Abstract
Increasing privacy demands have led to the design and construction of new and diverse universities student residences across Northern America, that prioritize private spaces for students. This paper proposes the Housing Unit Classification (HUC) using historical professional standards (ACUHO-I) to generate a nuanced unit typology of student housing. The refined typology permits engagement with additional variables of agent control, including density of usage (i.e., density) and governance (i.e., territoriality), in addition to unit facilities (i.e., bathroom, kitchen, lounge). The HUC is complemented by the analytical tool Hierarchy of Isolation and Privacy in Architecture Tool (HIPAT), together classifying levels of privacy in built space through a visual matrix. HUC allows spatial analysis of how agents acting on built space can create different feelings associated with privacy, crowding, isolation, and socialization in university housing and enables further multidisciplinary study of housing challenges using common terminology and systematic methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Homoud, M., & Abu-Obeid, N. (2003). University outdoor spatial layout effect on perception of students’ interaction and group seclusion. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 20(3), 221–233.
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
Altman, I., & Chemers, M. M. (1993). Culture and environment. Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, B. (2018). The investment outlook for student housing remains stable. National Real Estate Investor; Atlanta. Sep 11, 2018, 1.
Association of College and University Housing Officers – International. (2020). Knowledge resources, Research and data, Partner research. Retrieved from https://www.acuho-i.org/knowledge-resources/research-and-data/partner-research/construction-survey?portalid=0
Baum, A., Harpin, R. E., & Valins, S. (1975). The role of group phenomena in the experience of crowding. Environment and Behavior, 7, 185–198.
Balogh, C., Grimm, J., & Hardy, K. (2005). ACUHO-I construction and renovation data: The latest trends in housing construction and renovation. Journal of College & University Student Housing, 33(2), 51–56.
Balogh, C., Price, K., Day, J., & Moser, R. (2010). ACUHO-I construction and renovation data: The latest trends in housing construction and renovation. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 36(2), 82–91.
Bronkema, R., & Bowman, N. (2017). A residential paradox? Residence hall attributes and college student outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 58(4), 624–630.
Brown, J., Volk, F., & Spratto, E. M. (2019). The hidden structure: The influence of residence hall design on academic outcomes. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 56(3), 267–283.
Bowman, N. A. (2010). The development of psychological well-being among first-year college students. Journal of College Student Development, 51(2), 180–200.
Canada Dominion Bureau of Statistics. (1949). Eighth Census of Canada, Vol. IX: Housing. Ottawa, Ontario: King's Printer, 1949, xxxiii.
Case, F. D. (1981). Dormitory architecture influences: Patterns of student social relations over time. Environment and Behavior, 13(1), 23–41.
Chambliss, D. F., & Takacs, C. G. (2014). How college works. Harvard University Press.
Cheng, D. X. (2004). Students’ sense of campus community: What it means, and what to do about it. NASPA Journal, 41(2), 216.
Corbett, J. A. (1973). Are the suites the answer? Environment and Behavior, 5(4), 413.
Devlin, A., Donovan, S., Nicolov, A., Nold, O., & Zandan, G. (2008). Residence hall architecture and sense of community: Everything old is new again. Environment and Behavior, 40(4), 487–521.
Erb, N. M., Sinclair, M. S., & Braxton, J. M. (2015). Fostering a sense of community in residence halls: A role for housing and residential professionals in increasing college student persistence. Strategic Enrollment Mgmt Quarterly, 3, 84–108.
Evans, G. W., Lepore, S. J., & Schroeder, A. (1996). The role of interior design elements in human responses to crowding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 41–46.
Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 463–496.
Gieryn, T. F. (2002). What buildings do. Theory and Society, 31(1), 35–74.
Grant, W. (1974). Humanizing the residence hall environment. In D. DeCoster & T. Mable (Eds.), Student development and education in college residence halls (pp. 71–75). American College Personnel Assoc.
Heilweil, M. (1973). The influence of dormitory architecture on resident behavior. Environment and Behavior, 5(4), 377–412.
La Roche, C. R., Flanigan, M. A., & Copeland, P. K., Jr. (2010). Student housing: Trends, preferences and needs. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(10), 45–50.
Lauster, N., & Tester, F. (2010). Culture as a Problem in Linking Material Inequality to Health: On residential crowding in the arctic. Health and Place, 16, 523–530.
McCartney, S., & Rosenvasser, X. (2022). Privacy Territories in Student University Housing Design: Introduction of the Hierarchy of Isolation and Privacy in Architecture Tool (HIPAT). SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221089953
Moore, H. P., Carswell, A. T., Worthy, S., & Nielsen, R. (2019). Residential satisfaction among college students: Examining High-End amenity student housing. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 47(3), 260–275.
Mortgage, C., & Corporation, H. (1991). Core Housing Need in Canada. Ontario.
Rodger, S., & Johnson, A. W. (2005). The impact of residence design on freshman outcomes: Dormitories versus Suite-Style Residences. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 35(3), 83–99.
Schroeder, C. C., & Jackson, G. S. (1987). Creating conditions for student development in campus living environments. NASPA Journal, 25(1), 45–53.
Shook, N. J., Hopkins, P. D., & Koech, J. M. (2016). The effect of intergroup contact on secondary group attitudes and social dominance orientation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(3), 328–342.
Sotomayor, L., Tarhan, M. D., Vieta, M., McCartney, S., & Maas, A. (2022). When students are house-poor: Urban universities, student marginality, and the hidden curriculum of student housing. Cities, 124, 103572.
Terenzini, P. T., & Pascarella, E. (1984). Freshman attrition and the residential context. The Review of Higher Education, 7(2), 111–124.
Thomas, W. L. (1975). Housing Construction Survey. ACUHO News, Vol 14, Nº5, March 1975.
Valins, S., & Baum, A. (1973). Residential group size, social interaction, and crowding. Environment and Behavior, 5(4), 421–439.
Vinsel, A., Brown, B., Altman, I., & Foss, C. (1980). Privacy regulation, territorial displays, and effectiveness of individual functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1104–1115.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the University President’s of Toronto Metropolitan University, University of Toronto, OCAD University and York University; Office of the Dean, Faculty of Community Services at Toronto Metropolitan University; and Office of the Dean, Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science at Toronto Metroploitan University. The authors wish to acknowledge Thomas Gomez Ospina and Andrew Lee for their research assistance in summarizing articles and completing drawings for the development of the work. The authors wish to thank the greater StudentDwellTO (SDTO) team comprised of the Steering Committee, Advisory Committee and especially the core team members of Amy Campbell, Victoria McCrum, Dr. Luisa Sotomayor, Dr. Marcelo Vieta, Mauricio Quiros, and Jeremy Bowles for their commitment to the SDTO project. The authors with to thank the two anonymous reviewers who helped us to improve the manuscript with excellent comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCartney, S., Rosenvasser, X. New student residence unit typologies: introducing Housing Unit Classification (HUC), a framework for understanding student socialization. J Hous and the Built Environ 38, 443–465 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09950-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09950-4