Abstract
India is a major emitter of mercury to the environment. This mini-review condenses the information available since 2008 on mercury in air, soil, sediment, biota and human biomarkers near industrial locations. Information from eight regions was analyzed. More than 40% of studies did not report sufficient QA/QC information on analysis methods. Highest quality was observed for studies on human biomarkers, biota, and sediments, and the lowest on water quality. Concentrations of mercury in sediments (up to 3650 µg/kg), human biomarkers (up to 31 µg/g) and fish (up to 3 µg/g) in the vicinity of coal-fired power plants and iron and steel were high in general, and sometimes comparable to or higher than the global guideline, screening or reference values. Overall, impacts of industrial activities on mercury pollution of surrounding environment were evident, and warrant a speedy assessment of other industrial areas and implementation of mitigation measures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhattacharyya S, Chaudhuri P, Dutta S, Santra SC (2010) Assessment of total mercury level in fish collected from East Calcutta Wetlands and Titagarh sewage fed aquaculture in West Bengal, India. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84:618–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-010-9972-5
Burger Chakraborty L, Qureshi A, Vadenbo C, Hellweg S (2013) Anthropogenic Mercury Flows in India and Impacts of Emission Controls. Environ Sci Technol 47:8105–8113. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401006k
Herger LG (2016) Assessment of Mercury in Fish Tissue from Pacific Northwest Lakes EPA Region 10 Report (No. EPA-910-R-16-003). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of Environmental Assessment, Seattle, Washington 98101, USA
IIPS and ICF (2017) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Deonar, Mumbai 400088, India
Karagas MR, Choi AL, Oken E, Horvat M, Schoeny R, Kamai E, Cowell W, Grandjean P, Korrick S (2012) Evidence on the human health effects of low-level methylmercury exposure. Environ Health Perspect 120:799–806. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104494
Koshle A, Pervez Y, Pervez S (2009) Spatial and temporal variation of mercury load in surface water and sediments around an integrated steel plant in India. Environmentalist 29:421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9213-1
Koshle A, Pervez YF, Tiwari RP, Pervez S(2008) Environmental pathways and distribution pattern of total mercury among soils and groundwater matrices around an integrated steel plant in India. JSIR Vol 677 July 2008.
Kumar Sarkar S, Francisković-Bilinski S, Bhattacharya A, Saha M, Bilinski H (2004) Levels of elements in the surficial estuarine sediments of the Hugli River, northeast India and their environmental implications. Environ Int 30:1089–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.06.005
Kumari P, Chowdhury A, Maiti SK (2018) Assessment of heavy metal in the water, sediment, and two edible fish species of Jamshedpur Urban Agglomeration, India with special emphasis on human health risk. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 24:1477–1500. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1415131
Kumari P, Kumar Maiti S (2019) Health risk assessment of lead, mercury, and other metal(loid)s: A potential threat to the population consuming fish inhabiting, a lentic ecosystem in Steel City (Jamshedpur), India. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1495055
Li P, Feng XB, Qiu GL, Shang LH, Li ZG (2009) Mercury pollution in Asia: A review of the contaminated sites. J Hazard Mater 168:591–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.031
MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG, Berger TA (2000) Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39:20–31
Mahajan VE, Yadav RR, Dakshinkar NP, Dhoot VM, Bhojane GR, Naik MK, Shrivastava P, Naoghare PK, Krishnamurthi K (2012) Influence of mercury from fly ash on cattle reared nearby thermal power plant. Environ Monit Assess 184:7365–7372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2505-9
Menon JS, Mahajan SV (2012) Mercury levels in hair of fish consumers along Ulhas River Estuary and Thane Creek, Maharashtra, India. J Mar Biol India 54:9. https://doi.org/10.6024/jmbai.2012.54.2.01695-0
Mohan M, Shylesh Chandran MS, Jayasooryan KK, Ramasamy EV (2014) Mercury in the sediments of Vembanad Lake, western coast of India. Environ Monit Assess 186:3321–3336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3620-1
Mondal P, Reichelt-Brushett AJ, Jonathan MP, Sujitha SB, Sarkar SK (2018) Pollution evaluation of total and acid-leachable trace elements in surface sediments of Hooghly River Estuary and Sundarban Mangrove Wetland (India). Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:5681–5699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0915-0
Mukherjee AB, Bhattacharya P, Sarkar A, Zevenhoven R (2009) Mercury emissions from industrial sources in India and its effects in the environment. In: Mason R, Pirrone N (eds) Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere. Springer US, New York, pp 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93958-2_4
NGT (2019) National Green Tribunal Order, National Green Tribunal (NGT) order. Original application no. 453/2019. Court no 1, Item no. 07
Pervez S, Koshle A, Pervez Y (2010) Study of spatiotemporal variation of atmospheric mercury and its human exposure around an integrated steel plant, India. Atmos Chem Phys 10:5535–5549. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5535-2010
Pirrone N, Cinnirella S, Feng X, Finkelman RB, Friedli HR, Leaner J, Mason R, Mukherjee AB, Stracher GB, Streets DG, Telmer K (2010) Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources. Atmospheric Chem Phys 10:5951–5964. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010
Ram A, Borole DV, Rokade MA, Zingde MD (2009) Diagenesis and bioavailability of mercury in the contaminated sediments of Ulhas Estuary, India. Mar Pollut Bull 58:1685–1693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.06.021
Ramasamy EV, Jayasooryan KK, Chandran MSS, Mohan M (2017) Total and methyl mercury in the water, sediment, and fishes of Vembanad, a tropical backwater system in India. Environ Monit Assess 189:130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5845-2
Sahu R, Saxena P, Johnson S, Mathur HB, Agarwal HC (2014) Mercury pollution in the Sonbhadra district of Uttar Pradesh, India, and its health impacts. Toxicol Environ Chem 96:1272–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2014.939980
Sharma R, Ramteke S, Patel KS, Kumar S, Sarangi B, Agrawal SG, Lata L, Milosh H (2015) Contamination of Lead and Mercury in Coal Basin of India. J Environ Prot 06:1430–1441. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.612124
Sheu G-R, Gay DA, Schmeltz D, Olson M, Chang S-C, Lin D-W, Nguyen LS (2019) A New Monitoring Effort for Asia: The Asia Pacific Mercury Monitoring Network (APMMN). https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10090481. Atmosphere 10
Subhavana KL, Qureshi A, Roy A (2019) Mercury levels in human hair in South India: baseline, artisanal goldsmiths and coal-fired power plants. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0107-0
UNEP (2019) Minamata Convention on Mercury. UN Environment Programme
US EPA O(2015) Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) - Generic Tables [WWW Document]. URL https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables (accessed 10.2.21)
USEPA (2015) Method 7473: Mercury in solids and solutions by thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry. US EPA
Acknowledgements
This review was partially supported by the Bromine Science and Environmental Forum (BSEF). All views expressed herein are those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views of BSEF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qureshi, A. Mercury in the Environment Around Industrially Impacted Locations in India: A Mini-Review. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 109, 937–942 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-022-03548-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-022-03548-w