Recent development in catalyst and reactor design for CO2 reforming of alcohols to syngas: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2021.12.023Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A review on the dry reforming of alcohols over Ni-based catalyst is presented.

  • Alcohols as the potential feedstock for production of syngas.

  • Recent review on the catalyst and reactor design in dry reforming.

  • Thermodynamic analysis and future potential catalyst development are reported.

Abstract

Global energy demand has had a significant impact on the Green House Gases (GHGs) emission, which have harmful effects on the environment and human health. Catalytic CO2 reforming of biomass-derived alcohols converted into syngas is regarded as a viable option for reducing GHGs. Even though this is sustainable and ecologically beneficial for utilizing value-added biomass, little research has been done on the topic. Due to the high reaction temperature, metal sintering and coke formation have been widely reported as the major challenges in the CO2 reforming process. These conditions could reduce the catalyst efficiency and cause the reactor system to shut down. To address these issues, this article provides a review of the current catalyst and reactor design development for CO2 reforming of methanol, ethanol, glycerol, and butanol to generate synthetic gas. Thermodynamic analysis, catalyst performance, optimizing reaction parameters, and future potential catalyst design are also covered.

Introduction

In 2020, the major greenhouse gases (GHGs) of carbon dioxide (CO2) were reported to decrease by 5.7% from 2019. This intermittent trend occurred as a result of the current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic around the world. Unfortunately, the CO2 emission is predicted to rebound nearly 5% in the year 2021, which is in parallel with the global economic recovery, especially for energy-related industries (IEA, 2021). China produces the most CO2 emissions, with 11.535 gigatons produced in 2019, followed by the United States with 5.243 gigatons. Meanwhile, Malaysia produces almost 30 billion CO2 emissions, which come from various sectors, including daily human activities, residential areas, transportation, electricity generation, and industrial. Persistent greenhouse gas emissions continuously raise global temperatures, leading to abnormal natural disasters like droughts, floods, and storms (Roslan et al., 2020). According to the report by Asian Pacific Energy Centre (APEC), the CO2 emission in Malaysia is projected to grow by 4.2% per year and possibly increase to 414 million tonnes in 2030 for the commercial sector, followed by the transport sector (400 million tonnes), industry sector (270 million tonnes), other transformation sectors (172 million tonnes) and electrical generation (150 million tonnes) (Hosseini et al., 2013).

According to Le et al. (2021), carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) became one of the significant parts to mitigate the climate change caused by anthropogenic CO2 emissions while meeting the growing global energy demand (Le et al., 2021). Thus, minimizing carbon releases is an essential attempt to reduce global warming hazards and climate changes affected by GHGs emissions. Among them, CO2 utilization is becoming a promising technology in dealing with world climate change In general, CO2 can mainly be utilized either as a direct solvent, refrigerant, and extracting agent, or reactant gas to produce beneficial chemicals, for instance, light alcohol, urea, and syngas (Chung and Chang, 2016; Zhao et al., 2020).

Various established processes have been reported for syngas production, including hydrocarbon reforming (Ismagilov et al., 2019; Abdullah et al., 2020a,b; Abdullah et al., 2021), electrolysis (Kaddami and Mikou, 2017), and biochemical (photosynthesis and fermentation) processes (Suffredini et al., 2017). Most of the energy industries generate syngas (H2 and CO) from the process of fossil fuels reforming, including liquid petroleum, coal, natural gas, and naphtha in which unavoidably produced a high amount of CO2 that caused an environmental contaminants issue due to the releasing of the hazardous and chemicals substances to the atmosphere (Kaddami and Mikou, 2017). The global energy crisis is currently concern with the problem of depletion of fossil-based fuels as primary resources. This issue demand on other alternative energy sources for the production of a cleaner and sustainable form of fuel energy to replace current fossil fuels.

Recently, many researchers focused on synthesis syngas using dry reforming of biomass-derived feedstocks of alcohols like ethanol, butanol, methanol, and glycerol (Siew et al., 2014; Aouad et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2019; Abidin et al., 2020), as this renewable resource being carbon neutral process to future hydrogen economy (Muradov and Vezirog, 2008) and less effect to the global climate (Zakaria et al., 2015). CO2 reforming with oxygenates (short-chain alcohol) as the feedstock has become one of the most attractive routes for producing CO and H2 due to low reactant costs, promote cleaner fuels and a desired to reduce CO2 emissions in the environment while producing a valuable product (Li et al., 2016; Azizan et al., 2020). Among four types of alcohols, ethanol and glycerol became the popular feedstocks for dry reforming in syngas production due to their unique characteristics, as tabulated in Table 1.

