Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Support Over Silence for KIDS: A Bystander Training Program to Address Public Child Maltreatment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Support Over Silence for KIDS is a training program that equips bystanders with confidence and skills to defuse challenging moments between caregivers and their children in public. The purpose of this study was to assess the satisfaction with and effectiveness of Support Over Silence for KIDS within three training settings: a community organization, university, and children’s hospital. Participants completed pre-program and follow-up assessments to capture demographic characteristics and change in behaviors, attitudes, self-efficacy, and perceived barriers related to bystander intervention. Participants completed an immediate post-program questionnaire to assess program satisfaction and post-program intentions. Univariate statistics were used to describe the demographic characteristics of the sample, bystander behaviors, and program satisfaction. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to assess change between pre-program and follow-up. Sixty-six adults participated in the training program. Favorable outcomes were demonstrated at post-program for satisfaction with the program, future bystander intentions, and self-efficacy for bystander intervention. At follow-up, participants reported more favorable attitudes toward bystander intervention and significantly increased self-efficacy for intervention despite acknowledged barriers. Participants reported increased bystander intervention; at follow-up, none of the participants reported avoiding a challenging moment between a caregiver and their child in public. Support Over Silence for KIDS was effective in promoting supportive bystander intervention with caregivers navigating challenging interactions with their children in public. A bystander training program may help community members, university students, and hospital personnel respond in a positive way to caregiver struggles and create an environment where caregivers and their children feel supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhia, A., Potter, S. J., Stapleton, J., Zuckerman, B., Phan, N., & Bair-Merritt, M. (2017). Encouraging bystanders to promote positive parenting and prevent child maltreatment in retail settings: Results of an exploratory qualitative study. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26(3), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2016.1264527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banyard, V. L., Plante, E. G., & Moynihan, M. M. (2003). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.10078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banyard, V. L., Plante, E. G., & Moynihan, M. M. (2005b). Bystander Efficacy Scale [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t42713-000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banyard, V.L., Plante, E. G., & Moynihan, M. M. (2005a). Rape Prevention Through Bystander Education: Final Report. US Department of Justice; Document no. 208701. http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/grants/208701.pdf.

  • Christy, C. A., & Voigt, H. (1994). Bystander responses to public episodes of child abuse. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(9), 824–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00614.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daro, D., & Dodge, K. A. (2009). Creating community responsibility for child protection: Possibilities and challenges. Future of Children, 19(2), 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daro, D., & Donnelly, A. C. (2002). Charting the waves of prevention: Two steps forward, one step back. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(6–7), 731–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faghri, P., & Buden, J. (2015). Health behavior knowledge and self-efficacy as predictors of body weight. Journal of nutritional disorders & therapy5(3).

  • Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I., Greitemeyer, T., Vogrincic, C., Kastenmuller, A., Frey, D., Heene, M., Wicher, M., & Kainbacher, M. (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. American Psychological Association, 137(4), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershoff, E. T., Font, S. A., Taylor, C. A., Garza, A. B., Olson-Dorff, D., & Foster, R. H. (2018). A short-term evaluation of a hospital no hit zone policy to increase bystander intervention in cases of parent-to-child violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.09.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jouriles, E. N., Krauss, A., Vu, N. L., Banyard, V. L., & McDonald, R. (2018). Bystander programs addressing sexual violence on college campuses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of program outcomes and delivery methods. Journal of American College Health, 66(6), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1431906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokaliari, E. D., Roy, A. W., & Taylor, J. (2019). African American perspectives on racial disparities in child removals. Child Abuse & Neglect, 90, 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, H. N., Ceballo, R., Chao, R., Hill, N. E., Murry, V. M., & Pinderhughes, E. E. (2008). Excavating culture: Disentangling ethnic differences from contextual influences in parenting. Applied Development Science, 12(4), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, S., Postmus, J. L., & Koenick, R. A. (2011). Engaging bystanders: A primary prevention approach to sexual violence on campus. Journal of College Student Development, 52, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minto, K., Hornsey, M. J., Gillespie, N., Healy, K., & Jetten, J. (2016). A social identity approach to understanding responses to child sexual abuse allegations. PloS one11(4), e0153205.

  • Molnar, B. E., Beatriz, E. D., & Beardslee, W. R. (2016). Community-Level Approaches to Child Maltreatment Prevention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016658879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mujal, G. N., Taylor, M. E., Fry, J. L., Gochez-Kerr, T. H., & Weaver, N. L. (2021). A Systematic Review of Bystander Interventions for the Prevention of Sexual Violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(2), 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019849587

  • Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, O., & Baker, J. (2012). Key components of de-escalation techniques: A thematic synthesis. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 21(4), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0349.2011.00793.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, R. J. (2016). Parenting and family support within a broad child abuse prevention strategy. Child Abuse & Neglect, 51, 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, J. (2008). Engaging Bystanders in Sexual Violence Prevention. National Sexual Violence Resource Center. Retrieved from https://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default/files/Publications_NSVRC_Booklets_Engaging-Bystanders-in-Sexual-Violence-Prevention.pdf

  • Tankard, M. E., & Paluck, E. L. (2016). Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 181–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, A. S., & Czopp, A. M. (2011). Mother knows best so mother fails most: Benevolent stereotypes and the punishment of parenting mistakes. Current Research in Social Psychology16.

  • Weaver, N. L., Taylor, M. E., Weaver, T. L., & Kutz, T. J. (2020). Support Over Silence for KIDS: A bystander training program to address public child maltreatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 118(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105257

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participating community members, university students, and hospital personnel for their meaningful contributions to this research. We also thank the following individuals for their significant contributions to Support Over Silence for KIDS: Lindsay Maunz, Allie Diltz, Karen Nolte, Jessica Dederer, Jess Cowl, Zenique Gardner-Perry, Barbara Gubser, and Beth Moore.

Funding

This work was supported by the Missouri Foundation for Health (MFH), Grant No. 16–0421-CF-16 (PI: Nancy Weaver). The research and the contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the MFH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meghan E. Taylor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests for difference between pre-program and follow-up objectives, knowledge and attitudes items
Table 5 Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests for difference between pre-program and follow-up objectives, when a caregiver threatens or yells at a child in public – self-efficacy for intervention items
Table 6 Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests for difference between pre-program and follow-up objectives, when a caregiver threatens or yells at a child in public – self-efficacy for intervention with barriers, a
Table 7 Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests for difference between pre-program and follow-up objectives, when a caregiver threatens or yells at a child in public – self-efficacy for intervention with barriers, b
Table 8 Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests for difference between pre-program and follow-up objectives, when a caregiver physically hurts a child in public – self-efficacy for intervention items
Table 9 Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests for difference between pre-program and follow-up objectives, when a caregiver physically hurts a child in public – self-efficacy for intervention with barriers, a
Table 10 Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests for difference between pre-program and follow-up objectives, when a caregiver physically hurts a child in public – self-efficacy for intervention with barriers, b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taylor, M.E., Weaver, N.L., Weaver, T.L. et al. Evaluation of Support Over Silence for KIDS: A Bystander Training Program to Address Public Child Maltreatment. J Fam Viol 38, 309–320 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00376-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00376-8

Keywords

Navigation