Skip to main content
Log in

Native and non-native fish predators differ in their consumptive and non-consumptive impacts on a native freshwater snail

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Florida apple snails, Pomacea paludosa, serve as the nearly exclusive prey for the endangered Florida snail kite, Rostrhamus sociabilis, and many other predators in Florida wetlands. As the Florida Everglades is a hotspot for non-native species, it is prudent to understand the potential impacts non-native predators have on apple snails. In an aquarium setting, we recorded and documented the interactions between the non-native jewelfish, Hemichromis letourneuxi, and native apple snails. We compared these interactions to those recorded between apple snails and redear sunfish, Lepomis microlophus, a native predator. We found that sunfish successfully ate more snails. However, jewelfish attacked apple snails more frequently (n = 314) compared to sunfish (n = 68), resulting in apple snails withdrawing into their shells and displaying longer recovery times from attacks. Apple snails appear to spend more time recovering from attacks or possibly avoiding predation risk, rather than conducting normal movements, in the presence of the jewelfish. This may have impacts on apple snail behavioral ecology, physiology, and demography, potentially reducing prey availability for the endangered snail kite and other predators. Our research provides evidence that jewelfish negatively impact a critically important prey species in Florida wetland food webs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

It is available to editors and reviewers upon request, but we do not wish to make them available to readers.

Code availability

It is available to editors and reviewers upon request, but we do not wish to make them available to readers.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Pam Schofield and Kristen Weaver from the US Geological Survey (USGS) Gainesville facility for their assistance prior to and during the experiment. This work was funded by USGS (Reston, VA, USA) Grant Agreement G16AC00420 and the Office of Undergraduate Research at the University of West Florida (Pensacola, FL, USA). No permits were required for the collection of species used in this experiment since they were from USGS, Gainesville facility, aquaculture (Permit #AQ5111009, Hemichromis and Pomacea snails) or provided directly by Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission biologists (for Lepomis). Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval (UWF #2018-002) was obtained prior to the study. This manuscript was improved substantially from revisions suggested by anonymous reviewers.

Funding

Funding was provided by US Geological Survey (Reston, VA, USA) Grant Agreement G16AC00420 and the Office of Undergraduate Research at the University of West Florida (Pensacola, FL, USA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip C. Darby.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Ethical approval

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval, University of West Florida (UWF #2018–002), was obtained prior to the study.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Sébastien Villeger

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siegfried, T.R., Gutierre, S.M.M., Piacenza, S.E. et al. Native and non-native fish predators differ in their consumptive and non-consumptive impacts on a native freshwater snail. Aquat Ecol 56, 865–876 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-022-09944-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-022-09944-y

Keywords

Navigation