Methanol reforming has been considered a promising technology for producing syngas compared to gasoline and diesel fuel because of its free sulfur content, high hydrogen density, readily available, easily transported, and stored (Iulianelli et al., 2014). Methanol can basically be operated at low temperatures because it consists of one carbon atom (Aouad et al., 2016). Besides that, biomass-derived ethanol, which came from renewable biomass such as sugar-based feedstock (sugarcane and corn), starch, and cellulosic feedstocks, became one of the promising alternatives for syngas production due to its benefits in terms of non-toxic, biodegradable, sulfur-free, accessible storage, and high availability (Aouad et al., 2018; Arku et al., 2018). The ethanol production is expected to reach almost 200 billion litres in 2023, with an annual expansion rate of 2% (Voegele, 2018). In addition, butanol has become one of the interesting renewable feedstock compared to ethanol and methanol because it possesses a higher hydrogen composition (Kumar et al., 2018). It can be manufactured via the fermentation process of several feedstocks such as corn, wheat, lignocellulosic biomass, sugarcane, and microalgae. It also became one of the essential raw materials in various industries such as chemical and petrochemical because it has excellent tolerance capacity towards water contamination, inflammable and has a lower vapour pressure that able to minimize the risk of vapour lock (Kumar et al., 2018). Moreover, butanol has a low vapour pressure point, making it a potential and safe fuel for high temperature reforming processes (Kumar et al., 2018).

Additionally, glycerol by-products from biodiesel production as sustainable raw material for syngas production were reported among researchers worldwide. Dang et al. (2020) claimed that the glycerol reactant would act as a promising hydrogen donor (Dang et al., 2020) in which helps for stabilizing the decomposition products, thus preventing the coking. Glycerol is chosen as one of the reactants in the dry reforming process because it is non-toxicity, has lower pollutant emissions, and is biodegradable than conventional diesel (Dahdah et al., 2020). The United Nations, Food and Agriculture Organization reported that the amount of glycerol by-products from biodiesel production is continuously increased up to 4 billion litres in 2020 with 36 billion litres of biodiesel production. While the crude glycerol price was decreased as low as 18 cents/L (Fig. 1) due to global biodiesel demands, it increases at about 0.7 million tons per year annually (Lam et al., 2010). This makes this abundant glycerol become a significant issue that needs to be highlighted as its purification process is also costly. This makes this abundant glycerol become a significant issue that needs to be highlighted as its purification process is also costly. Purifying crude glycerol via the distillation process is pricy and not economically feasible, specifically for a small-scale biodiesel factory. On the contrary, various biodiesel factories have use crude glycerol to generate energy via direct burning process, in addition to the purification process. However, the process is not easy because the high glycerol viscosities impede the flow, pumping processes and flame spray. Moreover, high ignition temperature of crude glycerol lessens the effectiveness of the combustion process, resulting in the creation of very toxic acrolein (Bac et al., 2019; Roslan et al., 2021). To tackle the issue, the reuse of glycerol as raw sources in the catalytic process for syngas production had highly received attention. This alternative is beneficial as it can reduce environmental pollution and the syngas product can be applied in alcohol-based synthesis and Fischer–Tropsch (FT).

Recently, several review papers discussing on dry catalytic reforming has been published. Yu et al. (2019) reported on the CO2 reforming of ethanol and glycerol in which focusing on the thermodynamic pathway for both alcohols to produce syngas (Yu et al., 2019). Roslan et al. (2020) reported the review article on the application of Ni-based catalyst in glycerol reforming processes for productions of syngas. This research group also focused on the dry glycerol reforming that highlighted on development of the catalyst and catalyst deactivation phenomena (Roslan et al., 2020). However, no review articles were devoted to the CO2 reforming of alcohols. Thus, the present article offers an overview of the application of the methanol, ethanol, glycerol, and butanol for CO2 catalytic reforming to generate syngas. The detailed thermodynamic analysis and reforming catalyst development, including active metal, promoters, and support, were discussed. Additionally, the design of the reactor and a possible future catalyst for improved catalytic reforming activity were also being discussed.

Section snippets

Dry reforming of ethanol

Ethanol dry reforming (EDR) is regarded as one of the green processes because it consumes undesirable GHGs gas (CO2) and utilizes non-toxic ethanol low-cost and feedstock for syngas production. This reaction is in an endothermic process and can produce only syngas if ethanol is able to react in the most desirable way (refer to Eq. (1)). Ethanol can be decomposed into several products such as acetaldehyde, methane, carbon oxides, and H2, as tabulated in Table 2 (Eqs. (2)–(7)) (Bej et al., 2017).

