Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative Analysis of Coal by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Using TEA CO2 Laser as the Excitation Source

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work presents a study of the applicability of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy based on infrared transversally excited atmospheric CO2 pulsed laser for quantitative analysis of main inorganic elements in lignite coals. Calibration standards were prepared by mixing and pelleting an appropriate amount of rock reference material and graphite. Time-integrated spatially resolved measurements of analyte spectra of standard samples were used to construct univariate calibration curves of Al, Si, Ca, Fe and Mg. The spectral intensities of analytical lines were normalized by the carbon spectral line to compensate for the shot-to-shot fluctuation of plasma parameters. The obtained curves of growth have good linearity in a wide range of concentrations (up to 1% for Al and 3% for Si). Correlation coefficients were in the range of 0.955–0.993, depending on the element. Measured limits of detection (from 2.4 to 25 ppm for analyzed metals and 61 ppm for Si) are low enough to control the coal combustion process in power plants. The Stark-broadening and the Boltzmann plot method were used to determine apparent values of excitation temperatures and electron number densities. A relatively small but measurable influence of the concentration of metal elements on the plasma parameters was observed, which should be considered in quantitative analysis of coal samples with higher inorganic elements content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Dorokhov VV, Kuznetsov GV, Nyashina GS, Strizhak PA (2021) Composition of a gas and ash mixture formed during the pyrolysis and combustion of coal-water slurries containing petrochemicals. Environ Pollut 285:117390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang W, Pudasainee D, Gupta R et al (2021) An overview of inorganic particulate matter emission from coal/biomass/MSW combustion: sampling and measurement, formation, distribution, inorganic composition and influencing factors. Fuel Process Technol 213:106657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kazanc F, Levendis YA, Maffei T (2013) Chemical composition of submicrometer particulate matter (PM1) emitted from combustion of coals of various ranks in O2/N2 and O2/CO2 environments. Energy Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef400814q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao X, Li Y, Garcia-Perez M, Wu H (2012) Roles of inherent fine included mineral particles in the emission of PM 10 during pulverized coal combustion. Energy Fuels 26:6783–6791. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef300211u

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Folgueras MB, Díaz RM, Xiberta J, Alonso M (2007) Effect of inorganic matter on trace element behavior during combustion of coal−sewage sludge blends. Energy Fuels 21:744–755. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef060536r

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Huggins FE (2002) Overview of analytical methods for inorganic constituents in coal. Int J Coal Geol 50:169–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-5162(02)00118-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu K, He C, Zhu C et al (2021) A review of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for coal analysis. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 143:116357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2021.116357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Deguchi Y, Kurihara M, Ikeda K, et al (2002) Optimal boiler control through real-time monitoring of unburned carbon in fly ash using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. In: Laser induced plasma spectroscopy and applications. OSA, Washington, DC, p WD3

  9. Wallis FJ, Chadwick BL, Morrison RJS (2000) Analysis of lignite using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 54:1231–1235. https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702001950814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yuan T, Wang Z, Lui SL, Fu Y, Li Z, Liu J, Ni W (2013) Coal property analysis using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. J Anal At Spectrom 28:1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3JA50097G

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ctvrtnickova T, Mateo M-P, Yañez A, Nicolas G (2009) Characterization of coal fly ash components by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc 64:1093–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2009.07.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chadwick BL, Body D (2002) Development and commercial evaluation of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy chemical analysis technology in the coal power generation industry. Appl Spectrosc 56:70–74. https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702021954232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li J, Lu J, Lin Z et al (2009) Effects of experimental parameters on elemental analysis of coal by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Opt Laser Technol 41:907–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2009.03.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liangying Y, Jidong L, Wen C et al (2005) Analysis of pulverized coal by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Plasma Sci Technol 7:3041–3044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1009-0630/7/5/015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yao S, Mo J, Zhao J et al (2018) Development of a rapid coal analyzer using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Appl Spectrosc 72:1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003702818772856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li X, Wang Z, Fu Y et al (2015) Application of a spectrum standardization method for carbon analysis in coal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Appl Spectrosc 68:955–962. https://doi.org/10.1366/13-07345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sheta S, Afgan MS, Hou Z et al (2019) Coal analysis by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: a tutorial review. J Anal At Spectrom 34:1047–1082. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ja00016j

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dong M, Lu J, Yao S et al (2011) Application of LIBS for direct determination of volatile matter content in coal. J Anal At Spectrom 26:2183–2188. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ja10109a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Khumaeni A, Ramli M, Deguchi Y et al (2008) New technique for the direct analysis of food powders confined in a small hole using transversely excited atmospheric CO2 laser-induced gas plasma. Appl Spectrosc 62:1344–1348. https://doi.org/10.1366/000370208786822151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Khumaeni A, Lie ZS, Niki H et al (2011) Direct analysis of powder samples using transversely excited atmospheric CO2 laser-induced gas plasma at 1 atm. Anal Bioanal Chem 400:3279–3287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4801-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zivkovic S, Momcilovic M, Staicu A et al (2017) Spectrochemical analysis of powdered biological samples using transversely excited atmospheric carbon dioxide laser plasma excitation. Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc 128:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2016.12.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gautier C, Fichet P, Menut D, Dubessy J (2006) Applications of the double-pulse laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) in the collinear beam geometry to the elemental analysis of different materials. Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc 61:210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2006.01.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tognoni E, Cristoforetti G (2014) Basic mechanisms of signal enhancement in ns double-pulse laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy in a gas environment. J Anal At Spectrom 29:1318–1338. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4JA00033A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Campos D, Harilal SS, Hassanein A (2010) The effect of laser wavelength on emission and particle dynamics of Sn plasma. J Appl Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3493118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Guezenoc J, Gallet-Budynek A, Bousquet B (2019) Critical review and advices on spectral-based normalization methods for LIBS quantitative analysis. Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc 160:105688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2019.105688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun Q, Tran M, Smith B, Winefordner J (2000) Determination of Mn and Si in iron ore by laser-induced plasma spectroscopy. Anal Chim Acta 413:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)00806-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Juvé V, Portelli R, Boueri M et al (2008) Space-resolved analysis of trace elements in fresh vegetables using ultraviolet nanosecond laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc 63:1047–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2008.08.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ismail MA, Imam H, Elhassan A et al (2004) LIBS limit of detection and plasma parameters of some elements in two different metallic matrices. J Anal At Spectrom 19:489. https://doi.org/10.1039/b315588a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fisher BT, Johnsen HA, Buckley SG, Hahn DW (2001) Temporal gating for the optimization of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy detection and analysis of toxic metals. Appl Spectrosc 55:1312–1319. https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702011953667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Aragón C, Aguilera JA (2008) Characterization of laser induced plasmas by optical emission spectroscopy: a review of experiments and methods. Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc 63:893–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2008.05.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kramida A, Ralchenko Y, Reader J (2019) NAT NIST atomic spectra database (version 5.7.1). https://physics.nist.gov/asd. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. https://doi.org/10.18434/T4W30F

  32. Aragón C, Vega P, Aguilera JA (2011) Stark width measurements of Fe II lines with wavelengths in the range 260–300 nm. J Phys B At Mol Opt Phys 44:055002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/44/5/055002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, Contract numbers: 451-03-9/2021-14/200017, and 451-03-9/2021-14/200146.

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, Grant Nos: 451-03-9/2021-14/200017 and 451-03-9/2021-14/200146.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JP Investigation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing—Original Draft; JS Methodology, Writing—Review and Editing, Supervision; DR Investigation, Formal analysis, Validation; MK Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing—Review and Editing, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miroslav Kuzmanovic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petrovic, J., Savovic, J., Rankovic, D. et al. Quantitative Analysis of Coal by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Using TEA CO2 Laser as the Excitation Source. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 42, 519–533 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-022-10234-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-022-10234-6

Keywords

Navigation