiotics or antibacterial agents besides their physiological performance in small intestines of broiler chicken.

1 Introduction

Antibiotics have extensive consumption in poultry feed to promote growth, convalesce feed efficiency and lower the prevalence of certain diseases [13]. Many countries search for a natural compound alternative to antibiotics; various nutritious supplementation were previously obtainable in the market such as organic acids, probiotics oils, and prebiotics [46]. Nanotechnology is one of the fields of science that defied it as an innovative technology, which is dealt with different element; finally produced and created materials; modification of structure, boosted quality and texture of foodstuffs at the molecular level [7]. This technology has a major power on fabrication, processing, transportation, safety, packing and traceability of food [8]. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) has a simple method, is low cost and ecofriendly [9,10]. In many studies, algae were used to manufacture AgNPs that possessed efficiency against many bacterial pathogens and algae such as Oscillatoria limnetica [11], Corallina elongata and Gelidium amansii, [12], as well as Ulva fasciata [13,14]. Mixed organic acid has been found to promote the antioxidant characteristics and health status of broilers [15]. Besides, acidity harms the metabolism of pathogenic bacteria such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Proteus vulgaris, at a low concentration of 3% [16]. Using of metal nanoparticles as complements of animal diets has not always yielded clear results, the useful effect of metal nanoparticles used in animal production was most frequently detected in such parameters as weight gain, average daily gain, and health improvement [17,18]. Nano-metals are a promising nutrient additive, have bio-separation, signal processing, and are safe for animals [19]. AgNPs enhanced the growth of pigs and chicken in comparison to control [20]. The body weight of broiler chicken was enhanced when administrated with AgNPs; meanwhile there was no effect on the body weight, when broiler chicken was supervised with low concentrations of AgNPs [17,21]. The supplementation of acetic acid to AgNPs can improve the Ag ion release and possess high antibacterial efficiency [22]. Mixing of acetic acid to AgNPs improved immunological features, anti-oxidative function increased in serum and small intestine, elevated pancreatic digesting enzyme activity, improved expression of tight junction proteins, and altered cecum bacterial population, resulting in healthier broiler development [15]. The natural resource of plants had promising stabilizing and reducing agents with metallic ions which develop the approach of biological in NPs synthesis. They are safe from biohazard and ecofriendly which have multiple applications in pharmaceutical, and medicine manufacturing [2327]. Antibacterial activities and cytotoxicity of green synthesis AgNPs differ according to the green sources that used for biosynthesis [12].

Therefore, the objectives of this study were to manufacture and study partial physiochemical characterizations of the new green AgNPs of red algae (C. elongata) extract. Then, evaluating those NPs and/or the mixed ones with acetic acid on the growth performance, carcass traits, some blood parameters of Broiler chickens, and distinguishing their possible antibacterial impact and identification of intestinal microbiota content.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental design

This study was conducted in the Environmental Studies and Research Institute and Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, University of Sadat City for 35 days. A sum of 240 one-week broiler chicks (Ross breed) were randomly divided into four treatments: control or drinking water only (T1), biogenic AgNPs coated with acetic acid (T2; 5 mL·L−1 in drinking water), biogenic AgNPs mixed with drinking water (T3; adding 5 mL·L−1), and addition of 5 mL·L−1 of acetic acid in drinking water (T4). Groups were allocated to three cage replicates (20 birds each) for each of the four groups in a completely randomized design. Treated drinking water was freely obtainable. Diets were subedited to be iso-nitrogenous and iso-caloric to cover all recommendations. The experimental diet was formulated to supply the nutritional requirements, as mentioned in Table 1, recommended by the National Research Council (NRC) [28].

Table 1

Composition and calculated analysis of the experimental diet under this study

Ingredients Starter diets Grower diets
Ground yellow corn (8.5%) 50.58 58.54
Soybean meal (44%) 40.37 33.42
Vegetable oil 05.00 04.60
Mono calcium phosphate 00.25 00.25
Sodium chloride 00.30 00.30
Vitamins and minerals mixture 00.30 00.30
dl-Methionine 00.22 00.22
Limestone 02.00 02.37
Total 100 100
Calculated analysis
Crude protein (%) 22.08 20.02
ME (kcal·kg−1 diet) 3,110 3,100
C/P ratio 140.0 153.0
Available phosphorous (%) 0.400 0.400

Vitamins and minerals mixture at 0.30% of the diet supplies the following (kg of the diet): vitamin A, 10,000 IU; vitamin D3, 3,000 IU; vitamin E, 24 mg; vitamin K3, 2.1 mg; vitamin B12, 2 mg; riboflavin, 5.0 mg; pantothenic acid, 15 mg; niacin, 40 mg; choline chloride, 500 mg; folic acid, 0.9 mg; vitamin B6, 3.0 mg; biotin, 0.05 mg; Mn, 70 mg; Fe, 80 mg; Zn, 100 mg; Cu, 18.8 mg; I, 0.35 mg; Se, 0.30 mg. Crude protein in nutrient levels were analyzed values, other nutrients were calculated values: dl – methionine: 98% feed grade (98% methionine) according to NRC [29].

2.2 Biogenic of AgNPs and bio-AgNPs capping with acetic acid

The aqueous extract of red alga C. elongata was prepared according to our previous studies [12], where 10 mL of algal extract was added drop by drop to solutions of AgNO3 (1 mM AgNO3 was dissolved in 90 mL Double distilled water), with starrier at 60°C until the color became brownish [29]. For preparations of AgNPs capping with acetic acid (1:1) v/v, 50 mL of acetic acid (99.70 wt%) was added to freshly prepared AgNPs 50 mL and agitated for 30 min [22].

2.3 Partial physiochemical characterizations of biogenic AgNPs

UV-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy (Shimadzu UV-1601P Spectrophotometer, England) at wavelength 200–700 nm determines the intensity of peaks and absorptions wavelength of AgNPs sample after 1 h of synthesis. Surface morphology and distribution of AgNPs were examined by scanning electron microscopy JEOL JSM-6510/v. Japan. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector system (JEOL, JEM-2100, Japan) was used to distinguish the elements of the NPs sample [30]. The shape and size of formed, capped AgNPs and treated bacterial cells were characterized by high resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM) (JEOL, JEM-2100, Japan). Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was used to determine the functional groups present in the biogenic AgNPs and those capping with acetic acid.

