A Quantitative Method for Evaluating Contemporary Cultural Uses of Birds: A Case Study from Mexico

  • Dulce María Ávila-Nájera Departamento de Investigación, Universidad Intercultural del Estado de México, San Felipe del Progreso, México.
  • Barbara J. Tigar School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6037-3544
  • Zaira Zavala-Sánchez Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Ambientales, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Iguala, México.
  • Pedro Zetina-Cordoba Universidad Politécnica de Huatusco. Unidad Académica de Biotecnología y Agroindustrial. Huatusco, México.
  • Ricardo Serna-Lagunes Unidad de Manejo y Conservación de Recursos Genéticos. Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Peñuela, México.
Keywords: Wildlife, Ethnozoology, Ethno-ornithology, Psittacidae

Abstract

This study evaluates the relationship between people and birds in Mexico, a country where high cultural and biological diversity are reflected in the close associations between people and natural resources, recorded since pre-Hispanic times. It systematically reviews 1041 records of cultural use of wild birds in Mexico published between 1996–2017 and analyzes patterns of contemporary use of avifauna. It classifies information for 252 birds by grouping uses of species and families into 11 categories and quantifies overall use with a Cultural Value Index (CVI). The data show that birds have a high cultural value as food, pets, and for medicinal uses (312, 235, and 119 records, respectively), particularly in the state of Chiapas. Large edible birds had the highest CVIs and included Plain chachalacas (Ortalis vetula; 9.72), Black-bellied whistling-ducks (Dendrocygna autumnali; 6.65), Crested guams (Penelope purpurascens; 6.25), and Great currasows (Crax rubra; 6.23), with the Cracidae family recorded as favored gamebirds. Conspicuous, brightly-colored birds had high CVIs, including Keel-billed toucans (Ramphastos sulfuratus; 6.50), Red-lored amazons, (Amazona autumnalis; 6.03), and allied species, which were traded or kept as pets despite legal protection. The high CVIs of Barn owls (Tyto alba; 5.45) were related to medicinal uses, and Mourning doves (Zenaida macroura; 5.69) were mainly used as gamebirds. Wild bird populations face increasing pressure from habitat loss and overexploitation. We propose that evaluating the ethnological significance of wildlife with indices like CVIs can quantify the distinctive needs of rural communities, which when combined with information on conservation status can develop more sustainable species management plans.

Author Biographies

Dulce María Ávila-Nájera, Departamento de Investigación, Universidad Intercultural del Estado de México, San Felipe del Progreso, México.

Dulce María Ávila-Nájera is a researcher interested in the ecological interactions between species of big cats and the effect of natural disturbance on them. She is also interested in the traditional knowledge and use of natural resources by rural populations.

Barbara J. Tigar, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.

Barbara J. Tigar is a Senior Lecturer in Ecology and Environmental Biology, who is interested in using applied ecology to find sustainable solutions to global challenges, such as managing endangered or pest species and the relationship between humans and nature.

Zaira Zavala-Sánchez, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Ambientales, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Iguala, México.

Zaira Zavala-Sánchez has research interests in wildlife biology and the sustainable management and conservation of endangered animals both in captivity and in situ, and the relationship between humans and nature.

Pedro Zetina-Cordoba, Universidad Politécnica de Huatusco. Unidad Académica de Biotecnología y Agroindustrial. Huatusco, México.

Pedro Zetina-Cordoba is a Research Professor at the Agrobiotechnology Program at of the Polytechnical University of Huatusco, Mexico. His main research interests are in animal nutrition and animal welfare.

Ricardo Serna-Lagunes, Unidad de Manejo y Conservación de Recursos Genéticos. Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Peñuela, México.

Ricardo Serna-Lagunes is a Professor with research interests in the ecology and genetics of individuals, populations, and communities. He uses evolutionary theory to explore and explain different levels of biological organization through space and time.

