Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Personality Profile of the Self-Identified Highly Sensitive Person

A Lay Theory Approach

Published Online:December 10, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000363

Abstract

Abstract. The current paper presents a detailed examination of a lay theory perspective on the Sensory-Processing-Sensitivity (SPS) personality profile within the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality. The lay SPS personality profile was assessed by asking self-identified highly sensitive people to rate themselves on a Five-Factor Model questionnaire (NEO-PI-3). We applied the NEO-PI-3 norms (domains and facets) and examined the inter-rater agreement of the facets. The sample consisted of 560 (female: 86.43%, Mage = 37.36 years, SDage = 6.64 years, 18.17–47.42 years) self-identified highly sensitive adults. Six facets, in particular, stood out with good and very good inter-rater agreement: participants fell within the highest 23% of the population on facets Fantasy, Aesthetics, Feelings (Openness to Experience); Anxiety, Depression (Neuroticism); and the lowest 23% of the population on the facet Gregariousness (Extraversion).

References

  • Agresti, A. (2012). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Altman, D. G. (1999). Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.10370022-3514.73.2.345 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. (2012). Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311434213 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: An evolutionary-developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology, 17(2), 271–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579405050145 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bröhl, A. S., Van Leeuwen, K., Pluess, M., De Fruyt, F., Bastin, M., Weyn, S., Goossens, L., & Bijttebier, P. (2020). First look at the five-factor model personality facet associations with sensory processing sensitivity. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00998-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Development of a model for adult temperament. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 868–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.11.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (3rd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471445428 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fletcher, G. (1995). The scientific credibility of folk psychology. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203763452 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Furnham, A. (1988). Lay theories: Everyday understandings of problems in the social sciences. Pergamon Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1303 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greven, C. U., Lionetti, F., Booth, C., Aron, E. N., Fox, E., Schendan, H. E., Pluess, M., Bruining, H., Acevedo, B., Bijttebier, P., & Homberg, J. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity in the context of environmental sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hoekstra, H., & De Fruyt, F. (2014). NEO-PI-3 persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst [NEO-PI-3 Personality Questionnaire]. Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hong, Y., Levy, S. R., & Chiu, C. (2001). The contribution of the lay theories approach to the study of groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0502_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jagiellowicz, J., Xu, X., Aron, A., Aron, E., Cao, G., Feng, T., & Weng, X. (2010). The trait of sensory processing sensitivity and neural responses to changes in visual scenes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jayaratne, T. E., Ybarra, O., Sheldon, J. P., Brown, T. N., Feldbaum, M., Pfeffer, C. A., & Petty, E. M. (2006). White Americans’ genetic lay theories of race differences and sexual orientation: Their relationship with prejudice toward Blacks, and gay men and lesbians. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206059863 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Levy, S. R., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (2006). Lay theories and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206059855 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Licht, C. L., Mortensen, E. L., Hjordt, L. V., Stenbæk, D. S., Arentzen, T. E., Nørremølle, A., & Knudsen, G. M. (2020). Serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) variation and sensory processing sensitivity – Comparison with other anxiety-related temperamental dimensions. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 8(8), Article e1352. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1352 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2001). Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0502_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lionetti, F., Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Burns, G. L., Jagiellowicz, J., & Pluess, M. (2018). Dandelions, tulips and orchids: Evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Translational Psychiatry, 8(24). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0090-6 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lionetti, F., Pastore, M., Moscardino, U., Nocentini, A., Pluess, K., & Pluess, M. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity and its association with personality traits and affect: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.05.013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(3), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.110.3.401 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: A more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Lyman, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: Can the five-factor model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69(2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00144 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., McCain, J., Lynam, D. R., Few, L. R., Gentile, B., MacKillop, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2014). A comparison of the criterion validity of popular measures of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder via the use of expert ratings. Psychological Assessment, 26(3), 958–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036613 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Plaks, J. E., Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Violations of implicit theories and the sense of prediction and control: Implications for motivated person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.245 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pluess, M. (2013, April 19). Sensory-processing sensitivity: A potential mechanism of differential susceptibility. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD), Seattle, WA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pluess, M. (2015). Individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12120 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K. J., Krapohl, E., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (2018). Environmental sensitivity in children: Development of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale and identification of sensitivity groups. Developmental Psychology, 54(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000406 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pluess, M., Lionetti, F., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (2020). People differ in their sensitivity to the environment: An integrated theory, measurement and empirical evidence. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w53yc First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rathbone, A., Shaw, S., & Kumbhare, D. (2015, September 4). Package “ICC.Sample.Size”. https://cran.uni-muenster.de/web/packages/ICC.Sample.Size/ICC.Sample.Size.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Smolewska, K. A., McCabe, S. B., & Woody, E. Z. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five”. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.022 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Turnbull, J., Lea, D., Parkinson, D., Phillips, P., Francis, B., Webb, S., Bull, V., & Ashby, M. (2010). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary, 8th edition: Paperback. Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vergauwe, J., Wille, B., Hofmans, J., & De Fruyt, F. (2017). Development of a Five-Factor Model charisma compound and its relations to career outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.12.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weyn, S., Van Leeuwen, K., Pluess, M., Lionetti, F., Greven, C. U., Goossens, L., Colpin, H., Van Den Noortgate, W., Verschueren, K., Bastin, M., Van Hoof, E., De Fruyt, F., & Bijttebier, P. (2021). Psychometric properties of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale across developmental stage, gender, and country. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3309–3325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00254-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zou, G. Y. (2012). Sample size formulas for estimating intraclass correlation coefficients with precision and assurance. Statistics in Medicine, 31(29), 3972–3981. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5466 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar