Skip to main content
Log in

A skewed sense of newness

  • Letter to the editor
  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. See also FØrsund (1980, p. 12) “If a specific distribution is assumed for u, and if the parameters of this distribution can be derived from its higher-order (second, third, etc.) central moments, then we can estimate these parameters consistently from the moments of the OLS residuals. Since \(\mu \) is a function of these parameters, it too can be estimated consistently, and this estimate can be used to ‘correct’ the OLS constant term, which is a consistent estimate of \((\alpha -\mu )\). COLS thus provides consistent estimates of all of the parameters of the frontier.”

  2. The corresponding statement in Aigner et al. (1977, pp. 28–29) is “We note in passing that if estimation of \(\varvec{\beta }\) alone is desired, all but the coefficient in \(\varvec{\beta }\) corresponding to a column of ones in X is estimated unbiasedly and consistently by least squares. Moreover, the components of \(\sigma ^2\) can be extracted (i.e., consistent estimators for them can be found) based on the least squares results by utilizing Eq. (9) for \(V(\varepsilon )\) in terms of \(\sigma ^2_u\) and \(\sigma ^2_v\) and a similar relationship for a higher-order moment of \(\varepsilon \), since \(V(\varepsilon )\) and higher order mean-corrected moments of \(\varepsilon \) are themselves consistently estimable from the computed least-squares residuals.”

References

  • Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production functions. J Econom 6(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsler C, Prokhorov A, Schmidt P (2016) Endogeneity in stochastic frontier models. J Econom 190:280–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzalini A (2020) The R package sn: the skew-normal and related distributions such as the skew-\(t\) (version 1.6-2). Università di Padova, Italia. http://azzalini.stat.unipd.it/SN

  • Coelli TJ (1995) Estimators and hypothesis tests for a stochastic frontier function: a Monte Carlo analysis. J Prod Anal 6(4):247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Y, Li Q, Weersink A (1996) Semiparametric estimation of stochastic production frontier models. J Bus Econ Stat 14(4):460–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund FR, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1980) A survey of frontier production functions and of their relationship to efficiency measurement. J Econom 13(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh U, Pal N, Nguyen M (2021) Regression model under skew-normal error with applications in predicting groundwater arsenic level in the Mekong Delta Region. Environ Ecol Stat 28:323–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar SC, Lovell CAK (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Millimet DL, Parmeter CF (2020) Accounting for skewed or one-sided measurement error in the dependent variable. Polit Anal. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2020.45

  • Olson JA, Schmidt P, Waldman DA (1980) A Monte Carlo study of estimators of stochastic frontier production functions. J Econom 13:67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos A, Parmeter CF (2020) Type II failure and specification testing in the stochastic frontier model. Eur J Oper Res 293(3):990–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmeter CF, Kumbhakar SC (2014) Efficiency analysis: a primer on recent advances. Found Trends Econom 7(3–4):191–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polachek SW, Yoon BJ (1987) A two-tiered earnings frontier estimation of employer and employee information in the labor market. Rev Econ Stat 69(2):296–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt P (1985) Frontier production functions. Econom Rev 4(2):289–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher F. Parmeter.

Additional information

Communicated by Pierre R. L. Dutilleul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papadopoulos, A., Parmeter, C.F. A skewed sense of newness. Environ Ecol Stat 28, 861–863 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-021-00518-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-021-00518-z

Navigation