2.4 Measurements and methods of interpreting results

For the feeding trial, the following criteria were measured and/or calculated as follows: water consumption, feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), body weight gain (BWG), and growth rate (GR). Performance index (PI) was calculated according to the following relation [31]:

(1) PI = Live body weight (kg) × 100 ( feed conversion )

At the end of 35 days, blood samples were immediately taken during slaughtering and collected in heparinized tubes. Plasma constituents were determined calorimetrically, on individual bases, by using spectrophotometer, following the same steps as described by manufacturer in terms of plasma total protein (TP, g·dL−1), albumin (Alb, g·dL−1), globulin (Gl, g·dL−1), cholesterol, and ALT (u·dL−1), AST (u·L−1) and total anti-oxidant capacity (TAC, mL·L−1) were calculated and the A/G ratio was also calculated. The feedstuffs were analyzed for proximate analysis Association of Officials Analytical Chemists [32].

2.5 Meat preparation

Meat of broiler chicks was washed with triple distilled water to eliminate any contamination and then oven dried at 60°C and stored in plastic bags until needed. Drying takes about 3–4 days. After drying, they were grounded into fine powder using a mortar and pestle and stored in a well labeled air tight container for analysis [33].

2.6 EDX analysis of meat

Elemental analysis of meat powder after drying was carried out by EDX [33].

2.7 Determination and identification of intestinal microbiota contents

The ileum was chosen, whose function is to absorb the nutrients released from digestion; including amino acids, fatty acids and glucose, determined on the 35th day of rearing in three randomly selected chickens in each experimental group [34], to determine the total microbial count in intestinal content. Ileum samples (approx. 3 g) were collected immediately after sacrifice, homogenized of all the treatments, serially diluted in 10-fold in phosphate buffered saline. The plate count technique was used to count and enumerate bacterial community on LB medium (Merck, Germany) and was incubated at 37°C for 24 h [35]. The results were presented as colony forming units (CFU·mL−1) in triplicate. The results were expressed as the mean ± standard error of log CFU of viable bacteria. Selected colonies were identified at the species level based on standard biochemical tests by VITEK 2 system version: 07.01 BioMérieux. HR-TEM was used to investigate the morphological changes of isolated bacterial species after treatment with biogenic AgNPs capping with acetic acid [36].

2.8 Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis for the feeding trials was achieved by using the general linear model procedures and significant mean differences between treatment means were distinguished [37,38]. All statements of significance were based on p ≤ 0.05. The statistical model used was as follows:

(2) Y i j = u + a i + E i j

where Y ij  – an individual observation, u – overall mean, a i  – effect of treatment (i = 1, 2, 3, 4), and E ij  – the experimental error.

3 Results

3.1 Characterization of AgNPs

3.1.1 UV-Vis spectroscopy analysis

The formation of bio-AgNPs was confirmed by color change followed by UV-Visible spectrophotometer analysis (Figure 1a and b). The UV-Vis spectrophotometer intensity peaks of biogenic AgNPs by C. elongata, and AgNPs coated with acetic acid were 416 and 411, where the intensity was 0.33 and 0.31, respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1 
                     UV-Vis spectrum of AgNPs biogenic by C. elongata, AgNPs coated by acetic acids and AgNPs. Inset shows the color of (a) AgNPs capping by acetic acid and (b) AgNPs biogenic by C. elongata.
Figure 1

UV-Vis spectrum of AgNPs biogenic by C. elongata, AgNPs coated by acetic acids and AgNPs. Inset shows the color of (a) AgNPs capping by acetic acid and (b) AgNPs biogenic by C. elongata.

3.1.2 FTIR spectroscopy

The results in Figure 2 demonstrate the FTIR spectroscopy analysis of of AgNPs bio-fabricated by C. elongata and capping with acetic acid, there are difference in peak number and intensity, the peaks present with AgNPs bio-fabricated by C. elongata were 3,764, 3,444, 2,932, 2,377, 1,811, 1,642, 1,383, 1,149, 1,061, 895, 582, and 290 cm−1, meanwhile peaks present with AgNPs bio-fabricated coated with acetic acid are 3,781, 3,763, 3,452, 2,934, 2,366, 1,646, 1,385, 1,958, 602, 435, and 514 cm−1. Figure 2 represents change of the functional groups’ positions of biogenic AgNPs by C. elongata, from AgNPs coated by acetic acid, this denotes to action of the acetic acid capping agents.

Figure 2 
                     FTIR spectra of biogenic AgNPs by (a) C. elongata and (b) capping by acetic acid.
Figure 2

FTIR spectra of biogenic AgNPs by (a) C. elongata and (b) capping by acetic acid.

3.1.3 EDX spectrophotometry

Results in Figure 3 show peaks that denote metal content of aqueous AgNPs biosynthesized by C. elongata and AgNPs capping by acetic acid inspected using EDX spectrophotometry. Three peaks were present in aqueous AgNPs biosynthesized by C. elongata, the peaks are Si, Cl, and Ag with mass 1.89%, 14.0082%, and 84.097%, respectively. Whereas eight peaks were present in Bio AgNPs capping with acetic acid. The presented peaks were of O, Na, Si, S, Cl, Ca, Ag, and Ti with mass 17.1772%, 1.4825%, 1.6194%, 2.6240%, 10.2755%, 4.4912%, 59.5837%, and 2.7465%, respectively. It is clear that Ag mass of the biogenic AgNPs (84.09%) was more in comparison to bio-AgNPs capping by acetic acid (59.58%).

Figure 3 
                     EDX spectrophotometry analyses of bio-fabricated AgNPs by C. elongata (a) and capping bio-synthesis AgNPs by acetic acid (b) with the different percentages mass of metals.
Figure 3

EDX spectrophotometry analyses of bio-fabricated AgNPs by C. elongata (a) and capping bio-synthesis AgNPs by acetic acid (b) with the different percentages mass of metals.

