Skip to main content
Log in

Have men and women become equal in the housing market? effects of gender on mortgage rate

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study employed data on US mortgage rates from 2009 to 2017 to study the effect of gender on the mortgage rate. Preliminary examination revealed that women faced a comparatively high mortgage rate. This condition was most severe during 2012–2014, when female borrowers must pay an average of 0.1 percentage points higher rates than male peers. However, regression analysis indicated that income might exert diverse effects on the interest rates received by women. In terms of default risk assessment, lenders may distinguish between female borrowers with different incomes, causing income to become the key factor determining the interest rate received by female borrowers. This study adopted income as a threshold condition to estimate the effect of various default risk factors on mortgage rates. The obtained result indicated that during 2009–2017, women’s status shifted from disadvantageous to advantageous in the mortgage market. Female borrowers who belonged to the highest income group received their lowest interest rates in 2015–2017, which were 0.026 percentage points lower than those faced by male peers in the same financial position. Based on relevant behavioral differences between men and women proposed in literature, reasons for this phenomenon are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cheng et al. (2011) mentioned that compared to the extensive body of literature on racial disparity in nearly all aspects of mortgage lending, research on gender disparity is virtually nonexistent.

  2. The hypothetical housing market in this study was efficient, meaning that the transaction price of real estate indicates the actual value.

  3. Data source: FHFA. For more information, please see the website: https://www.fhfa.gov/DataTools/Downloads.

References

  • Adabre, M. A., Chan, A. P. C., & Darko, A. (2021). A scientometric analysis of the housing affordability literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, In press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901−021−09825−0

  • Adzis, A. A., Lim, H. E., Yeok, S. G., & Saha, A. (2020). Malaysian residential mortgage loan default: A micro−level analysis. Review of Behavioral Finance, In press. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF−03−2020−0047

  • Ahmed, A. M., & Hammarstedt, M. (2008). Discrimination in the rental housing market: A field experiment on the Internet. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al−Bahrani, A., Buser, W., & Patel, D. (2020). Early causes of financial disquiet and the gender gap in financial literacy: Evidence from college students in the southeastern United States. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 41, 558−571

  • Altonji, J. G., & Blank, R. M. (1999). Race and gender in the labor market. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics (pp. 3143–3259). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S. M., Baird, S. B., & Frye, M. B. (2003). Do female mutual fund managers manage differently? Journal of Financial Research, 26(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, I. (1991). Fair driving: Gender and race discrimination in retail car negotiations. Harvard Law Review, 104(4), 817–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, I., & Siegelman, P. (1995). Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. American Economic Review, 85(3), 304–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajtelsmit, V. L., & VanDerhei, J. L. (1997). Risk aversion and retirement income adequacy. In M. S. Gordon, O. S. Mitchell, & M. M. Twinney (Eds.), Positioning Pensions for the 21st Century (pp. 45–66). Pension Research Council and University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao, H. X. H., Meng, C. C., & Wu, J. (2021). Reference dependence, loss aversion and residential property development decisions. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, In press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901−020−09803−y

  • Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, D., & Menkhoff, L. (2008). Will women be women? Analyzing the gender difference among financial experts. Kyklos, 61(3), 364–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellucci, A., Borisov, A., & Zazzaro, A. (2010). Does gender matter in bank–firm relationships? Evidence from small business lending. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(12), 2968–2984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Solnick, S. (2008). Trust and gender: An examination of behavior and beliefs in the investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(3–4), 466–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, S., Devine, K., & McCarthy, Y. (2020). Room to improve: A review of switching activity in the Irish mortgage market. Economic Letter, No 12/EL/20.

