Elsevier

Crop Protection

Volume 159, September 2022, 106020
Crop Protection

Impact of fungicide application to control T-2 and HT-2 toxin contamination and related Fusarium sporotrichioides and F. langsethiae producing species in durum wheat

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2022.106020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • In field efficacy of azole fungicides on Fusarium langsethiae/F. sporotrichioides.

  • T-2 and HT-2 toxins 70–80% reduced after fungicide application.

  • With artificial infection, prothioconazole was the most effective among azoles.

  • Azoxystrobin was the less effective in containing infections.

  • At high concentrations of both species on wheat, F. sporotrichioides is favored.

Abstract

Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is the main devastating disease of wheat worldwide. Most of the studies are addressed to control the main fungal agent F. graminearum. However, the FHB species composition is wider and influenced by meteorological and agronomic factors, depending on geographical region and, more recently, subjected to the ongoing climate change. Many strategies to control FHB agents in field conditions have been studied. Among these strategies, the fungicide application proved to be among one of the most effective. To date, very poor investigations were carried out to evaluate the effects of fungicides in wheat against F. sporotrichioides and F. langsethiae, the species associated to FHB that produce type A trichothecenes, such as T-2 and HT-2 toxins.

The effectiveness of the triazoles, prothioconazole and metconazole, and the strobirulin azoxystrobin, alone and in combination with tebuconazole, was tested in three field trials, two locations and in two growing seasons, in Italy, against F. sporotrichioides and F. langsethiae species, to evaluate their impact on the T-2 + HT-2 contamination in wheat. The trials were carried out by comparing the different fungicide effects, under natural infection and on artificially infected wheat plants.

FHB incidence and severity, significantly different between the two geographical locations, were effectively reduced by fungicide application. Similarly, F. sporotrichioides and the positively correlated T-2 and HT-2 amounts, were effectively reduced up to a range of 53–91% under natural infection and 30–70% under artificial infection, depending on the active ingredient. On the contrary, F. langsethiae was effectively reduced by fungicides only in natural conditions, while it appears to be insensitive to fungicide treatments under artificial infection trials. In addition, the artificial inoculation with this species failed to achieve high level of infection. Moreover, qPCR was proved to be among the needful methods to detect F. langsethiae, whose isolation failed by classic mycological method.

In this first study on fungicide effectiveness against F. sporotrichioides, F. langsethiae and T-2+HT-2 contamination in wheat plants in field trials, we have demonstrated that triazole compounds are able to mitigate the possible contamination of type A trichothecenes and their producing species. Among the tested fungicides, prothioconazole demonstrated to be the most effective against both fungal species and under all the experimental conditions. On the other hand, azoxystrobin showed to be less effective in presence of high fungal infection.

Introduction

Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is the most devastating disease of wheat crop worldwide, causing yield reduction and contamination of mycotoxins, secondary metabolites that cause adverse effects on humans and animals, often occurring as a result of Fusarium infections (Desjardins, 2006). Several Fusarium species and Michrodochium nivale are causal agents of FHB, with F. graminearum, F. culmorum, F. avenaceum, F. poae, F. sporotrichioides, F. equiseti, F. langsethiae, and F. tricinctum, the most reported Fusarium species associated with the disease (Parry et al., 1995; Bottalico and Perrone, 2002). The species composition of the FHB complex changes depending on the climatic and environmental conditions (Wegulo et al., 2015). Thus, the predominance and frequency of individual Fusarium species can vary in different geographical areas (Xu et al., 2005). Usually, F. culmorum and F. avenaceum are more frequent in cool and wet conditions, F. graminearum dominates in temperate areas with humid climatic environment, F. poae is more associated with warmer and drier conditions (Doohan et al., 2003; Xu et al., 2008).

A correct identification is extremely important since Fusarium genus includes many species that produce a wide range of mycotoxins, and each species has its own mycotoxin profile. Indeed, F. avenaceum and F. culmorum are significant or even dominant Fusarium species in cereal grains in most parts of Northern Europe (Levitin, 2004; Kosiak et al., 2003; Yli-Mattila et al., 2008; Nielsen et al., 2011); F. sporotrichiodes has been reported in prevalence in Eastern and Northern Europe (Gagkaeva et al., 2019); F. graminearum is the most important Fusarium species in Central Europe (Xu et al., 2005; Gagkaeva and Yli-Mattila, 2004; Yli-Mattila, 2010). However, changes in climate are leading to dramatically influence the species composition in Europe. Thus, in recent years, F. graminearum has been spreading to the North of Europe and it has been replacing F. culmorum (Waalwijk et al., 2003; Fredlund et al., 2010; Yli-Mattila et al., 2013). In addition, in recent years, also an increase of the occurrence of F. poae among the species associated to FHB has been observed (Klix et al., 2008; Xu et al., 2008). Other species of minor frequency in the FHB complex, such as F. sporotrichioides, F. crookwellense, F. equiseti, F. tricinctum and F. langsethiae, can play a significant role when weather conditions are not favorable for the growth of the main species (Mielniczuk and Skwaryło-Bednarz, 2020). Although the presence of the main FHB agents has occurred often in Italy, in the last two decades a continuous increase of F. poae has been recorded (Shah et al., 2005; Pancaldi et al., 2010). However, in the past, the presence of F. poae was overestimated because it included F. langsethiae, whose spore morphology is indistinguishable (Torp and Nirenberg, 2004; Yli-Mattila et al., 2004; Knutsen et al., 2004). The distinction between these two species is important, since F. langsethiae produces T-2 and HT-2, the most harmful Fusarium mycotoxins, while F. poae does not (Proctor et al., 2009; Witte et al., 2021). Moreover, F. langsethiae infections on plants are mostly symptomless, which make them difficult to detect. Another T-2 and HT-2 producing species, F. sporotrichioides, is morphologically also very closely related to F. poae and F. langsethiae, and often co-occurs in the wheat grains. Although the isolation of F. langsethiae and F. sporotrichioides from grains has been demonstrated to be difficult (Imathiu et al., 2013a; Gavrilova et al., 2017; Edwards et al., 2012), causing underestimation of both species, their increase has been observed in recent years in Italy (Infantino et al., 2015; Morcia et al., 2016; Beccari et al., 2020; Haidukowski et al., submitted). In particular, in Italy, differences in species compositions among geographical areas were assessed and FHB infections were reported to increase from Southern to Northern Italy, with significant link to the amount of precipitations during wheat anthesis (Pancaldi et al., 2010; Covarelli et al., 2015).

Durum wheat, that is more susceptible to FHB than common wheat, is widely cultivated in Italy. Thus, the risk of mycotoxin accumulation in kernels is of particular concern when this crop is cultivated in geographic areas where the environmental conditions lead to the disease, such as Northern and Central regions (Xu et al., 2008). To date, F. sporotrichioides and F. lagsethiae have been poorly investigated, and only few studies were focused on their occurrence and ecology.

Both species are the main producers of T-2 and HT-2 toxins, two type A trichothecenes very harmful for human and animal health, and the most toxic among trichothecenes, since they inhibit DNA, RNA and protein synthesis and induce DNA fragmentation, causing acute or chronic intoxication of humans and animals. The European Commission adopted Recommendation for these mycotoxins, with the indicative level of 100 μg/kg for the sum of T-2 and HT-2 in unprocessed durum wheat (Commission Recommendation, 2013/165/EU). However, no legislative limits are established, although they are currently under consideration.

Under field conditions, together with environmental conditions, the spreading of species involved in FHB and their ability to produce mycotoxins, is influenced by many agronomic factors, such as tillage, cultivar selection, and use of fungicides.

Since information on F. sporotrichioides and F. langsethiae with respect to their epidemiology, environmental requirements for infection and toxin production, and influence of agronomic factors, are poor, compared those on F. graminearum, the strategies for their control management have not been assessed yet.

Kokkonen et al. (2012) and Nazari et al. (2019) studied the interaction of Fusarium species producing trichothecenes type A with temperature and humidity requirements in vitro and in vivo, respectively. Moreover, Nazari et al. (2019) investigated the relationship between plant growth stage, time of infection and the colonization and mycotoxin production of F. sporotrichioides, F. langsethiae and F. poae. Although weather conditions at flowering is well known as one of the most important factors for infection of FHB species (Parry et al., 1995; Edwards and Jennings, 2018), including F. sporotrichioides, the same finding was not evident for F. langsethiae (Nazari et al., 2019). The different behaviour of these fungal species, arise the need of more information about for control strategies, including fungicide application. Indeed, although preventive agronomic factors, as crop rotation, soil tillage and use of resistant varieties are important strategies to minimize the fungal and mycotoxin contamination in the field, in climatic conditions favorable to fungal infection (Blandino et al., 2012), these measures could be integrated by a direct control through fungicide application to increase the efficacy of the control (Mesterházy et al., 2003). In particular, fungicide application at flowering is the most effective practice in temperate areas (Ransom and McMullen, 2008). However, the selection of the optimal timing of the application is crucial (Wegulo et al., 2015).