Noble catalyst

Noble metals (precious metals), for instance, Ir, Rh, Ru, Pd, and Pt, were commonly used in reforming reactions because these kinds of active metals can boost the reforming catalytic performance compared to non-precious metals such as Co and Ni (Chung and Chang, 2016; Seo, 2018). This type of metal is widely used in the oxygenates reforming reaction, especially Rh, because it possesses high activity toward the C–C bond cleavage at low temperature and high coke resistance (Azizan et al., 2020).

Noble catalyst

Precious catalysts such as Ir, Rh, Ru, Pd, and Pt were also studied in GDR at 750 °C by Tavanarad et al. (2018b). They found that Rh supported on alumina-stabilized alumina (MgAl2O4) exhibited the highest conversion of glycerol (92%) and maintained the performance for 20 h of reaction compared to the other catalysts. The authors credited the excellent performance of Rh/MgAl2O4 due to its high BET surface area (159 m2 g−1), the smaller metal crystallite size (1.28 nm), and high active metal area

Reactor design for dry reforming of alcohols

Tsodikov et al. (2015) have successfully diverse the benefit of the membrane technology on the conventional system of the ethanol dry reforming process (Tsodikov et al., 2015). In this work, Ni/Co porous ceramic membrane with 80 mm length, 16 mm outer diameter, and 3 mm wall thickness was fitted in the centre of existed catalytic reactor system. Initially, this membrane system was synthesized at high temperatures using the self-propagating method and proven to have up to 60% of porosity. In

Conclusion and future perspective

The CO2 reforming of methanol, ethanol, glycerol and butanol under atmospheric pressure is thermodynamically endothermic, necessitating high reaction temperatures of more than 500 °C for glycerol and 700 °C for the others. Despite their high cost, noble metals are still considered active metals because of their ability to break down carbon bonds and potentially reduce formation of carbon during the reforming process. In addition, transition metal oxides such as NiO, CeO, ZrO2, Al2O3. CaO, and La

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Acknowledgements

The financial aid from the Ministry of Education (MOE) for awarding FRGS [FRGS/1/2019/TK10/UMP/02/13 or RDU1901163]; UMP Research Grant Scheme [RDU1803184]; and Postgraduate Research Scheme [PGRS180302 and PGRS2003190] are gratefully acknowledged.

References (92)

  • P.S. Bulutoglu et al.

    Dry reforming of glycerol over Rh-based ceria and zirconia catalysts: new insights on catalyst activity and stability

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2018)
  • Chi Cheng Chong et al.

    Dendritic fibrous SBA-15 supported nickel (Ni/DFSBA-15): a sustainable catalyst for hydrogen production

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2020)
  • W.C. Chung et al.

    Review of catalysis and plasma performance on dry reforming of CH4 and possible synergistic effects

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2016)
  • E. Dahdah et al.

    Zirconia supported nickel catalysts for glycerol steam reforming: effect of zirconia structure on the catalytic performance

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2020)
  • C. Dang et al.

    Syngas production by dry reforming of the mixture of glycerol and ethanol with CaCO3

    J. Energy Chem.

    (2020)
  • A. Drif et al.

    Applied catalysis a: general study of the dry reforming of methane and ethanol using Rh catalysts supported on doped alumina

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2015)
  • A.N. Fatsikostas et al.

    Production of hydrogen for fuel cells by reformation of biomass-derived ethanol

    Catal. Today

    (2002)
  • A.S. Fedotov et al.

    The role of aluminum in the formation of Ni Al Co-containing porous ceramic converters with high activity in dry and steam reforming of methane and ethanol

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2017)
  • A.S. Fedotov et al.

    Original hybrid membrane-catalytic reactor for the Co-production of syngas and ultrapure hydrogen in the processes of dry and steam reforming of methane, ethanol and DME

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2018)
  • S.A. Ghungrud et al.

    Sorption-enhanced reaction process for glycerol-to-hydrogen conversion over cobalt catalyst supported on promoted hydrotalcites

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2020)
  • N. Harun et al.

    Hydrogen production from glycerol dry reforming over Ag-promoted Ni/Al2O3

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2019)
  • S.E. Hosseini et al.

    The scenario of greenhouse gases reduction in Malaysia

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2013)
  • I. Hussain et al.