3.1.4 HR-TEM

The size and shape of the NPs were demonstrated using HR-TEM. The spherical shape appeared in AgNPs and AgNPs coated with acetic acid. The particle size ranged from 11.39 to 41 nm in the case of biogenic AgNPs by C. elongata aqueous extract, meanwhile it was 11–26 nm with bio-fabricated AgNPs capping by acetic acid (Figure 4).

Figure 4 
                     High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) measurement of (a) biogenic AgNPs by C. elongata, (b) bio-synthesis AgNPs capping by acetic acid red arrows, and (c) AgNPs coating with acetic acid.
Figure 4

High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) measurement of (a) biogenic AgNPs by C. elongata, (b) bio-synthesis AgNPs capping by acetic acid red arrows, and (c) AgNPs coating with acetic acid.

3.2 Growth performance of broiler chicks

The effect of experimental treatments on body weight and its gain were obtained in Table 2. There was a significant variance among all treatments of final body weight; the heaviest final body weight was seen in T3 and T1. Also, the same trend was found in BWG. While T4 and T2 had the lowest body weight and BWG, the growth obstruction in T4 and T2 appeared to be a result of a depressed water intake convinced by supplementation of acetic acid in water.

Table 2

Growth performance of broiler chickens affected by using biogenic (AgNPs) and their NPs capping by acetic acid broiler chicken

Items Treatments SE Sig.
T1 T2 T3 T4
Initial body weight (g) at day 7 145 145 143 144 0.40 NS
Final body weight (g) at day 35 1,850a 1,600b 1,958a 1,550c 19.34 *
Water consumption (mL per bird) (7–35 days) 8,000a 5,500b 8,000.6a 5,000.5c 190.1 *
BWG (g) (7–35 days) 1,705b 1,455c 1,815a 1,406d 25.19 *
FI (g) (7–35 days) 2,890b 2,702c 2,931a 2,600d 22.35 *
FCR (g feed per g gain) (7–35 days) 1.690b 1.85a 1.61c 1.84a 0.05 *
GR (%) 170.9b 166.7c 172.8a 165.9c 0.18 *
Livability rate (%) 96.96 b 94.60c 98.50a 92.20d 0.28 *
PI (%) 109.4b 86.4c 121.6a 84.2c 5.10 *

T1: control. T2: treated with biogenic AgNPs coated with acetic acid. T3: treated with biogenic Ag NPs (c) only. T4: treated with acetic acid only. Letters a, b, c, etc.: means within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05) (mean ± SE).

3.3 Blood constituents of broiler chicks

Results of blood parameters at 35 days were influenced by AgNPs and its capping by acetic acid in drinking water of broiler chicks, as presented in Table 3. TP, Alb, Gl, total cholesterol, ALT, and AST concentrations were not significantly impacted due to the organization of AgNPs. Administration of AgNPs had no significant effect on all blood parameters except for TAC values.

Table 3

Biochemical analysis of blood constituents as affected by using biogenic (AgNPs) and their NP capping by acetic acid in broiler chickens

Items Treatments SE Sig.
T1 T2 T3 T4
T P (g·dL−1) 3.83 3.69 3.33 3.51 0.19 NS
Al (g·dL−1) 1.36 1.34 1.23 1.29 0.05 NS
GL (g·dL−1) 2.47 2.35 2.10 2.22 0.14 NS
A/G ratio 0.55 0.57 0.58 0.58 0.03 NS
Cho (mg·dL−1) 99 88 93 84 0.32 NS
TAC (mL·L−1) 0.73a 0.96a 1.02b 0.53b 0.12 *
AST (unit·L−1)·dL−1 94 87 91 89 2.82 NS
ALT (u·L−1) 49 41 43 42 0.59 NS

T1: control. T2: treated with biogenic AgNPs coated with acetic acid. T3: treated with biogenic AgNPs (c) only. T4: treated with acetic acid only. Letters a, b, c, etc.: means within the same raw with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05) (mean ± SE).

3.4 Carcass characteristics

The effect of biogenic AgNPs and/or capping by acetic acid in drinking water of broiler on carcass weight percentage and relative weight of organs are tabulated in Table 4. No significant results were notable for dressing percentage and different parts of the carcass due to the impact of AgNPs. It can be noticed that the dose of AgNPs and acetic acid had no significant impact on carcass weight, dressing percentage, and various parts of carcass, such as the liver, heart, and spleen percentages.

Table 4

Carcass and relative weight of organs as affected by using AgNPs and their NP capping by acetic acid in broiler chickens

Item Treatments SE Sig.
T1 T2 T3 T4
Live bodyweight (g) 1,900 1,600 2,000 1,500 15.9 NS
Carcass (%) 63.1 75.0 67.5 70.0 3.34 NS
Liver (%) 2.77 2.69 2.95 2.13 0.19 NS
Gizzard (%) 1.85 2.47 1.59 2.00 0.95 NS
Heart (%) 0.58 0.54 0.64 0.53 0.05 NS
Spleen (%) 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.10 0.002 NS
Abdominal fat (%) 2.42a 1.20c 2.35b 1.13d 0.28 *

T1: control. T2: treated with biogenic AgNPs coated with acetic acid. T3: treated with biogenic AgNPs (c) only. T4: treated with acetic acid only. Letters a, b, c, etc.: means within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05) (mean ± SE).

3.5 EDS of boiler meats, treated with AgNPs their NP capped by acetic acid broiler chickens

A typical EDS measurement of the elements present in the meats were taken from the chicken that were treated with biogenic AgNPs and biogenic AgNPs capping with acetic acid and controls (Figure 5a–d). The results indicated that there was no accumulation of Ag metals in meats that were treated with biogenic AgNPs and biogenic AgNPs capping with acetic acid and controls, so there was no Ag toxicity, and the meats were safe to be consumed. There are elevations of Cu ions in both control and meat treated with AgNPs capping with acetic acid in comparison to meats treated with biogenic AgNPs. Low amount of aluminum was cleared in the meats treated with biogenic AgNPs capping with acetic acid only may be due to contamination of acetic acids with aluminum.

