Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

The Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS)

Psychometric Properties of Its Adaptation to the Religious Domain of Identity

Published Online:July 22, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000665

Abstract

Abstract. The current study proposed the adaptation of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS) to the religious domain as an instrument to measure both individuals’ religious identity formation processes (when a variable-centered approach is adopted) and religious identity statuses (when a person-centered approach is adopted). The scale has been tested on a sample of 727 Italian participants aged 13–65 years, by collecting evidence of score structure, convergent, and criterion-related validity. Regarding the score structure validity, we confirmed that religious identity formation consists of three processes (commitment, in-depth exploration, reconsideration of commitment) and that, by using these scores, individuals can be placed into five different religious identity clusters (achievement, diffusion, foreclosure, moratorium, searching moratorium). As to the convergent and criterion-related validity, we tested the relationship that the three factors (religious identity formation processes) and the five clusters (religious identity statuses) have with religiousness and subjective well-being, respectively. Results indicate that the instrument is a promising tool to measure religious identity. Future studies should test this scale in other countries and with people from diverse religious traditions.

References

  • Ashdown, B. K., Homa, N., & Brown, C. M. (2014). Measuring gender identity and religious identity with adapted versions of the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure – Revised. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v4n1p226 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baker-Sperry, L. (2001). Passing on the faith: The father’s role in religious transmission. Sociological Focus, 34(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2001.10571190 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bell, D. M. (2016). Development of the religious self: A theoretical foundation for measuring religious identity. In A. DayEd., Religion and the individual. Belief, practice, identity (pp. 127–143). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315604848 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brambilla, M., Manzi, C., Regalia, C., Becker, M., & Vignoles, V. L. (2016). Is religious identity a social identity? Self-categorization of religious self in six countries. Psicologia Sociale, 11(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1482/84098 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Crocetti, E., Cieciuch, J., Gao, C. H., Klimstra, T., Lin, C. L., Matos, P. M., Morsünbül, Ü., Negru, O., Sugimura, K., Zimmermann, G., & Meeus, W. (2015). National and gender measurement invariance of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS): A 10-nation study with university students. Assessment, 22(6), 753–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115584969 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Crocetti, E., & Meeus, W. (2015). The identity statuses: Strengths of a person-centered approach. In K. C. McLeanM. SyedEds., The Oxford handbook of identity development (pp. 97–112). Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crocetti, E., Rubini, M., Luyckx, K., & Meeus, W. (2008). Identity formation in early and middle adolescents from various ethnic groups: From three dimensions to the five statuses. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(8), 983–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9222-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Crocetti, E., Schwartz, S. J., Fermani, A., & Meeus, W. (2010). The Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS): Italian validation and cross-national comparisons. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(3), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000024 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Crocetti, E., Scrignaro, M., Sica, L. S., & Magrin, L. E. (2012). Correlates of identity configurations: Three studies with adolescent and emerging adult cohorts. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(6), 732–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9702-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Devlieger, I., Mayer, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2016). Hypothesis testing using factor score regression: A comparison of four methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(5), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415607618 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Di Fabio, A., & Busoni, L. (2009). Proprietà psicometriche della versione italiana della Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) con studenti universitari [Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) with university students]. Counseling, Giornale Italiano di Ricerca e Applicazioni, 1, 201–212. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dimitrova, R. (2014). The Four Basic Dimensions of Religiousness and life satisfaction among Dutch and Italian young adults. In M. MikuckaF. SaraccinoEds., Life satisfaction: Perceptions, social influences and implications for long-term health (pp. 17–28). Nova. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dimitrova, R., Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & Van de Vijver, F. J. (2014). Collective identity and well-being of Bulgarian Roma adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(3), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0043-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dimitrova, R., Buzea, C., Taušová, J., Uka, F., Zakaj, S., & Crocetti, E. (2018). Relationships between identity domains and life satisfaction in minority and majority youth in Albania, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Kosovo, and Romania. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1336997 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Doane, M. J., & Elliott, M. (2016). Religiosity and self-rated health: A longitudinal examination of their reciprocal effects. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(3), 844–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0056-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fadjukoff, P., & Kroger, J. (2016). Identity development in adulthood: Introduction. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2015.1121821 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gore, P. A. Jr. (2000). Cluster analysis. In H. E. A. TinsleyS. D. BrownEds., Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 297–321). Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Griffith, B. A., & Griggs, J. C. (2001). Religious identity status as a model to understand, assess, and interact with client spirituality. Counseling and Values, 46(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007x.2001.tb00203.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hatano, K., Sugimura, K., & Crocetti, E. (2016). Looking at the dark and bright sides of identity formation: New insights from adolescents and emerging adults in Japan. Journal of Adolescence, 47, 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.09.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Iannello, N. M., Hardy, S. A., Musso, P., Lo Coco, A., & Inguglia, C. (2019). Spirituality and ethnocultural empathy among Italian adolescents: The mediating role of religious identity formation processes. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000155 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Keyes, C. L. M., & Reitzes, D. C. (2007). The role of religious identity in the mental health of older working and retired adults. Aging and Mental Health, 11(4), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860601086371 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • King, P. E. (2003). Religion and identity: The role of ideological, social, and spiritual contexts. Applied Developmental Sciences, 7(3), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0703_11 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Levin, J. S., & Markides, K. S. (1986). Religious attendance and subjective health. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 25(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386061 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lopez, A. B., Huynh, V. W., & Fuligni, A. J. (2011). A longitudinal study of religious identity and participation during adolescence. Child Development, 82(4), 1297–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01609.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. AndelsonEd., Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159–187). Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, W. R., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003). Spirituality, religion, and health: An emerging research field. American Psychologist, 58(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.24 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The Big Four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1320–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111412267 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sorgente, A., Iannello, N. M., Musso, P., Inguglia, C., Lanz, M., Antonietti, A., & Villani, D. (2021). Open data, open materials and ESM for the “The Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS): Psychometric properties of its adaptation to the religious domain of identity” article [Data Set]. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14039123 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Terraciano, A., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.19.2.131 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Villani, D., Sorgente, A., Iannello, P., & Antonietti, A. (2019). The role of spirituality and religiosity in subjective well-being of individuals with different religious status. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01525 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zwingmann, C., & Murken, S. (2000). Coping with an uncertain future: Religiosity and millenarianism. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 23(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1163/157361200x00032 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar