Skip to main content
Log in

Physically mixed Ni2Co/graphene catalyst for enhanced glucose oxidation in a glucose fuel cell

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glucose oxidation reaction is kinetically sluggish and demands a highly efficient catalyst. Herein, we report a direct glucose alkaline fuel cell (DGAFC) using physically mixed Ni2Co nanoparticles and reduced graphene oxide (Ni2Co-rGO) supported on nickel foam as an anode to promote glucose oxidation. The DGAFC with the Ni2Co-rGO anode delivered a remarkably enhanced peak power density of 40.44 W/m2 at room temperature, which was 74.91% higher than the control (23.12 W/m2). Different techniques including XPS, SEM, linear sweep voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy were used to explore the physiochemical and electrochemical properties of the catalyst. Our results demonstrate that Ni2Co-rGO exhibits an excellent activity toward glucose oxidation in alkaline medium, leading to a drastic improvement in the anode performance. There should be a synergistic effect between rGO and Ni2Co. In the Ni2Co-rGO nanocomposite, rGO not only acts as a support for the Ni2Co nanoparticles and also promotes the electron transfer during the glucose oxidation process. This study can promote the development of bi-transition metal-based catalysts for DGAFCs.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang Y, Diaz DFR, Chen KS, Wang Z, Adroher XC (2020) Materials, technological status, and fundamentals of PEM fuel cells–a review. Materials today 32:178–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pan Z, An L, Zhao T, Tang Z (2018) Advances and challenges in alkaline anion exchange membrane fuel cells. Prog Energy Combust Sci 66:141–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang J, Wang H, Fan Y (2018) Techno-economic challenges of fuel cell commercialization. Engineering 4(3):352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilberforce T, Ijaodola O, Ogungbemi E, Khatib F, Leslie T, El-Hassan Z, Thomposon J, Olabi A (2019) Technical evaluation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell performance—a review of the effects of bipolar plates coating. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 113:109286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alias M, Kamarudin S, Zainoodin A, Masdar M (2020) Active direct methanol fuel cell: an overview. Int J Hydrog Energy 45(38):19620–19641

  6. Hao W, Ma H, Sun G, Li Z (2019) Magnesia phosphate cement composite bipolar plates for passive type direct methanol fuel cells. Energy 168:80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zakaria Z, Kamarudin SK (2016) Direct conversion technologies of methane to methanol: an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 65:250–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammed H, Al-Othman A, Nancarrow P, Tawalbeh M, El Haj AM (2019) Direct hydrocarbon fuel cells: a promising technology for improving energy efficiency. Energy 172:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leo TJ, Raso MA, Navarro E, Mora E (2013) Long term performance study of a direct methanol fuel cell fed with alcohol blends. Energies 6(1):282–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujiwara N, Yamazaki S-i, Siroma Z, Ioroi T, Senoh H, Yasuda K (2009) Nonenzymatic glucose fuel cells with an anion exchange membrane as an electrolyte. Electrochemistry communications 11(2):390–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Torigoe K, Takahashi M, Tsuchiya K, Iwabata K, Ichihashi T, Sakaguchi K, Sugawara F, Abe M (2018) High-power abiotic direct glucose fuel cell using a gold–platinum bimetallic anode catalyst. ACS omega 3(12):18323–18333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lawson K, Rossi R, Regan JM, Logan BE (2020) Impact of cathodic electron acceptor on microbial fuel cell internal resistance. Bioresource technology. 316:123919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Silveira G, de Aquino Neto S, Schneedorf JM (2020) Development, characterization and application of a low-cost single chamber microbial fuel cell based on hydraulic couplers. Energy. 208:118395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sorrentino I, Gentil S, Nedellec Y, Cosnier S, Piscitelli A, Giardina P, Le Goff A (2019) POXC laccase from pleurotus ostreatus: a high-performance multicopper enzyme for direct oxygen reduction reaction operating in a proton-exchange membrane fuel cell. ChemElectroChem. 6(4):1023–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cracknell JA, Vincent KA, Armstrong FA (2008) Enzymes as working or inspirational electrocatalysts for fuel cells and electrolysis. Chemical Reviews. 108(7):2439–2461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahmad YH, Mohamed AT, El-Shafei A, Al-Qaradawi SY, Aljaber AS (2020) Facile one-step synthesis of supportless porous AuPtPd nanocrystals as high performance electrocatalyst for glucose oxidation reaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 45(38):19163–19173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu H, Yan B, Zhang K, Wang J, Li S, Wang C, Du Y, Yang P, Jiang S, Song S (2017) N-doped graphene-supported binary PdBi networks for formic acid oxidation. Appl Surf Sci 416:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang J, Zhao P, Jin X, Wang Y, Yuan H, Zhu X (2020) Enzymatic biofuel cells based on protein engineering: recent advances and future prospects. Biomaterials science 8(19):5230–5240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao X, Xia H-q, Wu R, Bai L, Yan L, Magner E, Cosnier S, Lojou E, Zhu Z, Liu A (2019) Tackling the challenges of enzymatic (bio) fuel cells. Chemical reviews 119(16):9509–9558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Irfan M, Liu X, Li S, Khan IU, Li Y, Wang J, Wang X, Du X, Wang G, Zhang P (2020) High-performance glucose fuel cell with bimetallic Ni–Co composite anchored on reduced graphene oxide as anode catalyst. Renewable Energy 155:1118–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frei M, Martin J, Kindler S, Cristiano G, Zengerle R, Kerzenmacher S (2018) Power supply for electronic contact lenses: abiotic glucose fuel cells vs. Mg/Air batteries Journal of Power Sources 401:403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Le PG, Kim MI (2021) Research progress and prospects of nanozyme-based glucose biofuel cells. Nanomaterials 11(8):2116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bahari M, Malmberg MA, Brown DM, Nazari SH, Lewis RS, Watt GD, Harb JN (2020) Oxidation efficiency of glucose using viologen mediators for glucose fuel cell applications with non-precious anodes. Applied Energy 261:114382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Barzi S, Zhiani M, Ahmadi A (2019) Evaluation of carbon supported Fe–Co electrocatalyst for selective oxygen reduction to use in implantable glucose fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44(59):31515–31524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Basu D, Basu S (2012) Performance studies of Pd–Pt and Pt–Pd–Au catalyst for electro-oxidation of glucose in direct glucose fuel cell. International journal of hydrogen energy 37(5):4678–4684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rafaïdeen T, Baranton S, Coutanceau C (2019) Highly efficient and selective electrooxidation of glucose and xylose in alkaline medium at carbon supported alloyed PdAu nanocatalysts. Appl Catal B 243:641–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Escalona-Villalpando R, Gurrola M, Trejo G, Guerra-Balcázar M, Ledesma-García J, Arriaga L (2018) Electrodeposition of gold on oxidized and reduced graphite surfaces and its influence on glucose oxidation. J Electroanal Chem 816:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gao M, Liu X, Irfan M, Shi J, Wang X, Zhang P (2018) Nickle-cobalt composite catalyst-modified activated carbon anode for direct glucose alkaline fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43(3):1805–1815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sarwar E, Noor T, Iqbal N, Mehmood Y, Ahmed S, Mehek R (2018) Effect of Co-Ni ratio in graphene based bimetallic electro-catalyst for methanol oxidation. Fuel Cells 18(2):189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yan Z, Xu Z, Yang Z, Yue L, Huang L (2019) Graphene oxide/Fe2O3 nanoplates supported Pt for enhanced room-temperature oxidation of formaldehyde. Appl Surf Sci 467–468:277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Han J, Jun B-M, Heo J, Lee G, Yoon Y, Park CM (2019) Highly efficient organic dye removal from waters by magnetically recoverable La2O2CO3/ZnFe2O4-reduced graphene oxide nanohybrid. Ceramics International 45(15):19247–19256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sun S, Zhang G, Gauquelin N, Chen N, Zhou J, Yang S, Chen W, Meng X, Geng D, Banis MN (2013) Single-atom catalysis using Pt/graphene achieved through atomic layer deposition. Scientific Reports 3(1):1–9

