Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Pharmaceutical Analysis

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4129
ISSN (Online): 1875-676X

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Short Communication

Volatile Chemical Profile of Ethanol-based Hand Sanitizer Marketed in Brazil by HS-SPME/GC-MS

Author(s): Edenilson dos Santos Niculau*, Daniel Augusto Barra de Oliveira, Leandro Lima Carvalho, Karolina Lima Nogueira and Mirella Carvalho de Araújo Oliveira

Volume 18, Issue 7, 2022

Published on: 27 April, 2022

Page: [732 - 738] Pages: 7

DOI: 10.2174/1573412918666220117163508

Price: $65

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to determine the volatile chemical profile of ethanol-based hand sanitizer marketed in Brazil by HS-SPME/GC-MS.

Background: Ethanol-based hand sanitizer has been used to protect against coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In general, these formulations are prepared using a carbomer. In 2020 and 2021, the production of hand sanitizer has increased due to the COVID-19 epidemic. Therefore, it is important to know the composition of this formulation because certain molecules present in some alcoholic mixtures can cause health problems.

Methods: Ethanol-based hand sanitizer, AL1, AL2, BL1, CL1, DL1, EL1, FL1, and GL1 (ethanol derivative of fuel station), was purchased from manufacturers commercialized in Araguaína-TO and analyzed by HS-SPME/GC-MS for determining volatile chemical profile.

Results: The analyses showed different compositions for the ethanol-based hand sanitizers. Samples AL1 and AL2 contained isopropyl alcohol, ethyl acetate, benzene, ethane-1,1-diethoxy, limonene, and other compounds. Linear alkanes were also detected. Only ethyl acetate and ethane-1,1-diethoxy were detected in CL1, in addition to ethanol. Thus, it is the most suitable sample among those analyzed. The presence of benzene, alkanes, and other hydrocarbons may be associated with the use of fuel ethanol to prepare these sanitizers, as shown in the sample GL1. Benzene, xylene, and toluene were found in FL1. This sample is the most contaminated among those analyzed.

Conclusion: The chemical profile of commercial ethanol-based hand sanitizer from eight different samples sold in Araguaína-Brazil was established by GC-MS. Compounds like benzene and other alkanes were found in some samples. These results suggested possible contamination by alcohols unqualified in producing pharmaceutical substances. These analyzes are particularly relevant due to the pandemic situation to avoid COVID-19 proliferation. Benzene and other alkanes are harmful to human health and should be avoided in hand sanitizer production.

Keywords: Benzene, chemical analysis, contamination, hand sanitizer, HS-SPME/GC-MS, volatile chemical profile.

