Abstract
The evaluation of wild boar density in a hunting district can be performed by accurate drive counts of boars within the drive areas assigned to each hunting team. Because a complete driving of all the areas is prohibitive, only a subset is driven in a hunting occasion. Results are highly dependent on the subjective choice of these areas. In this study, an objective design-based approach is considered in which areas to be driven are randomly selected one per team in accordance with the one-per-stratum sampling scheme. Because the areas assigned to hunting teams are likely to be close to each other, the one-per-stratum sampling is likely to achieve samples of evenly spread areas. Then, the subsequent step is to choose the selection criterion for the areas and the estimation criterion for exploiting or not the information provided by area sizes. To this purpose, three sampling strategies are considered, together with methods to estimate their precision. These strategies are checked and compared by means of a simulation study performed on artificial populations constructed from the list of drive areas settled in the Province of Massa–Carrara (Italy) and partitioned among 39 hunting teams. Results from artificial populations give clear insights about the most suitable strategy to be used. Drive counts performed in this province in two hunting occasions during 2019 within 39 areas selected by one-per-stratum sampling are adopted as case studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acevedo P, Vicente J, Höfle U, Cassinello J, Ruiz-Fons F, Gortazar C (2007) Estimation of European wild boar relative abundance and aggregation: a novel method in epidemiological risk assessment. Epidemiol Infect 135:519–527
Apollonio M, Andersen R, Putman R (eds) (2010) European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press
Aronow PM, Samii C (2013) Conservative variance estimation for sampling designs with zero pairwise inclusion probabilities. Surv Methodol 39:231–241
Bobek B (2014) Use of a line intercept snow track index and plot sampling for estimating densities of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in southwestern Poland. Wildl Biol Pract 10:7–16
Borkowski J, Palmer SCF, Borowski Z (2011) Drive counts as a method of estimating ungulate density in forests: mission impossible? Acta Theriol 56:239–253
Breidt FJ (1995) Markov chain designs for one-per-stratum sampling. Surv Methodol 21:63–70
Breidt FJ, Opsomer JD, Sanchez-Borrego I (2016) Nonparametric variance estimation under fine stratification: an alternative to collapsed strata. J Am Stat Assoc 111:822–833
Brown JA, Robertson BL, McDonald T (2015) Spatially balanced sampling: applications to environmental surveys. Procedia Environ Sci 27:6–9
Chao A (1988) Estimating animal abundance with capture frequency data. J Wildl Manage 52:295–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801237
Chauvenet ALM, Gil RMA, Smith GC, Ward AI, Massei G (2017) Quantifying the bias in density estimated from distance sampling and camera trapping of unmarked individuals. Ecol Model 350:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.02.007
Corona P, Fattorini L, Pagliarella MC (2015) Sampling strategies for estimating forest cover from remote sensing-based two-stage inventories. For Ecosyst 2:18
Ebert C, Knauer F, Spielberger B, Thiele B, Hohmann U (2012) Estimating wild boar Sus scrofa population size using faecal DNA and capture-recapture modelling. Wildlife Biol 18:142–152
ENETwild Consortium (2018) Guidance on estimation of wild boar population abundance and density: methods, challenges, possibilities. EFSA Supporting Publication 2018: EN-1449. 48 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.EN-1449.