Figure 5 
                  EDS analysis of boiler meats: (a) control, (b) treated with biogenic AgNPs coated with acetic acid, (c) treated with biogenic Ag NPs, and (d) treated with acetic acid.
Figure 5

EDS analysis of boiler meats: (a) control, (b) treated with biogenic AgNPs coated with acetic acid, (c) treated with biogenic Ag NPs, and (d) treated with acetic acid.

3.6 Evaluation of biogenic AgNPs their NP capped by acetic acid broiler chickens’ effects on pathogenic genus count in the ileum

The number of the microbial content in the ileum changed significantly after 35 days of broiler performance. The total number was, on average, 5 × 109, 2.3 × 104, 1.1 × 103, and 3 × 107 CFU·mL−1 of control, biogenic AgNPs, biogenic NPs capping with acetic acid, and acetic acid 5 mL·L−1, respectively (Table 5). Watering broilers supplemented with acetic acid + nanosilver resulted in a slight decrease in the number of microbial total counts in the intestinal content after 35 days of breeding in comparison to control treatment. The promising result was found after the watering supplementation with bio-AgNPs, where the reduction percentage was about 2–3 times less than the control treatment under this investigation. Cultivated colonies were sampled at various times during the growth phases and tested for evaluation of the effects of biogenic AgNPs capping with acetic acid in broiler chickens for intestinal microbiota total count in the ileum in Table 5.

Table 5

Effects of Ag-NPs and biogenic Ag NPs coated with acetic acid in broiler chickens on intestinal microbiota total count in the ileum

Treatments Bacterial count (CFU·mL−1)
Control 5.0 × 109
Treated with biogenic AgNPs coated with acetic acid 2.3 × 104
Treated with biogenic AgNPs only 1.1 × 103
Treated with acetic acid (5 mL·L−1) only 3.0 × 107

CFU – colony forming unit.

3.7 Identification of microbiota in ileum samples

Cultured colonies were detected by the VITEK 2 as a rapid bacterial identification system that provides highly accurate and reproducible results. On the other hand, VITEK system identification patterns showed an acceptable confident was Pseudomonas orizihabitain 87% with bio number 4211210040000210. Isolate was positive for l-pyrrolydonyl-arylamidase (PyrA), d-celluobiose (dCEL), H2S production, d-glucose (dGLU), d-maltose (dMAL), d-mannitol, d-mannose (dMNE), d-trehalose (dTRE); coumarate (CMT), and resistance (occurrence of resistance to vibriostatic compound) (O129R); for details, see Figure A1 in Appendix. Acceptable confident level was Sphinogomonas paucimobilis 86% (bio number is 5201210040000210), where nine biochemical tests out of 64 tests were positive alpha-phe-pro arylamidase, l-PyrA, dCEL, dGLU, dMAL, dMNE; dTRE, CMT, and O129 O129R; for details, see Figure A2. Biogenic of AgNPs may have altered microbial ecosystem in the digestive tract by reducing colonization of pathogenic bacteria, such as P. orizihabitain and S. paucimobilis. A balanced intestinal microbiota is therefore essential for the performance of all food producing animals. Results in Figure 6 showed untreated and treated cells revealed changes under experimental conditions 24-hour exposure to biogenic AgNPs capping with acetic acid. Bacterial cell wall seemed to be affected or completely damaged with remarkable changes of flagella were found or lost after treatment of biogenic NPs in comparison with untreated cells (see Figure 6).

Figure 6 
                  HRTEM examination of detected bacteria (a) and morphological effect of biogenic (AgNPs) capping with acetic acid in intestinal microbiota of broker chicken (b).
Figure 6

HRTEM examination of detected bacteria (a) and morphological effect of biogenic (AgNPs) capping with acetic acid in intestinal microbiota of broker chicken (b).

4 Discussion

Marine algae produced various secondary metabolites; saccharides, phenolic compounds, fatty acids, alkaloids, and vitamins are working as a source of nutrition and an anticancer agent [39]. The color of the aqueous extract of seaweed after exposure to silver nitrate solution changed to brown, indicating the formation of AgNPs [40]. When acetic acid reacts with any metal ion, or any electropositive element compared to hydrogen that element replace the hydrogen from the acetic acid and give the metal acetate as final product along with hydrogen gas. Correspondingly in this case similarly silver replace the hydrogen ion and give the silver acetate as final product. Mixed organic acids with diet supplemented can maintain an appropriate acidity level of the gastrointestinal system (duodenum and cecum) of broilers as confirmed in ref. [41]. The NP size and size distribution are dependent on different factor such as reducing agents, temperature, and pH the reaction of the synthesis NP. When silver ions are reduced mainly by aldehydes, large NPs are formed and their size distribution is wide; however, when reduced by free radicals, small NPs with a narrow size distribution are obtained [42]. The peaks at 400–450 nm in the UV spectrum confirmed the formation of AgNPs of NPs can be determined by UV-Vis spectroscopy [43]. Small size of AgNPs (10–50 nm) predictably has small absorbance peak near 400 nm, while bigger AgNPs (100 nm) give a broader peak with a maximum that shifts toward longer wavelengths close to 500 nm [44,45,46]. FTIR analysis exhibited a very sharp peak 1642.44 cm−1 was observed with bio-AgNPs by C. elongata and 1,646.3 with AgNPs coated with acetic acid, these peaks related to secondary amide C═O stretching of the proteins derived from red alga C. elongata. [47]. The peaks 1,642.44 and 1,646.3 cm−1 are represented C═O stretching of the proteins, that act as reducing agent of Ag metal to AgNPs Abdel-Raouf et al. [47] stated that proteins possibly form a coat covering the metal NPs and prevent agglomeration of the NPs. Balaji et al. [48] denoted that extracellular protein compound can bind and synthesized AgNPs.