« Previous
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Suman, R.; Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Vaishya, R.; Bahl, S.; Nandan, D. Sustainability of coronavirus on different surfaces. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol., 2020, 10(4), 386-390.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2020.04.020] [PMID: 32377058]
[2]
Moorer, W.R. Antiviral activity of alcohol for surface disinfection. Int. J. Dent. Hyg., 2003, 1(3), 138-142.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-5037.2003.00032.x] [PMID: 16451513]
[3]
Fred, T.; Sophia, K.; Alex, S.; Emmanuel, B.; Tom, L.; Lucas, A. Comparison of antibacterial efficacy of locally produced alcohol based hand sanitizer and commonly available commercial hand sanitizer used in healthcare facilities in Uganda. OAlib, 2020, 7, 1-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106221]
[4]
van Engelenburg, F.A.C.; Terpstra, F.G.; Schuitemaker, H.; Moorer, W.R. The virucidal spectrum of a high concentration alcohol mixture. J. Hosp. Infect., 2002, 51(2), 121-125.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2002.1211] [PMID: 12090799]
[5]
Lages, S.L.S.; Ramakrishnan, M.A.; Goyal, S.M. In-vivo efficacy of hand sanitisers against feline calicivirus: A surrogate for norovirus. J. Hosp. Infect., 2008, 68(2), 159-163.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2007.11.018] [PMID: 18207605]
[6]
Berardi, A.; Perinelli, D.R.; Merchant, H.A.; Bisharat, L.; Basheti, I.A.; Bonacucina, G.; Cespi, M.; Palmieri, G.F. Hand sanitisers amid CoViD-19: A critical review of alcohol-based products on the market and formulation approaches to respond to increasing demand. Int. J. Pharm., 2020, 584(119431), 119431.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119431] [PMID: 32461194]
[7]
Itiki, R.; Roy Chowdhury, P. Fast deployment of COVID-19 disinfectant from common ethanol of gas stations in Brazil. Health Policy Technol., 2020, 9(3), 384-390.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.07.002] [PMID: 32837887]
[8]
Resolução de Diretoria Colegiada – RDC nº 252, de 16 de setembro de 2003. 2003. Available from:. http://www.ctpconsultoria.com.br/pdf/Resolucao-RDC-ANVISA-252-de-16-09-2003.pdf (Accessed Jun 12, 2020).
[9]
NR 15 - Norma Regulamentadora 15. Available from:. http://www.guiatrabalhista.com.br/legislacao/nr/nr15_anexoXIII_A.htm (Accessed Jun 05, 2020).
[10]
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária – Anvisa. Available from: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/setorregulado/regularizacao/saneantes/informes/informe-tecnico-saneantes-no-3-limite-maximo-de-substancias-neurotoxicas-em-saneantes (Accessed Jun 05, 2020).
[11]
Bonatto Machado de Castilhos, M.; Luiz Del Bianchi, V.; Gómez-Alonso, S.; García-Romero, E.; Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I. Sensory descriptive and comprehensive GC-MS as suitable tools to characterize the effects of alternative winemaking procedures on wine aroma. Part II: BRS Rúbea and BRS Cora. Food Chem., 2020, 311(126025), 126025.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126025] [PMID: 31869649]
[12]
de Castilhos, M.B.M.; Del Bianchi, V.L.; Gómez-Alonso, S.; García-Romero, E.; Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I. Sensory descriptive and comprehensive GC-MS as suitable tools to characterize the effects of alternative winemaking procedures on wine aroma. Part I: BRS carmem and BRS violeta. Food Chem., 2019, 272, 462-470.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.066] [PMID: 30309569]
[13]
NISTIR (National Institute of Standards and Technology) 8342: A Comparison of Measurement Methods for Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizers. 2021. Available from: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2021/NIST.IR.8342.pdf (Acessed Oct 22, 2021).
[14]
Tse, T.J.; Nelson, F.B.; Reaney, M.J.T. Analyses of commercially available alcohol-based hand rubs formulated with compliant and non-compliant ethanol. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2021, 18(7), 3766.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073766] [PMID: 33916568]
[15]
Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy. Ed. 2, Allured: Carol Stream, USA 2007.
[16]
NIST Office of Data Informatics. NIST chemistry webbook - SRD 69. 1997. Available from:
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18434/T4D303]
[17]
Vandendool, H.; Kratz, P.D. A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas-liquid partition chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A, 1963, 11, 463-471.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)80947-X] [PMID: 14062605]
[18]
Imprensa Nacional. Resolução - RDC n° 350, de 19 de março de 2020. Available from: http://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/resolucao-rdc-n-350-de-19-de-marco-de-2020-249028045
[19]
Zhao, J.; Sui, P.; Wu, B.; Chen, A.; Lu, Y.; Hou, F.; Cheng, X.; Cui, S.; Song, J.; Huang, G.; Xing, C.; Wang, Q.F. Benzene induces rapid leukemic transformation after prolonged hematotoxicity in a murine model. Leukemia, 2021, 35(2), 595-600.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0894-x] [PMID: 32503976]
[20]
Kim, S.; Park, E.; Song, S.H.; Lee, C.W.; Kwon, J.T.; Park, E.Y.; Kim, B. Toluene concentrations in the blood and risk of thyroid cancer among residents living near national industrial complexes in South Korea: A population-based cohort study. Environ. Int., 2021, 146, 106304.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106304] [PMID: 33395946]
[21]
Echeverria, D.; Fine, L.; Langolf, G.; Schork, T.; Sampaio, C. Acute behavioural comparisons of toluene and ethanol in human subjects. Br. J. Ind. Med., 1991, 48(11), 750-761.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.48.11.750] [PMID: 1954153]
[22]
U.S department of health and human services. Public Health Service. Agency for toxic substance and disease registry. Toxicological profile for xylene. 1993. Available from: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/94000VL2.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=1986+Thru+1990&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5CIndex%20Data%5C86thru90%5CTxt%5C00000035%5C94000VL2.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDocuments=1&Fu zzyDe-gree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425i425&Di splay=hpfr&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=Zy ActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&Zy Entry=1&SeekPage=x&ZyPURL.
[23]
Sánchez, C.; Santos, S.; Sánchez, R.; Lienemann, C.P.; Todolí, J.L. Profiling of organic compounds in bioethanol samples of different nature and the related fractions. ACS Omega, 2020, 5(33), 20912-20921.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c02360] [PMID: 32875226]
[24]
Ladygina, N.; Dedyukhina, E.G.; Vainshtein, M.B. A review on microbial synthesis of hydrocarbons. Process Biochem., 2006, 41, 1001-1014.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.12.007]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
27
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy