Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Cues of Collective Threat Increase Salience of Positive Ingroup Agency-Related Traits

Published Online:May 06, 2022https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000477

Abstract

Abstract. Three studies investigated the influence of collective threat on the importance of agency- and communion-related traits used in ingroup perception. Study 1 (N = 137) investigated how cues of such threat affect reaction times when individuals are asked to ascribe agentic or communal traits to their ingroup. Study 2 (N = 96) and Study 3 (N = 337) examined the role of social identification in response to a collective threat. The results suggest that cues of threat may lead to preferential processing of positive (but not negative) ingroup agency over ingroup communion, the effect particularly likely among highly identified individuals. Perceiving the ingroup as an agentic collective may thus act as a buffer that assists in managing threat-related emotions.

References

  • Abele, A. E., & Bruckmüller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 935–948. 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Abele, A. E., Hauke, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymkow, A., & Duan, Y. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness-communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1810. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751–763. 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195–255. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32(4), 397–408. 10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cameron, J. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3(3), 239–262. 10.1080/13576500444000047 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cichocka, A. (2016). Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology, 27(1), 283–317. 10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dodgson, P. G., & Wood, J. V. (1998). Self-esteem and the cognitive accessibility of strengths and weaknesses after failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 178–197. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.178 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fossati, P., Hevenor, S. J., Lepage, M., Graham, S. J., Grady, C., Keightley, M. L., Craik, F., & Mayberg, H. (2004). Distributed self in episodic memory: Neural correlates of successful retrieval of self-encoded positive and negative personality traits. Neuroimage, 22(4), 1596–1604. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.034 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., Ablasser, C., Beyer, M., Kuban, J., Manger, A.-M., & Schultz, M. (2013). The power of we: Evidence for group-based control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 19–32. 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., & Fankhänel, T. (2008). The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on ingroup support and defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 524–541. 10.1037/a0012666 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fritsche, I., Moya, M., Bukowski, M., Jugert, P., de Lemus, S., Decker, O., Valor-Segura, I., & Navarro-Carrillo, G. (2017). The great recession and group-based control: Converting personal helplessness into social class in-group trust and collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 117–137. 10.1111/josi.12207 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Harmon-Jones, E., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & McGregor, H. (1997). Terror management theory and self-esteem: Evidence that increased self-esteem reduced mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 24–36. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.24 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Higgins, E. T. (2012). Regulatory focus theory. In P. A. M. Van LangeA. W. KruglanskiE. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 483–504). Sage Publications Ltd. 10.4135/9781446249215.n24 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jonas, E., McGregor, I., Klackl, J., Agroskin, D., Fritsche, I., Holbrook, C., Nash, K., Proulx, T., & Quirin, M. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. In J. E. OlsonM. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 49, pp. 219–286). Academic Press. 10.1016/ B978-0-12-800052-6.00004-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 234–249. 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 435–468. 10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2015). The role of agency and morality in reconciliation processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 477–483. 10.1177/0963721415601625 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Soral, W. (2022). Data and analytic code for “Cues of collective threat increase salience of positive ingroup agency-related traits.” https://osf.io/jeaxz/?view_only=33c3b03bc319459ea449d7dc345b3ec5 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Soral, W., & Kofta, M. (2020). Differential effects of competence and morality on self-esteem at the individual and the collective level. Social Psychology, 51(3), 183–198. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000410 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Stollberg, J., Fritsche, I., & Bäcker, A. (2015). Striving for group agency: Threat to personal control increases the attractiveness of agentic groups. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 649. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00649 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Westfall, J. (2016). PANGEA: Power analysis for general ANOVA designs. Unpublished manuscript. http://jakewestfall.org/publications/pangea.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Reysen, S. (2010). Perceiving your group's future to be in jeopardy: Extinction threat induces collective angst and the desire to strengthen the ingroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 898–910. 10.1177/0146167210372505 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wojciszke, B. (2010). Sprawczość i wspólnotowość. Podstawowe wymiary spostrzegania społecznego [Agency and communion. Fundamental dimensions of social perception]. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wollschlaeger, D. (2020). Mixed-effects models for repeated-measures ANOVA. RExRepos. http://www.dwoll.de/rexrepos/posts/anovaMixed.html#mixed-effects-analysis-3 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ybarra, O., Chan, E., & Park, D. (2001). Young and old adults' concerns about morality and competence. Motivation and Emotion, 25(2), 85–100. 10.1023/A:1010633908298 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar