Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relations Between Parental Attachment, Empathy, and Bystander Help-Seeking Preference Following Peer Aggression

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the complex relations between two known predictors of bystander decisions in bullying incidents—empathy and family contextual factors—and bystander help-seeking from two preferred choices (i.e., adults and peers). In particular, we examined the mediating role of cognitive and affective empathy on the relation between parental attachment and bystander help-seeking in 826 adolescents in the 6th and 9th grade (49.9% female) using four bullying/acts of aggression scenarios. Results indicated that affective, but not cognitive, empathy served as a partial mediator for the relationship in boys, suggesting that both empathy and the family context can play a role in bystander decisions to intervene. On the other hand, empathy did not serve as a mediator for girls, suggesting that girls do not need the added push of empathy in order to intervene in bullying situations. Results suggest emphasizing home-school collaboration for boys, in particular, in bullying prevention programs in order to maximize efforts of bystanders.

Highlights

  • For boys, parental attachment was directly related to both peer and adult help-seeking. Indirectly, parental attachment was related to adult help-seeking through affective empathy.

  • For girls, parental attachment was directly related to peer help-seeking, but not adult help-seeking. Parental attachment was also indirectly related to peer help-seeking through affective, but not cognitive empathy.

  • Developing socio-emotional competencies and skills, particularly affective empathy, familial interventions may provide students, especially boys, with the ability to engage in prosocial responses during bullying situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, N., & Cameron, L. (2014). What makes a young assertive bystander? The effect of intergroup contact, empathy, cultural openness, and in-group bias on assertive bystander intervention intentions. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M. S. (1979). Infant–mother attachment. American Psychologist, 34(10), 932–937. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barboza, G. E., Schiamberg, L. B., Oehmke, J., Korzeniewski, S. J., Post, L. A., & Heraux, C. G. (2009). Individual characteristics and the multiple contexts of adolescent bullying: An ecological perspective. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9271-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2011). Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(4), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410396746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2018). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: role of affective versus cognitive empathy in increasing prosocial cyberbystander behavior. Frontier Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00799.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: experiences by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchinal, M., Roberts, J. E., Zeisel, S. A., Hennon, E. A. & Hooper, S. (2006). Social risk and protective child, parenting, and child care factors in early elementary school years. Parenting: Science and Practice, 79–113. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327922par0601_4.

  • Carlo, G., McGinley, M., Hayes, R. C., & Martinez, M. M. (2011). Empathy as a mediator of the relations between parent and peer attachment and prosocial and physically aggressive behaviors in Mexican American college students. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407511431181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2007). Expectations and perceptions at school transitions: The role of peer status and aggression. Journal of School Psychology, 45(5), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings-Robeau, T. L., Lopez, F. G., & Rice, K. G. (2009). Attachment-related predictors of college students’ problems with interpersonal sensitivity and aggression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28(3), 364–391. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2009.28.3.364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSmet, A., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., Cardon, G., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2016). Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: A multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M., Fagundes, C. P., & Butterworth, M. R. (2012). Attachment style, vagal tone, and empathy during mother–adolescent interactions. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00762.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiBlasi, T., Shin, J. Y., & Dill, C. A. (2018). Bullying and discrimination experiences among Korean- American junior high school students. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 20(2), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.24913/rjap.20.2.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., & Koller, S. (2001). Brazilian adolescents’ prosocial moral judgement and behavior: Relations to sympathy, perspective taking, gender-role orientation, and demographic characteristics. Child Development, 72, 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L. (2014). Ecological theory: Preventing youth bullying, aggression, & victimization. Theory into Practice, 53, 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L. (2015). Emerging issues in school bullying research & prevention science. In E. T. Emmer & E. Sabornie (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 76–93). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., Hamm, J. V., Leung, M.-C., Lambert, K., & Gravelle, M. (2011). Early adolescent peer ecologies in rural communities: Bullying in schools that do and do not have a transition during the middle grades. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9684-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., Lösel, F., Ttofi, M. M., & Theodorakis, N. (2012). School bullying, depression and offending behavior later in life: An updated systematic review of longitudinal studies. Stockholm: Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, S. N. (2008). Parental style and child bullying and victimization experiences at school. Social Psychology of Education, 11, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-007-9048-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gönültaş, S., & Mulvey, K. L. (2019). Social-developmental perspective on intergroup attitudes towards immigrants and refugees in childhood and adolescence: A roadmap from theory to practice for an inclusive society. Human Development, 63(2), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gönültaş, S., Mulvey, K. L., Irdam, G., Irvin, M. J., Carlson, R. G., & DiStefano, C. (2020). The role of social-emotional factors in bystanders’ judgments and responses to initial peer aggression and retaliation in adolescence. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426619870492.

  • Grassetti, S. N., Hubbard, J. A., Smith, M. A., Bookhout, M. K., Swift, L. E., & Gawrysiak, M. J. (2018). Caregivers’ advice and children’s bystander behaviors during bullying incidents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 47(Suppl 1), S329–S340. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1295381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, M. K., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Polanin, J. R., Holland, K. M., Degue, S., Matjasko, J. L., Reid, G. (2015). Bullying and suicidal ideation and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 135(2). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1864.

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, L. N., & Nickerson, A. (2019). Bystander intervention in bullying: Role of social skills and gender. Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(2), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431617735652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambe, L. J., Della Cioppa, V., Hong, I. K., & Craig, W. M. (2019). Standing up to bullying: A social ecological review of peer defending in offline and online contexts. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.-T., Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Memmott-Elison, M. K. (2017). The role of parents and peers on adolescents’ prosocial behavior and substance use. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(7), 1053–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516665928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, L., Pearce, N., Waters, S., Barnes, A., Beatty, S., & Cross, D. (2017). Family involvement in a whole-school bullying intervention: Mothers’ and fathers’ communication and influence with children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(10), 2716–2727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0793-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M., & Gumpel, T. (2018). The interplay between bystanders’ intervention styles: An examination of the “bullying circle” approach. Journal of School Violence, 17(3), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2017.1368396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Bian, C., Chen, Y., Huang, J., Ma, Y., Tang, L., Yan, Q., Ye, X., Tang, J., & Yu, Y. (2015). Indirect aggression and parental attachment in early adolescence: Examining the role of perspective taking and empathetic concern. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Chen, P. Y., Chen, F.-L., & Wu, W.-C. (2015). Roles of fatalism and parental support in the relationship between bullying victimization and bystander behaviors. School Psychology International, 36(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034315569566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longmore, M. A., Manning, W. D., & Giordano, P. C. (2013). Parent-child relationships in adolescence. In M. A. Fine & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Handbook of family theories: a content-based approach. (pp. 28–50). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Menolascino, N., & Jenkins, L. N. (2018). Predicting bystander intervention among middle school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(2), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merrin, G. J., Espelage, D. L., & Hong, J. S. (2018). Applying the social-ecological framework to understand the associations of bullying perpetration among high school students: A multilevel analysis. Psychology of Violence, 8, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesurado, B., & Richaud, M. C. (2017). The relationship between parental variables, empathy and prosocial-flow with prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 18, 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9748-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, K. L., Gönültaş, S., Goff, E., Irdam, G., Carlson, R., DiStefano, C., & Irvin, M. J. (2019). School and family factors predicting adolescent cognition regarding bystander intervention in response to bullying and victim retaliation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(3), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0941-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, K. L., & Killen, M. (2016). Keeping quiet just wouldn’t be right: Children’s and adolescents’ evaluations of challenges to peer relational and physical aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0437-y.