  • Campbell, J. Y., & Cocco, J. F. (2015). A model of mortgage default. Journal of Finance, 70(4), 1495–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., Cardoso, A. R., Heining, J., & Kline, P. (2018). Firms and labor market inequality: Evidence and some theory. Journal of Labor Economics, 36(S1), 13–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Huang, B., & Ye, D. (2020). Gender gap in peer−to−peer lending: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 112, 105633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Li, R., & Wu, X. (2021). Multi−home ownership and household portfolio choice in urban China. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36, 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Pinar, M., & Stengos, T. (2020). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus: Evidence from a threshold model. Energy Policy, 139, 111295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P., Lin, Z., & Liu, Y. (2011). Do women pay more for mortgages? Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 43(4), 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A., Huang, Y., & Yi, D. (2021). Can millennials access homeownership in urban China? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36, 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C., Gerardi, K., & Shen, L. (2021). The double trigger for mortgage default: Evidence from the fracking boom. Management Science, 67(6), 3943–3964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, N., Ivanov, V., & Cole, R. A. (2017). Entrepreneurial optimism, credit availability, and cost of financing: Evidence from U.S. small businesses. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do, C., & Paley, I. (2013). Does gender affect mortgage choice? evidence from the US. Feminist Economics, 19(2), 33–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dymski, G., Hernandez, J., & Mohanty, L. (2013). Race, gender, power, and the US subprime mortgage and foreclosure crisis: A meso analysis. Feminist Economics, 19(3), 124–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelberg, W. (2006). Risk−based pricing of interest rates for consumer loans. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(8), 2283–2298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L., & Munneke, H. J. (2020). Gender equality in mortgage lending. Real Estate Economics, 48(4), 957–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr-Duda, H., de Gennaro, M., & Schubert, R. (2006). Gender, financial risk and probability weights. Theory and Decision, 60(2–3), 283–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felton, J., Gibson, B., & Sanbonmatsu, D. M. (2003). Preference for risk in investing as a function of trait optimism and gender. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 4(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C. (2014). A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review, 104(4), 1091–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., & Shue, K. (2020). The gender gap in housing returns. NBER Working Paper No. 26914. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26914

  • Guzman, J., & Kacperczyk, A. (2019). Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 48(7), 1666–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz, R. P., McCarthy, D. D., & Turner, J. A. (1997). Are women conservative investors? Gender differences in participant−directed pension investments. In M. S. Gordon, O. S. Mitchell, & M. M. Twinney (Eds.), Positioning Pensions for the 21st Century (pp (pp. 91–103). Pension Research Council and University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, B., Lee, J. B., Marquering, W., & Zhang, C. Y. (2014). Gender differences in optimism and asset allocation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107, 630–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36(4), 620–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., & Li, Z. (2020). Is more use of electricity leading to less carbon emission growth? An analysis with a panel threshold model. Energy Policy, 137, 111121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y.-C., & Raghubir, P. (2005). Gender differences in unrealistic optimism about marriage and divorce: Are men more optimistic and women more realistic? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 198–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsy, H. (2020). Access to finance – Mind the gender gap. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 78, 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu, G., & Zhao, G. (2021). State, market, and family: Housing inequality among the young generation in urban China. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36, 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivetti, C., & Petrongolo, B. (2016). The evolution of gender gaps in industrialized countries. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 405–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. A., & Cox, C. M. (2001). The influence of gender on the perception and response to investment risk: The case of professional investors. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2(1), 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owusu-Manu, D.-G., Asiedu, R. O., Edwards, D. J., Donkor-Hyiaman, K., Abuntori, P. A., & El-Gohary, H. (2019). An assessment of mortgage loan default propensity in Ghana. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 17(5), 985–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, R., Brown, M., Gysler, M., & Brachinger, H. W. (1999). Financial decision−making: Are women really more risk−averse? American Economic Review, 89(2), 381–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, I. C. (2018). Investigating gender differences in real estate trading sentiments. American Economist, 63(2), 187–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., & McNaughton, M. (2007). Gender differences in risk aversion and expected retirement benefits. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(4), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, S., Hu, X., & Yang, J. (2021). Housing prices and carbon emissions: A dynamic panel threshold model of 60 Chinese cities. Applied Economics Letters, 28(3), 170–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am immensely grateful to Professor Peter Boelhouwer (Editor−in−Chief) and the three anonymous referees for the constructive comments of this paper. Funding from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under Project No. MOST−110−2410−H−390−008−MY3 has enabled the continuation of this research and the dissemination of these results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Chun Tsai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, IC. Have men and women become equal in the housing market? effects of gender on mortgage rate. J Hous and the Built Environ 37, 2157–2177 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09944-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09944-2

Keywords

Navigation