The free thiol groups existing in the proteins were caused reduction of silver nitrate to AgNP [49]. Zulfiqar et al. [50] represented that FTIR analysis revealed that the plant extract has decrease Ag ions to Ag atoms, so that coat them with hydroxyl and amine groups leading to significantly stable the antibacterial activity of AgNPs. The mixing of acetic to AgNPs can improve the Ag release and possessed high antibacterial efficiency [22]. According to our results, small AgNPs with a narrow size distribution can be synthesized with algal extract as a FITR analysis showed contains different functional groups hydroxyl and amine groups and polymers as proteins, polysaccharides leading to significantly stable the antibacterial activity of AgNPs in agreement with Prabha [51] reported, polymeric glycerol-AuNPs in with size ≥ 100 nm have been effectively internalized as the surface area increase the more interacts of cell lines. Andi et al. [52] revealed that AgNPs as feed supplementation (≥60 ppm) for 42 days had no effect on biochemical parameters of blood serum or liver enzyme activity, glucose, and cholesterol concentrations. Beside it did not enhance oxidative damage to liver DNA. Furthermore, Abd El-Ghany [53] reported, nano-silver ionic particles had improved nutritional absorption by decreasing the count of different pathogenic bacterial genera in broiler chicks. The enhancement of growth by adding AgNPs in T3 was like the mentioned results in literature who informed that weight gain was extensively improved by using nano-silver [54]. Furthermore, the body weight was improved at 25 ppm·kg−1 and boosted lactic acid bacteria, when Japanese quail added with 5, 15, and 25 mg of AgNPs per liter in drinking water [55]. Meanwhile, it is informed that the level of 900 ppm of AgNPs had a significant amplify in live body weight in comparison with control group [56]. On the other hand, it is exhibited that AgNPs had not remarkable significant toxic effect on growth performance in comparison with control, when using at quantities of 20, 40, and 60 ppm·kg−1 of diets in agreement with Ahmadi and Rahimi [57] improved, the performance, digestive organs and on live body weight of broiler through starter period at levels till 50 ppm. The progressive results may be due to improve anabolic activities and the antibacterial properties of AgNPs impacting in microbial populations without inducing conflict and that may be due to the motivation of development and growth of birds and promote the rate of metabolism, so, this may lead to the enhancement of the growth of broiler [7]. In this study results showed that FI was increased by T3 recorded the highest FI followed by control, while the lowest FI recorded by T4 which complemented by delayed growth to be the concern of depressed water intake by the submission of acetic acid in water. Feed conversion improved at T3 and showed that feed eating amplified and FCR amplified by using nano silver in broiler diets [58].

In this respect, it was found that add concentrations of 25 and 50 ppm of AgNPs in broiler diet had no significant influence on FI and FCR in comparison to control [9]. The results may be due to the influence of ionic silver on pathogenic bacteria in intestine, which caused improvement of absorption of nutrients [58]. In broiler chickens, it is achieved that broilers taken AgNPs displayed heavier BW and high BWG than those of the control. The biological effect of AgNPs on harmful bacteria in intestine, which resulted in improving growth as the absorption of nutrients was increased as mentioned [17]. Otherwise, the AgNPs growth stimulatory impact might be recognized to the encouragement of digestive enzymatic activities, which leaded to enhance the absorbance of nutrients [59].

On the contrary, some previous research did not find an upgrading in growth performance in broilers fed a diet supplemented with AgNPs [60]. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed on viability rate % among the experimental groups, besides the worst mortality was observed in T2 group chicks. Meanwhile, the groups of T3 recorded moderate mortality compared to control. These results mentioned that nanosilver has a role in decreasing poultry mortality as reported by Abd-Elnaby et al. [61].

Similarly, it is displayed that all blood parameters were not significantly affected by AgNPs treatments as demonstrated in NZW female rabbits [62]. Another comparable investigation was conducted that the total cholesterol values were significantly lower in the broiler chicks fed a diet supplemented with AgNPs, compared to those in the control group were explained that broiler chicks treated with AgNPs produced significant variations in total Alb, Gl, and TP [63]. Correspondingly, in rats, it is conveyed that oral administration of AgNPs had an insignificant influence on the relative weights of spleen, liver, heart, and kidney [64]. On the contrary, in broiler chickens, it is found that AgNPs supplementation in drinking water or diet had a significant influence on dressing, liver and heart percentage [65]. EDS is a vital devise used for the elemental analysis or chemical characterization of biomasses [66]. Results agree with Lawmzuali [33] demonstrated that there were copper and zinc ions are present in meat samples such as beef, pork, lamb, chicken, and foal. It was confirmed that supplemented with 200 ppm of AgNPs was effectively decrease the microbial content than that of control chicks [67]. It was revealed that P. oryzihabitans polluted drinking water source and examined whether these bacteria are generally obtained in innately distributed water [60]. It was considered that the balanced intestinal microbiota is consequently necessary for the performance of all food producing animals including supporting digestion, protecting from pathogens, and producing nutrients of the host immune system as mentioned by Rangan and Hang [66]. It was proved that the biogenic synthesized AgNPs is an excellent antibacterial activity against bacterial pathogens [61]. Furthermore, it was informed that the adsorption of AgNPs on the bacterial cell wall reacting with thiol or SH group of exterior proteins interferes with their potential enzyme activities, leading directly inhibit proteins; frustrate respiratory chain, influence membrane permeability, and separate cell membrane from cell wall [68]. Otherwise AgNPs inhibit DNA replication and transcription [67]. Bacterial cell wall seemed to be affected or completely damaged, which had played vital role in secreting different virulence factors [69]. Remarkable changes of flagella were found, which improve capacity pathogenic bacteria through attractive and stimulation by adaptive responses, and adhesion stage [6,70], were absent or lost after treatment of biogenic NPs in comparison with untreated cells. According to our results, small AgNPs (10–42 nm) can easily penetrate and remarkable damaged was appeared on the pathogenic bacterial cells as mentioned by Abdel-Hamid [10] reported that biogenic Indole acetic acid-AgNPs leads considerable harmful in the outer membrane and intracellular contents as well of pathogenic bacterial cells.

