Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of studies in the field of social sustainability in housing: a systematic review

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social sustainability reflects the relationship between individuals and community. Also, it relates to the surrounding and built environment, such as architectural issues of context that affect people’s lives. The purpose of the current research is to systematically review studies on social sustainability in housing, in order to find the indicators that affect them. Eventually, the intent is to design a theoretical framework in this regard based on the literature. The data are extracted from 28 studies that met the inclusion criteria by searching through six databases (6016 records) with looking more closely at keywords related to housing, eliminating additional and duplicated sources plus reading abstracts in several stages. At this point, evaluators’ agreement on the studies is 85.71% based on the CASP checklist, and the kappa coefficient is 0.708. After the checklist stage, 17 studies are identified, coded for concepts, and categorized. The results show that social sustainability in housing can be presented in five general dimensions and ten factors with more detailed indicators. The dimensions that emerged with the indicators are as follows: (a) Functional dimension in two factors of services and facilities—social interaction, (b) Semantic-Perceptual dimension in two factors of imagination and meaning—social capital, (c) Physical dimension in two factors of residential unit scale—neighborhood unit scale, (d) Environmental dimension in two factors of urban health—natural surveillance, and lastly (e) Economic dimension in two factors of socioeconomic equality—affordability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abedi, S., Karimi Moshaver, M., & Madadi, A. (2014). Theoretical framework for measuring objective measures of environmental quality with emphasis on residential satisfaction theory and its feedback in designing sustainable residential complexes. Haft Hesar, 2(8), 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahari, Z., & Habibi, M. (1989). Affordable housing. Tehran: Building and housing research center ministry of housing and urban development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, T., & Thaheem, M. J. (2017). Developing a residential building-related social sustainability assessment framework and its implications for BIM. Sustainable Cities and Society, 28, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancell, S., & Thompson-Fawcett, M. (2008). The social sustainability of medium density housing: A conceptual model and Christchurch case study. Housing Studies, 23(3), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahraini, S. A., Izadi, M. S., & Mofidi, M. (2014). The approaches and policies of urban renewal from" urban reconstruction" to" sustainable urban regeneration. Motaleate Shahri, 3(9), 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balta, F. G. (2012). Considering low-and middle-income group projects of the Housing Development Administration (TOKİ) from a social sustainability perspective: the case of Temelli Blocks. Bilkent University.

  • Barron, L., & Gauntlett, E. (2002). Stage 1 report-model of social sustainability. In Housing and Sustainable Communities’ Indicators Project. Perth, Murdoch University, Western Australia.

  • Boshagh, M. R., Seydaei, S. E., & Jomeyni, M. A. (2012). Analytic on Housing Social Sustainability in Rural Regions (Case Study: Rural Regions of Azna Township). Regional Planning, 2(5), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braide Eriksson, A. (2016). Residential usability and social sustainability, Towards a paradigm shift within housing design? Chalmers University of Technology.

  • Bramley, G., & Power, S. (2009). Urban form and social sustainability: The role of density and housing type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(1), 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buys, L., Barnett, K. R., Miller, E., & Bailey, C. (2005). Smart housing and social sustainability: Learning from the residents of Queensland’s Research House. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 3(1), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • CASP. (2013). Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Systematic Review Checklist. In Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.

  • Chiu, R. L. H. (2002). Social equity in housing in the Hong Kong special administrative region: A social sustainability perspective. Sustainable Development, 10(3), 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, R. L. H. (2003). 12 Social sustainability, sustainable development and housing development. In Housing and social change: East-west perspectives (Vol. 221). Routledge.

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colantonio, A. (2007). Social sustainability: An exploratory analysis of its definition, assessment methods metrics and tools. Oxford: Oxford Brooks University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colantonio, A., Dixon, T., Ganser, R., Carpenter, J., & Ngombe, A. (2009). Measuring socially sustainable urban regeneration in Europe. Oxford: Oxford Brooks University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, A. J. (2017). Kappa and rater accuracy: Paradigms and parameters. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(6), 1019–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, S. (2013). Smart cities, analysis of a strategic plan. Bologna: University of Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • GhaffarianHoseini, A., Dahlan, N. D., Berardi, U., GhaffarianHoseini, A., & Makaremi, N. (2013). The essence of future smart houses: From embedding ICT to adapting to sustainability principles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghafourian, M., Afshin, M. V., & Norouzi, Z. Z. (2017). Recognition of The Components of Social Sustainability And Their Impact on Increasing Social Interactions in Housing (Case Study: Abazar Neighborhood, Tehran). Hoviateshahr, 11(30), 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė, I., Kamičaitytė-Virbašienė, J., & Narvydas, A. (2013). Challenges and Dimensions of Sustainability in Social Housing: General Consideration and the Case of Kaunas. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 1(2), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamiduddin, I. (2015). Social sustainability, residential design and demographic balance: Neighbourhood planning strategies in Freiburg, Germany. Town Planning Review, 86(1), 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemnejad, H., Faizi, M., & Reazaei, M. (2016). Iranian Association of architecture & urbanism. Iranian Association of Architecture & Urbanism, 6(9), 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, B., & Verbeeck, G. (2017). Towards a Framework for Architectural Design Enhancing Social Sustainability in Dense Housing Projects.

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 159–174.

  • Li, M. B., Tang, X. X., Fan, H., & Li, Z. K. (2013). Green building and social sustainability: Study on Mosuo Folk housing in China. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 368, 1164–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mafi, E., & Abdoulahzadeh, M. (2017). Assessment of Social sustainability in Mashhad Metropolis. Urban Ecology Researches, 8(15), 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manoochehri, J. (2016). Social sustainability and the housing problem. In Building Sustainable Futures (pp. 325–347). Springer.

  • Manoochehri, J. (2018). Social Sustainability, Housing and Alienation. In Smart Futures, Challenges of Urbanisation, and Social Sustainability (pp. 49–67). Springer.

  • Marsal-Llacuna, M.-L. (2016). City indicators on social sustainability as standardization technologies for smarter (citizen-centered) governance of cities. Social Indicators Research, 128(3), 1193–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messerli, P., Murniningtyas, E., Eloundou-Enyegue, P., Foli, E. G., Furman, E., Glassman, A., Hernández Licona, G., Kim, E. M., Lutz, W., & Moatti, J.-P. (2019). Global Sustainable Development Report 2019: The Future Is Now–Science for Achieving Sustainable Development. United Nations.

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 151(4), 264–269.

  • Polèse, M., Stren, R. E., & Stren, R. (2000). The social sustainability of cities: Diversity and the management of change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Razzaghi Asl, S., & Khoshghadam, F. (2017). Evaluation of the Factors Affecting Social Sustainability Improvements and Their Impact on the Renovation of Deteriorated Areas from Resident’s Viewpoint (Case Study: Shiva Neighborhood in Tehran). Motaleate Shahri, 6(22), 59–74. http://urbstudies.uok.ac.ir/article_47826.html

  • Rid, W., Lammers, J., & Zimmermann, S. (2017). Analysing sustainability certification systems in the German housing sector from a theory of social institutions. Ecological Indicators, 76, 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robison, R. A. V., & Jansson-Boyd, C. V. (2013). Perspectives on Sustainability: Exploring the Views of Tenants in Supported Social Housing. Sustainability, 5(12), 5249–5271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sajjadi Ghaem Maghami, P. A., Poordeihimi, S., & Zarghami, E. (2011). Principles of social sustainability in residential complexes, from the perspective of iranian experts. Soffeh, 20(51), 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson, B., Azar, C., Holmberg, J., Johansson, D., Morrison, G., Nässen, J., Åhman, M., Ahlbäck, A., Sterner, T., & Hydén, H. (2004). From Here to Sustainability–Is the Lisbon/Göteborg agenda delivering?

  • Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, E. (2016). Research methods in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Agah.

  • Severson, M., & de Vos, E. (2018). A measurement framework: Social sustainability in social and affordable housing. Calgary: University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi, M. R., & Keivani, R. (2017). Critical reflections on the theory and practice of social sustainability in the built environment–a meta-analysis. Local Environment, 22(12), 1526–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, P., Coates, R., & Maycock, B. (2012). Investigating marital relationship in infertility: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 13(2), 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrens, M. J. (2011). Cohen’s kappa is a weighted average. Statistical Methodology, 8(6), 473–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcraft, S. (2012). Social sustainability and new communities: Moving from concept to practice in the UK. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcraft, S., & Dixon, T. (2013). Creating strong communities–measuring social sustainability in new housing development. Town and Country Planning Association, 82(11), 473–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, L., Qiu, Q., & Gao, L. (2016). Chinese Housing reform and social sustainability: Evidence from post-reform home ownership. Sustainability, 8(10), 1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Z., Gadepalli, C., & Cheetham, B. M. G. (2017). Reformulation and generalisation of the cohen and fleiss kappas. LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences, 3(3), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T., Shen, G. Q., Shi, Q., Zheng, H. W., Wang, G., & Xu, K. (2017). Evaluating social sustainability of urban housing demolition in Shanghai, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghami, E. (2011). The Social Sustainability Principals of Residential Complexes in The Iranian-Islamic Cities. Journal of Studies on Iranian Islamic City, 2(1), 103–115. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=198639

  • Zou, H., Duan, X., Ye, L., & Wang, L. (2017). Locating sustainability issues: Identification of ecological vulnerability in Mainland China’s mega-regions. Sustainability, 9(7), 1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, 16846-13114, Tehran, Iran

    Amirali Alaie, Seyed-Abbas Yazdanfar & Seyed-Bagher Hosseini

  2. Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, 19839-69411, Tehran, Iran

    Saeid Norouzian-Maleki

Authors
  1. Amirali Alaie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seyed-Abbas Yazdanfar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saeid Norouzian-Maleki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seyed-Bagher Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed-Abbas Yazdanfar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alaie, A., Yazdanfar, SA., Norouzian-Maleki, S. et al. Evaluation of studies in the field of social sustainability in housing: a systematic review. J Hous and the Built Environ 37, 2179–2214 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09946-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09946-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation