Articles
Radiation segmentectomy for curative intent of unresectable very early to early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (RASER): a single-centre, single-arm study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00091-7Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Unresectable solitary very early to early stage hepatocellular carcinoma is managed with ablation for curative intent. Radiation segmentectomy is a treatment option that delivers radioactive 90yttrium (90Y)-bound microspheres transarterially to a segment of liver. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of radiation segmentectomy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma deemed unfavourable for ablation.

Methods

RASER was a single-centre, single-arm study that included adults (>18 years) with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma with unfavourable location for ablation, without metastasis or macrovascular invasion. Eligibility criteria included measurable disease 3 cm or less in diameter, Child-Pugh score A–B7, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0, and adequate haematological and organ function. The primary endpoint was target tumour response measured by mRECIST. Patients were followed up with imaging and office visits for up to 24 months. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03248375), and is completed.

Findings

Individuals were enrolled between Aug 3, 2016, and April 4, 2019, and the last patient follow-up occurred on March 31, 2021. Of the 44 individuals assessed for eligibility, 29 patients were included in the study. Initial target lesion complete response was observed in 24 (83%) of 29 patients, and partial response was observed in five (17%) of patients. All patients had an initial objective response and 26 (90%) individuals had a sustained complete response. Four (14%) patients had grade 3 leukopenia and two (7%) had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. There were two (7%) non-laboratory-related grade 3 adverse events (one arterial injury and one ascites). The most frequent (>10% patients) grade 1 or 2 adverse events were fatigue (nine [31%]); nausea, vomiting, or anorexia (seven [24%]); abdominal discomfort (six [21%]), leukopenia (nine [31%]), thrombocytopenia (four [14%]), increased alkaline phosphatase (four [14%]), increased alanine or aspartate aminotransferase (four [14%]), increased bilirubin (four [14%]), and decreased albumin (six [21%]). There was one death that was not treatment related.

Interpretation

Radiation segmentectomy was efficacious, with a low proportion of high-grade adverse events in patients with unresectable very early to early stage hepatocellular carcinoma with suboptimal location for ablation. These results suggest that radiation segmentectomy should be further investigated as a potential curative treatment option for well selected patients.

Funding

Boston Scientific.

Introduction

Unresectable solitary very early to early stage hepatocellular carcinoma is treated with ablation for lesions 3 cm or smaller, with the goal of curative intent.1 However, tumours might not be amendable to ablation for a variety of reasons, such as unfavourable locations (appendix p 4). In these situations, ablation might underperform, with high rates of incomplete necrosis and local recurrence.2, 3 Radiation segmentectomy, defined as selective administration of an ablative dose with 90yttrium (90Y) microspheres to two couinaud hepatic segments or less, is another treatment option showing promising results. Radiation segmentectomy uses the preferential blood flow to the tumour to deliver radioactive microspheres to a volume of tissue while minimising damage to the non-tumoural parenchyma. Unlike ablation, radiation segmentectomy avoids a percutaneous approach and thus limits the risk of seeding, bleeding, or injury to key structures.4 Compared with transarterial chemoembolisation, radiation segmentectomy can provide better tumour control and complete response.5, 6, 7 In addition, radioembolisation can increase progression-free survival and achieve similar responses to transarterial chemoembolisation followed by ablation for lesions 3 cm or less.8 Radiological–pathological correlation has also shown complete pathological response for tumours less than 5 cm treated with radiation segmentectomy.9, 10 The LEGACY study11 showed that radiation segmentectomy can provide good local tumour control and overall survival for solitary tumours up to 8 cm, adding to the body of evidence in support of the US Food and Drug Administration approval and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer guideline inclusion of 90Y glass microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma.12 Despite favourable results, no prospective study has validated the safety and efficacy of radiation segmentectomy used in very early to early stage, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This is important, as retrospective studies involving radiation segmentectomy are often limited by selection bias and non-standardised imaging and adverse event follow-up protocols. We aimed to assess outcomes and adverse events of radiation segmentectomy, when used as a treatment for unresectable, solitary very early to early stage hepatocellular carcinoma deemed unfavourable for ablation.

