Does a Payment-for-Outcomes Model Improve Indigenous Wellbeing? Commissioning Agencies and Social Impact Bonds in New Zealand

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2020.11.4.8195

Keywords:

New Zealand, Indigenous Peoples, social impact bonds, commissioning agencies, payment-for-outcomes

Abstract

Commissioning agencies and social impact bonds are two examples of New Zealand’s shift towards payment-for-outcomes funding mechanisms over the last decade, as the government attempted to improve both policy innovation and social outcomes. This article highlights that although the commissioning agencies have been more successful than social impact bonds, neither has completely achieved these goals of innovation and improved outcomes. This is particularly concerning given Indigenous Māori are disproportionately impacted by both policies. Discussion concludes by highlighting some of the problems associated with applying a payment-for-outcomes model to Indigenous Peoples, given these funding mechanisms are becoming increasingly popular in other settler nation states.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-15

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2020)

Section

Policy

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Louise Humpage

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

In keeping with IIPJ's Open Access policy, IIPJ has a shared approach to copyright. A shared approach means that authors do not have to waive all of their rights to the work published in IIPJ. By submitting to IIPJ, the author(s) grant(s) IIPJ the right to:

  1. Copy edit the article,
  2. Display the article in perpetuity, and
  3. Enforce the conditions of the Creative Commons license associated with the article.

All articles published in IIPJ carry the Creative Commons Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivatives license (click here for the human-readable summary and here for the legal code).

This means that the article can be copied or redistributed without written permission from the author(s) or IIPJ if the following conditions are met:

  1. IIPJ is appropriately credited as the original source. The reference should include the article's DOI (Digital Object Identifier), which helps us track the dissemination of articles published in IIPJ.
  2. The article is not being used for a commercial purpose. Users must be able to access the reprinted or republished article without paying any fee.
  3. The article is not altered from its original form. This means it cannot be edited, transformed, remixed, or truncated in any way. This policy protects our authors from having their work or intent misrepresented.

Any reprints, republications, or distributions that do not meet all of these conditions must be approved in writing by the author(s) of the article and IIPJ.

IIPJ will not grant permission to any publisher that requires authors or IIPJ to waive any of their rights to the article.

Authors who wish to reprint, republish, or distribute their article published in IIPJ for any commercial purpose must obtain written permission from IIPJ and provide appropriate attribution.

IIPJ will consider accepting articles that have been previously published. However, authors submitting articles of this nature must:

  1. Indicate that the article was previously published,
  2. Provide details of all previous publications (that is, source, publication date, format, etc.),
  3. Describe how their IIPJ submission differs from the original publication, and
  4. Provide written permission to republish the article from the copyright holder(s) if applicable.