5 Conclusion

The results of using biogenic AgNPs of drinking water supplementation exposed the body weight significantly enhanced in broiler given AgNPs and/or AgNPs capping with acetic acid compared with control chicks. Since gut bacteria have a key role in food digestion, the results demonstrated that ileal digest bacteria were encouragingly related to AgNPs. For consumers’ being concerns, AgNPs capped with acetic acid used as antibacterial activities, and hence encourage productive performance in poultry. Alternatively, residues of silver ions in chick’s meat may be toxic for human. Results confirmed that there are not any accumulated silver ions in chick’s meat with all treatments. So, biogenic AgNPs capping with acetic acid is a safe additive of broiler drinking water, alternative antibiotics and eco-friendly as well. Biogenic AgNPs or mixed with acetic acid were used for their antibacterial activity, which increase productive performance and immune response in Broiler chicks. From the consumers’ health concern, it is of interest to note that there is no accumulated silver in broilers meat.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Department of Microbial Biotechnology, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute and Department of Sustainable Development of Environment, Environmental Studies and Research Institute, at University of Sadat City, for their support this research work.

  1. Funding information: Authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: Ragaa A. Hamouda: conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis, methodology, validation, writing – original draft, visualization; Marwa Salah Abdel-Hamid: investigation, methodology, validation, writing – review and editing; Niamat M. El-Abd: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, validation, resources; Turki M. Al-Shaikh: writing – review and editing.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. These datasets are also available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Appendix

Figure A1 
                  Identification of microbiota in ileum P. orizihabitain by VITEK 2.
Figure A1

Identification of microbiota in ileum P. orizihabitain by VITEK 2.

Figure A2 
                  Identification of microbiota in ileum S. paucimobilis by VITEK 2.
Figure A2

Identification of microbiota in ileum S. paucimobilis by VITEK 2.

References

[1] Butaye P, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F. Antimicrobial growth promoters used in animal feed: effects of less well known antibiotics on gram-positive bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:175–88. 10.1128/cmr.16.2.175-188.2003.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Daeseleire E, De-Graef E, Rasschaert G, De Mulder T, Van den Meersche T, Van Coillie E, et al. Antibiotic use and resistance in animals: Belgian initiatives. Drug Test Anal. 2016;8(5–6):549–55. 10.1002/dta.2010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] National Research Council. The effects on human health of subtherapeutic use of antimicrobials in animal feeds. Washington, DC, US: The National Academic Press; 1980. 10.17226/21.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Diaz-Sanchez S, D’Souza D, Biswas D, Hanning I. Botanical alternatives to antibiotics for use in organic poultry production. Poult Sci. 2015;94(6):1419–30. 10.3382/ps/pev014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Gheisar MM, Hosseindoust A, Kim IH. Evaluating the effect of microencapsulated blends of organic acids and essential oils in broiler chickens diet. J Appl Poult Res. 2015;24(4):511–9. 10.3382/japr/pfv063.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Saima KS, Rahman A, Pasha TN, Mahmud A, Hayat Z. Effects of dietary organic acids on performance, cecal microbiota, and gut morphology in broilers. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020;52:3589–96. 10.1007/s11250-020-02396-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Gallocchio F, Biancotto G, Cibin V, Losasso C, Belluco S, Peters R, et al. Transfer study of silver nanoparticles in poultry production. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65(18):3767–74. 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00670.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Hassan S, Hassan F, Rehman MS. Nano-particles of trace minerals in poultry nutrition: potential applications and future prospects. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2020;195:591–612. 10.1007/s12011-019-01862-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Saravanakumar A, Peng MM, Ganesh M, Jayaprakash J, Mohankumar M, Jang HT. Low-cost and eco-friendly green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Prunus japonica (Rosaceae) leaf extract and their antibacterial, antioxidant properties. Artificial Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45(6):1165–71. 10.1080/21691401.2016.1203795.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Abdel-Hamid MS, El Wakeel ME, Hamza HA, Tahoun EA, Alshehrei F, Rizwan M, et al. Biogenic and characterizations of new silver nanoparticles stabilized with indole acetic acid derived from Azospirillum brasilense MMGH-SADAT1, their bioactivity, and histopathological assessment in rats. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2021;221:1–12. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112521.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Hamouda RA, Hussein MH, Abo-elmagd RA, Bawazir SS. Synthesis and biological characterization of silver nanoparticles derived from the cyanobacterium Oscillatoria limnetica. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–17. 10.1038/s41598-019-49444-y.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Hamouda RA, Abd El-Mongy M, Eid KF. Comparative study between two red algae for biosynthesis silver nanoparticles capping by SDS: Insights of characterization and antibacterial activity. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2019b;129:224–32. 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.02.016.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hamouda RA, Yousuf WE, Abdeen EE, Mohamed A. Biological and chemical synthesis of silver nanoparticles: characterization, mic and antibacterial activity against pathogenic bacteria. J Chem Pharmaceutical Res. 2019c;11(7):1–12.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Abo-Shama UH, El-Gendy H, Mousa WS, Hamouda RA, Yousuf WE, Hetta HF, et al. Synergistic and antagonistic effects of metal nanoparticles in combination with antibiotics against some reference strains of pathogenic microorganisms. Infect Drug Resistance. 2020;13:351. 10.2147/idr.s234425.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Zhang S, Shen YR, Wu S, Xiao YQ, He Q, Shi SR. The dietary combination of essential oils and organic acids reduces Salmonella enteritidis in challenged chicks. Poultry Sci. 2019;98:6349–55. 10.3382/ps/pez457.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Ryssel H, Kloeters O, Germann G, Schäfer T, Wiedemann G, Oehlbauer M. The antimicrobial effect of acetic acid-an alternative to common local antiseptics? Burns. 2009;35(5):695–700. 10.1016/j.burns.2008.11.009.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Bąkowski M, Kiczorowska B, Samolińska W, Klebaniuk R. Lipiec, A silver and zinc nanoparticles in animal nutrition – a review. Annals Animal Sci. 2018;18(4):879–98. 10.2478/aoas-2018-0029.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Smekalova M, Aragon V, Panacek A, Prucek R, Zboril R, Kvitek L. Enhanced antibacterial effect of antibiotics in combination with silver nanoparticles against animal pathogens. Vet J. 2016;209:174–9. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.10.032.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Nanotechniques and approaches in biotechnology. Mater Today. 2001;4:22–8. 10.1016/S1369-7021(01)80035-3.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Elkloub KM, Ghazalah AA, Rehan AA. Effect of dietary nanosilver on broiler performance. Int J Poult Sci. 2015;14:177–82. 10.3923/ijps.2015.177.182.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Saleh AA, El-Magd MA. Beneficial effects of dietary silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate on broiler nutrition. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:27031–8. 10.1007/s11356-018-2730-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Sedira S, Ayachi AA, Lakehal S, Fateh M, Achour S. Silver nanoparticles in combination with acetic acid and zinc oxide quantum dots for antibacterial activities improvement-A comparative study. Appl Surface Sci. 2014;311:659–65. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.132.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Cuong HN, Pansambal S, Ghotekar S, Oza R, Hai NTT, Viet NM, et al. New frontiers in the plant extract mediated biosynthesis of copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles and their potential applications: a review. Environ Res. 2022;20:111858. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111858.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Hasan M, Teng Z, Iqbal J, Awan U, Meng S, Dai R, et al. Nanoscience assessment of bioreducing and stabilizing potential of dragon’s blood (Dracaena Cochinchinensis, Lour. S. C. Chen) resin extract in synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Nanosci Nanotechnol Lett. 2013;5(7):780–4. 10.1166/nnl.2013.1600.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Hasan M, Ullah I, Zulfiqar H, Naeem K, Arfa I, Gul H, et al. Biological entities as chemical reactors for synthesis of nanomaterials: Progress, challenges and future perspective, review. Mater Today Chem. 2018;8:13e28. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Ghotekar S. A review on plant extract mediated biogenic synthesis of CdO nanoparticles and their recent applications – a review. Asian J Green Chem. 2019;3:187–200. 10.22034/ajgc.2018.140313.1084.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Ghotekar S, Pansambal S, Bilal M, Pingale SS, Oza R. Environmentally friendly synthesis of Cr2O3 nanoparticles: characterization, applications and future perspective a review case studies in chemical. Environ Eng. 2021;3:100089. 10.1016/j.cscee.2021.100089.Search in Google Scholar