    A highly competitive system for CO methanation over an active metal-free fibrous silica mordenite via in-situ ESR and FTIR studies

    Energy Convers. Manage.

    (2020)
  • Z.R. Ismagilov et al.

    Hydrogen production through hydrocarbon fuel reforming processes over Ni based catalysts

    Catal. Today

    (2019)
  • A. Iulianelli et al.

    Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen generation via conventional and membrane reactors: a review

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2014)
  • S. Jankhah et al.

    Thermal and catalytic dry reforming and cracking of ethanol for hydrogen and carbon nanofilaments’ production

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2008)
  • W. Kurdowski

    Role of delayed release of sulphates from clinker in DEF

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2002)
  • M.K. Lam et al.

    Homogeneous, heterogeneous and enzymatic catalysis for transesterification of high free fatty acid oil (waste cooking oil) to biodiesel: a review

    Biotechnol. Adv.

    (2010)
  • H.C. Lee et al.

    Synthesis and characterisation of cement clinker-supported nickel catalyst for glycerol dry reforming

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2014)
  • H.C. Lee et al.

    Catalytic performance of cement clinker supported nickel catalyst in glycerol dry reforming

    J. Energy Chem.

    (2014)
  • W. Liu et al.

    Design of Ni-ZrO2@SiO2 catalyst with ultra-high sintering and coking resistance for dry reforming of methane to prepare syngas

    J. CO2 Util.

    (2018)
  • N.N. Mohd Arif et al.

    Hydrogen production via CO2 dry reforming of glycerol over Re-Ni/CaO catalysts

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2019)
  • N.Z. Muradov et al.

    “Green” path from fossil-based to hydrogen economy: an overview of carbon-neutral technologies

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2008)
  • V. Palma et al.

    Enhancing Pt-Ni/CeO2 performances for ethanol reforming by catalyst supporting on high surface silica

    Catal. Today

    (2018)
  • N.A. Roslan et al.

    A review on glycerol reforming processes over Ni-based catalyst for hydrogen and syngas productions

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2020)
  • N.A. Roslan et al.

    H2-rich syngas from glycerol dry reforming over Ni- based catalysts supported on alumina from aluminum dross

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2021)
  • K.W. Siew et al.

    Production of CO-rich hydrogen gas from glycerol dry reforming over La-promoted Ni/Al2O3 catalyst

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2014)
  • K.W. Siew et al.

    Syngas production from glycerol-dry(CO2) reforming over La-promoted Ni/Al2O3 catalyst

    Renew. Energy

    (2015)
  • D.F.P. Suffredini et al.

    Renewable hydrogen from glycerol reforming over nickel aluminate-based catalysts

    Catal. Today

    (2017)
  • M. Tavanarad et al.

    Production of syngas via glycerol dry reforming on Ni catalysts supported on mesoporous nanocrystalline Al2O3

    J. CO2 Util.

    (2018)
  • M. Tavanarad et al.

    Preparation and evaluation of Ni/g-Al2O3 catalysts promoted by alkaline earth metals in glycerol reforming with carbon dioxide

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2021)
  • P.E. Tsakiridis et al.

    Examination of the jarosite–alunite precipitate addition in the raw meal for the production of Portland cement clinker

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2005)
  • S. Wang et al.

    Thermodynamic equilibrium composition analysis of methanol autothermal reforming for proton exchanger membrane fuel cell based on FLUENT software

    J. Power Sources

    (2008)
  • W. Wang et al.

    Dry reforming of ethanol for hydrogen production: thermodynamic investigation

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2009)
  • X. Wang et al.

    Thermodynamic analysis of glycerol dry reforming for hydrogen and synthesis gas production

    Fuel

    (2009)
  • B. Wang et al.

    Preparation of stable and highly active Ni/CeO2 catalysts by glow discharge plasma technique for glycerol steam reforming

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2019)
  • Cited by (4)

    • Deactivation and in-situ regeneration of Dy-doped Ni/SiO<inf>2</inf> catalyst in CO<inf>2</inf> reforming of methanol

      2023, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, in this work, the CO2 reforming of methanol (Eq. (4)) was employed as it occurs at much lower temperature than that of methane; thus, preventing the deactivation may be caused by sintering of Ni active phase while keeping the process practical. In addition, in comparison with steam reforming of methanol, this process can utilize one of the most important greenhouse gases while it does not require the excessive supply of steam which is an energy-intensive and water-consuming process [16–19]. CH3OH + CO2 → 2CO + H2 + H2O ΔH° = 131.6 kJ/mol

    View full text