Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Service robots’ anthropomorphism: dimensions, factors and internal relationships

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robots have been widely used in social production, especially in the service industry. As their use continues to spread, their anthropomorphic design, which increases a robot’s efficiency and effectiveness in terms of human–robot interaction, becomes increasingly important. Based on grounded theory, this study encodes one-to-one in-depth interview data, and constructs a theoretical model of service robots’ anthropomorphism. The results show that service robots’ anthropomorphism comprises four dimensions: mission completion (core), user sensory experience (external manifestation), artificial intelligence (guarantee), and unique human characteristics (promotion). Meanwhile, a linkage between the dimensions and factors is proposed. This study thus systematically elucidates service robots’ anthropomorphism. The findings provide some implications for practitioners to design anthropomorphic robots and develop tools for evaluating anthropomorphism, corresponding factors and potential influences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

The work was substantially supported by Anhui Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project (AHSKY2017D24).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaodong Li.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Doug Vogel.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Topic 1 related questions are as follows:

  1. (1)

    “The first question is, do you have any experience of dining in restaurants served by service robots?”

  2. (2)

    “Or have you seen intelligent robots provide services in other service scenarios, such as hotels, shopping malls, and airports?”

  3. (3)

    “Have you ever observed what an intelligent robot looks like?”

  4. (4)

    “What was your mood when you saw it (the intelligent robot)?”

  5. (5)

    “Have you interacted with it? For example, talking to it or operating its display.”

  6. (6)

    “Do you think that in this same situation, the presence or absence of this intelligent robot would have an impact on your perceived service quality?”

  7. (7)

    “In what ways do you think this intelligent robot is anthropomorphic?”

  8. (8)

    “Do you think the degree of anthropomorphism of this intelligent robot meets your expectations? That is, do you think its anthropomorphism is excessive, appropriate, or insufficient?”

  9. (9)

    “What do you think can be improved, in relation to the anthropomorphism of intelligent robots?”

Topic 2 related questions are as follows:

  1. (10)

    “Haidilao hot pot opened an experience store with intelligent robots to provide services in Beijing. Here are some related pictures. Figure 

    Fig. 2
    figure 2

    Meal delivery robot

    2 is a meal delivery robot. After the customer orders the food, the back chef will put the corresponding dishes on this tray. The intelligent robot has wheels under it, and it will run to the customer’s table, but the customer needs to stand up and move the dishes on the tray to the table. Figure 

    Fig. 3
    figure 3

    Welcome robot

    3 is a welcome robot. Because dining in Haidilao hot pot usually requires queuing by number, after you tell the welcome robot your number, it will lead you to the corresponding seat. By the way, if an obstacle or person is blocking its way during the journey, the robot will say ‘Excuse me, please let me through, I am working.’”

  2. (11)

    “If you were asked to be the designer of these intelligent robots, if there were customers who said they wanted these intelligent robots to be more anthropomorphic, regardless of whether the technology can be realized but only considering the needs of customers, what kind of design would you create?”

  3. (12)

    “Are there more design aspects to consider?”

Topic 3 related questions are as follows:

  1. (13)

    “Here are some words that we have summarized from related literature, websites, and previous interviews that may be able to describe the anthropomorphism of intelligent robots in service scenarios. Please select the six words that you think are the most important for the anthropomorphism of the intelligent robots according to your understanding, and rank them with the most important being No. 1.”

  2. (14)

    “Can you briefly explain your reasons for this ranking?”

  3. (15)

    “In the previous interview, someone had a different point of view than you. He/she thought… is the most important. What do you think?”

  4. (16)

    “…This item is rarely selected (as an important factor in the anthropomorphism of intelligent robots). What do you think is the uniqueness of your thinking?”

  5. (17)

    “The last question is, if you were asked to choose one of these words that you think is the least important to the anthropomorphism of intelligent robots, which one would you choose?”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Lin, X., Li, X. et al. Service robots’ anthropomorphism: dimensions, factors and internal relationships. Electron Markets 32, 277–295 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00527-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00527-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation