Who’s eating pork? Investigating pig breeding and consumption in Byzantine, Islamic and Norman/Aragonese Sicily (7th-14th c. AD)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103299Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Zooarchaeology of the Roman/Byzantine – Arab transition in Sicily.

  • Zooarchaeology of the Arab – Norman/Aragonese transition in Sicily.

  • Results from species frequencies, ageing, and biometry are contextualised.

  • Impact of Islamic food prohibitions and dietary habits on local communities.

  • A focused analysis on pork consumption in urban and rural sites is provided.

Abstract

This paper investigates the culture of pork consumption in Sicily by examining a number of archaeological faunal assemblages dated to chronological phases spanning from the Byzantine to the Norman/Aragonese period (7th-14th c. AD). Zooarchaeological analyses reveal substantial diachronic changes in the use of the main domesticates, particularly concerning pig frequencies. In the Islamic period (9th-11th c. AD), pig is poorly represented at urban sites; this is likely to reflect a socio-cultural acceptance of the Islamic religious precepts forbidding pork consumption. By contrast, and in continuity with the Roman and Byzantine periods, pigs are well-represented in rural settlements, thus indicating a more resilient attitude of these communities toward newly imported religious traditions. In the later Norman/Aragonese period, the frequency of pig increases at some urban sites, reflecting the fact that that pork prohibition had been lifted and that new food production and consumption practices were developed. Pig continues, however, to be almost absent at a number of urban sites and castles/fortified villages; this may suggest the persistence of Islamised communities in Sicily after the end of Islamic rule.

Introduction

For millennia Sicily’s productive lands and strategic position in the Mediterranean Basin have stimulated the interest of different powers; this holds especially true for the Middle Ages when the island became a frontier of the Arab world.

Until the early 9th c. AD, Sicily was under Byzantine administration. In AD 827, the Arab conquest of Sicily began; troops coming from Ifrīqya (modern Tunisia and eastern Algeria) landed in Mazara del Vallo (south-western Sicily) and, after four years, they conquered Palermo, which became the capital of the island. The Arab conquest of Sicily was a rather slow and staged process. A complete conquest of the island was only achieved in AD 848 and was followed by a period of economic prosperity (Amari, 1954, Metcalfe, 2009, Chiarelli, 2011, Nef, 2013, Molinari, 2019, Molinari, 2020).

In the second half of the 11th c. AD, the Normans started their own conquest of the island, which took thirty years to complete (CE 1061–1091). In this period, Islamic communities still made up most of the Sicilian population; however, growing religious intolerance resulted in the first mass migration of Islamic people from Sicily to North Africa. When the Norman dynasty died out, political control over Sicily passed by inheritance to the Hohenstaufen (Swabian) dynasty (CE 1198–1266); later, the island fell to the Angevin (CE 1266–1282) and the Aragonese (CE 1282–1516; Bresc, 1986, Metcalfe, 2011, Bresc, 2013). From the end of the Swabian period, Islamic objects are no longer part of the Sicilian archaeological record, indicating that Islamic cultural influence on the island was waning (Molinari 2020).

The centrality of medieval Sicily within the complex economic and political dynamics of the Mediterranean has been the subject of many archaeological and historical studies (e.g. Spatafora 2005; Molinari 2009; Arcifa 2010; Molinari, 2010a; 2010b; Nef and Prigent, 2010, Nef, 2011, Arcifa et al., 2012, Molinari, 2012, Molinari, 2013, Nef, 2013, Pezzini, 2013, Spatafora and Canzonieri, 2014, Arcifa, 2016, Mandalà, 2016, Carver et al., 2017; 2018; 2019; Molinari, 2019, Arcifa and Sgarlata, 2020). Specific categories of archaeological evidence (e.g. pottery, burials) and buildings (especially mosques) have been used as indicators of socio-cultural and economic change across the different political phases of medieval Sicily (e.g. Molinari, 1997, Bagnera and Pezzini, 2004, Di Salvo, 2004; Molinari 2009; Molinari 2010c; 2010d; Molinari, 2011, Arcifa and Bagnera, 2014, Ardizzone et al., 2014, Sacco, 2014, Ardizzone et al., 2016, Bramoullé et al., 2017, Sacco, 2018).

Conversely, animal remains have rarely been considered (but see Arcoleo and Sineo, 2014, Arcoleo, 2015, Battaglia et al., 2016, Scavone, 2016, Scavone, 2019, Aniceti, 2020, Castrorao Barba et al., 2021, Aniceti, in press).

Yet, zooarchaeological investigations can be highly informative as animal remains are often the result of food consumption, an important cultural identifier. Their potential is especially valuable in a region such as medieval Sicily, which was composed of different ethnic groups contributing to a melting pot of traditions and beliefs. The religions professed by these groups (Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Paganism) were also associated with different dietary habits. Islam and Judaism were and are still characterised by several permanent food taboos, pork avoidance being the most relevant to this study (Insoll, 2001, Kocturk, 2002, Regenstein et al., 2003, Greenfield and Bouchnick, 2011, Morales-Muñiz et al., 2011, Price, 2020). Food avoidances are also associated with Christianity, although these tend to be temporary and are usually only followed by restricted groups of people (e.g. clerics) – the only exception being the consumption of horse meat (Simoons, 1994, Lauwerier, 1999).

Considering the important economic role played by pigs in Roman and Byzantine Sicily (e.g. Scavone, 2016, Aniceti, 2020, Castrorao Barba et al., 2021; Mackinnon Unpublished report [a], Unpublished report [b], Unpublished report [c], Unpublished report [d]), a potential absence of pigs in Islamic sites cannot be ascribed to environmental constrains. Such a theory would rely on the fact that, because of their inability to sweat, pigs tend to be intolerant of high temperatures (>36 degrees Celsius), unless some water sources, mud or wooded areas are present in the vicinity (Simoons, 1994, Diener et al., 1978, Insoll, 2001). Palynological analyses from Pergusa Lake (central Sicily) have demonstrated that, despite a long period of aridity before the Arab conquest (AD 750–800) (Sadori et al. 2013), wooded areas survived in the Islamic period (Incarbona et al. 2010). These could have represented refuge areas in medieval times, favouring pig husbandry and the practice of free-range herding. Similarly, recent anthracological studies at Islamic Mazara del Vallo (south-western Sicily) have revealed the occurrence of a mosaic of different ecosystems, including thermo-xerophilous woodland (with a clear incidence of the Quercus ilex type) and Mediterranean maquis (Fiorentino et al., in press).

Since environmental factors cannot explain the potential absence of suids in Islamic assemblages, the reason is more likely to be found in the ‘social Islamisation process’1 of the island in medieval times. Since the Byzantine period, Jewish communities also settled in Sicily; in Palermo, at the end of the 10th c. AD, they were established in an area known as Harat Al-Yahud (the Jewish quarter) (La Lumia, 1984, Vanoli, 2012, Mandalà, 2013). In Judaism, like in Islam, dietary rules include permanent food taboos, such as the prohibition of consuming pork. In addition, to be halal and kosher (‘consumable’ in Arab and Jewish respectively), animals had to be culled in a specific way. Usually, this consists in cutting the jugular vein and the esophagus of the animal with a sharp knife, in order to interrupt the flow of blood to the brain, thus producing an immediate state of unconsciousness. During the Schechita (the Jewish butchery process), the animal sciatic nerve is also removed. Because of the difficulties in removing this nerve, all hind limbs are often considered prohibited (Daróczi-Szabó 2004). The Jewish practice can be detected in the archaeological record (Lisowski 2019) more easily than Muslim butchery (Aniceti 2020). No evidence of Schechita has been detected on the kosher species (e.g. caprines, cattle) analysed from the sites discussed in this paper (Aniceti 2020).

In this paper, for the first time, the pork-taboo issue is analysed by examining a substantial number of faunal assemblages that are contextualised within their historical framework. The main aim of this research is to investigate pork production and consumption in medieval Sicily (7th-14th c. AD) with a specific focus on the Islamic period and placing this phenomenon within its broader husbandry and cultural context.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Animal remains from five urban sites and three rural sites were analysed; most of them are located in the western part of the island (Fig. 1) and are dated to the Byzantine, Islamic and/or Norman/Aragonese period. With the exception of Byzantine Rocchicella, all sites have an Islamic and/or a Norman/Aragonese phase (Tab.1).

Some of the sites were discovered during rescue excavations (Corso dei Mille, Sant’Antonino, the Norman Palace, Mazara del Vallo, and Colmitella) and others as a result of

Results

In this section taxonomic frequencies of the main domesticates (cattle, caprines, and pig) from different types of sites and periods are compared. Particular attention is paid to suid presence/absence, as well as frequency, in the Islamic period and, for the sake of comparison, the earlier and later periods.

Conclusions

Following the Roman/Byzantine period, food production and consumption practices changed substantially in Islamic Palermo and Mazara del Vallo. Here, the Muslim dietary prohibition of pork was adopted more strictly than at contemporary rural settlements, where a stronger continuity with previous animal husbandry strategies is evident. Such persistence of previous practices in rural areas may suggest that the Islamic administration had insufficient power or motivation to successfully impose

Submission declaration

The work described in this article has not been published previously, it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, its publication is approved by all authors and by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without the written consent of the copyright-holder.

Role of the funding source

The PhD project on which this article is based was funded by the White Rose University Consortium (strategic partnership between the Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York, United Kingdom) - PhD Scholarship Award 2014-2017, granted to Veronica Aniceti. This sponsor was not involved in the study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, and the decision to submit the article for publication.

Data statement

Raw research data will be made available following acceptance of the article, by depositing a complete dataset in a relevant repository, and linking the finalised article directly to such dataset. Free-to-use, open access repositories will be preferred (e.g., Mendeley Data).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Veronica Aniceti: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Umberto Albarella: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This paper presents and discusses part of the results of VA’s doctoral project, funded by the White Rose Consortium (Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York, UK). The PhD project has been the result of a collaboration between the University of Sheffield, the University of York and a number of archaeologists working in Sicily; among these, our gratitude goes to the people of the Soprintendenza per i Beni Culturali ed Ambientali di Palermo (Stefano Vassallo, Giuseppina Battaglia, Carla Aleo

References (127)

  • Aleo Nero, C. (2017). Palermo. Ceramica da contesti urbani di età medievale, circolazione e consumo. Lo scavo nel...
  • Alfano, A. (2019). La ceramica medievale. In P. Pensabene and P. Barresi (eds.) Piazza Armerina, Villa del Casale:...
  • M. Amari

    Storia dei musulmani di Sicilia

    (1954)
  • Aniceti, V. (2020). Animals and their role in the medieval society of Sicily: from Byzantine to Arabs and from Arabs to...
  • V. Aniceti et al.

    Le risorse animali nella dieta e nella vita degli abitanti di Via Romano (Mazara): tra religione ed incremento produttivo. In Molinari, A. and A. Meo (eds.) Mazara, Mazar: nel ventre della città medievale (secoli VII–XV). Edizione degli scavi, in Via Tenente Gaspare Romano

    (1997)
  • L. Arcifa

    Per un nuovo approccio allo studio delle città siciliane nell’Altomedioevo: Catania e Siracusa tra VIII e IX secolo

  • L. Arcifa

    Nuove ipotesi a partire dalla rilettura dei dati archeologici: la Sicilia orientale

  • L. Arcifa et al.

    Islamizzazione e cultura materiale a Palermo: una riconsiderazione dei contesti ceramici di Castello San Pietro

  • L. Arcifa et al.

    Archeologia della Sicilia islamica: nuove proposte di riflessione

  • Arcifa, L. and E. Lesnes (1997). Primi dati sulle produzioni ceramiche palermitane dal X al XV secolo. In G. Démians...
  • L. Arcifa et al.

    Il perché́ dopo l’Antico

  • L. Arcifa et al.

