Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Out-of-hospital management of unresponsive, apneic, witnessed opioid overdoses: a case series from a supervised consumption site

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

There are conflicting recommendations for lay rescuer management of patients who are unresponsive and apneic due to opioid overdose. We evaluated the management of such patients at an urban supervised consumption site.

Methods

At a single urban supervised consumption site in Vancouver, BC, we conducted a retrospective chart review and administrative database linkage of consecutive patients who were unresponsive and apneic following witnessed opioid overdose between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. We linked these visits with regional hospital records to define the entire care episode, which concluded when the patient was discharged from the supervised consumption site, ED, or hospital, or died. The primary outcome was successful resuscitation, defined as alive and neurologically intact (ambulatory and speaking coherently, or alert and oriented, or Glasgow Coma Scale 15) at the conclusion of the care episode. Secondary outcomes included mortality and predefined complications of resuscitation.

Results

We collected 767 patients, with a median age of 43 and 81.6% male, with complete follow-up on 763 patients (99.5%). All patients were managed with oxygen and ventilation (100%, 95% CI 0.995–1.0); 715 (93.2%, 95% CI 0.911–0.949) received naloxone; no patients underwent chest compressions (0%, 95% CI 0–0.005). All patients with complete follow-up were alive and neurologically intact at the end of their care episode (100%, 95% CI 0.994–1.0). Overall, 191 (24.9%) patients were transported to hospital, and 15 (2.0%) patients required additional naloxone after leaving the supervised consumption site; 16 (2.1%) developed complications, and 1 patient was admitted to hospital.

Conclusions

At an urban supervised consumption site, all unresponsive, apneic patients with witnessed opioid overdose were successfully resuscitated with oxygen and/or naloxone. No patients required chest compressions.

Résumé

Objectifs

Il existe des recommandations contradictoires concernant la prise en charge par des secouristes non professionnels des patients qui ne réagissent pas et sont apnéiques en raison d'une surdose d'opioïdes. Nous avons évalué la prise en charge de ces patients dans un site urbain de consommation supervisée.

Méthodes

Dans un seul site de consommation supervisée urbain à Vancouver, en Colombie-Britannique, nous avons effectué un examen rétrospectif des dossiers et un couplage de bases de données administratives de patients consécutifs qui étaient insensibles et apnéiques après avoir été témoins d'une surdose d'opioïdes entre le 1er janvier 2012 et le 31 décembre 2017. Le résultat primaire était la réussite de la réanimation, définie comme étant vivante et neurologiquement intacte (ambulatoire et parlant de manière cohérente, ou alerte et orientée, ou échelle de coma de Glasgow 15) à la fin de l'épisode de soins. Les résultats secondaires comprenaient la mortalité et les complications prédéfinies de la réanimation.

Résultats

Nous avons recueilli 767 patients, avec un âge médian de 43 ans et 81,6 % d'hommes, avec un suivi complet de 763 patients (99,5 %). Tous les patients ont été pris en charge avec de l'oxygène et la ventilation (100 %, IC à 95 % : 0,995-1,0) ; 715 (93,2 %, IC à 95 % : 0,911-0,949) ont reçu de la naloxone ; aucun patient n'a subi de compressions thoraciques (0 %, IC à 95 % : 0-0,005). Tous les patients ayant fait l’objet d’un suivi complet étaient vivants et intacts sur le plan neurologique à la fin de leur épisode de soins (100 %, IC à 95 % : 0,994-1,0). Dans l'ensemble, 191 (24,9 %) patients ont été transportés à l'hôpital, et 15 (2,0 %) patients ont eu besoin de naloxone supplémentaire après avoir quitté le site de consommation supervisée ; 16 (2,1 %) ont développé des complications, et 1 patient a été admis à l'hôpital.