  • Mulvey, K. L., Palmer, S. B., & Abrams, D. (2016). Race-based humor and peer group dynamics in adolescence: Bystander intervention and social exclusion. Child Development, 87, 1379–1391. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12600.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.16.2094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, A. B., Aloe, A. M., & Werth, J. M. (2015). The relation of empathy and defending in bullying: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Review, 44, 372–390. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-15-0035.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Princiotta, D. (2008). Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. Journal of School Psychology, 46(6), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi, R. P., & Ollendick, T. H. (2010). Is family expressiveness as reported by mothers and fathers related to children’s social anxiety symptoms? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9295-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: Long-term outcomes for the victims and an effective school-based intervention program. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: current perspectives (pp. 97–130). New York, NY: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2014). Parental socialization of prosocial behavior. In L. M. Padilla-Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: a multidimensional approach (pp. 131–155). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bulling prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouwelse, M., Bolman, C., Lodewijkx, H., & Spaa, M. (2011). Gender differences and social support: Mediators or moderators between peer victimization and depressive feelings? Psychology in the Schools, 48(8), 800–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Thornberg, R. (2017). Getting angry matters: Going beyond perspective taking and empathic concern to understand bystanders’ behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 61, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.09.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26(3), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robers, S., Zhang, A., Morgan, R. E., & Musu-Gillette, L. (2015). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2014 (NCES 2015-072/ NCJ 248036). Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, W., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 67, 449–470. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rock, P. F., & Baird, J. A. (2012). Tell the teacher or tell the bully off: Children’s strategy production for bystanders to bullying. Social Development, 21(2), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00627.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochester Youth Development, S., Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1991). Testing interactional theory: An examination of reciprocal causal relationships among family, school, and delinquency. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 82, 3–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1143788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: vol. 3. social, emotional, and personality development. 5th ed. (pp. 779–862). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. C., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132, 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, J. A., Borelli, J. L., & Smiley, P. A. (2015). Assessing parental empathy: A role for empathy in child attachment. Attachment & Human Development, 17(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2014.969749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teymoori, A., & Shahrazad, W. (2012). Relationship between mother, father, and peer attachment and empathy with moral authority. Ethics & Behavior, 22(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2012.638820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberg, R., & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trentini, C., Tambelli, R., Maiorani, S., & Lauriola, M. (2021). Gender differences in empathy during adolescence: does emotional self-awareness matter?. Psychological Reports, 33294120976631. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120976631.

  • Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (2008). Thought about actions in social domains: Morality, social conventions, and social interactions. Cognitive Development, 23, 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volk, A., Craig, W., Boyce, W., & King, M. (2006). Adolescent risk correlates of bullying and different types of victimization. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 18(4), 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vossen, H. G. M., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2017). The longitudinal relationship between media violence and empathy: Was it sympathy all along? Media Psychology, 20(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1121825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D., & Espelage, D. L. (2019). Cognitive/affective empathy, pro-bullying beliefs, and willingness to intervene on behalf of a bullied peer. Youth & Society, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X19858565.

  • Wentzel, K., Baker, S., & Russell, S. (2009). Peer relationships and positive adjustment at school. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: vol. 3. social, emotional, and personality development. 5th ed. (pp. 229–243). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M. L., Espelage, D. L., Valido, A., Hong, J. S., & Prescott, T. L. (2019). Perceptions of middle school youth about school bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 75, 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.10.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • You, S., Lee, J., Lee, Y., & Kim, A. Y. (2015). Bullying among korean adolescents: The role of empathy and attachment. Psychology in the Schools, 52(6), 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q., Eisenberg, N., Losoya, S. H., Fabes, R. A., Reiser, M., Guthrie, I. K., & Shepard, S. A. (2002). The relations of parental warmth and positive expressiveness to children’s empathy- related responding and social functioning: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 733, 893–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was supported by Award No. 2016-R2-CX-0056, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

    Jerica L. Knox, Secil Gönültaş & Kelly Lynn Mulvey

  2. Department of Pyschology, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey

    Secil Gönültaş

  3. Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

    Stephen M. Gibson

Authors
  1. Jerica L. Knox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Secil Gönültaş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephen M. Gibson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kelly Lynn Mulvey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerica L. Knox.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed with human participants were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of South Carolina and North Carolina State University with an inter-institutional agreement.

Informed Consent

All participants assented to participate. Parents provided passive informed consent for all participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knox, J.L., Gönültaş, S., Gibson, S.M. et al. Relations Between Parental Attachment, Empathy, and Bystander Help-Seeking Preference Following Peer Aggression. J Child Fam Stud 31, 2401–2411 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02312-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02312-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation