Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maternal Low Self-Control, Maternal Attachment Toward Children, Parenting Practices, and Adolescent Low Self-Control: a Prospective 15-Year Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research surrounding the intergenerational transmission of self-control has expanded recently. Yet, findings are mixed, and key limitations regarding the inclusion of distinct measures of parental attachment toward children and parenting practices within a longitudinal framework remain. We seek to address these limitations by providing a longitudinal test of serial mediation linking maternal low self-control, maternal attachment toward children, maternal parenting practices, and adolescent low self-control. We employed structural equation modeling to examine direct and indirect effects between maternal low self-control measured when children were 6 months old, maternal attachment toward children measured when target children were 7 years old, maternal parenting practices assessed when children were 12 years old, and adolescent low self-control when children were 15 years old. Findings partially support assertions from self-control theory in that maternal low self-control was positively related to later adolescent low self-control indirectly via maternal attachment toward children and, in turn, maternal parenting practices. However, direct associations between maternal low self-control and maternal parenting practices and, even more, between maternal low self-control and adolescent low self-control were also observed. Limitations and implications of our findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990:97) also state, “All that is required to activate the system (of monitoring and discipline) is affection for or investment in the child.”.

  2. To be clear, several studies testing self-control theory have measured attachment as the child/adolescent’s attachment to parents, finding that stronger attachment to parents is related to higher self-control in children/adolescents (Alvarez-Rivera 2016; Alvarez-Rivera, Price, and Ticknor 2017; Miller et al. 2009). This, however, is not our focus, nor is it the stated focus of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s (1990) arguments (see p. 98).

  3. We describe the SECCYD as having concluded in 2007, as this reflects the end of primary data collection that has been archived at the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). It is the case, however, that additional funding has been provided to some of the original SECCYD researchers, which has enabled additional follow-up data collection from the study participants. Currently, data from these follow-ups has not been archived for researchers to freely access and use. For additional details, see https://seccyd.weebly.com/.

  4. The factor loadings for this latent measure, as well as for the latent measures of maternal low self-control and maternal parenting practices, can be found in Appendix Table 3. Because the latent factors in this study are constructed based on different sets and numbers of items, the value ranges would be different if we simply summed the values of raw items for a given factor. Given this, and following past practice (Gelman et al. 2008; Magidson & Vermunt 2002), we standardized the latent factor loadings so that they are more comparable.

  5. The item “Too often, when things go wrong, I get discouraged and feel like giving up” is similar to the item “When things get complicated, I tend to quit or withdraw” appearing in the Grasmick et al. (1993) “simple tasks” subscale. Likewise, the item “I often feel tense and jittery” is similar to the item “is nervous, high strung, or tense” included in measures of low self-control in past research (e.g., Raffaelli et al., 2005; Turner & Piquero, 2002).

  6. Even though the information on maternal warmth is based on adolescent reports, there is some conceptual (though certainly not temporal) overlap between this measure and the maternal-reported indicator of maternal attachment toward the child previously described. Given this, we estimated all models when excluding the latent measure of maternal warmth from the second-order latent measure of maternal parenting practices. Importantly, the results based on the reduced measure of maternal parenting practices were substantively identical to those when the warmth measure was included as part of the second-order latent variable. Given this, we report results based on the more inclusive measure of maternal parenting practices.

  7. Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) do acknowledge there are other sources of self-control, such as school socialization. Still, their theoretical emphasis is on the role of parental socialization, and it is unclear whether something like schooling would mediate any effect of maternal low self-control on adolescent low self-control.

  8. We also estimated both model 1 and model 2 when specifying each of the control variables as predictors of maternal attachment toward the child and parenting practices in addition to adolescent low self-control. Importantly, none of the associations (both direct and indirect) between the key variables of interest was substantively (or statistically) changed when these additional control paths were specified. Because of the decrease in degrees of freedom that results from the inclusion of these additional paths, we elected to present the models where the controls are only used to predict the outcome of adolescent low self-control.

  9. The CFI of 0.81 is below the conventional standard cutoff for an acceptable model fit of 0.90. In analyses not shown, however, we re-estimated model 2 when excluding all control variables other than race, as none of them was predictive of the outcomes of interest. Of note, when excluding these controls, CFI increased to 0.97 and the TLI increased to 0.90. The RMSEA also decreased to 0.04 and the SRMR decreased to 0.02. Because anonymous reviewers recommended the inclusion of certain controls in the analysis, however, we have chosen to retain the controls in the model.

  10. While we have interpreted some of the items to be reflective of a lack of persistence and diligence, others may interpret the items as reflecting internalizing behavior such as depressive symptoms.

References

  • Alvarez-Rivera, L. L. (2016). Maternal attachment, self-control, and offending among college students. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 14(1), 58–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Rivera, L. L., Price, A. M., & Ticknor, B. (2017). The effect of attachment and self-control on status offending among Puerto Rican high school students. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augimeri, L. K., Walsh, M., Donato, A., Blackman, A., & Piquero, A. R. (2018). SNAP (Stop Now And Plan): Helping children improve their self-control and externalizing behavior problems. Journal of Criminal Justice, 56, 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, K. M., DeLisi, M., Vaughn, M. G., & Wright, J. P. (2010). The intersection of genes and neuropsychological deficits in the prediction of adolescent delinquency and low self-control. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(1), 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, M. A., Meldrum, R. C., & Barnes, J. C. (2018). The contribution of maternal and paternal self-control to child and adolescent self-control: A latent class analysis of intergenerational transmission. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 4(3), 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., Harden, J. J., Ray, S., & Zavisca, J. (2014). BIC and alternative Bayesian information criteria in the selection of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 1–19.

  • Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 115–140.

  • Botchkovar, E., Marshall, I. H., Rocque, M., & Posick, C. (2015). The importance of parenting in the development of self-control in boys and girls: Results from a multinational study of youth. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(2), 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutwell, B. B., & Beaver, K. M. (2010). The intergenerational transmission of low self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(2), 174–209.

  • Burt, C. H., Simons, R. L., & Simons, L. G. (2006). A longitudinal test of the effects of parenting and the stability of self-control: Negative evidence for the general theory of crime. Criminology, 44(2), 353–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, C. H., Sweeten, G., & Simons, R. L. (2014). Self-control through emerging adulthood: Instability, multidimensionality, and criminological significance. Criminology, 52(3), 450–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecil, C. A., Barker, E. D., Jaffee, S. R., & Viding, E. (2012). Association between maladaptive parenting and child self-control over time: Cross-lagged study using a monozygotic twin difference design. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 201(4), 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, C. L., Tyler, K. A., & Bersani, B. E. (2005). Child neglect and adolescent violence: Examining the effects of self-control and peer rejection. Violence & Victims, 20(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, C. L., Vaske, J., & Hope, T. L. (2010). Sex differences in the causes of self-control: An examination of mediation, moderation, and gendered etiologies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(1), 1122–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinkinbeard, S. S., Barnum, T. C., & Rhodes, T. N. (2018). The other side of the coin: Exploring the effects of adolescent delinquency on young adult self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 56, 86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb-Clark, D. A., Dahmann, S. C., Kamhöfer, D. A., & Schildberg-Hörisch, H. (2021). The predictive power of self-control for life outcomes (No. 14920). Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

  • Conger, R. D., Wallace, L., Sun, Y., McLoyd, V., & Brody, G. (2002). Economic pressure in African American families: A replication and extension of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., Unnever, J. D., Wright, J. P., & Beaver, K. M. (2008). Parenting and self-control. Out of control: Assessing the general theory of crime, 61–74.

  • De Ridder, D. T., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, C., Stok, F. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 76–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Kern, M. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(3), 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, E., Balluerka, N., & Widaman, K. F. (2008). Factorial invariance and the specification of second-order latent growth models. Methodology, 4(1), 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, W., Hay, C., Widdowson, A. O., & Rocque, M. (2019). Development of impulsivity and risk-seeking: Implications for the dimensionality and stability of self-control. Criminology, 57(3), 512–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, M. S., Cox, M. G., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2015). Increasing statistical power in mediation models without increasing sample size. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 38(3), 343–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Jakulin, A., Pittau, M. G., & Su, Y. S. (2008). A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2(4), 1360–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (2019). Modern control theory and the limits of criminal Justice. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., Jr., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2001). Parenting, self-control, and delinquency: A test of self-control theory. Criminology, 39(3), 707–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C., & Forrest, W. (2006). The development of self-control: Examining self-control theory’s stability thesis. Criminology, 44(4), 739–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C., & Meldrum, R.C. (2015). Self-control and crime over the life course. Sage Publications.

  • Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 366–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Burk, W. J. (2010). A reinterpretation of parental monitoring in longitudinal perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(1), 39–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamborn, S., Mounts, N., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful homes. Child Development, 62, 1049–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. (2002). Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’s circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meldrum, R. C. (2008). Beyond parenting: An examination of the etiology of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(1), 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meldrum, R. C., Young, J. T., Hay, C., & Flexon, J. L. (2012). Does self-control influence maternal attachment? A reciprocal effects analysis from early childhood through middle adolescence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(4), 673–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meldrum, R. C., Barnes, J. C., & Hay, C. (2015a). Sleep deprivation, low self-control, and delinquency: A test of the strength model of self-control. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(2), 465–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meldrum, R. C., Young, J. T., & Lehmann, P. S. (2015b). Parental low self-control, parental socialization, young adult low self-control, and offending: A retrospective study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(11), 1183–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meldrum, R. C., Connolly, G. M., Flexon, J., & Guerette, R. T. (2016). Parental low self-control, family environments, and juvenile delinquency. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(14), 1623–1644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meldrum, R. C., Petkovsek, M. A., Boutwell, B. B., & Young, J. T. (2017). Reassessing the relationship between general intelligence and self-control in childhood. Intelligence, 60, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meldrum, R. C., Verhoeven, M., Junger, M., van Aken, M. A., & Deković, M. (2018). Parental self-control and the development of male aggression in early childhood: A longitudinal test of self-control theory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(4), 935–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. V., Jennings, W. G., Alvarez-Rivera, L. L., & Lanza-Kaduce, L. (2009). Self-control, attachment, and deviance among Hispanic adolescents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(1), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Roberts, B. W., Ross, S., Sears, M. R., Thomson, W. M., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693–2698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1933). IX. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 231(694–706), 289–337.

