Characteristics and differences of microplastics ingestion for farmed fish with different water depths, feeding habits and diets

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107189Get rights and content

Highlights

  • First report of the relationship between MPs accumulation and water depth, feeding habits and diets.

  • The bottom-dwelling omnivorous fish had the largest ingestion of MPs accumulation.

  • Fish size and diets were linked to differences in MPs accumulation.

Abstract

Microplastics have become a potential hazard to the quality and safety of aquatic products although there are few reports on microplastics distribution related to water depth, feeding habits and diets in aquaculture ponds. In this study, five aquaculture fish species (Ctenopharyngodon idella, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, Cirrhinus molitorella, Oreochromis niloticus and Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) were selected and their accumulation of microplastics was measured and classified. We found that the water depth, feeding habits and diets led to large differences in microplastics accumulation. The bottom-dwelling omnivorous fish had the largest ingestion of microplastics and ranked as P. fulvidraco>O. niloticus>C. molitorella,the herbivore C. idella in the middle benthic layer and the upper-layer filter-feeder H. molitrix had the lowest ingestion. The detection frequency in the gastro-intestinal tracts for C. idella, H. molitrix, C. molitorella, O. niloticus, and P. fulvidraco were 93.33%, 91.67%, 87.50%, 92.86%, and 90.91%, and detection frequencies for gills were 86.67%, 100%, 87.5%, 100%, and 81.82%, respectively. Fibers presented the dominant shape (91.92%) and blue was the primary particle color in the majority of the samples (77.39%) and 0.5–2 mm particles dominated. The plastics were composed of olefins, acrylic, rayon, polyester, polyethylene and polypropylene. Our study first reported the relationship between MPs accumulation and water depth, feeding habits and diets in aquaculture ponds, which also has a certain correlation with the fish size.

Introduction

Fish products are an important high-quality protein source and aquaculture is an effective means to achieve human nutritional goals and food security ( [1], [68]). China possesses the largest aquaculture area in the world with production in 2020 at 52.24 million tons, which is the only country in which aquaculture production exceeds that of wild fishing [74]. However, all types of fisheries are currently threatened with pollution and in particular the presence of microplastics (MPs) that was first reported in 1972 [10], [12], [60], [9]. Plastic outputs have also been increasing and this is directly related to elevated amounts of pollution by these materials [43], [81]. Physical forces such as wave action and chemical forces including solar radiation led to the disintegration of plastics into small pieces < 0.5 mm to become MPs [21], [25].

MPs are new pollution types that have paralleled technological developments and have far-reaching influences [26], [29]. The MPs pose an even greater harm to animals [52] such as intestinal wall damage and reproductive and behavioral abnormalities [3]. For instance, exposure of brine shrimp (Artemia parthenogenetica) to MPs resulted in deformed and disorderly intestinal epithelia [69]. Ingestion of 100 nm polystyrene particles by the zooplankton Daphnia magna inhibited their growth and development and decreased their reproductive ability [8]. The number and size of oocytes produced by female oysters exposed to MPs were significantly smaller than those were not exposed. In addition, sperm motility rates were significantly lower than controls and the growth rate of offspring larvae was also significantly slowed [62]. In additionally, the plastics themselves are often chemically modified using a variety of additives and amendments [5] and these compounds have included teratogens and carcinogens. These additives will be continuously released into the environment via their disintegration and will most likely have a profound impact on the environment [24]. Fish ingest food from the water and this commonality belies the wide variety of digestive and feeding organs that have evolved [59]. Pond aquaculture systems have relied on polyculture to foster an ecologically balanced environment that increases the diversity and the stability of the system [27]. The MPs are also present in these farm ponds, although their effects are not completely understood and further research is needed to guide farmers to rational polyculture and healthy consumption by consumers ( [18], [38], [72], [73]).

In this study, we examined 68 fish samples from five different fish species (Ctenopharyngodon idella, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, Cirrhinus molitorella, Oreochromis niloticus and Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) that display different water depth and feeding habits in a typical aquaculture farm. We comprehensively explored the degree of their MPs contamination and correlated this with feeding habits and with the number, color and size of the MPs materials in the gills and digestive tracts. We examined the five fish species that were the primary components of the system to determine whether all were exposed and affected to the same extent. These data will provide a theoretical basis for future ecological assessment and healthy breeding in aquaculture farms.

Section snippets

Sampling

Fish samples were collected from aquaculture ponds in Nansha, Guangzhou, Guangdong China. The area of each sampling pond was about 10 acres, the water depth was 1.8−2.0 m. The C. idella was the subjective aquaculture variety, which mixed with H. molitrix, C. molitorella, P. fulvidraco, and the stocking ratio was 3000:20:2000:500, while the O. niloticus entered the pond from the outside water when the stage of fertilized egg. The puffed coordination feed was fed 2 times per day and the amount of

Distribution and enrichment characteristics of microplastics

A total of 68 fish were collected in our sampling procedure and 681 pieces of MPs were detected with an average of 10.01 items/individual and the detection rates of MPs in five fish species were 100%, respectively. Representative photomicrographs are depicted in Fig. 1. The plastics were also detected in 91.18% of the gills and GITs, which were present in the individual species at 86.67%, 100%, 87.5%, 100%, and 81.82% for gills, and 93.33%, 91.67%, 87.5%, 92.86%, and 90.91% of the fish listed

