Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surface soil organic carbon sequestration under post agricultural grasslands offset by net loss at depth

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Post agricultural grasslands are thought to accumulate soil organic carbon (SOC) after cultivation cessation. The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) in the U.S. is a wide-scale, covering approximately 8.9 Mha as of 2020, example of row-crop to grassland conversion. To date, changes in SOC stock in CRP lands have mostly been evaluated at local scales and focused on the surface 20–30 cm of the soil profile. Thus, we lack knowledge of SOC dynamics in CRP lands on a continental scale, especially in the subsurface soil, after agricultural cessation. The Rapid Carbon Assessment (RaCA) project is the most recent effort by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to systematically quantify C stock in the 0–100 cm soil profile across the conterminous US. Here we analyzed data from RaCA to evaluate the SOC stocks of both surface and subsurface soil of the CRP on a continental scale. We found there was no difference in SOC stock between croplands and CRP lands when comparing the 0–100 cm soil profiles, which indicates that the C sequestration in CRP lands is insignificant overall. We did find that CRP lands have higher SOC stocks in the surface soil (0–5 cm). However, such higher SOC levels in surface (0–5 cm) soil were offset by the lower SOC stock in the subsurface (30–100 cm) of the CRP. We also found that CRP lands in humid and warm regions may have net soil C sequestration because they have much more SOC in the surface as compared with croplands in the same regions. Whether the lower SOC in the subsurface of CRP lands is caused by legacy effects or is a result of C losses needs to be verified by long-term repeated sampling in both surface and subsurface soil. This analysis highlights the importance of examining C dynamics in subsurface soil after agricultural cessation to accurately measure and improve C sequestration rates in CRP lands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The original data from the RaCA project can be downloaded at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/survey/?cid=nrcs142p2_054164

Code availability

The R code for the data analysis is available upon request.

References

  • Alcantara V, Don A, Well R, Nieder R (2016) Deep ploughing increases agricultural soil organic matter stocks. Glob Chang Biol 22:2939–2956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angers DA, Eriksen-Hamel NS (2008) Full-inversion tillage and organic carbon distribution in soil profiles: a meta-analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:1370–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer SG, Kitchen DJ, Blair JM, Rice CW (2002) Changes in ecosystem structure and function along a chronosequence of restored grasslands. Ecol Appl 12:1688–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer SG, Meyer CK, Bach EM, Klopf RP, Six J (2010) Contrasting ecosystem recovery on two soil textures: implications for carbon mitigation and grassland conservation. Ecosphere 1

  • Bell S, Barriocanal C, Terrer C, Rosell-Melé A (2020) Management opportunities for soil carbon sequestration following agricultural land abandonment. Environ Sci Policy 108:104–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernal B, McKinley DC, Hungate BA, White PM, Mozdzer TJ, Megonigal JP (2016) Limits to soil carbon stability; Deep, ancient soil carbon decomposition stimulated by new labile organic inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 98:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billings SA, Ziegler SE (2008) Altered patterns of soil carbon substrate usage and heterotrophic respiration in a pine forest with elevated CO2 and N fertilization. Glob Chang Biol 14:1025–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blagodatskaya E, Khomyakov N, Myachina O, Bogomolova I, Blagodatsky S, Kuzyakov Y (2014) Microbial interactions affect sources of priming induced by cellulose. Soil Biol Biochem 74:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronson KF, Zobeck TM, Chua TT, Acosta-Martinez V, van Pelt RS, Booker JD (2004) Carbon and nitrogen pools of southern high plains cropland and grassland soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarholm M, Skyllberg U, Rosling A (2015) Organic acid induced release of nutrients from metal-stabilized soil organic matter – The unbutton model. Soil Biol Biochem 84:168–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conant RT, Paustian K, Elliott ET, Monton B, Kierland B (2001) Grassland management and conversion into grassland: effects on soil carbon. Ecol Appl 11:343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra FA, Bader NE, Johnson DW, Cheng W (2009) Does accelerated soil organic matter decomposition in the presence of plants increase plant N availability. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1080–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra FA, Zhu B, Cheng W (2021) Root effects on soil organic carbon: a double-edged sword. New Phytol 230:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas B, Martin MA, Ben B, Steve W (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake JE, Gallet-Budynek A, Hofmockel KS, Bernhardt ES, Billings SA, Jackson RB, Johnsen KS, Lichter J, McCarthy HR, McCormack ML (2011) Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2. Ecol Lett 14:349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuPont ST, Beniston J, Glover JD, Hodson A, Culman SW, Lal R, Ferris H (2014) Root traits and soil properties in harvested perennial grassland, annual wheat, and never-tilled annual wheat. Plant Soil 381:405–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fick SE, Hijmans RJ (2017) WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 37:4302–4315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry JA, Xian G, Jin S, Dewitz JA, Homer CG, Yang L, Barnes CA, Herold ND, Wickham JD (2011) Completion of the 2006 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. PE&RS Photogram Eng Remote Sens 77:858–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhart DL, Johnson HB, Mayeux H, Polley H (1994) The CRP increases soil organic carbon. J Soil Water Conserv 49:488–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand I, Zenone T, Jasrotia P, Chen J, Hamilton SK, Robertson GP (2011) Carbon debt of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grasslands converted to bioenergy production. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:13864–13869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Amundson R, Gong P, Yu Q (2006) Quantity and spatial variability of soil carbon in the conterminous United States. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:590–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108:389–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2000) The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10:423–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MB, Donnelly A (2004) Carbon sequestration in temperate grassland ecosystems and the influence of management, climate and elevated CO2. New Phytol 164:423–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern JS (1994) Spatial patterns of soil organic carbon in the contiguous United States. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:439–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knops JMH, Bradley KL (2009) Soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation and vertical distribution across a 74-year chronosequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:2096–2104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knops JMH, Tilman D (2000) Dynamics of soil nitrogen and carbon accumulation for 61 years after agricultural abandonment. Ecology 81:88–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucharik CJ (2007) Impact of prairie age and soil order on carbon and nitrogen sequestration. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:430–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Carbon emission from farm operations. Environ Int 30:981–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Fultz LM, Moore-Kucera J, Acosta-Martínez V, Horita J, Strauss R, Zak J, Calderón F, Weindorf D (2017) Soil carbon sequestration potential in semi-arid grasslands in the Conservation Reserve Program. Geoderma 294:80–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K, Lal R (2005) The depth distribution of soil organic carbon in relation to land use and management and the potential of carbon sequestration in subsoil horizons. Adv Agron 88:35–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Dijkstra FA, Wang P, Cheng W (2019) Roots of non-woody perennials accelerated long-term soil organic matter decomposition through biological and physical mechanisms. Soil Biol Biochem 134:42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Z, Wang E, Sun OJ (2010) Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:224–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann H, Wald A (1942) On the choice of the number of class intervals in the application of the chi square test. Ann Math Stat 13:306–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley ML, Lajtha K, Kramer MG, Bacon AR, Heine PR, Richter DD (2015) Surficial gains and subsoil losses of soil carbon and nitrogen during secondary forest development. Glob Chang Biol 21:986–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morefield PE, LeDuc SD, Clark CM, Iovanna R (2016) Grasslands, wetlands, and agriculture: the fate of land expiring from the Conservation Reserve Program in the Midwestern United States. Environ Res Lett 11(9):094005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munson SM, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC (2012) Soil carbon and nitrogen recovery on semiarid Conservation Reserve Program lands. J Arid Environ 79:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien SL, Jastrow JD, Grimley DA, Gonzalez-Meler MA (2010) Moisture and vegetation controls on decadal-scale accrual of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in restored grasslands. Glob Chang Biol 16:2573–2588

