Skip to main content
Log in

Development of drone-type float for surface-velocity measurement in rivers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study develops a safety survey system for measuring natural river discharge. Monitoring of rivers is very important for river environment conservation and flood prevention. The new system is a drone-type float with a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, which can safely and quickly monitor a river. This float flies to the target point on a free surface according to the operator’s control. After which, it runs freely downstream, detecting the time-series of self-position with a centimeter-order accuracy using the real-time kinetic GPS method. It also measures the local water depth using an ultrasonic sensor during the drifting downstream. The same works are repeatedly conducted on all survey lines to evaluate the discharge through a target cross-section. The data correction formula considering the wind effects is introduced to improve the measurement accuracy. We performed field tests in natural rivers and obtained reliable results for practical application. The present system can evaluate the discharge in a 250 m width large-scale river without using an observation bridge or a rubber boat.

Highlights

  1. 1.

    Safe and quick measurements of surface velocity and discharge in rivers becomes possible using a drone-type float.

  2. 2.

    Reliable river surface survey can be performed by consideration of wind effects on float velocity.

  3. 3.

    The present portable instrumentation has a practical advantage in safe and remote river survey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig.5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ngoma DH, Wang Y (2018) Hhaynu micro hydropower scheme: Mbulu–Tanzania comparative river flow velocity and discharge measurement methods. Flow Meas Instrum 62:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fujita I, Muste M, Kruger A (1998) Large-scale particle image velocimetry for flow analysis in hydraulic engineering applications. J Hydraulic Res 36(3):397–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fujita I, Notoya Y, Tani K, Tateguchi S (2019) Efficient and accurate estimation of water surface velocity in STIV. Environ Fluid Mech 19:1363–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Muste M, Yu K, Spasojevic M (2004) Practical aspects of ADCP data use for quantification of mean river flow characteristics; part I: moving-vessel measurements. Flow Meas Instrum 15(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. García CM, Oberg K, García MH (2007) ADCP measurements of gravity currents in the Chicago River, Illinois. J Hydraulic Eng 133(12):1356–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Konsoer KM, Rhoads BI (2014) Spatial-temporal structure of mixing interface turbulence at two large river confluences. Environ Fluid Mech 14:1043–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tauro F, Pagano C, Phamduy P, Grimaldi S, Porfiri M (2015) Large-scale particle image velocimetry from an unmanned aerial vehicle. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech 20(6):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Perks MT, Russell AJ, Largem ARG (2016) Technical notes: advances in flash flood monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20(10):4005–4015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tauro F, Petroselli A, Arcangeletti E (2016) Assessment of drone-based surface flow observations. Hydrol Process 30(7):1114–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koutalakis P, Tzoraki O, Zaimes G (2019) UAVs for hydrologic scopes: application of a low-coat UAV to estimate surface water velocity by using three different image-based methods. Drone 3(1):14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Strelnikova D, Paulus G, Kafer S, Anders KH, Mayr P, Mader H, Scherling U, Schneeberger R (2020) Drone-based optical measurements of heterogeneous surface velocity fields around fish passages at hydropower dams. Remote Sens 12(3):384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pearce S, Ljubicic R, Pena-Haro S, Perks M, Tauro F, Pizarro A, Dal Sasso SF, Strelnikova D, Grimaldi S, Maddock I, Paulus G, Plavsic J, Prodanovic D, Manfreda S (2020) An evaluation of image velocimetry techniques under low flow conditions and high seeding densities using unmanned aerial systems. Remote Sens 12(2):232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu WC, Lu CH, Huang WC (2021) Large-scale particle image velocimetry to measure streamflow from videos recorded from unmanned aerial vehicle and fixed imaging system. Remote Sens 13:2661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanjou M, Nagasaka T (2017) Development of autonomous boat-type robot for automated velocity measurement in straight natural river. Water Resour Res 53(11):9089–9105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanjou M, Shigeta A, Kato K, Aizawa W (2021) Portable unmanned surface vehicle that automatically measures flow velocity and direction in rivers. Flow Meas Instrum 80:101964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tazioli A (2011) Experimental methods for river discharge measurements: comparison among tracers and current meter. Hydrol Sci J 56(7):1314–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shin SS, Park SD, Lee SK (2016) Measurement of flow velocity using video image of spherical float. Procedia Eng 154:885–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shin S, Park S (2021) Application of spherical-rod float image velocimetry for evaluating high flow rate in mountain rivers. Flow Meas Instrum 78:101906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahn M, Yoon B, Ji U (2019) Uncertainty analysis for mean flow velocity and discharge measurements using floats based on large-scale experiments. KSCE J Civil Eng 23(8):3364–3371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Risio MD, Sammarco P (2020) Effects of floaters on the free surface profiles of river flows. Environ Fluid Mech 20:527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanjou M, Nezu I (2017) Fundamental study on mixing layer and horizontal circulation in open-channel flows with rectangular embayment zone. J Hydrodynamics 29(1):75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Genc O, Ardiclioglu M, Agiralioglu N (2015) Calculation of mean velocity and discharge using water surface velocity in small streams. Flow Meas Instrum 41:115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanjou M, Nezu I, Suzuke S, Itai K (2010) Turbulence structure of compound open-channel flows with one-line emergent vegetation. J Hydrodyn 22(1):560–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the financial supports of the Research Project Grant-In-Aid for Scientific Research (C) of Japanese Government (No. 20K04704, Principle Investigator= M. Sanjou) and the Research Project Grant-In-Aid for Scientific Research (B) of Japanese Government (No.19H02249, Principle Investigator= Y. Sugihara). We appreciate English editing by Enago, and thank Mr. Kouki Yoshinaga for the great support in the field survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michio Sanjou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanjou, M., Kato, K., Aizawa, W. et al. Development of drone-type float for surface-velocity measurement in rivers. Environ Fluid Mech 22, 955–969 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-022-09874-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-022-09874-1

Keywords

Navigation