Abstract
Existing criteria for optimal coke quality used in practice in batch formulation are reviewed. The chemical and petrographic parameters of the optimal batches are presented for various Russian coke plants and for the production of high-quality coke. It is found that the economic indices of blast-furnace operation—such as the coke consumption and productivity—depend more on the mechanical strength M10 of the coke than on M25. A cost–quality criterion is proposed for finding the optimal coke. In contrast to previous criteria, the cost–quality criterion is based on a model for M10, ignoring M25. That simplifies the calculations required to find the optimal batch.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
An optimality criterion is a target function whose global extremum is found under specific constraints [12].
Coke of high quality in terms of its strength is “coke produced from optimal batch without special preparation or special coking conditions and then wet-quenched, without any mechanical treatment” [13].
The petrographic parameters of the optimal batch at NTMK differ considerably from the others [4]. That may be attributed to the use of highly oxidized coal in the batch (for the batch, Πo = 1.152 and 1.215).
REFERENCES
Smirnov, A.N., Petukhov, V.N., and Alekseev, D.I., Classification of models for predicting coke quality (M25 and M10), Coke Chem., 2015, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 170–174.
Stankevich, A.S., Myuller, I.P., and Lel’chuk, V.I., Distribution of coals and compilation of coal charges for coking with coke quality forecast based on linear programming, Koks Khim., 1981, no. 11, pp. 4–8.
Stankevich, A.S., Chegodaeva, N.A., Vens, V.A., and Cheremiskina, A.N., Optimization of composition of charge for coking and prediction of coke quality according to chemical and petrographic parameters, Koks Khim., 1998, no. 9, pp. 11–17.
Stankevich, A.S., Kruglov, V.N., Vorsina, D.V., and Zolotukhin, Yu.A., A model of optimization of coke strength indicators based on chemical and petrographic parameters of coals and nonlinear programming, Koks Khim., 2000, no. 5, pp. 21–29.
Stankevich, A.S., Yablochkin, N.V., Kogtev, Yu.P., et al., Composition of charges for coking based on optimization and prediction of coke strength by chemical and petrographic parameters of coals, Koks Khim., 2002, no. 3, pp. 9–15.
Bazegskii, A.E., Ryabichenko, A.D., Khamidulin, F.Z., et al., A model for prediction of the qualitative characteristics of metallurgical coke based on chemical and petrographic indicators of coal charge and coking parameters, Koks Khim., 2002, no. 9, pp. 15–22.
Stankevich, A.S., Smelyanskii, A.Z., Berkutov, N.A., et al., Rational distribution of coals and optimization of charge materials for coking, Koks Khim., 2003, no. 9, pp. 8–16.
Stankevich, A.S., Gilyazetdinov, R.R., Popova, N.K., and Koshkarov, D.A., Predicting CSR and CRI of coke on the basis of the chemical and petrographic parameters of the coal batch and the coking conditions, Coke Chem., 2008, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 357–363.
Stankevich, A.S. and Bazegskiy, A.E., Optimizing coke production at OAO EVRAZ ZSMK on the basis of the available coal, Coke Chem., 2013, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 364–371.
North, L., Blackmore, K., Nesbitt, K., and Mahoney, M.R., Methods of coke quality prediction: a review, Fuel, 2018, vol. 219, pp. 426–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.090
North, L., Blackmore, K., Nesbitt, K., and Mahoney, M.R., Models of coke quality prediction and the relationships to input variables: a review, Fuel, 2018, vol. 219, pp. 446–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.062
Lyashenko, I.N., Karagodova, E.A., Chernikova, N.V., and Shor, N.Z., Lineinoe i nelineinoe programmirovanie (Linear and Nonlinear Programming), Kiev: Vishcha Shkola, 1975.
Kiselev, B.P. and Leushin, V.A., Resource base of Russia. 1. Retrospective, Koks Khim., 1999, no. 11, pp. 2–9.
Kiselev, B.P., Russian coking coal in 2008 and 2009, Coke Chem., 2009, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 507–514.
Gagarin, S.G., Coal fractionation by density for coking purposes, Coke Chem., 2010, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 333–338.
Stankevich, A.S., Stepanov, Yu.V., Gilyazetdinov, R.R., and Popova, N.K., Forecast of coke strength based on chemical and petrographic parameters of coal charges taking into account their pneumomechanical separation, Koks Khim., 2005, no. 12, pp. 14–21.
Stankevich, A.S. and Stankevich, V.S., Determining the coking properties and technological value of coal and coal mixtures, Coke Chem., 2012, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–9.
Stankevich, A.S. and Stankevich, V.S., Determining the value of coals used for coke production, Coke Chem., 2011, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 185–192.
Tovarovskii, I.G., Sovershenstvovanie i optimizatsiya parametrov domennogo protsessa (Improvement and Optimization of Parameters of Blast Furnace Processes), Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1987.
Stepanov, Yu.V., Abramicheva, A.I., Kolesnikova, R.Ya., et al., The relationship between the quality indicators of coke and blast-furnace smelting, Koks Khim., 1985, no. 7, p. 15.
Alekseev, D.I., Evaluation and control of the quality of blast-furnace coke based on the abrasion parameter, Cand. Sci. (Eng.) Dissertation, Magnitogorsk, 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Translated by B. Gilbert
About this article
Cite this article
Alekseev, D.I., Smirnov, A.N. & Stepanov, E.N. A New Criterion for Optimizing Coke Quality and Batch Parameters. Coke Chem. 64, 552–557 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X21120036
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X21120036