Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hydraulic fluctuations during the pump power-off runaway transient process of a pump turbine with consideration of cavitation effects

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A runaway transition after the pump power interruption and the simultaneous guide vane servomotor failure is one of the most dangerous and complex transitions for a pumped storage power system (PSPS). This paper analyzes the fluctuation behavior and mechanism of a PSPS during a runaway transition caused by the pump power interruption. The transient cavitation flow in the PSPS is simulated by using a one-dimensional and three-dimensional coupling flow simulation method for the runaway transition. Subsequently, the effects of the transient fluctuation of the radial hydraulic thrust on the runner and transient pressures are analyzed using the short-time Fourier transform method. Finally, the mechanisms are analyzed based on the analysis of the internal flow field. This study suggests that the extreme fluctuation generally occurs near the critical transformation points between the two operation modes. In addition, the extreme fluctuation behavior is primarily related to the local backflow near the runner inlet and the unstable cavitation phenomena in the runner and the draft tube. This finding helps for optimizing the runner design to resolve the instability problems of a PSPS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marcos G. G., Roberto L. A. Assessment of the European potential for pumped hydropower energy storage based on two existing reservoirs [J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 75: 856–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbour E., Wilson I. A. G., Radcliffe J. et al. A review of pumped hydro energy storage development in significant international electricity markets [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 61: 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang W., Pavesi G., Pei J. et al. Transient simulation on closure of wicket gates in a high-head Francis-type reversible turbine operating in pump mode [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 145: 1817–1830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zuo Z., Liu S., Sun Y. et al. Pressure fluctuations in the vaneless space of high-head pump-turbines?A review [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 41: 965–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rezghi A., Riasi A. Sensitivity analysis of transient flow of two parallel pump-turbines operating at runaway [J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 86: 611–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Trivedi C., Cervantes M. J., Gandhi B. K. et al. Transient pressure measurements on a high head model Francis turbine during emergency shutdown, total load rejection, and runaway [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2014, 136(12): 121107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang W., Chen Z., Zhu B. et al. Pressure fluctuation and flow instability in S-shaped region of a reversible pump-turbine [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 154: 826–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rahul G. Vortex core formation in a Francis turbine during transient operation from best efficiency point to high load [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(7): 74109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahul G., Gandhi B. K., Cervantes M. J. Measurements on a model Francis turbine during start-stop [J]. International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems, 2019, 12(3): 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu K., Yang F., Yang Z. et al. Runner lifting-up during load rejection transients of a Kaplan turbine: Flow mechanism and solution [J]. Energies, 2019, 12(24): 4781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kan K., Zheng Y., Chen H. et al. Numerical simulation of transient flow in a shaft extension tubular pump unit during runaway process caused by power failure [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 154: 1153–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stens C., Riedelbauch S. Investigation of a fast transition from pump mode to generating mode in a model scale reversible pump turbine [J]. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 2016, 49(11): 112001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang X., Zeng W., Cheng Y. et al. Mechanism of fast transition of pressure pulsations in the vaneless space of a model pump-turbine during runaway [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2019, 141(12): 121104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gou D. M., Guo P. C., Luo X. Q. et al. 3-D combined simulation of power-off runaway transient process of pumped storage power station under pump condition [J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 33(1): 28–39(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou D., Chen H., Zhang L. Investigation of pumped storage hydropower power-off transient process using 3D numerical simulation based on SP-VOF hybrid model [J]. Energies, 2018, 11(4): 1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang Z., Cheng Y., Xia L. et al. Evolutions of flow patterns and pressure fluctuations in a prototype pumpturbine during the runaway transient process after pump-trip [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 152: 1149–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang C., You J., Tai R. et al. CFD simulations of pumptrip runaway process pressure pulsation of a model pumpturbine [J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2020, 39(4): 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang L., Zhou D. CFD research on runaway transient of pumped storage power station caused by pumping power failure [J]. IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2013, 52(5): 52027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang P., Yu J. Numerical simulation of water hammer boundary conditions based on nozzle outflow law [J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2020, 38(8): 814–818.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang L., Wang F., Lei X. Investigation on friction models for simulation of pipeline filling transients [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2018, 56(6): 888–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huai W. X, Wang Z. W., Qian Z. D. et al. Numerical simulation of sandy bed erosion by 2D vertical jet [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(12): 3265–3274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li Z. W., Huai W. X., Qian Z. D. Study on the flow field and concentration characteristics of the multiple tandem jets in crossflow [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2012, 55(10): 2778–2788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang L. Y., Ji B., Cheng H. Y. et al. One-dimensional/ three-dimensional analysis of transient cavitating flow in a venturi tube with special emphasis on cavitation excited pressure fluctuation prediction [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2020, 63(2): 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang H., Liu X., Jiang Q, et al. Numerical simulation of cavitation turbulence in Francis turbine runner with splitter blades [J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2020, 38(1): 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tran C. T., Long X. P., Ji B. et al. Prediction of the precessing vortex core in the Francis-99 draft tube under off-design conditions by using Liutex/Rortex method [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2020, 32(3): 623–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Trivedi C., Dahlhaug O. G. Interaction between trailing edge wake and vortex rings in a Francis turbine at runaway condition: compressible large eddy simulation [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2018, 30(7): 75101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang X. X., Cheng Y. G. Simulation of hydraulic transients in hydropower systems using the 1D-3D coupling approach [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2012, 24(4): 595–604.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Fu X., Li D., Wang H. et al. Numerical simulation of the transient flow in a pump-turbine during the load rejection process with special emphasis on the cavitation effect [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2020, 142(1): 11103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China

    Xiao-long Fu, De-you Li & Yong-guang Cheng

  2. School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, Canada

    Xiao-long Fu, De-you Li & Hong-jie Wang

  3. State Key Laboratory of Hydro-Power Equipment, Harbin Institute of Large Electrical Machinery Harbin, Harbin, 150001, China

    Xian-zhu Wei

Authors
  1. Xiao-long Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. De-you Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hong-jie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yong-guang Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xian-zhu Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to De-you Li.

Additional information

Projects supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52079034).

Biography

Xiao-long Fu (1992-), Male, Ph. D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, Xl., Li, Dy., Wang, Hj. et al. Hydraulic fluctuations during the pump power-off runaway transient process of a pump turbine with consideration of cavitation effects. J Hydrodyn 33, 1162–1175 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0105-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0105-5

Key words

Search

Navigation