Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of visitation of the Linnaeus’s two-toed sloth (Choloepus didactylus) at Amazonian mineral licks

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mineral licks are essential to many species of mammals and birds in the Amazon rainforest, including the Linnaeus’s two-toed sloth (Choloepus didactylus). While sloths have been recorded at mineral licks, visitation of the two-toed sloth at mineral licks has not been described in detail. We used camera traps to observe sloth visitation at 53 mineral lick sites and generalized linear mixed-effects model to evaluate patterns in visitation. We recorded a visitation rate of 29.39 visits per 100 camera nights, with a peak activity time of 22.00 h. Our model results suggest that sloth visitation at mineral licks may be related to differential habitat selection based in part on elevation, slope, and distance from rivers and streams. This study describes the largest dataset on sloth visitation at mineral licks to date, provides key natural history information on this cryptic mammal, and contributes to our understanding of the ecological importance of mineral licks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Availability of data

Upon acceptance of this manuscript, data will be uploaded into the publicly accessible data repository Dryad. The DOI of the data will be included in the final version of the manuscript.

References

  • Abrahams PW, Parsons JA (1996) Geophagy in the tropics: a literature review. Geogr J 162:63–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/3060216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton K (2009) Mu-MIn: multi-model inference. R Package Version 0.12.2/r18. http://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/mumin/

  • Blake JG, Guerra J, Mosquera D et al (2010) Use of mineral licks by white-bellied spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth) and red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) in eastern Ecuador. International Journal of Primatology 31:471–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake JG, Mosquera D, Guerra J et al (2011) Mineral licks as diversity hotspots in lowland forest of eastern Ecuador. Diversity 3:217–234. https://doi.org/10.3390/d3020217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake JG, Mosquera D, Salvador J (2013) Use of mineral licks by mammals and birds in hunted and non-hunted areas of Yasuní National Park, Ecuador. Animal Conservation 16:430–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brightsmith DJ (2004) Effects of weather on parrot geophagy in Tambopata, Peru. The Wilson Bulletin 116:134–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brightsmith DJ, Taylor J, Phillips TD (2008) The roles of soil characteristics and toxin adsorption in avian geophagy. BioTropica 40:766–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (2014) Why are there so many species in the tropics? J Biogeogr 41:8–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill-McFarland KA, Weimer PJ, Pauli JN et al (2016) Diet specialization selects for an unusual and simplified gut microbiota in two-and three-toed sloths. Environ Microbiol 18:1391–1402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S et al (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg JF (1989) Mammals of the neotropics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza Villar JC, Ronchail J, Guyot JL et al (2009) Spatio-temporal rainfall variability in the Amazon basin countries (Brazil, Peru, Bolivia, Colombia, and Ecuador). International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 29:1574–1594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore DP, Da Costa CP, Duarte DPF (2001) Sloth biology: an update on their physiological ecology, behavior and role as vectors of arthropods and arboviruses. Braz J Med Biol Res 34:9–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore MP, Vriesendorp C, Alverson WS et al (2010) Perú: Maijuna. Rapid biological and social inventories report 22. Chicago: The Field Museum

  • Gómez-Hoyos DA, González-Maya JF, Pacheco J et al (2017) Mineral-lick use by Choloepus hoffmanni (Pilosa: Megalonychidae) at Las Cruces Biological Station, Coto Brus, Costa Rica. Southwest Nat 62:278–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BM, Bowler M, Gilmore MP, Luther D (2020) Temporal patterns of visitation of birds and mammals at mineral licks in the Peruvian Amazon. Ecol Evol 10:14152–14164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BM, Gilmore MP, Bowler M (2020b) Predation of a Brazilian porcupine (Coendou prehensilis) by an ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) at a mineral lick in the Peruvian Amazon. Food Webs 24:e00148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fooweb.2020.e00148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayssen V (2011) Choloepus hoffmanni (Pilosa: Megalonychidae). Mammalian species 43:37–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heymann EW, Amasifuén CF, Tello NS et al (2011) Disgusting appetite: two-toed sloths feeding in human latrines. Mamm Biol 76:84–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2010.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kays R, Arbogast BS, Baker-Whatton M, et al (2020) An empirical evaluation of camera trap study design: how many, how long and when? Methods in ecology and evolution

  • Kreulen DA (1985) Lick use by large herbivores: a review of benefits and banes of soil consumption. Mammal Review 15:107–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1985.tb00391.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazaridis E (2014) Lunar: lunar phase & distance, seasons and other environmental factors (version 0.1-04).