    From polis to madina. La trasformazione delle città siciliane tra tardoantico ed alto medioevo

    (2020)
  • L. Arcoleo

    Indagini archeozoologiche della Palermo antica: la Gancia, Palazzo Bonagia e Via Imera

    (2015)
  • L. Arcoleo et al.

    Analisi archeozoologica di due contesti della città antica di Palermo: la Gancia e i Sili di via Imera (Palermo, IX–X secolo D.C.)

  • F. Ardizzone et al.

    The role of Palermo in the central Mediterranean: evolution of the harbour and circulation of ceramics (10th–11th centuries)

    Journal of Islamic Archaeology

    (2016)
  • F. Ardizzone et al.

    Lo scavo della chiesa di Santa Maria degli Angeli alla Gancia: indicatori archeologici della prima età islamica a Palermo

  • A. Bagnera

    From a small town to a capital: the urban evolution of Islamic Palermo (9th-mid-11th century)

  • A. Bagnera et al.

    I cimiteri di rito musulmano nella Sicilia medievale

    Dati e problemi. MEFRM

    (2004)
  • R. Barone
    (1976)
  • Battaglia, G., L. Riolo and V. Aniceti (2016). Produzioni artigianali nella Palermo islamica. In V. Caminneci, M. C....
  • Bedini E. (1999). I reperti faunistici del palazzo fortificato medievale (SAS 1/2), in AA.VV., Entella. Relazioni...
  • M. Benkheira

    Islâm et interdits alimentaires. Juguler l’animalité̀

    (2000)
  • M. Benkheira

    La nourriture carnée comme frontière rituelle

    Archives des Sciences Sociales des Religions

    (1995)
  • J. Boessneck

    Osteological differences between sheep (Ovis aries Linné) and goat (Capra hircus Linné)

  • Bossard-Beck, C. (1984). Le mobilier ostéologique et botanique. In J. M. Pesez (ed.) Brucato. Histoire et archéologie...
  • D. Bramoullé et al.

    Le mobilier céramique dans la Méditerranée des Xe-XIIe siècles

    Annales Islamologiques

    (2017)
  • H. Bresc

    Religious Palermo: A Panorama between the 12th and the 15th Centuries

  • H. Bresc

    Un monde méditerranéen: économie et société en Sicile (1300–1460)

    (1986)
  • Carver, M., A. Molinari, V. Aniceti, C. Capelli, F. Colangeli, L. Drieu, G. Fiorentino, F. Giovannini, M. Hummler, J....
  • M. Carver et al.

    Sicily in transition

    Interim report of investigations at Castronovo di Sicilia 2016. The Journal of Fasti Online 412

    (2018)
  • --- (2017). Ricerche 2016 a Castronovo di Sicilia, Sicily in Transition (Progetto ERC advanced grant 2016-693600)....
  • Cassai, D. (2003). La vita quotidiana a Mazara del Vallo (TP) in età islamica: i “pozzi di butto” di via Tenente...
  • Castrorao Barba, A., C. Speciale, R. Miccichè, F. Pisciotta, C. Aleo Nero, P. Marino and G. Bazan (2021).The Sicilian...
  • Chiarelli, L. C. (2011). A history of Muslim Sicily. Venera: Midsea...
  • Colangeli, F. (in prep.). Il riflesso di vetri e metalli: oltre alla cermaica per la comprensione dei mutamenti...
  • Corretti, A., M. Gargini, C. Michelini and M. A. Vaggioli (2004). Tra Arabi, Berberi e Normanni: Entella ed il suo...
  • J. Covaneiro et al.

    Proibições e tolerãncias. Os hábitos alimentares das populações em época islãmica (Tavira)

  • L. Daróczi-Szabó

    Animal bones as indicators of kosher food refuse from 14th century AD Buda, Hungary

  • De Grossi Mazzorin, J. and C. Minniti (2009). L’utilizzazione degli animali nella documentazione archeozoologica a Roma...
  • P. Diener et al.

    Ecology, evolution, and the search for cultural origins: the question of Islamic pig prohibition [and comments and reply]

    Current Anthropology

    (1978)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text