Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Saur September 6, 2021

The Role of Bots in the Disinformation Process in Brazilian Politics between 2014 and 2018

  • Célio Santana ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Amanda Nunes and Fabio Silva
From the journal Libri

Abstract

This paper presents the participation of bots in the process of disinformation in the Brazilian political/electoral scenario between 2014 and 2018. The justification for this research was the growth of ideological polarization and the emergence of hate speech linked to political positioning that culminated in a massive campaign of disinformation, evidenced by fake news and other forms of manipulation. In this research multiple case studies were used referring to three moments: the 2014 elections, the 2016 impeachment and the 2018 election. We found studies investigating these events, and they were used as data sources for analysis of the conjuncture and the interpretation of these facts in a chronological perspective pointed toward the role of bots and the results of such actions. It has been observed that the use of bots has occurred since 2014; however, they were only engaged in propagating false content from 2015. The automation of the messages was sophisticated between 2014 and 2018, when bots ceased to be players who replicated posts indiscriminately (spam) to become users’ catalysts with the intention of creating or expanding new bubbles of disinformation. Finally, we observed that the same botnet active in Brazil was also involved in electoral processes around the world, making Brazil simply one more piece in this grand network of disinformation where who is involved and what their purpose might be is not known.


Corresponding author: Célio Santana, Departamento de Ciências da Informação, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av Da Arquitetura S/N, Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco, 50670-901, Brazil, E-mail:

References

Arnaudo, D. 2017. Computational Propaganda in Brazil: Social Bots during Elections. http://goo.gl/P8tocc (accessed January 15, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

BBC. 2016. Na semana do impeachment, 3 das 5 notícias mais compartilhadas no Facebook são falsas. http://goo.gl/Vs8KRu (accessed December 1, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Burkhardt, J. 2017. “Combating Fake News in the Digital Age.” Library Technology Reports 53 (8): 14–9, https://doi.org/10.5860/ltr.53n4.Search in Google Scholar

Burkhardt, J. 2018. “Social Media Bots: How they Spread Misinformation.” http://goo.gl/XQCyYj (accessed February 5, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

de Jesus, D. 2014. “The Benign Multipolarity: Brazilian Foreign Policy under Dilma Rousseff.” Journal of International Relations and Foreign Policy 2 (1): 19–42.Search in Google Scholar

Estadão. 2015. Governo cita uso de robôs nas redes sociais em campanha eleitoral. http://goo.gl/RkxFcR (accessed September 7, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Ferrara, E. 2017. Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run up to the 2017 French Presidential Election. arXiv:1707.00086 (accessed June 10, 2021).10.5210/fm.v22i8.8005Search in Google Scholar

Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV). 2017. Bots, Social Networks and Politics in Brazil: A Study on Illegitimate Interferences with the Public Debate on the Web, Risks to the Democracy and the 2018 Elections. http://goo.gl/GEfN1G (accessed January 15, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV). 2018a. Robôs, redes sociais e política no Brasil: análise de interferências de perfis automatizados nas eleições de 2014. http://goo.gl/RTskE3 (accessed February 5, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV). 2018b. O Estado da Desinformação: Redes estrangeiras no twitter interferem no no debate eleitoral brasileiro. http://goo.gl/7pCdDe (September 25, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

ITS. 2018. Poder Computacional: Automação no uso do WhatsApp nas Eleições. http://goo.gl/S7Ei78 (accessed July 12, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

LABIC. 2014. Bots Contra a Sociedade. https://bit.ly/2OpZzBg (accessed July 12, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Lazer, D., M. Baum, Y. Benkler, B. Adam, G. Kelly, F. Menczer, M. Metzger, B. Nyhan, G. Pennycook, D. Rothschild, M. Schudson, S. Sloman, S. Cass, E. Thorson, D. Watts, and J. Zittrain. 2018. “The Science of Fake News.” Science 359 (6380): 1094–6, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998.Search in Google Scholar

Lewandowsky, S., U. Ecker, C. Seifert, N. Schwarz, and J. Cook. 2012. “Misinformation and its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13 (3): 106–31, https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018.Search in Google Scholar

Lupa. 2018. Só 4 das 50 imagens mais compartilhadas por 347 grupos de WhatsApp são verdadeiras. http://goo.gl/Qy622p (accessed April 8, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Machado, C., B. Kira, G. Hirsch, N. Marchal, B. Kollanyi, P. Howard, and B. Vlad. 2018. News and Political Information Consumption in Brazil: Mapping the First Round of the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Election on Twitter. http://goo.gl/z7Unz (accessed April 8, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Malini, F. 2016. 17 de abril: quando a Câmara dos Deputados virou alvo do #impeachmentday. http://goo.gl/5aAAww (accessed July 12, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Oliveira, E., F. de França, D. Goya, and C. Penteado. 2016. “The Influence of Retweeting Robots during Brazilian Protests.” In 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.260.Search in Google Scholar

Skyrms, B. 2010. Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580828.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tudjman, M. and N. Mikelic. 2003. “Information Science: Science about Information, Misinformation and Disinformation.” In Proceedings of Informing Science + Information Technology Education, 1513–27. https://doi.org/10.28945/2728.Search in Google Scholar

Varol, O., E. Ferrara, C. Davis, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. 2017. Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization. http://goo.gl/Axkmon (accessed July 12, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Wardle, C. 2017. Fake News, ts Complicated. http://goo.gl/3y4P19 (accessed July 12, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Wardle, C., and H. Derakhshan. 2017a. Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policymaking. Council of Europe report DGI(2017)09. 109p. https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c (access July 30, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Wardle, C. and D. Hossain. 2017b. How did the News Go ‘fake’? When the Media Went Social. http://goo.gl/a6hJXq (accessed July 12, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-09-06
Published in Print: 2021-12-20

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/libri-2020-0071/html
Scroll to top button