    Google Scholar 

  • Post WMM, Kwon KCC (2000) Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes and potential. Glob Chang Biol 6:317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2019) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Porter JP (1991) RUSLE: Revised universal soil loss equation. J Soil Water Conserv 46:30–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumpel C, Kögel-Knabner I (2011) Deep soil organic matter—a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle. Plant Soil 338:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell L (2019) Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means

  • Sequeira CH, Wills SA, Seybold CA, West LT (2014) Predicting soil bulk density for incomplete databases. Geoderma 213:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CR, Smith HA, Johnson JB, Clark RT (1994) Aggregate economic effects of CRP land returning to production. J Soil Water Conserv 49:473–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennekes M (2018) tmap: Thematic Maps in R. J Stat Softw 84:1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey JW (1949) Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5(2):99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2020) The Conservation Reserve Program: a 35-year history. USDA

  • Von Haden AC, Dornbush ME (2019) Depth distributions of belowground production, biomass and decomposition in restored tallgrass prairie. Pedosphere 29:457–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Tang C, Severi J, Butterly CR, Baldock JA (2016) Rhizosphere priming effect on soil organic carbon decomposition under plant species differing in soil acidification and root exudation. New Phytol 211:864–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertebach TM, Hölzel N, Kämpf I, Yurtaev A, Tupitsin S, Kiehl K, Kamp J, Kleinebecker T (2017) Soil carbon sequestration due to post-Soviet cropland abandonment: estimates from a large-scale soil organic carbon field inventory. Glob Chang Biol 23:3729–3741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesmeier M, Urbanski L, Hobley E, Lang B, von Lützow M, Marin-Spiotta E, van Wesemael B, Rabot E, Ließ M, Garcia-Franco N, Wollschläger U, Vogel H-J, Kögel-Knabner I (2019) Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils - A review of drivers and indicators at various scales. Geoderma 333:149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills S, Seybold C, Chiaretti J, Sequeira C, West L (2013) Quantifying tacit knowledge about soil organic carbon stocks using soil taxa and official soil series descriptions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:1711–1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills S, Loecke T, Sequeira C, Teachman G, Grunwald S, West LT (2014) Overview of the U.S. Rapid Carbon Assessment Project: Sampling Design, Initial Summary and Uncertainty Estimates, Soil Carbon, pp 95–104

  • Yang Y (2019) Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Abandoned Agricultural Lands. (Publication No. 27739474) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/openview/5edb0a6373be04c7d2522b29a10deeff/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was accomplished using the Special Funds from the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. We thank all the staff at USDA-NRCS Soil Science Division that were involved in the RaCA project, without whom this study would not have been possible. We thank Skye Wills for the leadership of the RaCA program. Dave Wedin, Chad Brassil, and Sheri Fritz made helpful comments that improved the manuscript greatly.

Funding

This study was supported by the Special Funds from the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. Data analyses were performed by YY and TL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YY and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terrance Loecke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Stephen D. Sebestyen

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2847 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Loecke, T. & Knops, J.M.H. Surface soil organic carbon sequestration under post agricultural grasslands offset by net loss at depth. Biogeochemistry 159, 303–313 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00929-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00929-5

Keywords

Navigation