Fungicide application against FHB agents has been focused mostly on F. graminearum and deoxynivalenol (DON) reduction. The most effective fungicides used in controlling FHB are demethylation inhibitors (DMIs). Azole fungicides, such as tebuconazole, metconazole and prothioconazole, have proven to provide the most effective control of FHB infections and DON contamination in wheat (Paul et al., 2008), although none of them is sufficient alone (Dweba et al., 2017). Tebuconazole and prothioconazole applied at anthesis reduced FHB severity and DON content up to 90% in field trials (Haidukowski et al., 2005, 2012; Paul et al., 2008). However, these fungicides induce resistance in Fusarium, due to repeated applications (Paul et al., 2018). Therefore, mixtures with different other fungicides have been suggested, according with the integrated pest management (IPM) strategies.

On the other hand, triazole efficacy against the Fusarium species producing T-2 and HT-2, F. langsethiae and F. sporotrichiodes, was poorly, if ever, investigated.

The aim of this study was to assess for the first time the efficacy of triazole fungicides, also in combination with a strobirulin fungicide, on durum wheat, against F. sporotrichiodes and F. langsethiae species and related T-2 and HT-2 contamination on wheat, under both naturally and artificially-infected field conditions. In particular, four different fungicides, containing prothioconazole, metconazole, azoxystrobin and a mixture of azoxystrobin and tebuconazole, were tested on durum wheat grown in three fields experiments in Italy, and in two different growing seasons.

Section snippets

Field experimental design, inoculum preparation and wheat samples

The effect of fungicide application on T-2+HT-2 contamination in durum wheat kernels was studied in 3 field experiments carried out in Italy.

Experiments were carried out in the 2011–12 and 2012-13 growing seasons at Budrio (44° 32′ N, 11° 32′ E; altitude 25 m), in Emilia Romagna region, and 2012-13 growing season at Rome (41°58′N, 12° 28′ E; altitude 20 m), in Lazio region.

In each growing season, 4 fungicide treatments applied at the manufacturer's recommended field rates at heading [growth

Meteorological data

The three growing seasons were subject to different meteorological trends, as far as both rainfall and temperature (expressed as growing degree days, GDDs) from the end of tillering to the harvest are concerned (Table 3). The experiment carried out at Budrio in 2012, resulted in the highest temperature and lowest rainfall, in particular during the ripening (June). In 2013, Rome had higher temperature and lower rainfall than Budrio.

FHB symptoms

As shown in Table 4, FHB incidence and severity observed in

Discussion

Most of the studies on FHB control through fungicides are focused on the main causal agents F. graminearum and F. culmorum and on reduction of the related mycotoxins DON and ZEA.

In previous field research, the efficacy of DMI fungicides, such as metconazole, prothioconazole, tebuconazole, was successfully tested against DON content also (Pirgozliev et al., 2002; Blandino et al., 2006; Avozani et al., 2014), although the use of QoI fungicide, such as azoxystrobin, could result in an increase of

Conclusion

In our study, for the first time, the effects of prothioconazole, metconazole, azoxystrobin, alone and combined with tebuconazole, on F. langsethiae and F. sporotrichioides and on T-2 and HT-2 contamination, were tested on wheat, in field conditions. The mycotoxin content was always reduced after fungicide application, with all the tested molecules, in both natural and artificial infections. However, while in the natural infections the mycotoxin reduction was about 70–80% after the application

Author contributions

Stefania Somma: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft; Valentina Scarpino: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing - review & editing; Fabrizio Quaranta: Formal analysis, Investigation; Antonio F. Logrieco: Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision; Amedeo Reyneri: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision; Massimo Blandino: Conceptualization, Investigation, Data curation, Funding

Funding

This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Forestry (MiPAAF), as a part of the MICOPRINCEM interregional project.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:

Massimo Blandino reports financial support was provided by Ministry of Agriculture Forest Food and Tourism.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Francesca Vanara (Università di Torino), Gianpiero Alvisi, Claudio Cristiani and Davide Ponti for their precious help and cooperation in the laboratory facilities and field work.

The research was conducted with the financial support of the Italian Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Forestry (MiPAAF), as a part of the MICOPRINCEM interregional project.

References (77)

  • M. Torp et al.

    Fusarium langsethiae sp. nov. on cereals in Europe

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2004)
  • S.N. Wegulo et al.

    Management of Fusarium head blight of wheat and barley

    Crop Protect.

    (2015)
  • K. Audenaert et al.

