The moments of the maximum of normalized partial sums related to laws of the iterated logarithm under the sub-linear expectation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2022.109542Get rights and content

Abstract

Let {Xn;n1} be a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables on a sub-linear expectation space (Ω,,Ê), Sn=X1++Xn. We consider the moments of maxn1|Sn|/2nloglogn. The sufficient and necessary conditions for the moments to be finite are given. As an application, we obtain the law of the iterated logarithm for moving average processes of independent and identically distributed random variables.

Section snippets

Introduction and basic settings

Let {Xn;n1} be a sequence of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d) random variables on a probability space (Ω,F,P) with mean zeros and finite variances, Sn=X1++Xn, logx=lnmax(e,x) and an=2nloglogn. Siegmund (1969) and Teicher (1971) studied the moments related to Hartman and Wintner (1941)’s law of the iterated logarithm. They obtained the sufficient and necessary conditions for the moments of the maximum of normalized partial sums maxn1|Sn|/an to be finite. Recently, Dolera and

Main results

Let (Ω,,Ê) be a sub-linear expectation space and {X,Xn;n1} be a sequence random variables on it. Denote Sn=i=1nXi, an=2nloglogn.

When X1,X2, are i.i.d. random variables on a classical probability space (Ω,F,P), Siegmund (1969) and Teicher (1971) studied the moments of maxn1|Sn|/an. Particularly, it is shown that Emaxn1|Sn|/an< if and only if E[X]=0 and E[X2]< (see (16) of Siegmund, 1969). [1] established a reformulation of the Siegmund–Teicher inequality for Emaxn1|Sn|r/anr (r>2). In

Applications

As an application of Theorem 2.1, we show the law of the iterated logarithm for the moving average process in this section. Let {Yi;i1} be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables under the sub-linear expectation Ê. We consider the moving average process Xt=j=t1βjYtj,where B=ˆj=|βj|<,β=ˆj=βj.Let Tn=t=1nXt. Define Yt=0 for t=0,1,2,. Then Xt=j=βjYtj,Tn=j=βjt=1nYtj.If {Yi}i= is a bi-directional sequence of i.i.d. random variables, i.e., for any i1<i2<<ip, {Yi1,,Yip}

Proofs

For proving the main results, we need several inequalities.

Lemma 4.1

Suppose that {X1,,Xn} is a sequence of independent random variables on (Ω,,Ê). Set Sn=k=1nXk, An(p,y)=i=1nÊ[(Xi+y)p] and B̆n,y=i=1nĔ[(Xiy)2]. Then, for all p2, x,y>0, 0<δ1, V̂(maxkni=1k(XiĔ[Xi])x)V̂(maxknXk>y)+2exp{pp}{An(p,y)yp}δx10y+expx22B̆n,y(1+δ).

Proof

The proof of (4.1) is the same as that of (3.2) of Zhang (2021) if we note Ê[et(Xky)]=Ĕ[et(Xky)]1+tĔ[Xk]+ety1tyy2Ĕ[(Xky)2],y>0.

Lemma 4.2

Suppose X, r>0. Let ςX and ηX

References (8)

  • DoleraE. et al.

    Uniform rates of the Glivenko–Cantelli convergence and their use in approximating Bayesian inferences

    Bernoulli

    (2019)
  • HartmanP. et al.

    On the law of iterated logarithm

    Amer. J. Math.

    (1941)
  • LiuW. et al.

    The law of the iterated logarithm for linear processes generated by a sequence of stationary independent random variables under the sub-linear expectation

    Entopy

    (2021)
  • PengS.

    A new central limit theorem under sublinear expectations

    (2008)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Research supported by grants from the NSF of China (Grant No. 11731012, 12031005), Ten Thousands Talents Plan of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2018R52042), NSF of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. LZ21A010002) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities .

View full text