Research in context

Evidence before this study

We searched PubMed for articles published from Jan 1, 1991, to Jan 1, 2016, in English, focusing on publications of randomised studies and systematic reviews, but also including larger retrospective studies, for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. In particular, we focused our review on very early to early stage hepatocellular carcinoma. We used search terms “hepatocellular carcinoma” and “selective internal radiation therapy” or “radioembolization” or “chemoembolization” or “ablation.” We identified no prospective studies involving radioembolisation for very early to early hepatocellular carcinoma. Several retrospective studies were found, the results of which suggested that radioembolisation can achieve good response rates as well as result in complete histopathological necrosis. We also found many articles discussing suboptimal outcomes after thermal ablation in patients with unfavourable tumour locations.

Added value of this study

To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study to assess outcomes after radiation segmentectomy in patients with very early to early stage hepatocellular carcinoma. The study showed that radiation segmentectomy, which delivers an ablative radiation dose via a transarterial route, can achieve good sustained complete response rates for tumours deemed suboptimal for ablation. Our findings support the inclusion of radioembolisation in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer guidelines for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Implications of all the available evidence

This study provides a strong rationale for new randomised trials comparing radiation segmentectomy to ablation. Given complete pathological necrosis of the explanted tumours, larger investigative studies on the curative potential of radiation segmentectomy are warranted.

Section snippets

Study design and participants

We conducted RASER, a prospective, open-label, single centre, single-arm study. Patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma as per the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines and determined by a multidisciplinary tumour board to be ineligible for resection and suboptimal for ablation were included. Unfavourable location for ablation was defined as a maximum distance of 5 mm from the portal vein, hepatic vein, inferior vena cava, diaphragm, heart, stomach, bowel,

Results

Individuals were enrolled between Aug 3, 2016, and April 4, 2019, and the last patient follow-up occurred on March 31, 2021. Of the 44 patients screened, 29 were included in the study (figure 1). 15 patients were excluded: ten did not meet the inclusion criteria, and five declined to participate. No patients were excluded for excessive shunting or inability to treat selected vessels. No patients ended the study early due to additional locoregional treatment to the target area. Patient and

Discussion

In this single centre, single-arm study, we prospectively evaluated the use of radiation segmentectomy in patients with unresectable very early to early stage hepatocellular carcinoma who were suboptimal ablation candidates. The results showed that radiation segmentectomy can achieve sustained complete response with low incidence of high-grade adverse events. Several prospective studies involving 90Y radioembolisation have been published comparing radioembolisation to chemoembolisation,

Data sharing

The study protocol can be seen in the supplemental data. Informed consent form can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author (EK). Individual participant data will not be made available.

Declaration of interests

EK receives grant support, consulting fees, and is on the medical advisory board of Boston Scientific. RL is on the medical advisory board of Boston Scientific. AF receives royalties from Merit Medical; stock in Adient Medical; and consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Terumo, and Embolx. JL recieves grant support from Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Eisai Inc, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Ipsen; and consulting fees from Eli Lilly, Bayer, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Glycotest,

References (30)

  • T Livraghi et al.

    Treatment of focal liver tumors with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation- complications - encountered in a multicenter study

    Radiology

    (2002)
  • SA Padia et al.

    Segmental yttrium-90 radioembolization versus segmental chemoembolization for localized hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a single-center, retrospective, propensity score-matched study

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2017)
  • R Salem et al.

    Y90 radioembolization significantly prolongs time to progression compared with chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

    Gastroenterology

    (2016)
  • DM Biederman et al.

    Radiation segmentectomy versus selective chemoembolization in the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2018)
  • DM Biederman et al.

    Radiation segmentectomy versus TACE combined with microwave ablation for unresectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma up to 3 cm- a propensity score matching study

    Radiology

    (2017)
  • Cited by (46)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text