[28] National Research Council (NRC). Nutrition requirements of poultry. 9th edn. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Devi JS, Bhimba V, Ratnam K. Anticancer activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized by the seaweed Ulva lactuca in vitro. Sci Rep. 2012;1:242–8. 10.3934/bioeng.2016.4.425.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Oliani WL, Parra DF, Komatsu LGH, Lincopan N, Rangari VK, Lugao AB. Fabrication of polypropylene/silver nanocomposites for biocidal applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;75:845–53. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.109.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] North MO. Commercial chicken production manual. 3rd edn. West-port, Connecticut, USA: The AVI, Publishing Co. Inc.; 1984.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official methods of analysis. Vol. 2. 16th edn. Washington, DC; 2003. p. 57–8.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Lawmzuali R, Singh KB, Sudarshan M, Singh NM. Determination of elements present in meat foodstuffs in aizawl with ED-XRF. Sci Technol J. 2011;3. II ISSN: 2321-3388.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Hazrati S, Rezaeipour V, Asadzadeh S. Effects of phytogenic feed additives, probiotic and mannan-oligosaccharides on performance, blood metabolites, meat quality, intestinal morphology, and microbial population of Japanese quail. British Poult Sci. 2019;61(2):132–9. 10.1080/00071668.2019.1686122.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. The Proteobacteria part B, The Gammaproteobacteria. Vol. 2, Second edn. New York, USA: Springer Science and Business Media, Inc.; 2005.10.1007/0-387-29298-5Search in Google Scholar

[36] Zhou Y, Kong Y, Kundu S, Cirillo JD, Liang H. Antibacterial activities of gold and silver nanoparticles against Escherichia coli and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. J Nanobiotechnol. 2012;10:19. 10.1186/1477-3155-10-19.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] SAS Institute. User’s Guide: Statistic. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Duncan DB. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 1955;11:1–42.10.2307/3001478Search in Google Scholar

[39] Blunt JW, Copp BR, Keyzers RA, Munro MHG, Prinsep MR. Marine natural products. Nat Prod Rep. 2014;31:160–258. 10.1039/C4NP00144C.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Ismail GA, El-Sheekh MM, Samy RM, Ghada SF. Antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antiviral activities of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles by phycobiliprotein crude extract of the cyanobacteria Spirulina platensis and Nostoc linckia. Bio Nano Sci. 2021;11(2):355–70. 10.1007/s12668-021-00828-3.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Ma J, Mahfuz S, Wang J, Piao X. Effect of dietary supplementation with mixed organic acids on immune function, antioxidative characteristics, digestive enzymes activity, and intestinal health in broiler chickens. Front Nutr. 2021;8:673316. 10.3389/fnut.2021.673316.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[42] Liu T, Baek DR, Kim JS, Joo SW, Lim JK. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles with size distribution depending on reducing species in glycerol at ambient pH and temperatures. ACS Omega. 2020;5:16246–54. 10.1021/acsomega.0c02066.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[43] Haiss W, Thanh NT, Aveyard J, Fernig DG. Determination of size and concentration of gold nanoparticles from UV− Vis spectra. Analytical Chem. 2007;79(11):4215–21. 10.1021/ac0702084.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[44] Hsu CW, Zhen B, Qiu W, Shapira O, DeLacy BG, Joannopoulos JD, et al. Transparent displays enabled by resonant nanoparticle scattering. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3152. 10.1038/ncomms4152.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Paramelle D, Sadovoy A, Gorelik S, Free P, Hobley J, Fernig DG. A rapid method to estimate the concentration of citrate capped silver nanoparticles from UV-visible light spectra. Analyst. 2014;139:4855–61. 10.1039/C4AN00978A.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Bastús NG, Piella J, Puntes V. Quantifying the sensitivity of multipolar (dipolar, quadrupolar, and octapolar) surface plasmon resonances in silver nanoparticles: The effect of size, composition, and surface coating. Langmuir. 2015;32:290–300. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03859.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Abdel-Raouf N, Al-Enazi NM, Ibraheem BM. Green biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using Galaxaura elongata and characterization of their antibacterial activity. Arabian J Chem. 2017;10(2):23–9. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.11.044.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Balaji DS, Basavaraja S, Deshpande R, Mahesh DB, Prabhakar BK, Venkataraman A. Extracellular biosynthesis of functionalized silver nanoparticles by strains of Cladosporium cladosporioides fungus. Colloids Surf. 2009;B68:88–92.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.09.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Mishra A, Sardar M. Alpha-amylase mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Si Adv Mater. 2012;4:143–6. 10.1166/sam.2012.1263.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Zulfiqar H, Zafar A, Rasheed MN, Ali Z, Mehmood K, Mazher A, et al. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Fagonia cretica and their antimicrobial activities. Nanoscale Adv. 2019;1:1707–13. 10.1039/C8NA00343B.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Prabha S, Arya G, Chandra R, Ahmed B, Nimesh S. Effect of size on biological properties of nanoparticles employed in gene delivery. Artificial Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2016;44(1):83–91. 10.3109/21691401.2014.913054.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Andi MA, Hashemi M, Ahmadi F. Effects of feed type with/without nanosil on cumulative performance, relative organ weight and some blood parameters of broilers. Global Vet. 2011;7:605–9.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Abd El-Ghany WA. Nanotechnology and its Considerations in Poultry Field: An Overview. J Hellenic Vet Med Society. 2019;70(3):1611–6. 10.12681/jhvms.21783.Search in Google Scholar

