Abstract
Kant’s essays in the philosophy of history, such as Universal History and Conjectural Beginning, offer a speculative account of the gradual development of reason in our species and of the way the mature use of reason can be attained. Such mature use of reason, as Kant explains a few years later in the published Anthropology, is characterized by abandoning the standpoint of “practical egoism” and learning how to exercise the psychological disposition to “pluralism”. To be a pluralist, he claims, means to be capable of seeing things from other people’s standpoints, of giving deliberative weight to the needs of others, and of taking part in universally valid judgments. But Kant is never explicit about what is required in order to become a pluralist, nor does he explain what it means to be a pluralist beyond a brief remark in the Anthropology. My paper takes a detailed look at this under-studied notion and offers a novel account of this notion. I explicate the features of pluralistic thinking and I connect this notion to the public use of reason, the three maxims of common human understanding, and the role played by interpersonal communication in advancing the progress of our rational capacities. I also explain the key role of education in reason’s development and the conceptual relationship between the enlightenment of an individual and the enlightenment of the human species.
References
All translations are quoted from The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (1992 ff.) and the quotation rules followed are those established by the Akademie Ausgabe. Kant, Immanuel (1900 ff): Gesammelte Schriften. Hrsg.: Bd. 1 – 22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Berlin.
Bittner, Rudiger (1974): Maximen, in: G. Funke (ed.): Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Berlin, De Gruyter, pp. 485 – 498.10.1515/9783110878707-057Search in Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, Katerina (2002): Universalizability, Publicity, and Communication. Kant’s Conception of Reason, in: European Journal of Philosophy 10 (2), pp. 143 – 159.10.1111/1468-0378.00153Search in Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, Katerina (2005): Kant and the Culture of Enlightenment, New York, SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald (1995): The Rational, the Reasonable and Justification, in: Journal of Political Philosophy 3, pp. 234 – 258.10.1111/j.1467-9760.1995.tb00036.xSearch in Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald (1999): Reasonable Pluralism and the Domain of the Political. How the Weaknesses of John Rawls’s Political Liberalism Can be Overcome by a Justificatory Liberalism, in: Inquiry 42 (2), pp. 259 – 284.10.1080/002017499321570Search in Google Scholar
Höffe, Ottfried (1997): Kants kategorischer Imperativ als Kriterium des Sittlichen, in: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 31 (3), pp. 354 – 384.Search in Google Scholar
Louden, Robert (2020): Johann Bernhard Basedow and the Transformation of Modern Education, New York, NY, Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350163690Search in Google Scholar
Munzel, G. Felicitas (1999): Kant’s Conception of Moral Character. The ‘Critical’ Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment, Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Neiman, Susan (1994): The Unity of Reason. Rereading Kant, New York, NY, Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1989): Constructions of Reason. Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1992): Vindicating Reason, in: P. Guyer (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 280 – 308.10.1017/CCOL0521365872.010Search in Google Scholar
Patrone, Tatiana (2008): How Kant’s Conception of the Reason Implies a Liberal Politics. An Interpretation of the ‘Doctrine of Right’, Lewiston, NY, Edwin Mellen Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1993): Political Liberalism, New York, Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Velkley, Richard (1989): Freedom and the Ends of Reason. On the Moral Foundations of Kant’s Critical Philosophy, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226157580.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Weinstock, Daniel (1996): Natural Law and Public Reason in Kant’s Political Philosophy, in: Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26 (3), pp. 389 – 411.10.1080/00455091.1996.10717459Search in Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1999): Kant’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