Characteristics of microplastics in fish

The fish samples we collected for these experiments were representative of five fish species that lived at different water depths and possessed unique diets. The presence of MPs in almost all the samples confirmed the ubiquity and seriousness of MPs contamination in the water as has been previously documented [36]. Many aquatic organisms are threatened by MPs from the zooplankton at low nutritional levels [41], [69], to snails [71], crabs [79] as well as commercial fish and their processed

Conclusions

The development of aquaculture has provided people with a high-quality source of animal protein, but MPs pollution is a hidden danger for the consumption of aquatic food. The present study selected a typical breeding pond for to examine feeding habits for the most commonly consumed fish in China and linked their behaviors to MPs ingestion. Our results revealed MPs abundance differed between species and between gills and GITs for the fish. The materials we identified in these fish indicated that

Funding

This work was supported by China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-45–50), Key Realm R&D Program of Guangdong Province (No. 2020B0202080005), Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (No. 20212100006), China Scholarship Council (No. 201908440582) and Talent Introduction Special Funds of South China Agricultural University (No. K16226).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

The authors thank Guangzhou Chengyi Aquatic Products Technology and Dr. D.D. Zhao for assistance in samples collection. AZ, JZ, GX, and HT: Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. AZ, JZ, CW and XL: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. DS and PL: Resources, Formal analysis, Data curation. AZ, YC: Software, Visualization.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (78)

  • N.C.F.M. Dantas et al.

    Plastic intake does not depend on fish eating habits: Identification of microplastics in the stomach contents of fish on an urban beach in Brazil

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2020)
  • H. Dong et al.

    Interactions of microplastics and antibiotic resistance genes and their effects on the aquaculture environments

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2021)
  • A.V. Filgueiras et al.

    Microplastic ingestion by pelagic and benthic fish and diet composition: A case study in the NW Iberian shelf

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2020)
  • Z. Fu et al.

    Current practices and future perspectives of microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems in China

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2019)
  • G.C. Ghosh et al.

    Microplastics contamination in commercial marine fish from the Bay of Bengal

    Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci.

    (2021)
  • J.S. Huang et al.

    Microplastic accumulation in fish from Zhanjiang mangrove wetland, South China

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • H. Huuskonen et al.

    Do whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) larvae show adaptive variation in the avoidance of microplastic ingestion?

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2020)
  • K. Jabeen et al.

    Microplastics and mesoplastics in fish from coastal and fresh waters of China

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2017)
  • A. Karami et al.

    A high-performance protocol for extraction of microplastics in fish

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2017)
  • J.B. Koongolla et al.

    Occurrence of microplastics in gastrointestinal tracts and gills of fish from Beibu Gulf, South China Sea

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2020)
  • L. Krüger et al.

    Plastic debris accumulation in the seabed derived from coastal fish farming

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2020)
  • C. Le Guen et al.

    Microplastic study reveals the presence of natural and synthetic fibres in the diet of King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) foraging from South Georgia

    Environ. Int.

    (2020)
  • B. Li et al.

    Microplastics in fishes and their living environments surrounding a plastic production area

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • M. Liu et al.

    Microplastic and mesoplastic pollution in farmland soils in suburbs of Shanghai, China

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2018)
  • J. Ma et al.

    High levels of microplastic pollution in aquaculture water of fish ponds in the Pearl River Estuary of Guangzhou, China

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • A.R. McGoran et al.

    Presence of microplastic in the digestive tracts of European flounder, Platichthys flesus, and European smelt, Osmerus eperlanus, from the River Thames

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2017)
  • R. Md Amin et al.

    Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton in Terengganu coastal waters, southern South China Sea

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2020)
  • R. Mizraji et al.

    Is the feeding type related with the content of microplastics in intertidal fish gut?

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2017)
  • M.J. Nematollahi et al.

    Microplastic fibers in the gut of highly consumed fish species from the southern Caspian Sea

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2021)
  • D. Neves et al.

    Ingestion of microplastics by commercial fish off the Portuguese coast

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2015)
  • H. Nie et al.

    Microplastic pollution in water and fish samples around Nanxun Reef in Nansha Islands, South China Sea

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2019)
  • N. Ohkubo et al.

    Estimation of the uptake and gut retention of microplastics in juvenile marine fish: Mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus) and red seabreams (Pagrus major)

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2020)
  • A.R. Oliveira et al.

    Microplastics presence in cultured and wild-caught cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2020)
  • N.C. Ory et al.

    Capture, swallowing, and egestion of microplastics by a planktivorous juvenile fish

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2018)
  • Z. Pan et al.

    Microplastic pollution and ecological risk assessment in an estuarine environment: the Dongshan Bay of China

    Chemosphere

    (2021)
  • P. Pannetier et al.

    Environmental samples of microplastics induce significant toxic effects in fish larvae

    Environ. Int.

    (2020)
  • T. Park et al.

    Occurrence of microplastics in the Han River and riverine fish in South Korea

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • F. Parvin et al.

    Abundance, characteristics and variation of microplastics in different freshwater fish species from Bangladesh

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2021)
  • G. Pellini et al.

    Characterization of microplastic litter in the gastrointestinal tract of Solea solea from the Adriatic Sea

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (19)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text