Abstract
This article discusses the representation of NARA’s INS Records in Ancestry’s database portal. Ancestry, the world’s largest and most popular online collection of historical records relevant for people interested in family history, was able to grow into the world’s leading genealogy company through a wide range of partnership agreements with public as well as private institutions and organizations, including the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Ancestry has been able to control the online presentation of and researcher access to large volumes of records containing genealogical information, including records from the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). This position gives the company considerable influence on the discovery and interpretation of these public records. The company’s focus leads to a re-contextualization of these records and collections in Ancestry’s portal environment, in which records acquire new meaning primarily as containers for selective genealogical information that can be mined by researchers. Particularly concerning is the ability of the company to provide access to millions of poorly regulated immigration records containing personally identifiable information. This raises fundamental questions about the ethical consequences of outsourcing the development of online access portals to these public records to Ancestry.com and other companies that thrive on mining millions of records containing genealogical information while making the data available through their commercial portals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal K (2016) Doing right online: archivists shape an ethics for the digital age. AHA Perspectives on History Nov. 2016, https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/november-2016/doing-right-online-archivists-shape-an-ethics-for-the-digital-age Accessed 1 Oct 2020
Ancestry, Wikipedia article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestry.com Accessed 1 Oct 2020
Ancestry Company Facts (2020), https://www.ancestry.com/corporate/about-ancestry/company-facts Accessed 1 Oct 2020
Bearman D, Lytle R (1985) The power of the principle of provenance. Archivaria 21:14–27
Benson E (2008) The national archives and private partnerships: a new trend for the digital age? DttP 36(4):29–32
Burnes E, Louie M (2013) The A-files: finding your immigrant ancestors. Prologue 44(1):54–57
Carlson SE (2020) Chain of custody: access and control of state archival records in public-private partnerships. Provenance, J Soc Georgia Arch 36(1), https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/provenance/vol36/iss1/4 Accessed 1 Oct 2020
Code of Ethics for Archivists (2012), SAA, https://www2.archivists.org/statements/saa-core-values-statement-and-code-of-ethics Accessed 1 Oct 2020
Cohen D (2007) The flawed agreement between the national archives and footnote, Inc. Dan Cohen blog 15 Jan. http://dancohen.org/archives/the-flawed-agreement-between-the-national-archives-and-footnote-inc/ permalink: https://perma.cc/Z58S-77VA
Cook T (2002) Archives and privacy in a wired world. Archivaria 53:94–114
Creet J (2020) The genealogical sublime. The University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst and Boston
De Groot J (2020) Ancestry.com and the evolving nature of historical information companies. Public Hist 42(1):8–28. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2020.42.1.8
Duranti L, Thibodeau K (2006) The concept of record in interactive, experiential and dynamic environments: the view of InterPARES. Arch Sci 6:13–68
Gavison R (1989) Privacy and the limits of the law. Yale Law Review 89(3):421–471. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2060957
Guidelines for Primary Source Literacy (2017)ACRL RBMS, SAA joint task force on the development of guidelines for primary source literacy, https://www2.archivists.org/sites/all/files/Guidelines%20for%20Primary%20Souce%20Literacy%20-%20FinalVersion%20-%20Summer2017_0.pdf Accessed 1 Oct 2020
Harman Sutherland A (2012) Using Ancestry.com to Access NARA Records, NARA know your records series, Spring 2012. You Tube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvZfi-77xCU Accessed 1 Oct 2020
Hering K (2016) Palatines or Pennsylvania German Pioneers? the development of transatlantic Pennsylvania German family and migration history, 1890s–1966. Pa Mag Hist Biogr: Immigr Ethn Pa Hist 140(3):305–334
Hering K (2009) “We are all makers of history”: people and publics in the practice of Pennsylvania German Family History, 1891–1966. George Mason University, PhD diss
Jacobs J (2008) The NARA/TGN contract as a bad precedent. Free Government Information, April 5, https://freegovinfo.info/node/1783, permalink https://perma.cc/WQ3D-8H3T
Kang DS (2017) The INS on the Line: making immigration law on the US-Mexico border, 1917–1954. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Ketelaar E (1995) The right to know and the right to forget? personal information in public archives. Arch Manuscr 23(1):8–17
Koltun L (1999) The promise and threat of digital options in an archival age. Archivaria 47:114–134
Kriesberg A (2017) The future of access to public records? public-private partnerships in US state and territorial archives. Arch Sci 17(5):5–25
MacNeil H (2005) Information privacy, liberty and democracy. In: Behrnd-Klodt ML, Wosh P (eds) Privacy and confidentiality perspectives: archivists and archival records. The Society of American Archivists, Chicago, pp 67–81
MacNeil H (1992) Without Consent: the ethics of disclosing personal information in public archives. The Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, N.J. and London.