  • Lee AT, Kumar S, Brightsmith DJ, Marsden SJ (2010) Parrot claylick distribution in South America: do patterns of “where” help answer the question “why”? Ecography 33:503–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link A, Galvis N, Fleming E, Di Fiore A (2011) Patterns of mineral lick visitation by spider monkeys and howler monkeys in Amazonia: are licks perceived as risky areas? Am J Primatol 73:386–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahaney WC, Milner MW, Sanmugadas K et al (1997) Analysis of geophagy soils in Kibale Forest, Uganda. Primates 38:159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marengo J (1998) Climatología de la zona de Iquitos, Perú. Geoecologia y desarrollo Amazonico: estudio integrado en la zona de Iquitos, Peru University of Turku Press, Turku, Finland 35–57

  • McNab BK (2002) The physiological ecology of vertebrates: a view from energetics. Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina E, León TE, Armenteras D (2014) Characteristics of natural salt licks located in the Colombian Amazon foothills. Environmental geochemistry and health 36:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-013-9523-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montenegro OL (2004) Natural licks as keystone resources for wildlife and people in Amazonia. University of Florida, Ph.D.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosquera D, Vinueza-Hidalgo G, Blake JG (2019) Patterns of mineral lick visitation by Linnaeus’s two-toed sloth Choloepus didactylus (Pilosa, Megalonychidae) in eastern Ecuador. Notas sobre mamiferos Sudamericanos 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31687/saremNMS.19.0.07

  • Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x

  • Panichev AM, Golokhvast KS, Gulkov AN, Chekryzhov IY (2013) Geophagy in animals and geology of kudurs (mineral licks): a review of Russian publications. Environ Geochem Health 35:133–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Ridout M, Linkie M (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 14:322–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunquist ME, Montgomery GG (1973) Activity patterns and rates of movement of two-toed and three-toed sloths (Choloepus hoffmanni and Bradypus infuscatus). J Mammal 54:946–954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taube E (1997) Translocation de deux especes sympatriques de paresseux (Bradypus tridactylus et Choloepus didactylus) lors de la mise en eau d’un barrage (Petit Saut, Guyane Francaise). PhD Thesis

  • Taube E, Vié J-C, Fournier P et al (1999) Distribution of two sympatric species of sloths (Choloepus didactylus and Bradypus tridactylus) along the Sinnamary River, French Guiana 1. BioTropica 31:686–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler MW, Carrillo-Percastegui SE, Pitman RL et al (2008) An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Anim Conserv 11:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00169.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler MW, Carrillo-Percastegui SE, Powell G (2009) Habitat use, activity patterns and use of mineral licks by five species of ungulate in south-eastern Peru. J Trop Ecol 25:261–270

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Maijuna people of Sucusari for their eagerness to collaborate. We would like to acknowledge Elizabeth Benson for providing assistance with the fieldwork portion of this project, Explorama Lodges for providing in-kind support, and OnePlanet, Inc. for providing funding and in-kind support. We would like to thank the Morpho Institute for providing in-kind support and organizing data analysts. We would like to thank the Fulbright Association for awarding a U.S. Student Grant to B.M.G. which funded the fieldwork for this research.

Funding

This study was funded by a Fulbright U.S. Student Grant awarded to Brian M. Griffiths.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Brian M. Griffiths, Hannah D. Stewart, and Erin Tighe. The first draft of the manuscript was written by all authors and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian M. Griffiths.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have seen and approved the final version of this manuscript and consent to publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1454 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stewart, H.D., Tighe, E. & Griffiths, B.M. Patterns of visitation of the Linnaeus’s two-toed sloth (Choloepus didactylus) at Amazonian mineral licks. Eur J Wildl Res 68, 25 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-022-01573-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-022-01573-y

Keywords

Navigation