Skip to main content
Log in

Female ornamentation does not predict aggression in a tropical songbird

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although conflict is often adaptive and necessary to secure limited resources, it is also frequently a costly endeavor. Signals that reliably communicate competitive ability are commonly employed by animals to reduce conflict costs. Both male and female signals have the capacity to serve as honest indicators of competitive ability, but the extent to which this occurs in females has received relatively limited attention. We studied how natural feather coloration and experimentally manipulated plumage ornamentation in female white-shouldered fairywrens (Malurus alboscapulatus moretoni) relates to their aggressive behavior. These fairywrens are a useful study system in that female, but not male coloration varies throughout New Guinea. We tested behavioral responses to simulated rivals both prior to and after plumage manipulation via two distinct behavioral assays: simulated territorial intrusions (where both sexes jointly respond to rival intruders) and mirror image simulation (where females are isolated from their mate). Plumage manipulation treatments had no measurable impact on female aggression during mirror image simulation tests, though aggression did decrease over the course of multiple assays. Similarly, using simulated territorial intrusion assays, we found no difference in female aggression with respect to both natural coloration and manipulation treatment. Finally, our correlative analysis of natural feather color also revealed no detectable relationship. These findings suggest that female white scapular coloration is unlikely to function as a signal of competitive ability in this tropical species with derived female ornamentation and we discuss possible alternative explanations.

Significance statement

Like their showy male counterparts, female animals may use plumage-based signals to mediate aggressive encounters. Determining if and how signals used in female-female competition may mitigate the costs of agonistic encounters is particularly important, as it is thought to be a key driver of female signal evolution. We used a repeated-measures design and two distinct behavioral assays to explore how both manipulated and natural feather coloration relate to aggression in female white-shouldered fairywrens of Papua New Guinea – a species with female, but not male, plumage polymorphisms. We were unable to detect any differences in aggression with respect to female plumage coloration despite two distinct behavioral assays that mimic distinct social contexts, suggesting that female plumage coloration may function in other contexts or lack a modern signaling function altogether in this system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and associated R scripts are available via Dryad: DOI:10.5061/dryad.6djh9w12k.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the locals of Podagha Village (Milne Bay Province, Papua New Guinea), without whom none of this research would have been possible. We are grateful for their hospitality and for their logistical and in-field support. We thank the Milne Bay provincial government for permits and permissions and the National Research Institute for their assistance in acquiring country-level research permits (#99902100765) and visas. Finally, we are grateful to Ian Ross Hoppe, Annelise Blanchette, Kevin McGraw, and two anonymous reviewers for their insights and comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (IOS-1354133) awarded to JK, the American Ornithological Society to JAJ and JB, the Animal Behaviour Society to JAJ, and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology of Tulane University to JAJ. Funders have had no influence on the content of the submitted manuscript, nor do they require approval for the final manuscript to be published.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Anthony Jones.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Our study was carried out in strict accordance with the guidelines established by the Tulane University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (#0395R2) as well as in adherence to research permits from the Conservation and Environment Protection Authority of Papua New Guinea (#99902100765). All birds were captured, processed, exposed to one (or two) mirror assays, and then released in under one hour. We continuously monitored our mist-nets and removed birds immediately upon hitting the net. All individuals involved in the removal of birds from mist-nets were trained in the appropriate way to handle birds prior to their handling. All manipulated birds recaptured had marker residue cleaned with rubbing alcohol and feathers plucked to induce healthy molting of a normal shoulder patch. Through routine monitoring of the birds throughout the season, we confirmed that the plumage manipulation did not have any lasting effects (i.e., shoulders were visibly naturally white again a few weeks after treatment).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by K. McGraw.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 5600 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, J.A., Boersma, J., Liu, J. et al. Female ornamentation does not predict aggression in a tropical songbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 76, 57 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03165-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03165-x

Keywords

Navigation