References

Alves, R. R. N., R. C. L. Leite, W. M. S. Souto, D. M. M. Bezerra, and A. Loures-Ribeiro. 2013. Ethno-ornithology and Conservation of Wild Birds in the Semi-Arid Caatinga of Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 9:14. DOI:10.1186/1746-4269-9-14.

Alves, R. R. N., J. S. Silva, L. da Silva Chaves, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2018. Introduction—Ethnozoology Animals in Our Lives. In Ethnozoology and Animal Conservation, edited by R. R. N. Alves and U. P. Albuquerque, pp. 1–7. Academic Press, London, UK.

Alves, R. R. N., and W. M. S. Souto. 2015. Ethnozoology: A Brief Introduction. Ethnobiology and Conservation 4:1–13. DOI:10.15451/ec2015-1-4.1-1-13

Anderson, E. N., and F. Medina-Tzuc. 2005. Animals and the Maya in Southeast Mexico. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.

Anderson, E. N. 2017. Birds in Maya Imagination: A Historical Ethno-Ornithology. Journal of Ethnobiology 37:621–636. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-37.4.621.

Ávila-Nájera, D. M., E. J. Naranjo, B. J. Tigar, O. Villarreal, and G. D. Mendoza. 2018. An Evaluation of the Contemporary Uses and Cultural Significance of Mammals in Mexico. Ethnobiology Letters 9:124–135. DOI:10.14237/ebl.9.2.2018.1106.

Berlanga, H., H. Gómez de Silva, V. M. Vargas-Canales, V. Rodríguez-Contreras, L. A. Sánchez-González, R. Ortega-Álvarez, and R. Calderón-Parra. 2017. Aves de México: Lista Actualizada de Especies y Nombres Comunes. México D.F, CONABIO. Available at: https://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/especies/scripts_aves/docs/lista_actualizada_aos_2017.pdf. Accessed on August 26, 2019.

Birdlife International. 2018. State of the World’s Birds. Taking the Pulse of the Planet. [web page]. Available at: https://www.birdlife.org/sites/default/files/attachments/BL_ReportENG_V11_spreads.pdf. Accessed on August 26, 2019.

Costa-Neto, E. M., M. Vargas Clavijo, and D. Santos Fita. 2009. Manual de Etnozoología. Una Guía Teórico-Práctica Para Investigar la Interconexión del Ser Humano con los Animales. Tundra Ediciones Valencia, Spain.

Cuéllar Soto, E. 2017. El Aspecto Humano de la Conservación: Algunos Conflictos, Desafíos y Acciones en Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical 24:9–5. Available at: https://www.sarem.org.ar/mastozoologia-neotropical-vol-24-no1/. Accessed on August 26, 2019.

Eaton, J. A., C. R. Shepherd, F. E. Rheindt, J. B. C. Harris, S. B. van Balen, D. S. Wilcove, and N. J. Collar. 2015. Trade-Driven Extinctions and Near-Extinctions of Avian Taxa in Sundaic Indonesia. Forktail 31:1–12.

Figueroa–Solano, E. 2000. Uso Agroecológico, Actual y Potencial, de Especies Arbóreas en una Selva Baja Caducifolia Perturbada del Suroeste del Estado de México. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Mexico.

González-Herrera L. R., J. Chablé-Santos, W. Aguilar-Cordero, and P. Manríque-Saide. 2018. El Comercio de Aves Silvestres En La Ciudad de Mérida, Yucatán, México. Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios 5:271–281.

Hull, K., and R. Fergus. 2017. Birds as Seers: An Ethno-Ornithological Approach to Omens and Prognostication among the Ch'Orti' Maya of Guatemala. Journal of Ethnobiology 37:604–620. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-37.4.604.

Jacobo-Salcedo, M. R., A. J. Alonso-Castro, and A. Zarate-Martínez. 2010. Folk Medicinal Use of Fauna in Mapimi, Durango, México. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 122:902–906. DOI:10.1016/j.jep.2010.10.005.

Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G., M. F. Rebón-Gallardo, A. Gordillo-Martínez, A. T. Peterson, H. Berlanga-García, and L. A. Sánchez-González. 2014. Biodiversidad de Aves en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85:S476–495. DOI:10.7550/rmb.41882.