[54] Sawosz E, Binek M, Grodzik M, Zielińska M, Sysa P, Szmidt M, et al. Influence of hydrocolloidal silver nanoparticles on gastrointestinal microflora and morphology of enterocytes of quails. Arch Animal Nutri. 2007;61(6):444–51. 10.1080/17450390701664314.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[55] Chauke N, Siebrits FK. Evaluation of silver nanoparticles as a possible coccidiostat in broiler production. South African J Animal Sci. 2012;42(5):493–7. 10.4314/sajas.v42i5.10.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Ahmadi J, Mehrdad I, Mahdi C. Pathological study of intestine and liver in broiler chickens after treatment with different levels of silver nanoparticles. World Appl Sci J. 2009;7:28–32.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Ahmadi F, Rahimi F. The effect of different levels of nano silver on performance and retention of silver in edible tissues of broilers. World Appl Sci J. 2011;12:1–4.Search in Google Scholar

[58] Montalvo D, McLaughlin MJ, Degryse F. Efficacy of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as phosphorus fertilizers in Andisols and Oxisols. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2015;79:551–8. 10.2136/sssaj2014.09.0373.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Mishra S, Wang W, Pires de Oliveira I, Atapattu AJ, Wen Xia S, Grillo R, et al. Interaction mechanism of plant-based nanoarchitectured materials with digestive enzymes of termites as target for pest control: Evidence from molecular docking simulation and in vitro studies. J Haz Mat. 2021;403:123840. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123840.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[60] Jamil B, Bokhari H, Imran M. Mechanism of action: how nano-antimicrobials act? Current Drug Targets. 2017;18:363–73. 1010.2174/1389450116666151019101826.Search in Google Scholar

[61] Abd-Elnaby HM, Abo-Elala GM, Abdel-Raouf UM, Hamed MM. Antibacterial and anticancer activity of extracellular synthesized silver nanoparticles from marine Streptomyces rochei MHM13. Egypt J Aquat Res. 2016;42:301–12. 10.1016/j.ejar.2016.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

[62] Emerich DF, Thanos CG. The pinpoint promise of nanoparticle-based drug delivery and molecular diagnosis. Biomolecular Eng. 2006;23(4):171–84. 10.1016/j.bioeng.2006.05.026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[63] Spotin A, Rouhani S, Ghaemmaghami P, Haghighi A, Zolfaghari MR, Amirkhani A, et al. Different Morphologies of leishmania major amastigotes with no molecular diversity in a neglected endemic area of zoonotic Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Iran. Iranian Biomedical J. 2015;19(3):149–59. 10.7508/ibj.2015.03.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[64] George J, Arun P, Muraleedharan C. Experimental investigation on co-gasification of coffee husk and sawdust in a bubbling fluidised bed gasifier. J Energy Inst. 2019;92(6):1977–86. 10.1016/j.joei.2018.10.014.Search in Google Scholar

[65] Vadalasetty KP, Lauridsen C, Engberg RM, Vadalasetty RKP, Kutwin M, Chwalibog A, et al. influence of silver nanoparticles on growth and health of broiler chickens after infection with Campylobacter jejuni. B M C Vet Res. 2018;14(1):1–11. 10.1186/s12917-017-1323-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[66] Rangan KJ, Hang HC. Biochemical Mechanisms of Pathogen Restriction by Intestinal Bacteria. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42(11):887–98. 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.08.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[67] Li K, Zhao X, Hammer BK, Songyan D, Chen Y. Nanoparticles inhibit DNA replication by binding to DNA: modeling and experimental validation. ACS Nano. 2013;7(11):9664–74. 10.1021/nn402472k.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] McShan D, Ray PC, Yu H. Molecular toxicity mechanism of nanosilver. J Food Drug Analysis. 2014;22(1):116–27. 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[69] Parvez SA, Rahman D. Virulence factors of uropathogenic E coli, chapter 2. United Kingdom: Intech Open Publishing House London; 2018. p. 8–21.Search in Google Scholar

[70] Ben-Sallem R, Ben Slama K, Estepa V, Jouini A, Gharsa H, Klibi N, et al. Prevalence and characterisation of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli isolates in healthy volunteers in Tunisia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:1511–6. 10.1007/s10096-011-1471-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2021-09-10
Revised: 2022-02-07
Accepted: 2022-02-10
Published Online: 2022-03-26

© 2022 Niamat M. El-Abd et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2022-0025/html
Scroll to top button