Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preliminary Economic Analysis of Red Mud Valorization via Colloidal Aqueous Electrolytic Reduction in a Modern Electricity Infrastructure

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrolytic reduction (ER) of hematite (Fe2O3) can serve as a low-direct-emissions production method for powder ferrometallurgy against traditional blast furnace (BF) and direct reduction (DR) methods. Use of ER in these contexts will also allow for valorization of hematite-rich waste feeds such as red mud. This study performs a techno-economic analysis on a low-temperature aqueous ER technology to determine the value of the process and its products at a scale of 100,000 tons red mud processed per year. The study is performed under several electricity pricing scenarios, for which the material, energy, economic, and emissions impacts are developed and compared to incumbent technologies. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to account for uncertainties surrounding variable feedstock composition and process parameters. It was found that hematite content and conversion rate were the most sensitive variables, followed by electricity pricing. The iron powder product has an expected minimum selling price of ~ $1450/ton when operating on feeds with ~ 50 wt% Fe2O3, under processes with ~ 66 mol% conversion and ~ 70% Faradaic efficiency. The studied electricity sources had minimal impact on iron selling price, but renewable electricity sourcing significantly undercuts carbothermic process emissions. Because of the high cost and small scale relative to bulk iron manufacture, this process could find a niche in valorizing red mud to produce a high-quality iron powder for additive manufacturing or powder metallurgy industries in addition to reducing red mud causticity and promoting downstream purification of the outlet stream.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Renzulli P, Notarnicola B, Tassielli G, Arcese G, Di Capua R (2016) Life cycle assessment of steel produced in an italian integrated steel mill. Sustainability 8(8):719. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Winkler D, Bidló A, Bolodár-Varga B, Erdó Á, Adrienn H (2018) Long-term ecological effects of the red mud disaster in Hungary: regeneration of red mud flooded areas in a contaminated industrial region. Sci Total Environ 644:1292–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sadoway DR (1995) New opportunities for metals extraction and waste treatment by electrochemical processing in molten salts. J Mater Res 10(3):487–492. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1995.0487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramakgala C, Gwiranai D (2019) A review of ironmaking by direct reduction processes: quality requirements and sustainability. Procedia Manufacturing 35(2019):242–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.05.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Allanore A (2014) Features and challenges of molten oxide electrolytes for metal extraction. J Electrochem Soc 162(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang D, Gmitter AJ, Sadoway DR (2011) Production of oxygen gas and liquid metal by electrochemical decomposition of molten iron oxide. J Electrochem Soc 158(6):E51. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3560477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Allanore A, Yin L, Sadoway DR (2013) A new anode material for oxygen evolution in molten oxide electrolysis. Nature 497(7449):353–356. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim H, Paramore JD, Allanore A, Sadoway DR (2020) Stability of iridium anode in molten oxide electrolysis for ironmaking: influence of slag basicity. In: Proceedings of the 218th ECS Meeting, 2010. Las Vegas, pp 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3484779

  9. Wang Q, Zhu Y, Wu Q, Gratz E, Wang Y (2015) Low temperature electrolysis for iron production via conductive colloidal electrode. RSC Adv 5(8):5501–5507. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA14576C

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Allanore A, Lavelaine H, Valentin G, Birat JP, Lapicque F (2008) Iron metal production by bulk electrolysis of iron ore particles in aqueous media. J Electrochem Soc 155(9):E125. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2952547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maihatchi A, Pons M-N, Ricoux Q, Goettmann F, Lapique F (2020) Electrolytic iron production from alkaline suspensions of solid oxides: compared cases of hematite, iron ore and iron-rich Bayer process residues. J Electrochem Sci Eng 10:95. https://doi.org/10.5599/jese.751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sevasti Koutsoupa SK, Bourbos E, Balomenos E, Panias D (2021) Electrolytic iron production from alkaline bauxite residue slurries at low temperatures. Johnson Matthey Technol Rev 65(3):366–364. https://doi.org/10.1595/205651320X15918757312944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Home | Siderwin. https://www.siderwin-spire.eu/

  14. Fischedick M, Marzinkowski J, Winzer P, Weigel M (2014) Techno-economic evaluation of innovative steel production technologies. J Clean Prod 84:563–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalamaras CM, Efstathiou AM (2013) Hydrogen production technologies: current state and future developments. Conf Papers Energy 2013:690627. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/690627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. HYBRIT Fossil-Free Steel (2018) SSAB, LKAB and Vattenfall

  17. Mendicino L, Menniti D, Pinnarelli A, Sorrentino N (2019) Corporate power purchase agreement: formulation of the related levelized cost of energy and its application to a real life case study. Appl Energy 253:113577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Climate Neutral Research Campuses—Power Purchase Agreements. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://www.nrel.gov/climate-neutral/power-purchase-agreements.html

  19. Allanore A, Lavelaine H, Birat JP, Valentin G, Lapicque F (2010) Experimental investigation of cell design for the electrolysis of iron oxide suspensions in alkaline electrolyte. J Appl Electrochem 40(11):1957–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-010-0172-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Narasimhan KS (2001) Sintering of powder mixtures and the growth of ferrous powder metallurgy. Mater Chem Phys 67(1):56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(00)00420-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Simchi A (2004) The role of particle size on the laser sintering of iron powder. Metall Mater Trans B 35(5):937–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-004-0088-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khairul MA, Zanganeh J, Moghtaderi B (2019) The composition, recycling and utilisation of Bayer red mud. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:483–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giesen H, Hibbel J, Jansen W, Speth S Separation of carbon black by liquid hydrocarbons. US4107036A

  24. George Zheng Chen DF, Farthing T (2000) Direct electrochemical reduction of titanium dioxide to titanium in molten calcium chloride. Nature 407(6802):361–364. https://doi.org/10.1038/35030069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Den Hond R, Hiralil I, Rijkeboer A (2007) Alumina yield in the Bayer process: past, present, and prospects.In Donaldson D, Raahauge B.E. (eds) Essential readings in light metals. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48176-0_73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chase MW (1998) NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data Monograph 9

  27. Ma L-C, Castro-Dominguez B, Ma YH, Kazantzis N (2015) Integration of membrane technology into hydrogen production plants with CO2 capture: An economic performance assessment study. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 42:424–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.08.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma L-C, Castro-Dominguez B, Kazantzis NK, Ma YH (2016) A cost assessment study for a large-scale water gas shift catalytic membrane reactor module in the presence of uncertainty. Sep Purif Technol 166:205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.04.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Peters M, Timmerhaus K, West R (2002) Plant design and economics for chemical engineers, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu Y, Snowden-Swan LJ, Hallen RT, Hart TR, Bearden MD, Liu J, Seiple TE, Albrecht KO, Jones SB, Fox SP, Schmidt AJ, Maupin GD, Billing JM, Elliott DC (2017) Conceptual biorefinery design and research targeted for 2022: hydrothermal liquefaction processing of wet waste to fuels. Pacif Northwest Natl Lab 27186:89. https://doi.org/10.2172/1415710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Organic Chemical Process Industry (1983) Carbon black. United States Environmental Protection Agency

  32. Australia’s Energy Production, Consumption and Exports. Geoscience Australia. https://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/energy/basics

  33. Australia Renewables. Australian Government Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. https://www.energy.gov.au/data/renewables

  34. Kopsakangas-Savolainen M, Mattinen M, Manninen K, Nissinen A (2017) Hourly-based greenhouse gas emissions of electricity—cases demonstrating possibilities for households and companies to decrease their emissions. J Clean Prod 153:384–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Batan L, Graff G, Bradley T (2016) Techno-economic and Monte Carlo probabilistic analysis of microalgae biofuel production system. Biores Technol 219:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang Y, Wang Y, Yang SH (2008) Design of a networked control system with random transmission delay and uncertain process parameters. Int J Syst Sci 39(11):1065–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207720802085286

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Prof. Nikolaos Kazantzis for assistance with Monte Carlo cost modeling methodology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam C. Powell IV.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

The contributing editor for this article was Christina Meskers.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 644 kb)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 1994 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahabuddin, M., Powell, A.C. & Wang, Y. Preliminary Economic Analysis of Red Mud Valorization via Colloidal Aqueous Electrolytic Reduction in a Modern Electricity Infrastructure. J. Sustain. Metall. 8, 900–912 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-022-00537-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-022-00537-5

Keywords

Navigation