Conclusions

Dans un centre de consommation supervisée urbain, tous les patients apnéiques non réceptifs ayant été témoins d’une surdose d’opioïdes ont été réanimés avec succès avec de l’oxygène et/ou de la naloxone. Aucun patient n’a eu besoin de compressions thoraciques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Special Advisory Committee on the Epidemic of Opioid Overdoses. Opioid- and stimulant-related harms in Canada [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Public Health Agency of Canada; December 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 07]. Available from: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/substance-related-harms/opioids-stimulants

  2. Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General. Illicit drug overdose deaths in BC: findings of coroners’ investigations. [Internet]. Victoria (BC): Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General; 2018 [cited 2021 Feb 07]. 34 p. Available from: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/birth-adoption-death-marriage-and-divorce/deaths/coroners-service/statistical/illicitdrugoverdosedeathsinbc-findingsofcoronersinvestigations-final.pdf

  3. White JM, Irvine RJ. Mechanisms of fatal opioid overdose. Addiction. 1999;94(7):961–72. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9479612.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eberle B, Dick WF, Schneider T, Wisser G, Doetsch S, Tzanova I. Checking the carotid pulse check: diagnostic accuracy of first responders in patients with and without a pulse. Resuscitation. 1996;33(2):107–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(96)01016-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bahr J, Klingler H, Panzer W, Rode H, Kettler D. Skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse. Resuscitation. 1997;35(1):23–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(96)01092-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitra M, Schoffel L, Globerman J. Rapid Response Service. Chest compressions and rescue breathing when administering naloxone in opioid overdose [Internet]. Toronto (ON): Ontario HIV Treatment Network; 2016 Aug [cited 2021 Sep 19]. Available from: https://www.ohtn.on.ca/rapid-response-chest-compressions-and-rescue-breathing-when-administering-naloxone-in-opioid-overdose/

  7. Community management of opioid overdose [Internet]. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization; 2014 Nov 02. Updated 2014. [cited 2021 Feb 08]; [88 p]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241548816

  8. Dezfulian C, Orkin A, Maron B, Elmer J, Girota S, Gladwin M, et al. Opioid-associated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: distinctive clinical features and implications for health care and public responses: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Canadian Red Cross. First aid, resuscitation, and education guidelines: 2020 clinical and education updates for Canada [Internet]. Canadian Red Cross; 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 08]. 66 p. Available from: https://www.redcross.ca/crc/documents/Training-and-Certification/First-Aid-Tips-and-Resources/CRC_FA_Guidelines_E_EN_20201130.pdf

  10. Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (Public Health Ontario), Leece P. Evidence brief: evidence on rescue breathing or chest compressions in local naloxone programs [Internet]. Toronto (ON): Queen’s Printer for Ontario; 2016 Dec [cited 2021 Feb 08]. 11 p. Available from: https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/E/2017/eb-cpr-naloxone-programs.pdf?la=en

  11. BC CDC Toolkit: Responding to Opioid Overdose for BC service providers [Internet]. (BC): BC Centre for Disease Control; 2020 [cited 2021 Sep 19]. 73 p. Available from: https://towardtheheart.com/assets/uploads/1610668700M5CUWes9iDssX45XdoCISipddL2uVyX08CmViUF.pdf

  12. Alberta Health Services. Community based naloxone program recommendations on suspected opioid poisoning response in the community [Internet]. (AB): Alberta Health Services; 2020 Apr 28 [cited 2021 Feb 08]. 2 p. Available from: https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/ppih/if-ppih-covid-19-opioid-poisoning-response.pdf

  13. Manitoba Health, Seniors and Active Living, Population Health and Health Equity. Training Manual: Overdose Prevention, Recognition and Response [Internet]. (MB): Province of Manitoba; 2017 Jul [cited 2021 Feb 08]. 18 p. Available from: https://www.gov.mb.ca/health/publichealth/docs/training_manual_overdose.pdf

  14. Government of Quebec. Rescuing a person from a possible opioid overdose [Internet]. Government of Quebec; [updated 2020 Feb 26; cited 2021 Feb 08]. Available from: https://www.quebec.ca/en/health/advice-and-prevention/alcohol-drugs-gambling/rescuing-a-person-from-a-possible-opioid-overdose/