ENETwild Consortium (2019) Harmonization of the use of hunting statistics for wild boar density estimation in different study areas. EFSA Supporting Publication 2019: EN-1706. 29 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.EN-1706
Engeman RM, Massei G, Sage M, Gentle MN (2013) Monitoring wild pig populations: a review of methods. Environ Sci Pollut R 20:8077–8091
Fattorini N, Ferretti F (2020) Estimating wild boar density and rooting activity in a Mediterranean protected area. Mamm Biol 100(3):241–251
Fattorini L, Puletti N, Chirici G, Corona P, Gazzarri C, Mura M, Marchetti M (2016) Checking the performance of point and plot sampling on a large-scale population of trees outside forests using high-resolution imagery. Can J for Res 46:1264–1274
Fattorini L, Marcheselli M, Pisani C, Pratelli L (2017) Design-based asymptotics for two-phase sampling strategies in environmental surveys. Biometrika 104:195–205
Fattorini L, Meriggi A, Merli E, Varuzza P (2019) Sampling strategies to estimate deer density by drive counts. J Agr Biol Envir St 25:168–185
Ferretti F, Fattorini L, Sforzi A, Pisani C (2016) The use of faeces counts to estimate relative densities of wild boar in a Mediterranean area. Popul Ecol 58:329–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-016-0536-3
Focardi S, La Morgia V, Montanaro P, Riga F, Calabrese A, Ronchi F, Aragno P, Scacco M, Calmanti R, Franzetti B (2020) Reliable estimates of wild boar populations by nocturnal distance sampling. Wildlife Biol. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00694
Frackowiak W, Gorczyca S, Merta D, Wojciuch-Ploskonka M (2013) Factors affecting the level of damage by wild boar in farmland in north-eastern Poland. Pest Manag Sci 69:362–366
Frank B (2017) Human dimensions of wild boar: the need to include people in decision-making processes. In: Melletti M, Meijaard E (eds) Ecology, conservation and management of wild pigs and peccaries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Franzetti B, Ronchi F, Marini F, Scacco M, Calmanti R, Calabrese A, Paola A, Paolo M, Focardi S (2012) Nocturnal line transect sampling of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean forest: long-term comparison with capture–mark–resight population estimates. Eur J Wildlife Res 58:385–402
Galindo I, Alonso C (2017) African swine fever virus: a review. Viruses 9(5):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9050103
Grafström A (2012) Spatially correlated poisson sampling. J Stat Plan Inference 142:139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2011.07.003
Guinat C, Vergne T, Jurado-Diaz C, Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM, Dixon L, Pfeiffer DU (2017) Effectiveness and practicality of control strategies for African swine fever: what do we really know? Vete Rec 180:97. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.103992
Hanson LB, Grand JB, Mitchell MS, Jolley DB, Sparklin BD, Ditchkoff SS (2008) Change-in-ratio density estimator for feral pigs is less biased than closed mark–recapture estimates. Wildlife Res 35:695–699
Herrero J, García-Serrano A, Couto S, Ortuno VM, García-González R (2006) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. Eur J Wildlife Res 52:245–250
Imperio S, Ferrante M, Grignetti A, Santini G, Focardi S (2010) Investigating population dynamics in ungulates: do hunting statistics make up a good index of population abundance? Wildlife Biol 16:205–214. https://doi.org/10.2981/08-051
Keuling O, Podgórski T, Monaco A, Melletti M, Merta D, Albrycht M, Genov PV, Gethoffer F, Jori F, Vetter S, Scalera R, Gongora J (2017) Eurasian Wild Boar Sus scrofa (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Melletti M, Meijaard E (eds) Ecology, conservation and management of wild pigs and peccaries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 202–233
Link W (2003) Nonidentifiability of population size from capture-recapture data with heterogeneous detection probabilities. Biometrics 59:1123–1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2003.00129.x
Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M (2004) 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species: a selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN), 12pp.
