Abstract
Gradient coils are used to generate the spatially varying gradient magnetic fields used to phase- and frequency-modulate the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) signal and enable position encoding in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The continuous-current–density-based method of gradient coil design has been well developed in mathematical modeling, however, practical design as it relates to the experimental realization of simulated gradient coil designs and their ultimate performance has not been well studied. In this work, we design and build a planar gradient coil system, consisting of X, Y, and Z gradient coils, for use in a 6.5 mT ultra-low-field MRI (ULF MRI) system. Specifically, we designed each gradient coil using the equivalent magnetic dipole method (EMDM), and further studied its realization by analyzing gradient-coil geometric parameters, including size, gap, conductor pattern, and conductor density. The geometric parameters are varied during the design of an optimal gradient coil and then analyzed using finite-element-method (FEM) simulations to reveal the relationship between the geometric parameters and gradient coil performance. Based on EMDM and the geometric parameter analysis, we arrive at an optimal gradient coil system whose performance was evaluated by FEM simulation and magnetic field measurement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L.L. Wald, P.C. McDaniel, T. Witzel, J.P. Stockmann, C.Z. Cooley, Low-cost and portable MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 4(3), 31 (2019)
S. Geethanath, J.T. Vaughan, Accessible magnetic resonance imaging: A review. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 242, 190 (2019)
J.P. Marques, F.F.J. Simonis, A.G. Webb, Low-field MRI: An MR physics perspective. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 58, 1182 (2019)
K.N. Sheth et al., Assessment of brain injury using portable, low-field magnetic resonance imaging at the bedside of critically ill patients. JAMA Neurol. 78(1), 41–47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3263
M.H. Mazurek et al., Portable, bedside, low-field magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of intracerebral hemorrhage. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 5119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25441-6
D. Ma, V. Gulani, N. Seiberlich, K. Liu, J.L. Sunshine, J.L. Duerk, M.A. Griswold, Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature 495, 187–192 (2013)
B. Zhu, J.Z. Liu, S.F. Cauley, B.R. Rosen, M.S. Rosen, Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning. Nature 555(7697), 487–492 (2018)
N. Koonjoo, B. Zhu, G.C. Bagnall, D. Bhutto, M.S. Rosen, Boosting the signal-to-noise of low-field MRI with deep learning image reconstruction. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 8248 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87482-7
M. Sarracanie, C.D. LaPierre, N. Salameh, D.E.J. Waddington, T. Witzel, M.S. Rosen, Low-cost high-performance MRI. Sci. Rep. 5(1), 15177 (2015)
A.J. Mäkinen, K.C.J. Zevenhoven, R.J. Ilmoniemi, Automatic spatial calibration of ultra-low-field MRI for high-accuracy hybrid MEG–MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38(6), 1317–1327 (2019)
C.Z. Cooley, P.C. McDaniel, J.P. Stockmann et al., A portable scanner for magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 229–239 (2021)
R. Turner, Gradient coil design: A review of methods. Magn. Reson. Imaging 11(7), 903–920 (1993)
S.S. Hidalgo-Tobon, Theory of gradient coil design methods for magnetic resonance imaging. Concepts Magn. Reason. Part A 36A(4), 223–242 (2010)
F. Roméo, D.I. Hoult, Magnet field profiling: Analysis and correcting coil design. Magn. Reason. Med. 1, 44–65 (1984)
Golay MJE. Magnetic Field Control Apparatus. US Patent 3,515,979 (1957).
E.M. Purcell, Helmholtz coils revisited. Am. J. Phys. 57, 18–22 (1989)
T.A. Frenkiel, A. Jasinski, P.G. Morris, Apparatus for generation of magnetic field gradient waveforms for NMR imaging. J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum. 21, 374–377 (1988)
B.H. Suits, D.E. Wilken, Improving magnetic field gradient coils for NMR imaging. J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum. 22, 565–573 (1989)
R. Turner, A target field approach to optimal coil design. J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. 19(8), L147–L151 (1986)
R. Turner, Minimum inductance coils. J. Phys. E-Sci. Instrum. 21(10), 948–952 (1988)
J.W. Carlson, K.A. Derby, K.C. Hawryszko, M. Weideman, Design and evaluation of shielded gradient coils. Magn. Reason. Med. 26, 191–206 (1992)
S. Pissanetzky, Minimum energy MRI gradient coils of general geometry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 3(7), 667 (1992)
M. Poole, R. Bowtell, Novel gradient coils designed using a boundary element method. Concepts Magn. Reason. Part B Magn. Reason. Eng. 31B(3), 162–175 (2007)
D. Tomasi, Stream function optimization for gradient coil design. Magn. Reson. Med. 45(3), 505–512 (2001)
Y. Hu, X. Hu, L. Yan et al., Shim coil set for an open biplanar MRI system using an inverse boundary element method. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26(7), 4403905 (2016)
Z. Xu, X. Li, P. Guo et al., Equivalent magnetic dipole method used to design gradient coil for unilateral magnetic resonance imaging. Chin. Phys. B 027(005), 545–550 (2018)
F. Jia, Z. Liu, M. Zaitsev et al., Design multiple-layer gradient coils using least-squares finite element method. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 49(3), 523–535 (2014)
G. Shou, X. Ling, L. Feng et al., MRI coil design using boundary-element method with regularization technique: A numerical calculation study. IEEE Trans. Magn. 46(4), 1052–1059 (2010)
H.S. Lopez, F. Liu, M. Poole et al., Equivalent magnetization current method applied to the design of gradient coils for magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans. Magn. 45(2), 767–775 (2009)
D. Calvetti, E. Somersalo, Inverse problems: From regularization to Bayesian inference. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 10(3), e1427 (2018)
D. Krawczyk-Stando, M. Rudnicki, Regularization parameter selection in discrete ill-posed problems—The use of U-curve. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 17, 157–164 (2007)
A.N. Tikhonov, Solution of incorrectly formulated problem and the regularization method. Soviet Math. Dokl. 4, 1035–1038 (1963)
A.N. Tikhonov, Regularization of incorrectly posed problems. Soviet Math. Dokl. 4, 1624–1627 (1963)
Y. Wang, Q. Wang, H. Qu et al., Highly shielded gradient coil design for a superconducting planar MRI system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 67(8), 2328–2336 (2020)
W. Liu, Zu. Donglin, X. Tang, H. Guo, An optimized target-field method for MRI transverse biplanar gradient coil design. Meas. Sci. Technol. 22(12), 1863–1868 (2011)
Acknowledgements
We appreciate the help provided by Wei Zhang, Cai Wan, Qing Zhao, and Yuhang Yang in gradient coil winding and assembling. This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52077023), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing(cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0340), and Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (CJGJZD20200617102402006). Data will be made available on reasonable request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, S., Koonjoo, N., Kong, X. et al. Gradient Coil Design and Optimization for an Ultra-Low-Field MRI System. Appl Magn Reson 53, 895–914 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-022-01470-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-022-01470-2