Skip to main content
Log in

A New Criterion for Optimizing Coke Quality and Batch Parameters

  • COKE
  • Published:
Coke and Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing criteria for optimal coke quality used in practice in batch formulation are reviewed. The chemical and petrographic parameters of the optimal batches are presented for various Russian coke plants and for the production of high-quality coke. It is found that the economic indices of blast-furnace operation—such as the coke consumption and productivity—depend more on the mechanical strength M10 of the coke than on M25. A cost–quality criterion is proposed for finding the optimal coke. In contrast to previous criteria, the cost–quality criterion is based on a model for M10, ignoring M25. That simplifies the calculations required to find the optimal batch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An optimality criterion is a target function whose global extremum is found under specific constraints [12].

  2. Coke of high quality in terms of its strength is “coke produced from optimal batch without special preparation or special coking conditions and then wet-quenched, without any mechanical treatment” [13].

  3. The petrographic parameters of the optimal batch at NTMK differ considerably from the others [4]. That may be attributed to the use of highly oxidized coal in the batch (for the batch, Πo = 1.152 and 1.215).

REFERENCES

  1. Smirnov, A.N., Petukhov, V.N., and Alekseev, D.I., Classification of models for predicting coke quality (M25 and M10), Coke Chem., 2015, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 170–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stankevich, A.S., Myuller, I.P., and Lel’chuk, V.I., Distribution of coals and compilation of coal charges for coking with coke quality forecast based on linear programming, Koks Khim., 1981, no. 11, pp. 4–8.

  3. Stankevich, A.S., Chegodaeva, N.A., Vens, V.A., and Cheremiskina, A.N., Optimization of composition of charge for coking and prediction of coke quality according to chemical and petrographic parameters, Koks Khim., 1998, no. 9, pp. 11–17.

  4. Stankevich, A.S., Kruglov, V.N., Vorsina, D.V., and Zolotukhin, Yu.A., A model of optimization of coke strength indicators based on chemical and petrographic parameters of coals and nonlinear programming, Koks Khim., 2000, no. 5, pp. 21–29.

  5. Stankevich, A.S., Yablochkin, N.V., Kogtev, Yu.P., et al., Composition of charges for coking based on optimization and prediction of coke strength by chemical and petrographic parameters of coals, Koks Khim., 2002, no. 3, pp. 9–15.

  6. Bazegskii, A.E., Ryabichenko, A.D., Khamidulin, F.Z., et al., A model for prediction of the qualitative characteristics of metallurgical coke based on chemical and petrographic indicators of coal charge and coking parameters, Koks Khim., 2002, no. 9, pp. 15–22.

  7. Stankevich, A.S., Smelyanskii, A.Z., Berkutov, N.A., et al., Rational distribution of coals and optimization of charge materials for coking, Koks Khim., 2003, no. 9, pp. 8–16.

  8. Stankevich, A.S., Gilyazetdinov, R.R., Popova, N.K., and Koshkarov, D.A., Predicting CSR and CRI of coke on the basis of the chemical and petrographic parameters of the coal batch and the coking conditions, Coke Chem., 2008, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 357–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stankevich, A.S. and Bazegskiy, A.E., Optimizing coke production at OAO EVRAZ ZSMK on the basis of the available coal, Coke Chem., 2013, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 364–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. North, L., Blackmore, K., Nesbitt, K., and Mahoney, M.R., Methods of coke quality prediction: a review, Fuel, 2018, vol. 219, pp. 426–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. North, L., Blackmore, K., Nesbitt, K., and Mahoney, M.R., Models of coke quality prediction and the relationships to input variables: a review, Fuel, 2018, vol. 219, pp. 446–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lyashenko, I.N., Karagodova, E.A., Chernikova, N.V., and Shor, N.Z., Lineinoe i nelineinoe programmirovanie (Linear and Nonlinear Programming), Kiev: Vishcha Shkola, 1975.

  13. Kiselev, B.P. and Leushin, V.A., Resource base of Russia. 1. Retrospective, Koks Khim., 1999, no. 11, pp. 2–9.

  14. Kiselev, B.P., Russian coking coal in 2008 and 2009, Coke Chem., 2009, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 507–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gagarin, S.G., Coal fractionation by density for coking purposes, Coke Chem., 2010, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stankevich, A.S., Stepanov, Yu.V., Gilyazetdinov, R.R., and Popova, N.K., Forecast of coke strength based on chemical and petrographic parameters of coal charges taking into account their pneumomechanical separation, Koks Khim., 2005, no. 12, pp. 14–21.

  17. Stankevich, A.S. and Stankevich, V.S., Determining the coking properties and technological value of coal and coal mixtures, Coke Chem., 2012, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stankevich, A.S. and Stankevich, V.S., Determining the value of coals used for coke production, Coke Chem., 2011, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tovarovskii, I.G., Sovershenstvovanie i optimizatsiya parametrov domennogo protsessa (Improvement and Optimization of Parameters of Blast Furnace Processes), Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1987.

  20. Stepanov, Yu.V., Abramicheva, A.I., Kolesnikova, R.Ya., et al., The relationship between the quality indicators of coke and blast-furnace smelting, Koks Khim., 1985, no. 7, p. 15.

  21. Alekseev, D.I., Evaluation and control of the quality of blast-furnace coke based on the abrasion parameter, Cand. Sci. (Eng.) Dissertation, Magnitogorsk, 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to D. I. Alekseev, A. N. Smirnov or E. N. Stepanov.

Additional information

Translated by B. Gilbert

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alekseev, D.I., Smirnov, A.N. & Stepanov, E.N. A New Criterion for Optimizing Coke Quality and Batch Parameters. Coke Chem. 64, 552–557 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X21120036

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X21120036

Keywords:

Navigation