Michetti G (2017) Provenance in the archives: the challenge of the digital. In: Smith F et al (eds) Archives in liquid times. Stichting Archiefpublicaties, Den Haag, Jaarboek 17: 229–246
Millar L (2002) The death of the fonds and the resurrection of provenance: archival context in space and time. Archivaria 53:1–15
Mittman J (2010) Mexico passes sweeping new law on data protection. Privacy Law Blog. https://privacylaw.proskauer.com/2010/05/articles/international/mexico-passes-sweeping-new-law-on-data-protection/. Accessed 1 Oct 2020
Morgan F (2010a) A noble pursuit?: Bourgeois America’s uses of lineage. In: Beckert S, Rosenbaum J (eds) The American Bourgeoisie: distinction and identity in the nineteenth century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 135–152
Morgan F (2010b) Lineage as capital: genealogy in Antebellum New England. New England Quarterly 83(1):250–282
Morgan F (2017) “My Furthest-Back Person”: black genealogy before and after roots. In: Ball EL, Carter Jackson K (eds) Reconsidering roots: race, politics and memory, 63–78. The University of Georgia Press, Athens, pp 63–78
Morgan F (2021) A Nation of descendants. politics and the practice of genealogy in U.S. history. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
NARA-The Generations Network Digitization Agreement, 20 May 2008, https://www.archives.gov/files/digitization/pdf/tgn-agreement.pdf; permalink https://perma.cc/BM38-2X97
National Archives and Records Administration and Ancestry.com Operations, Inc. Digitization Agreement, 23 Sept 2015, https://www.archives.gov/files/digitization/pdf/ancestry-2015-agreement.pdf, permalink https://perma.cc/9U2X-TNYJ
NARA, index and manifests of alien arrivals in Nogales, Arizona, 1905–1952, Microfilm M-1769, finding aid published 2003, https://www.archives.gov/files/research/microfilm/m1769.pdf, permalink https://perma.cc/JX9X-APTX
Nesmith T (1999) Still fuzzy, but more accurate: some thoughts on the ghosts of archival theory. Archivaria 47:136–150
Powell TF (1985) The miracle of microfilm: the foundation of the largest genealogical record collection in the world. Microform Review 14(3):148–156
Prechtel Kluskens C (2007) Canadian border immigration records, 1895–1950s. NGS Magazine, July-September: 43–48
Prechtel Kluskens C (2011) Mexican border crossing records, NARA website, updated April 4, https://www.archives.gov/research/immigration/border-mexico.html, permalink https://perma.cc/76LJ-CXGR
Provenance, Glossary of Archival Terms, Society of American Archivists, https://www2.archivists.org/glossary/terms/p/provenance Accessed 1 Oct 2020
Scheinfeldt T (2009) Privatizing holocaust history? Found History, 3 Oct, http://foundhistory.org/2009/10/privatizing-holocaust-history/, permalink https://perma.cc/XKU5-GHLZ
Stallard M, de Groot J (2020) “Things are coming out that are questionable, we never knew about”: DNA and the new family history. J Fam Hist. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363199020906853
Sternfeld J (2011) Archival theory and digital historiography: selection, search, and metadata as archival processes for assessing historical contextualization. Am Arch 74:544–575
Steuart BW (1988) The Role of the American genealogical lending library in supplying microform sources readily available to genealogists. Microform Rev 17(4):216–219
The DNA Geek (2020) Ancestry DNA Breaks 18 Million Customers. 14 July. https://thednageek.com/ancestrydna-breaks-18-million-customers/
Theimer K (2009) NARA’s Digital partnership agreements: the good, the bad, and let’s hope, not the Ugly. Archives Next, 16 Oct, http://archivesnext.com/?p=515, permalink: https://perma.cc/WZ34-GKNS
Thelen D, Rosenzweig R (1998) The presence of the past: popular uses of history in American life. Columbia University Press, NY
Trump Is Paving the Way for Erosion of Immigrants’ Privacy Rights (2017) Rewire News 29 March, https://rewire.news/article/2017/03/29/trump-paving-way-erosion-immigrants-privacy-rights/ Accessed 1 Oct 2020
Vajcner M (2008) The importance of context for digitized archival collections. J Assoc Hist Comput, https://perma.cc/D3S9-4PXM
Weil F (2013) Family trees: a history of genealogy in America. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, Mass and London
Wormser P (2013) Documenting Immigrants: An Examination of Immigration and Naturalization Service Case Files, National Archives-Pacific Southwest Region, 29 March, unpublished paper, http://www.archives.gov/research/immigration/case-files.pdf; https://perma.cc/96ZA-BKHL
Acknowledgements
I thank Eric Stoykovich and the two anonymous reviewers for Archival Science for their helpful and knowledgeable criticism and suggestions for my paper. Thanks also for Ricardo Punzalan and the Archival Science editorial staff, and to Eileen Clancy, Stephen Brier, Rachel Mattson, and Laura Putnam, who commented on an earlier version of this article, originally conceived for the project Beyond Citation in 2017/18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hering, K. The representation of NARA’s INS records in Ancestry’s database portal. Arch Sci 23, 29–44 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09386-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09386-3