Elsevier

Geoderma

Volume 423, 1 October 2022, 115961
Geoderma

Effects of afforestation on soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity: A meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115961Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Afforestation enhanced soil fungal diversity and enzyme activity.

  • Degraded land afforestation increased soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity.

  • Soil bacterial diversity increased significantly with afforestation duration.

  • Soil microbial richness changed greater after broad-leaved species afforestation.

Abstract

Afforestation is thought to be one of the key measures for mitigating climate change by capturing atmospheric carbon. However, despite the importance of afforestation in ecosystem functioning, its effects on soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity remain unclear. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of these effects, using a newly compiled dataset of soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity before and after afforestation collected from 80 sites worldwide. Soil fungal diversity and soil enzyme activities increased significantly after afforestation, but soil bacterial diversity did not change significantly. Among these soil enzymes, the activities of β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), urease (UREA), alkaline phosphatase (AP), dehydrogenase (DEH), and catalase (CAT) increased by 104.7%, 84.0%, 101.7%, 199.2%, and 58.3%, respectively. The responses of soil microbial diversity and enzyme activities varied across afforestation durations, climate zones, prior land use types, and species. Specifically, soil bacterial diversity and the activity of BG increased significantly with afforestation duration, and the increase in BG activity was higher in tropical than in temperate zones. In degraded sites, both soil microbial diversity and enzyme activities significantly increased after afforestation. In addition, structural equation models showed that soil carbon content, nitrogen content, and soil pH value were significant driving factors for the soil microbial community diversity and soil enzyme activities. Overall, our results provided a comprehensive understanding of the changes in soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity under different afforestation conditions, as well as scientific bases for locally adapted afforestation in the future.

Introduction

Afforestation is recognized as an effective way to mitigate climate change (IPCC, 2014, Bastin et al., 2019). In recent decades, the area of planted forests has continuously increased and currently accounts for 7% of the total global forest area (FAO, 2020). Afforestation influences the composition of soil microbial community that plays an important role in various ecological processes (Lamb et al., 2011, Deng et al., 2016). Many studies have suggested that the increase in vegetation coverage after afforestation leads to changes in soil environmental conditions (Farley et al., 2005, Peng et al., 2014), as attributed to changes in soil microbial community composition and the activities of relevant hydrolytic enzymes (Lauber et al., 2008, Sinsabaugh et al., 2008). Forest management activities such as soil disturbance from site preparation and timber machinery harvesting also affect the soil physical structure as well as soil air and water circulation, regulating microbial growth and community composition (Wardle, 1992, Ilstedt et al., 2007, Hartmann et al., 2012, Hui et al., 2018, Cui et al., 2020). Soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity change with afforestation, but there is little consensus on the direction of the change (Chodak et al., 2009, Kang et al., 2018, Gonzalez-Polo et al., 2019, Xu et al., 2020, Zhong et al., 2020, Chen et al., 2021, Ding and Wang, 2021). Moreover, quantitative synthesis clarifying the impacts of afforestation on soil microorganisms in different afforestation regions and conditions has not been conducted.

Soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity are commonly used as indicators of the degree of ecosystem restoration after afforestation (Fu et al., 2015, Gunina et al., 2017, Liu et al., 2017, Liu et al., 2018). In terrestrial ecosystems, changes in soil microbial diversity may alter the diversity, productivity, and environmental adaptability of plants, litter decomposition and nutrient cycling (van der Heijden et al., 2008, Bardgett and van der Putten, 2014, Wagg et al., 2014). Alterations in soil enzyme activities reflect changes in soil microbial nutrient requirements and metabolic activity (Sinsabaugh et al., 2008, Moorhead et al., 2012, Kang et al., 2018). For example, β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), urease (UREA), and alkaline phosphatase (AP) are involved in the carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles, respectively (Sinsabaugh et al., 2008), and oxidase enzymes such as catalase (CAT) and polyphenol oxidase (POX) are indispensable for the redox process of the macromolecules contained in soil organic matter (Garcı́a-Gil et al., 2000). Therefore, exploring the responses of soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity to afforestation is helpful not only for understanding the changes in the structure and metabolic activity of the soil microbial community but also for further understanding the functioning and stability of the plantation ecosystem. Nevertheless, previous studies on soil microbial properties after afforestation have mostly focused on soil microbial biomass (Zhang et al., 2017) or the community structure and metabolism of microorganisms through traditional methods, such as the phospholipid fatty acid method and Biolog microplate method (Macdonald et al., 2009, Zhao et al., 2019). Such methods cannot provide accurate details of soil microbial diversity and community composition compared with next-generation sequencing technology. In recent years, next-generation sequencing technology has promoted the study of soil microbial diversity, enriching research on the response of soil microbial diversity to afforestation (Garcia-Franco et al., 2015, Zhao et al., 2019, Xu et al., 2020).

To explore changes in soil microbial community after afforestation, we selected soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity as indicators of the composition and metabolic activity of soil microorganisms. We collected 260 observations from 80 sites worldwide to establish a global database of soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity before and after afforestation and then conducted a meta-analysis. We attempted to answer the following questions: (1) how do soil microbial diversity and soil enzyme activity change after afforestation? (2) how do the changes differ with afforestation duration, climate zone, land use type, and plant species (broad-leaved vs. coniferous)? and (3) what are the underlying mechanisms for these changes?

Section snippets

Data sources and extraction

We used the Web of Science and China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database to retrieve literature published up to December 2021. During the search, we used the combined keywords “soil” and “microb*” or “bacteri*” or “fung*” or “enzyme*” and “reforest*” or “afforest*” or “plantation” or “afforestation” or “silvicultur*” or “land use” OR “landuse*” OR “land-use*” for screening and added the literatures to our literature library. A total of 24,034 publications were screened.

The literature and

Effects of afforestation on soil properties and soil microbial diversity

Afforestation significantly increased the SWC, soil clay content, SOC, TN, TP, MBC, MBN, MBP and MBC:SOC ratio by 21.3%, 9.8%, 83.2%, 52.5%, 18.6%, 146.1%, 160.6%, 91.9%, and 117.8%, respectively (Fig. 2). In contrast, afforestation had no significant effect on the pH, C:N ratio or MBC:MBN ratio (Fig. 2).

Regarding soil microbial diversity, the Shannon and Chao1 indices of fungi increased significantly following afforestation. However, afforestation exhibited no significant effect on the number

Afforestation stimulated soil fungal diversity and enzyme activity but did not change soil bacterial diversity

Our meta-analysis showed no significant change in soil bacterial diversity (as measured by OTUs/Shannon/Chao1) after afforestation, yet soil fungal diversity and enzyme activity increased significantly, suggesting that fungal diversity and microbial metabolism were more sensitive to afforestation than bacterial diversity (Singh et al., 2012, Ren et al., 2016, Moghimian et al., 2017). Soil microorganisms can enhance their adaptability by adjusting their use efficiency of soil nutrients and

Conclusions

Overall, afforestation had no significant effect on soil bacterial diversity but increased soil fungal diversity and soil enzyme activity (Fig. 9). In particular, the changes in soil bacterial diversity and the activity of BG were positively significantly correlated with the duration of afforestation. The soil enzyme participating in carbon cycle exhibited a stronger response to afforestation in tropical than in temperate zones. Moreover, afforestation with broad-leaved species was more

Declaration of Competing Interest

H.H and F.J designed the research. H.H completed the data collection. H.H and F.Y analyzed data. H.H, T.D, Z.L, S.H, M.S, T.Z, F.J wrote the manuscript. All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31988102). We thank Qingshui Yu for his helpful suggestions for data analysis of the manuscript. We thank Shangshi Liu for his helpful suggestions for manuscript submission.

Author contributions

H.H and F.J designed the research. H.H completed the data collection. H.H and F.Y analyzed data. H.H, T.D, Z.L, S.H, M.S, T.Z, F.J wrote the manuscript. All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References (83)

  • A.S.F. Araújo et al.

    Soil microbial properties and temporal stability in degraded and restored lands of Northeast Brazil

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2013)
  • L. Augusto et al.

    Influences of evergreen gymnosperm and deciduous angiosperm tree species on the functioning of temperate and boreal forests

    Biol. Rev.

    (2015)
  • M.G. Bakker et al.

    Diffuse symbioses: roles of plant-plant, plant-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions in structuring the soil microbiome

    Mol. Ecol.

    (2014)
  • R.D. Bardgett et al.

    Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning

    Nature

    (2014)
  • J.F. Bastin et al.

    The global tree restoration potential

    Science

    (2019)
  • I.R. Booth

    Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria

    Microbiol. Rev.

    (1985)
  • C. Brunel et al.

    Additive or non-additive effect of mixing oak in pine stands on soil properties depends on the tree species in Mediterranean forests

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2017)
  • R.G. Burns et al.

    Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2013)
  • C.Y. Cao et al.

    Soil chemical and microbiological properties along a chronosequence of Caragana microphylla Lam. plantations in the Horqin sandy land of Northeast China

    Appl. Soil Ecol.

    (2008)
  • X.D. Chen et al.

    Impact of grassland afforestation with contrasting tree species on soil phosphorus fractions and alkaline phosphatase gene communities

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2021)
  • M. Chodak et al.

    Development of microbial properties in a chronosequence of sandy mine soils

    Appl. Soil Ecol.

    (2009)
  • Y.X. Cui et al.

    Soil moisture mediates microbial carbon and phosphorus metabolism during vegetation succession in a semiarid region

    Soil. Biol. Biochem.

    (2020)
  • M. de Graaff et al.

    Labile soil carbon inputs mediate the soil microbial community composition and plant residue decomposition rates

    New Phytol.

    (2010)
  • B.P. Degens et al.

    Decreases in organic C reserves in soils can reduce the catabolic diversity of soil microbial communities

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2000)
  • Q. Deng et al.

    Soil microbial community and its interaction with soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics following afforestation in central China

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2016)
  • Q. Deng et al.

    A global meta-analysis of soil phosphorus dynamics after afforestation

    New Phytol.

    (2017)
  • L.L. Ding et al.

    Afforestation suppresses soil nitrogen availability and soil multifunctionality on a subtropical grassland

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2021)
  • K.A. Farley et al.

    Effects of afforestation on water yield: a global synthesis with implications for policy

    Global Change Biol.

    (2005)
  • FAO, 2020. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020, Main Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United...
  • Y.H. Feng et al.

    Multispecies forest plantations outyield monocultures across a broad range of conditions

    Science

    (2022)
  • N. Fierer et al.

    The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities

    P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2006)
  • J. Fox

    Applied Regression Analysis, Linear Models, and Related Methods

    (1997)
  • X.L. Fu et al.

    Understory vegetation leads to changes in soil acidity and in microbial communities 27 years after reforestation

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2015)
  • N. Garcia-Franco et al.

    Changes in soil aggregation and microbial community structure control carbon sequestration after afforestation of semiarid shrublands

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2015)
  • J.C. Garcı́a-Gil et al.

    Long-term effects of municipal solid waste compost application on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2000)
  • N.J.C. Gellie et al.

    Revegetation rewilds the soil bacterial microbiome of an old field

    Mol. Ecol.

    (2017)
  • M. Gispert et al.

    The impact of land management and abandonment on soil enzymatic activity, glomalin content and aggregate stability

    Geoderma.

    (2013)
  • M. Gonzalez-Polo et al.

    Soil microbial processes in a pine silvopastoral system in NW Patagonia

    Agroforest. Syst

    (2019)
  • A. Gunina et al.

    Response of soil microbial community to afforestation with pure and mixed species

    Plant Soil.

    (2017)
  • M. Harrer et al.

    Doing Meta-analysis with R: A Hands-on guide

    (2021)
  • M. Hartmann et al.

    Significant and persistent impact of timber harvesting on soil microbial communities in Northern coniferous forests

    ISME J.

    (2012)
  • L.V. Hedges et al.

    The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology

    Ecology.

    (1999)
  • S.B. Hong et al.

    Afforestation neutralizes soil pH

    Nat. Commun.

    (2018)
  • N. Hui et al.

    Over twenty years farmland reforestation decreases fungal diversity of soils, but stimulates the return of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities

    Plant Soil.

    (2018)
  • U. Ilstedt et al.

    The effect of afforestation on water infiltration in the tropics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Forest Ecol. Manag.

    (2007)
  • IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment...
  • P. Iovieno et al.

    Soil microbial community structure and biomass as affected by Pinus pinea plantation in two Mediterranean areas

    Appl. Soil Ecol.

    (2010)
  • M. Jeanbille et al.

    Soil parameters drive the structure, diversity and metabolic potentials of the bacterial communities across temperate beech forest soil sequences

    Microbial Ecol.

    (2016)
  • S.Y. Jian et al.

    Soil extracellular enzyme activities, soil carbon and nitrogen storage under nitrogen fertilization: a meta-analysis

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2016)
  • F.X. Joly et al.

    Tree species diversity affects decomposition through modified micro-environmental conditions across European forests

    New Phytol.

    (2017)
  • H.Z. Kang et al.

    Changes in soil microbial community structure and function after afforestation depend on species and age: Case study in a subtropical alluvial island

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (23)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text