  • Nofziger, S. (2008). The “cause” of low self-control: The influence of maternal self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(2), 191–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nofziger, S., & Newton, K. (2017). Self-control, parental crime, and discipline across three generations. Deviant Behavior, 1–19.

  • Perrone, D., Sullivan, C. J., Pratt, T. C., & Margaryan, S. (2004). Parental efficacy, self-control, and delinquency: A test of General Theory of Crime in a nationally representative sample of youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(3), 298–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petkovsek, M. A., & Boutwell, B. B. (2014). Childhood intelligence and the emergence of self-control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(10), 1232–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phythian, K., Keane, C., & Krull, C. (2008). Family structure and parental behavior: Identifying the sources of adolescent self-control. Western Criminology Review, 9, 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C. (1996). Manual and scoring guide for the student–teacher relationship scale. University of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., & Rocque, M. (2020). Changing self-control: Promising efforts and a way forward. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2020(173), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2010). Self-control interventions for children under age 10 for improving self-control and delinquency and problem behaviors. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 1–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., Farrington, D. P., Diamond, B., & Gonzalez, J. M. R. (2016). A meta-analysis update on the effectiveness of early self-control improvement programs to improve self-control and reduce delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(2), 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: A meta‐analysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931–964.

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffaelli, M., Crockett, L. J., & Shen, Y. L. (2005). Developmental stability and change in self-regulation from childhood to adolescence. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166(1), 54–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L., Beach, S. R., & Barr, A. B. (2012). Differential susceptibility to context: A promising model of the interplay of genes and the social environment. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Darling, N., Mounts, N. S., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1994). Over-time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 65, 754–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, B., & Silver, E. (2009). Neighborhoods and self-control: Toward and expanded view of socialization. Social Problems, 56(1), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., & Piquero, A. R. (2002). The stability of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(6), 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., Piquero, A. R., & Pratt, T. C. (2005). The school context as a source of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(4), 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unnever, J. D., Cullen, F. T., & Pratt, T. C. (2003). Parental management, ADHD, and delinquent involvement: Reassessing Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. Justice Quarterly, 20(3), 471–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazsonyi, A. T., & Huang, L. (2010). Where self-control comes from: On the development of self-control and its relationship to deviance over time. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazsonyi, A. T., Mikuška, J., & Kelley, E. L. (2017). It’s time: A meta-analysis on the self-control-deviance link. Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera, E. P., & Moon, B. (2013). An empirical test of low self-control theory: Among Hispanic youth. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(1), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, M., Junger, M., Aken, C., Dekovic, M., & Van Aken, M. G. (2007). Parenting during toddler: Contributions of parental, contextual, and child characteristics. Journal of Family Issues, 28(12), 1663–1691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Fan, C., Tao, T., & Gao, W. (2017). Age and gender differences in self‐control and its intergenerational transmission. Child: Care, Health and Development, 43(2), 274–280.

  • Weinberger, D. A., & Schwartz, G. E. (1990). Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self-reported adjustment: A typological perspective. Journal of Personality, 58(2), 381–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willems, Y. E., Boesen, N., Li, J., Finkenauer, C., & Bartels, M. (2019). The heritability of self-control: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 100, 324–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. P., & Beaver, K. M. (2005). Do parents matter in creating self-control in their children? A genetically informed test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory of low self-control. Criminology, 43(4), 1169–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., Beaver, K., Delisi, M., & Vaughn, M. (2008). Evidence of negligible parenting influences on self-control, delinquent peers, and delinquency in a sample of twins. Justice Quarterly, 25(3), 544–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle A. Bolger.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 16 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bolger, M.A., Meldrum, R.C. & Liu, L. Maternal Low Self-Control, Maternal Attachment Toward Children, Parenting Practices, and Adolescent Low Self-Control: a Prospective 15-Year Study. J Dev Life Course Criminology 8, 206–231 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-022-00198-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-022-00198-8

Keywords

Navigation