Marchetti M, Garfi V, Pisani C, Franceschi S, Marcheselli M, Corona P, Puletti N, Vizzarri M, Di Cristoforo M, Ottaviani M, Fattorini L (2018) Inference on forest attributes and ecological diversity of tree-outside-forest by a two-phase inventory. Ann For Sci 75:37
Mayle BA, Peace AJ, Gill RMA (1999) How many deer? A field guide to estimating deer population size. Field Book 18, Forestry Commission, London
Massei G, Kindberg J, Licoppe A, Gačić D, Šprem N, Kamler J, Baubet E, Hohmann U, Monaco A, Ozoliņš J, Cellina S, Podgórsk T, Fonseca C, Markov N, Pokorny B, Rosell C, Náhlik A (2014) Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Manag Sci 71:492–500
Müller B, Mercker M, Brün J (2020) Population size estimates based on the frequency of genetically assigned parent–offspring pairs within a subsample. Ecol Evol 10:6356–6363
Mur L, Atzeni M, Martínez-López B (2014) Thirty-five-year presence of African swine fever in Sardinia: history, evolution and risk factors for disease maintenance. Transbound Emerg Dis 63:e165–e177
Náhlik A, Cahill S, Cellina S, Gál J, Jánoska F, Rosell C, Rossi S, Massei G (2017) Wild boar management in Europe: knowledge and practice. In: Melletti M, Meijaard E (eds) Ecology, conservation and management of wild pigs and peccaries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Organ J, Decker DJ, McDonald JE, Riley SJ, Mahoney SP (2012) Adaptive management in wildlife conservation. In: Techniques TWS (ed) NJ Silvy NJ. Johns Hopkins University Press, Manual, pp 43–54
Pagliarella MC, Sallustio L, Capobianco G, Conte E, Corona P, Fattorini L, Marchetti M (2016) From one- to two-phase sampling to reduce costs of remote sensing-based estimation of land-cover and land-use proportions and their changes. Remote Sens Environ 184:410–417
Plhal R, Kamler J, Homolka M, Adamec Z (2011) An assessment of the applicability of photo trapping to estimate wild boar population density in a forest environment. Folia Zool 60:237–246
Plhal R, Kamler J, Homolka M (2010) Comparison of four methods for estimation of wild boar population density in forest environment. In: 8th symposium on wild boar and other suids, talk 40–41, York, September 1–4, 2010
Quirós-Fernández F, Marcos J, Acevedo P, Gortázar C (2017) Hunters serving the ecosystem: the contribution of recreational hunting to wild boar population control. Eur J Wildlife Res 63:57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-017-1107-4
Sandom CJ, Hughes J, Macdonald DW (2013) Rooting for rewilding: quantifying wild boar’s Sus scrofa rooting rate in the Scottish Highlands. Restor Ecol 21:329–335
Särndal CE, Swensson B, Wretman J (1992) Model assisted survey sampling. Springer, New York
Sáez-Royuela C, Tellerìa JL (1986) The increased population of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Europe. Mammal Rev 16:97–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1986.tb00027.x
Schley L, Dufrêne M, Krier A, Frantz AC (2008) Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period. Eur J Wildlife Res 54:589–599
Schley L, Roper TJ (2003) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal Rev 33:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.00010.x
Segura A, Acevedo P, Rodríguez O, Naves J, Obeso J (2014) Biotic and abiotic factors modulating wild boar relative abundance in Atlantic Spain. Eur J Wildlife Res 60:469–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0807-2
Scillitani L, Monaco A, Toso S (2010) Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behaviour in Italy? Some evidences and management implications. Eur J Wildlife Res 56:307–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-009-0314-z
Skalski JR (1994) Estimating wildlife populations based on incomplete area surveys. Wildl Soc Bull 22:192–203
Stephens PA, Pettorelli N, Barlow J, Whittingham MJ, Cadotee MW (2015) Management by proxy? The use of indices in applied ecology. J Appl Ecol 52:1–6
Vajas P, Calenge C, Richard E, Fattebert J, Rousset C, Saïd S, Baubet E (2020) Many, large and early: hunting pressure on wild boar relates to simple metrics of hunting effort. Sci Total Environ 698:134251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134251
Vicente J, Segalés J, Höfle U, Balasch M, Plana-Duràn J, Domingo M, Gortazàr C (2004) Epidemiological study on porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infection in the European wild boar (Sus scrofa). Vet Res 35:243–253
Williams BK, Nichols JD, Conroy MJ (2002) Analysis and management of animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego
Wolter KM (2007) Introduction to variance estimation, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to wild boar hunting teams of the Massa–Carrara province, who have entirely accepted the proposed scheme and carried out the data collection correctly. We also wish to thank the ATC MS13 hunting office and its president, Filippo Merlini, who shared the study and facilitated the relations with hunting teams.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Pierre R. L. Dutilleul
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fattorini, L., Bongi, P., Monaco, A. et al. Estimating wild boar density in hunting areas by a probabilistic sampling of drive counts. Environ Ecol Stat 29, 393–413 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-021-00527-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-021-00527-y