Thoracic: Trachea
Tracheobronchoplasty yields long-term anatomy, function, and quality of life improvement for patients with severe excessive central airway collapse

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.05.037Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

This study examines the long-term anatomic and clinical effects of tracheobronchoplasty in severe excessive central airway collapse.

Methods

Included patients underwent tracheobronchoplasty for excessive central airway collapse (2002-2016). The cross-sectional area of main airways on dynamic airway computed tomography was measured before and after tracheobronchoplasty. Expiratory collapse was calculated as the difference between inspiratory and expiratory cross-sectional area divided by inspiratory cross-sectional area ×100. The primary outcome was improvement in the percentage of expiratory collapse in years 1, 2, and 5 post-tracheobronchoplasty. Secondary outcomes included mean response profile for the 6-minute walk test, Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, Karnofsky Performance Status score, and St George Respiratory Questionnaire. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analyses.

Results

The cohort included 61 patients with complete radiological follow-up at years 1, 2, and 5 post-tracheobronchoplasty. A significant linear decrease in the percentage of expiratory collapsibility of the central airways after tracheobronchoplasty was present. Anatomic repair durability was preserved 5 years after tracheobronchoplasty, with decrease in percentage of expiratory airway collapse up to 40% and 30% at years 1 and 2, respectively. The St George Respiratory Questionnaire (74.7 vs 41.8%, P < .001) and Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (78 vs 47, P < .001) demonstrated significant improvement at year 5 compared with baseline. Similar results were observed in the 6-minute walk test (1079 vs 1268 ft, P < .001) and Karnofsky score (57 vs 82, P < .001).

Conclusions

Tracheobronchoplasty has durable effects on airway anatomy, functional status, and quality of life in carefully selected patients with severe excessive central airway collapse.

Section snippets

Study Design and Cohort

This is a longitudinal study of sequential repeated measurements of airway collapsibility in patients who underwent TBP for severe ECAC. The study was approved on July 2005 by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Institutional Review Board (Protocol No. 2005P-000112). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before any study interventions.

The study cohort included patients 18 years and older diagnosed with severe symptomatic ECAC who underwent TBP from 2002 to 2016. Severe

Results

Between January 2002 and December 2016, our cohort consisted of 162 patients. A total of 75 patients (46.29%) had postoperative complications, with 38 (23.45%) having severe complications (Clavien Dindo Score >3a). Of these, only 3 patients died of complications related to surgery. Only 7 patients underwent re-do TBP during the study period. Of the remaining 152 patients (excluding the 3 who died and the 7 with re-do TBP), 61 with severe ECAC who had undergone TBP with consecutive repeated

Discussion

Our study shows that patients with severe ECAC undergoing central airway stabilization with TBP demonstrate mid-term and long-term clinical benefit with regard to airway anatomy, respiratory symptoms, QOL, functional status, and exercise capacity in patients with severe ECAC. The anatomic improvement was greatest at years 1 and 2, with a marked decrease (improvement) in the degree of expiratory airway collapse up to 40% and 30%, respectively. In general, the repair durability persisted at

Conclusions

In this largest longitudinal study reported to date, we have shown that TBP has beneficial midterm and long-term effects on airway anatomy, respiratory symptoms, functional status, QOL, and exercise capacity outcome measures in a carefully selected cohort of patients with severe symptomatic ECAC. We believe that despite the limitations of this study, the results in our study are innovative and compelling, and further justify this aggressive surgical approach for these patients with significant

Cited by (1)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Institutional Review Board (Protocol No. 2005P-000112), approved July 2005.

Presented at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians, New Orleans, Louisiana.

View full text