Ortiz-Pulido, R. 2018. ¿Qué Especies de Aves Están en Riesgo en México? Huitzil, Revista Mexicana de Ornitología 19:237–272. DOI:10.28947/hrmo.2018.19.2.348.

Ortiz-Pulido, R., J. L. Alcántara-Carbajal, H. de la Cueva, J. Martínez-Gómez, P. Escalante Pliego, S. Parra-Martínez, T. P. Feria Arroyo, and S. Albert. 2016. Conservación de Aves en México, una Instantánea de 2015. Huitzil, Revista Mexicana de Ornitología 17:234–238. DOI:10.28947/hrmo.2016.17.2.252.

Partasasmita, R., J. Iskandar, and N. Malone. 2016. Karangwangi People’s (South Cianjur, West Java, Indonesia) Local Knowledge of Species, Forest Utilization and Wildlife Conservation. Biodiversitas 17:154–161. DOI:10.13057/biodiv/d170123.

Pires, S. F. 2012. The Illegal Parrot Trade: A Literature Review. Global Crime 13:176–190. DOI:10.1080/17440572.2012.700180.

Riedler, R., E. Pearlstein, and M. Gleeson. 2012. Featherwork: Beyond Decorative. Studies in Conservation 57 (Supplement 1):S244–249. DOI:10.1179/2047058412Y.0000000052.

Roblero-Morales, M. 2008. La Relación Hombre-Naturaleza Entre los Lacandones de Nahá, Ocosingo, Chiapas. Estudios Sociales y Humanísticos 6:125–140. DOI:10.29043/liminar.v6i1.271.

Roldán-Clará, V., V. M. Toledo, and I. Espejel. 2017. The Use of Birds as Pets in Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 13:1–18. DOI:10.1186/s13002-017-0161-z.

Sault, N. 2016. How Hummingbird and Vulture Mediate Between Life and Death in Latin America. Journal of Ethnobiology 36:783–806. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-36.4.783.

SEMARNAT. 2010. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010. Protección Ambiental, Especies Nativas de Flora y Fauna Silvestres de México, Categorías de Riesgo y Especificaciones Para su Inclusión, Exclusión o Cambio, y Lista de Especies en Riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación. S. D. M. A. and R. N. (SEMARNAT, Mexico). Available at: http://dof.gob.mx/normasOficiales/4254/semarnat/semarnat.htm. Accessed on August 26, 2019.

Tábara, J. D. 2006. Las Aves Como Naturaleza y la Conservación de las Aves Como Cultura. Papers: Revista de Sociología 82:57–77. DOI:10.5565/rev/papers.2049.

Toledo, V. M., and N. Barrera-Bassols. 2008. La Memoria Biocultural. La Importancia Ecológica de las Sabidurías Tradicionales, 1st edition. Icaria, Barcelona, Spain.

Turner, N. J. 1988. The Importance of a Rose: Evaluating the Cultural Significance of Plants in Thompson and Lillooet Interior Salish. American Anthropologist, New Series 90:272–290. DOI:10.1525/aa.1988.90.2.02a00020.

Valadez, A. R. 2003. Domesticación y Zootecnia en el México Antiguo. Imagen Veterinaria 3:32–45.

White, T., A. Johnson-Camacho, T. Bloom, P. Lancho-Diéguez, and R. Sellares. 2011. Human Perceptions Regarding Endangered Species Conservation: A Case Study of Saona Island, Dominican Republic. Revista Latinoamericana de Conservación 2:18–29.

Published
2020-12-04
How to Cite
Ávila-Nájera, D. M., Tigar, B. J., Zavala-Sánchez, Z., Zetina-Cordoba, P., & Serna-Lagunes, R. (2020). A Quantitative Method for Evaluating Contemporary Cultural Uses of Birds: A Case Study from Mexico. Ethnobiology Letters, 11(2), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.11.2.2020.1644
Section
Research Communications