  33. Baronia R, Goel J, Tiwari S, Singh P, Singh D, Singh SP, Singhal SK (2017) Efficient electro-oxidation of methanol using PtCo nanocatalysts supported reduced graphene oxide matrix as anode for DMFC. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42(15):10238–10247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu J, Choi HJ, Meng L-Y (2018) A review of approaches for the design of high-performance metal/graphene electrocatalysts for fuel cell applications. J Ind Eng Chem 64:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hummers WS Jr, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxide. Journal of the american chemical society 80(6):1339–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang H, Wang G, Ling Y, Qian F, Song Y, Lu X, Chen S, Tong Y, Li Y (2013) High power density microbial fuel cell with flexible 3D graphene–nickel foam as anode. Nanoscale 5(21):10283–10290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Aghayee S, Fereydooni Y, Talebi A (2012) The use of a glucose-reduced graphene oxide suspension for photothermal cancer therapy. Journal of Materials Chemistry 22(27):13773–13781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sharma K, Maiti K, Kim NH, Hui D, Lee JH (2018) Green synthesis of glucose-reduced graphene oxide supported Ag-Cu2O nanocomposites for the enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Compos B Eng 138:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dong F, Liu X, Irfan M, Yang L, Li S, Ding J, Li Y, Khan IU, Zhang P (2019) Macaroon-like FeCo2O4 modified activated carbon anode for enhancing power generation in direct glucose fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44(16):8178–8187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang L, Liu X, Ding J, Li S, Dong F, Irfan M, Li Y, Wang G, Du X, Zhang P (2019) Chlorella-derived porous heteroatom-doped carbons as robust catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in direct glucose alkaline fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44(5):2823–2831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ho J, Li Y, Dai Y, Kim T, Wang J, Ren J, Yun H, Liu X (2021) Ionothermal synthesis of N-doped carbon supported CoMn2O4 nanoparticles as ORR catalyst in direct glucose alkaline fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 46(39):20503–20515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu Q, Zhou Q, Gao C, Liu L, Ye H (2021) Excellent electrochemical stability of Co3O4 array with carbon hybridization derived from metal-organic framework. Nanotechnology 32(48):485710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang Y-L, Liu X-H, Hao M-Q, Zhang P-P (2015) Performance of a low-cost direct glucose fuel cell with an anion-exchange membrane. International journal of hydrogen energy 40(34):10979–10984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang L, Li M, Huang Z, Li Y, Qi S, Yi C, Yang B (2014) Ni–WC/C nanocluster catalysts for urea electrooxidation. J Power Sources 264:282–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ding Y, Zhang P, Zhuo Q, Ren H, Yang Z, Jiang Y (2011) A green approach to the synthesis of reduced graphene oxide nanosheets under UV irradiation. Nanotechnology 22(21):215601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stobinski L, Lesiak B, Malolepszy A, Mazurkiewicz M, Mierzwa B, Zemek J, Jiricek P, Bieloshapka I (2014) Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide studied by the XRD, TEM and electron spectroscopy methods. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 195:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ban F, Majid SR, Huang NM, Lim H (2012) Graphene oxide and its electrochemical performance. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci 7(5):4345–4351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang T, Zhang S, Yan X, Lyu M, Wang L, Bell J, Wang H (2017) 2-Methylimidazole-derived Ni–Co layered double hydroxide nanosheets as high rate capability and high energy density storage material in hybrid supercapacitors. ACS applied materials & interfaces 9(18):15510–15524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Liang H, Lin J, Jia H, Chen S, Qi J, Cao J, Lin T, Fei W, Feng J (2018) Hierarchical NiCo-LDH/NiCoP@ NiMn-LDH hybrid electrodes on carbon cloth for excellent supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 6(31):15040–15046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cheng M, Yang R, Zhang L, Shi Z, Yang W, Wang D, Xie G, Shi D, Zhang G (2012) Restoration of graphene from graphene oxide by defect repair. Carbon 50(7):2581–2587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Martin A, Escarpa A (2014) Graphene: the cutting–edge interaction between chemistry and electrochemistry. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 56:13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tuinstra F, Koenig JL (1970) Raman spectrum of graphite. The Journal of chemical physics 53(3):1126–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Farooqui U, Ahmad A, Hamid N (2018) Graphene oxide: a promising membrane material for fuel cells. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:714–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen J, Zheng H, Kang J, Yang F, Cao Y, Xiang M (2017) An alkaline direct oxidation glucose fuel cell using three-dimensional structural Au/Ni-foam as catalytic electrodes. RSC Advances 7(5):3035–3042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lemoine C, Dubois L, Napporn TW, Servat K, Kokoh KB (2020) Electrochemical energy conversion from direct oxidation of glucose on active electrode materials. Electrocatalysis 11(2):170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sakai H, Nakagawa T, Tokita Y, Hatazawa T, Ikeda T, Tsujimura S, Kano K (2009) A high-power glucose/oxygen biofuel cell operating under quiescent conditions. Energy & Environmental Science 2(1):133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen J, Zhao CX, Zhi MM, Wang K, Deng L, Xu G (2012) Alkaline direct oxidation glucose fuel cell system using silver/nickel foams as electrodes. Electrochimica acta 66:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was partially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFC1407800) and the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City (Grant No. 19YFZCSN01130).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianhua Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• the catalyst has the advantages of low cost

Easy fabrication and high efficiency.

• Maximum power density of 40.44 W/m2 was obtained under ambient conditions.

• A synergistic effect between Ni2Co and graphene was proposed.

• This study can facilitate the development of cost-effective catalysts for DGAFC

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Ding, J., Liu, X. et al. Physically mixed Ni2Co/graphene catalyst for enhanced glucose oxidation in a glucose fuel cell. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 14, 525–537 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02317-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02317-3

Keywords

Navigation