    Impact of fungicide timing on the composition of the Fusarium head blight disease complex and the presence of deoxynivalenol (DON) in wheat

  • A. Avozani et al.

    In vitro sensitivity reduction of Fusarium graminearum to DMI and QoI fungicides

    Summa Phytopathol.

    (2014)
  • G. Beccari et al.

    Cultivation area affects the presence of fungal communities and secondary metabolites in Italian durum wheat grains

    Toxins 12(2)

    (2020)
  • T. Bertuzzi et al.

    Co-occurrence of type A and B trichothecenes and zearalenone in wheat grown in northern Italy over the years 2009–2011

    Food Addit. Contam. B

    (2014)
  • A. Bottalico et al.

    Toxigenic Fusarium species and mycotoxins associated with head blight in small-grain cereals in Europe

    Eur. J. Plant Pathol.

    (2002)
  • Y. Chen et al.

    Sexual recombination of carbendazim resistance in Fusarium graminearum under field conditions

    Pest Manag. Sci.

    (2009)
  • Commission Recommendation (Ec) 2013/165/Eu. Recommendations on the presence of T-2 and HT-2 toxin in cereals and cereal...
  • L. Covarelli et al.

    Fusarium species, chemotype characterisation and trichothecene contamination of durum and soft wheat in an area of central Italy

    J. Sci. Food Agric.

    (2015)
  • M.G. Cromey et al.

    Control of Fusarium head blight of wheat with fungicides

    Australas. Plant Pathol.

    (2001)
  • A.E. Desjardins

    Fusarium Mycotoxins: Chemistry, Genetics, and Biology

    (2006)
  • F.M. Doohan et al.

    Influence of climatic factors on Fusarium species pathogenic to cereals

    Eur. J. Plant Pathol.

    (2003)
  • S.G. Edwards et al.

    Impact of agronomic factors on Fusarium mycotoxins in harvested wheat

    Food Addit. Contam.

    (2018)
  • E. Fredlund et al.

    Real-time PCR detection of Fusarium species in Swedish oats and correlation to T-2 and HT-2 toxin content

    World Mycotoxin J.

    (2010)
  • T. Gagkaeva et al.

    Genetic diversity of Fusarium graminearum in Europe and asia

    Eur. J. Plant Pathol.

    (2004)
  • T. Gagkaeva et al.

    Analysis of toxigenic fusarium species associated with wheat grain from three regions of Russia: volga, Ural, and West Siberia

    Toxins

    (2019)
  • I. Gaurilcikiene et al.

    The effect of fungicides on rye and triticale grain contamination with Fusarium fungi and mycotoxins

    Zemdirbyste-Agricul.

    (2011)
  • O.P. Gavrilova et al.

    Identification and characterization of spontaneous auxotrophic mutants in Fusarium langsethiae

    Microorganisms

    (2017)
  • M. Haidukowski et al.

    Effect of fungicides on the development of Fusarium head blight, yield and deoxynivalenol accumulation in wheat inoculated under field conditions with Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium culmorum

    J. Sci. Food Agric.

    (2005)
  • M. Haidukowski et al.

    Effect of prothioconazole-based fungicides on Fusarium head blight, grain yield and deoxynivalenol accumulation in wheat under field conditions

    Phytopathol. Mediterr.

    (2012)
  • Haidukowski, M., Somma, S., Ghionna, V., Cimmarusti, M.T., Masiello, M., Logrieco, A.F., Moretti, A. Deoxynivalenol and...
  • I.S. Hofgaard et al.

    Associations between Fusarium species and mycotoxins in oats and spring wheat from farmers' fields in Norway over a six-year period

    World Mycotoxin J.

    (2016)
  • D. Hrubošová-Hrmová et al.

    Effect of selected fungicides on Fusarium growth and toxins production

    Czech J. Food Sci.

    (2011)
  • S.M. Imathiu et al.

    Fusarium langsethiae—a HT-2 and T-2 toxins producer that needs more attention

    J. Phytopathol.

    (2013)
  • S.M. Imathiu et al.

    A survey investigating the infection of Fusarium langsethiae and production of HT‐2 and T‐2 mycotoxins in UK oat fields

    J. Phytopathol.

    (2013)
  • S.M. Imathiu et al.

    Agronomic practices influence the infection of an oats cultivar with Fusarium langsethiae

    Acta Phytopathol. Hun.

    (2017)
  • A. Infantino et al.

    Occurrence of Fusarium langsethiae strains isolated from durum wheat in Italy

    J. Phytopathol.

    (2015)
  • View full text