  15. Newfoundland and Labrador Community & Health Services. Opioids and naloxone [Internet]. Newfoundland and Labrador Community & Health Services; [cited 2021 Feb 08]. Available from: https://www.gov.nl.ca/hcs/mentalhealth-committee/mentalhealth/opioids-and-naloxone/

  16. Hoke RS, Chamberlain D. Skeletal chest injuries secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2004;63(3):327–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.05.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaldırım U, Toygar M, Karbeyaz K, Arziman I, Tuncer SK, Eyi YE, et al. Complications of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in non-traumatic cases and factors affecting complications. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2016;6(3):270–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfs.2015.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rudinská LI, Hejna P, Ihnát P, Tomášková H, Smatanová M, Dvořáčekabet I. Intra-thoracic injuries associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation—frequent and serious. Resuscitation. 2016;103:66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mackle T, Rhine D. Elderly man in respiratory arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(4):599–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vancouver Coastal Health. Opioid overdose: advanced interventions in supervised consumption settings [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Jan 28]. Available from: http://shop.healthcarebc.ca/vch/VCHDSTs/D-00-13-30230.pdf

  21. Vancouver Coastal Health. Insite user statistics [Internet]. Vancouver: Vancouver Coastal Health; 2020 [cited 2021 Aug 24]. Available from: http://www.vch.ca/public-health/harm-reduction/supervised-consumption-sites/insite-user-statistics

  22. Kaji A, Schriger D, Green S. Looking through the retrospectoscope: reducing bias in emergency medicine chart review studies. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(3):292–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.03.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Scheuermeyer F, DeWitt C, Christenson J, Torkjari R, Sahota I, Innes G. Safety of a brief emergency department observation protocol for patients with presumed fentanyl overdose. Ann Emerg Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.01.054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Overdose response indicators. BC Centre for Disease Control; 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 13]. Available from: http://www.bccdc.ca/health-professionals/data-reports/overdose-response-indicators#BCAS

  27. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse (CCSA), Canadian Community Epidemiology Network on Drug Use. CCENDU bulletin: deaths involving fentanyl in Canada, 2009–2014. Ottawa (ON): CCSA; 2015 [cited 2021 Aug 24]. Available from: https://www.ccsa.ca/sites/default/files/2019-05/CCSA-CCENDU-Fentanyl-Deaths-Canada-Bulletin-2015-en.pdf

  28. Moe J, Godwin J, Purssell R, O’Sullivan F, Hau J, Purssell E, et al. Naloxone dosing in an era of ultra-potent opioid overdoses: a systematic review. CJEM. 2020;22(2):178–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2019.471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hess D, Baran C. Ventilatory volumes using mouth-to-mouth, mouth-to-mask, and bag-valve-mask techniques. Am J Emerg Med. 1985;3(4):292–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-6757(85)90049-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Elam JO, Greene DG, Brown ES, Clements JA. Oxygen and carbon dioxide exchange and energy cost of expired air resuscitation. JAMA. 1958;167(3):328–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1958.72990200019008b.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Swor R, Khan I, Domeier R, Honeycutt L, Chu K, Compton S. CPR training and CPR performance: do CPR-trained bystanders perform CPR? Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(6):596–601. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shibata K, Taniguchi T, Yoshida M, Yamamoto K. Obstacles to bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Japan. Resuscitation. 2004;44(3):187–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00143-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Moustaqim-Barrette A, Papamihali K, Williams S, Ferguson M, Moe J, Purssell R, et al. Adverse events related to bystander naloxone administration in cases of suspected opioid overdose in British Columbia: an observational study. PLoS One. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to sincerely thank Christopher Mah, Richa Sharma, Fiona O’Sullivan and Jeff West for their contributions to this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrianna Rowe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rowe, A., Chang, A., Lostchuck, E. et al. Out-of-hospital management of unresponsive, apneic, witnessed opioid overdoses: a case series from a supervised consumption site. Can J Emerg Med 24, 650–658 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-022-00326-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-022-00326-9

Keywords

Navigation