Abstract
In this study, Turkish citrus sector and citrus export are assessed from the point of target and competitor countries and the effects of incentives are investigated from the point of global competition power. With this regard, between February 2015 and March 2015, a survey is conducted with 201 companies which export citrus all across Turkey and according to the 2014–2015 production period data. Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) and Revealed Comparative Advantages Index is generated for lemon, orange, mandarin and grapefruit production. Profitability and competition indicators are calculated for citrus species as lemon, orange, mandarin and grapefruit. Within the scope of this study, globalization and developments in the free trade will be assessed from the point of citrus markets and the policies applied during this process will be evaluated. In order to concretize the effects of this evaluation, the effects of the sectorial development will be tried to execute globally with competitor countries in terms of citrus which is an important product group for Turkey in terms of local production and global trade intensity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akgün C (2006) Citrus sector profile. http://www.ito.org.tr/Dokuman/Sektor/197.pdf Accessed 20 May 2020 (in Turkish)
Akhtar W, Akmal N, Shah H, Niazi MA, Tahir A (2013) Export competitiveness of Pakistani horticultural products. Pakistan J Agric Res 26(2):87–96
Anonymous (2015a) TC Ekonomi Bakanlığı. https://www.ekonomi.gov.tr. Accessed 10 Nov 2015 (in Turkish)
Anonymous (2015b) Mediterranean exporter union. https://www.akib.org.tr. Accessed 10 Jan 2020
Anonymous (2020a) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 12 May 2020
Anonymous (2020b) International trade center. http://www.intracen.org/. Accessed 9 Apr 2020
Anonymous (2020c) Foreign trade statistics. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1046. Accessed 17 Apr 2020
Anonymous (2015c) Mediterranean exporter union
Arıkan R (2007) Research techniques and report preparation, p 6 ISBN 9758784358 (in Turkish)
Basavaraj G, Rao PP, Lalith A, Ravinder Reddy C (2013) Assessing competitiveness of sweet sorghum for ethanol production: A policy analysis matrix approach. Agric Econ Res Rev 26(1):31–40
Chen Y, Yuoreng LI, Wenjuan LIU, Jiasheng LAI (2017) Interprovincial comparison and evaluation of export competitiveness of gannan navel orange based on 2011–2016 data. Asian Agric Res 9(8):10–14
Dlikilili X, Rooyen J (2018) Measuring the competitive trends of the South African citrus industry. SA-TIED Working Paper, vol 11
Elsayed EE, Alnagarabi M, Ahmed AS, Mohamed EA (2015) Impact analysis of the government policies on fruit and vegetable sector in Sudan in 2003 and 2009. Arab Unv Jagric Sci Cairo 23(1):167–177
Elsedig EAA, Mohd MI, Fatimah MA (2015) Assessing the competitiveness and comparative advantage of broiler production in Johor using policy analysis matrix. Int Food Res J 22(1):116–121
Fidan H (2008) Citrus overview of the European Union–15 and Turkey. Agric Trop Et Subtrop 41(4):175–186
Gonchigsumlaa G (2016) Competitiveness of pastoral livestock production and sea buckthorn farming in Mongolia: Application of Policy Analysis Matrix, PhD. Dissertation. George August University Göttingen, Germany
Güney Oİ (2012) Evaluation of developments in world agricultural trade in terms of export competition of Turkish citrus sector. PhD. thesis. p.198 Adana (in Turkish)
Joubert C, Van Schalkwyk HD (2000) The effect of policy on the South African Valencia industry. Agrekon. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2000.9523569
Martinez ER, Tadeo AJ, Estruch V (2008) The policy analysis matrix with profit-efficient data: evaluating profitability in rice cultivation. Span J Agric Res 6(3):309–319
Monke EA, Pearson SR (1989) The policy analysis matrix for agricultural development. Cornell University, Ames
Oguntade AE (2011) Assessment of protection and comparative advantage in rice processing in Nigeria. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev 11(2):4632–4646. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajfand.v11i2.65918
Pearson S, Gotsch C, Bahri S (2003) Application of policy analysis matrix in Indonesian agriculture, p 331, ISBN 979-461-508-0
Pellokila MR, Wiendiyati, UR Raya (2004) The impact of technology improvement on the profitability of soe keprok citrus farming in Timor Tengah Selatan. Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang, 1–13
Santosa TH, Mochammad Chabib MI, Prayuginingsih H (2019) The improvement of local citrus’ competitiveness to strengthen the rural community economy. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Community Development https://doi.org/10.2991/iccd-19.2019.143
Souza ARL, Revillion JPP, Waquil PD, Belarmino LC, Lanfranco BA (2017) Economic and accounting evaluation of rice milled production chains in Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) and Uruguay with application of the policy analysis matrix. Cienc Rural Santa Maria 47:4
Tokatlıoğlu M, Selen U, Leba R (2018) The Strategic importance of agriculture in the globalization process and the role of the state in ensuring agricultural supply security. J Life Econ 5(4):2148–4139
Yılmaz B (2003) Turkey’s competitiveness in the European Union: a comparison with five candidate countries—Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and the EU. In: 15. Ezoneplus Working Paper. Fifth Framework Programme No: 12, Berlin, Germany
Yılmaz H, Aydın B (2020) Comparative input-output energy analysis of citrus production in Turkey: case of Adana province. Erwerbs-Obstbau 62(1):29–36
Zheng S, Lambert D, Wang S, Wang Z (2013) Effects of agricultural subsidy policies on comparative advantage and production protection in China. Chin Econ 46(1):20–37
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
U. Gültekin, O. Uysal, O.S. Subaşı, G. Kafa, Y. Aras and D.B. Budak declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gültekin, U., Uysal, O., Subaşı, O.S. et al. Evaluation of Structure of Citrus Export and the Effects of Supports on International Competitiveness in Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau 64, 491–497 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00657-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00657-y