Parameter estimation with gravitational waves

Nelson Christensen and Renate Meyer
Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 025001 – Published 8 April 2022

Abstract

The new era of gravitational wave astronomy truly began on September 14, 2015, with the detection of GW150914, the sensational first direct observation of gravitational waves from the inspiral and merger of two black holes by the two Advanced LIGO detectors. In the subsequent first three observing runs of the LIGO-Virgo network, gravitational waves from 50 compact binary mergers have been announced, with more results to come. The events have mostly been produced by binary black holes, but two binary neutron star mergers have been observed thus far, as well as the mergers of two neutron star–black hole systems. Furthermore, gravitational waves emitted by core-collapse supernovae, pulsars, and the stochastic gravitational wave background are within the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA sensitivity band and are likely to be observed in future observation runs. Beyond signal detection, a major challenge has been the development of statistical and computational methodology for estimating the physical waveform parameters and quantifying their uncertainties in order to accurately characterize the emitting system. These methods depend on the sources of the gravitational waves and the gravitational waveform model that is used. This review examines the main waveform models and parameter estimation methods used to extract physical parameters from gravitational wave signals detected to date by LIGO and Virgo and from those expected to be observed in the future, which will include KAGRA, and how these methods interface with various aspects of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA science. Also presented are the statistical methods used by LIGO and Virgo to estimate detector noise, test general relativity, and draw conclusions about the rates of compact binary mergers in the Universe. Furthermore, a summary of major publicly available gravitational wave parameter estimation software packages is given.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
13 More
  • Received 21 May 2021
  • Corrected 19 April 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.025001

© 2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Gravitation, Cosmology & Astrophysics

Corrections

19 April 2022

Correction: Minus signs were missing in two exponents in the second full paragraph below Eq. (59) and have been inserted.

Authors & Affiliations

Nelson Christensen*

  • Artemis, Université Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Nice 06300, France

Renate Meyer

  • Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand

  • *nelson.christensen@oca.eu
  • renate.meyer@auckland.ac.nz

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 94, Iss. 2 — April - June 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Reviews of Modern Physics

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×