Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Personality Profile of Risk-Takers

An Examination of the Big Five Facets

Published Online:April 01, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000346

Abstract

Abstract. Risk-taking is a long-standing area of inquiry among psychologists and economists. In this paper, we examine the personality profile of risk-takers in two independent samples. Specifically, we examined the association between the Big Five facets and risk-taking propensity across two measures: The Domain-Specific Risk-Taking Scale (DOSPERT) and the General Risk Propensity Scale (GRiPS). At the Big Five domain level, we found that extraversion and agreeableness were the primary predictors of risk-taking. However, facet-level analyses revealed that responsibility, a facet of conscientiousness, explained most of the total variance accounted for by the Big Five in both risk-taking measures. Based on our findings across two samples (n = 764), we find that the personality profile of a risk-taker is extraverted, open to experiences, disagreeable, emotionally stable, and irresponsible. Implications for the risk measurement are discussed.

References

  • Anglim, J., & Grant, S. (2016). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: Incremental prediction from 30 facets over the Big 5. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9583-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anglim, J., Morse, G., Dunlop, P. D., Minbashian, A., & Marty, A. (2019). Predicting trait emotional intelligence from HEXACO personality: Domains, facets, and the general factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 88(2), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12493 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Arnett, J. (1992). Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental Review, 12(4), 339–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90013-R First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barnes, C. D., Brown, R. P., & Tamborski, M. (2012). Living dangerously: Culture of honor, risk-taking, and the nonrandomness of “accidental” deaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611410440 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blais, A. R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/t13084-000 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Credé, M., Harms, P. D., Blacksmith, N., & Wood, D. (2016). Assessing the utility of compound trait estimates of narrow personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(5), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1170023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eysenck, S. B., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the Psychoticism Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Figner, B., & Weber, E. U. (2011). Who takes risks when and why? Determinants of risk taking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411415790 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fox, C. R., & Tannenbaum, D. (2011). The elusive search for stable risk preferences. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00298 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frey, R., Pedroni, A., Mata, R., Rieskamp, J., & Hertwig, R. (2017). Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits. Science Advances, 3(10), Article e1701381. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701381 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hanoch, Y., Johnson, J. G., & Wilke, A. (2006). Domain specificity in experimental measures and participant recruitment: An application to risk-taking behavior. Psychological Science, 17(4), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01702.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hartley, C. A., & Phelps, E. A. (2012). Anxiety and decision-making. Biological Psychiatry, 72(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.12.027 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Herzberg, P. Y. (2009). Beyond “accident-proneness”: Using five-factor model prototypes to predict driving behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1096–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Highhouse, S., Nye, C. D., Zhang, D. C., & Rada, T. B. (2017). Structure of the Dospert: Is there evidence for a general risk factor? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1953 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ironson, G. H., Smith, P. C., Brannick, M. T., & Gibson, W. M. (1989). Construction of a job in general scale: A comparison of global, composite, and specific measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(2), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.193 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the big five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1149–1179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0837 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kerr, S. P., Kerr, W. R., & Dalton, M. (2019). Risk attitudes and personality traits of entrepreneurs and venture team members. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(36), 17712–17716. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908375116 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lauriola, M., & Levin, I. P. (2001). Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00130-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lauriola, M., & Weller, J. A. (2018). Personality and risk: Beyond daredevils – risk taking from a temperament perspective. In M. RaueE. LermerB. StreicherEds., Psychological perspectives on risk and risk analysis (pp. 3–36). Springer. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, K., Ogunfowora, B., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Personality traits beyond the big five: Are they within the HEXACO space? Journal of Personality, 73(5), 1437–1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00354.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Zvolensky, M. J., & Pedulla, C. M. (2003). Evaluation of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviours. Journal of Adolescence, 26(4), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00036-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maples-Keller, J. L., Williamson, R. L., Sleep, C. E., Carter, N. T., Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2019). Using item response theory to develop a 60-item representation of the NEO PI–R using the international personality item pool: Development of the IPIP–NEO–60. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1381968 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mata, R., Frey, R., Richter, D., Schupp, J., & Hertwig, R. (2018). Risk preference: A view from psychology. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.2.155 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. PervinO. P. JohnEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 139–153). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Millroth, P., Juslin, P., Winman, A., Nilsson, H., & Lindskog, M. (2020). Preference or ability: Exploring the relations between risk preference, personality, and cognitive abilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(4), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2171 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mishra, S., Lalumière, M. L., & Williams, R. J. (2010). Gambling as a form of risk-taking: Individual differences in personality, risk-accepting attitudes, and behavioral preferences for risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 616–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.032 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., & Willman, P. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000123856 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta-analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five-factor model of personality: Dark triad and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12126 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (2000). What is beyond the big five? Plenty!. Journal of Personality, 68(5), 821–835. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pedroni, A., Frey, R., Bruhin, A., Dutilh, G., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2017). The risk elicitation puzzle. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(11), 803–809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0219-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Szrek, H., Chao, L.-W., Ramlagan, S., & Peltzer, K. (2012). Predicting (un)healthy behavior: A comparison of risk-taking propensity measures. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(6), 716–727. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tonidandel, S., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011). Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9204-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.414 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weller, J. A., & Tikir, A. (2011). Predicting domain-specific risk taking with the HEXACO personality structure. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(2), 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.677 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhang, D. C., Highhouse, S., & Nye, C. D. (2019). Development and validation of the General Risk Propensity Scale (GRiPS). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2102 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.757 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar