Skip to main content
Log in

Computational modeling of fracture in capsule-based self-healing concrete: A 3D study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a three-dimensional (3D) numerical model to investigate complex fracture behavior using cohesive elements. An efficient packing algorithm is employed to create the mesoscale model of heterogeneous capsule-based self-healing concrete. Spherical aggregates are used and directly generated from specified size distributions with different volume fractions. Spherical capsules are also used and created based on a particular diameter, and wall thickness. Bilinear traction-separation laws of cohesive elements along the boundaries of the mortar matrix, aggregates, capsules, and their interfaces are pre-inserted to simulate crack initiation and propagation. These pre-inserted cohesive elements are also applied into the initial meshes of solid elements to account for fracture in the mortar matrix. Different realizations are carried out and statistically analyzed. The proposed model provides an effective tool for predicting the complex fracture response of capsule-based self-healing concrete at the meso-scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cailleux E, Pollet V. Investigations on the development of self-healing properties in protective coatings for concrete and repair mortars. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Self-Healing Materials. Chicago, IL, 2009

  2. Dry C. Matrix cracking repair and filling using active and passive modes for smart timed release of chemicals from fibers into cement matrices. Smart Materials and Structures, 1994, 3(2): 118–123

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. White S, Maiti S, Jones A, Brown E, Sottos N, Geubelle P. Fatigue of self-healing polymers: Multiscale analysis and experiments. In: 11th International Conference on Fracture. Turin, 2005

  4. de Borst R. Some recent developments in computational modelling of concrete fracture. International Journal of Fracture, 1997, 86(1): 5–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Murthy A R C, Palani G, Iyer N R. State-of-the-art review on fracture analysis of concrete structural components. Sadhana, 2009, 34(2): 345–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu M, Johannesson B, Geiker M. A review: Self-healing in cementitious materials and engineered cementitious composite as a self-healing material. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 28(1): 571–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Tittelboom K, deBelie N. Self-healing in cementitious materialsa review. Materials (Basel), 2013, 6(6): 2182–2217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Talaiekhozan A, Abd Majid M Z. A review of self-healing concrete research development. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 2014, 2(1): 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mauludin L M, Oucif C. Modeling of self-healing concrete: A review. Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics, 2019, 5: 526–539

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oucif C, Mauludin L. Continuum damage-healing and super healing mechanics in brittle materials: A state-of-the-art review. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2018, 8(12): 2350

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mauludin L M, Budiman B A, Santosa S P, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Numerical modeling of microcrack behavior in encapsulation-based self-healing concrete under uniaxial tension. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2020, 34(5): 1847–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. White S R, Sottos N, Geubelle P, Moore J, Kessler M, Sriram S, Brown E, Viswanathan S. Autonomic healing of polymer composites. Nature, 2001, 409(6822): 794–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zemskov S V, Jonkers H M, Vermolen F J. Two analytical models for the probability characteristics of a crack hitting encapsulated particles: Application to self-healing materials. Computational Materials Science, 2011, 50(12): 3323–3333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mookhoek S D, Fischer H R, van der Zwaag S. A numerical study into the effects of elongated capsules on the healing efficiency of liquid-based systems. Computational Materials Science, 2009, 47(2): 506–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lv Z, Chen H. Analytical models for determining the dosage of capsules embedded in self-healing materials. Computational Materials Science, 2013, 68: 81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilabert F, Garoz D, Van Paepegem W. Stress concentrations and bonding strength in encapsulation-based self-healing materials. Materials & Design, 2015, 67: 28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lv Z, Chen H, Yuan H. Analytical solution on dosage of self-healing agents in cementitious materials: long capsule 229 model. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2014, 25(1): 47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaltzakorta E, Erkizia I. Silica microcapsules encapsulating epoxy compounds for self-healing cementitiousmaterials. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Self Healing Materials. Bath, 2011

  19. Hilloulin B, Van Tittelboom K, Gruyaert E, de Belie N, Loukili A. Design of polymeric capsules for self-healing concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2015, 55: 298–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexeev A, Verberg R, Balazs A C. Patterned surfaces segregate compliant microcapsules. Langmuir, 2007, 23(3): 983–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mauludin L M, Oucif C. The effects of interfacial strength on fractured microcapsule. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(2): 353–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mauludin L M, Oucif C. Interaction between matrix crack and circular capsule under uniaxial tension in encapsulation based self-healing concrete. Underground Space, 2018, 3(3): 181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mauludin L M, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Computational modeling of fracture in encapsulation-based self-healing concrete using cohesive elements. Composite Structures, 2018, 196: 63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wriggers P, Moftah S. Mesoscale models for concrete: Homogenisation and damage behaviour. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2006, 42(7): 623–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hirsch T J. Modulus of elasticity of concrete affected by elastic moduli of cement paste matrix and aggregate. Journal Proceedings, 1962, 59: 427–452

    Google Scholar 

  26. Daudeville M L. Role of coarse aggregates in the triaxial behavior of concrete: experimental and numerical analysis. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Cergy-Pontoise: Cergy-Pontoise University, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  27. Du X, Jin L, Ma G. Numerical modeling tensile failure behavior of concrete at mesoscale using extended finite element method. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 2014, 23(7): 872–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gruyaert E, Van Tittelboom K, Sucaet J, Anrijs J, Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P, de Geest B, Remon J P, de Belie N. Capsules with evolving brittleness to resist the preparation of self-healing concrete. Construction Materials, 2016, 66 (323): e092

    Google Scholar 

  29. Quayum M S, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Computational model generation and rve design of self-healing concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2015, 9(4): 383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Simulia, Abaqus 6.13 Documentation, 2013

  31. Yang Y, Ning Y, Wang C, Tong Z. Capsule clusters fabricated by polymerization based on capsule-in-water-in-oil pickering emulsions. Polymer Chemistry, 2013, 4(21): 5407–5415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang X, Jivkov A P. Combined numerical-statistical analyses of damage and failure of 2d and 3d mesoscale hetero geneous concrete. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015: 1–12

  33. Wang X, Xing F, Zhang M, Han N, Qian Z. Experimental study on cementitious composites embedded with organic microcapsules. Materials (Basel), 2013, 6(9): 4064–4081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Keller M, Sottos N. Mechanical properties of microcapsules used in a self-healing polymer. Experimental Mechanics. 2006, 46(6): 725–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. You Y J, Kim J H J, Park K T, Seo D W, Lee T H. Modification of rule of mixtures for tensile strength estimation of circular GFRP rebars. Polymers, 2017, 9(12): 682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang J, Soens H, Verstraete W, de Belie N. Self-healing concrete by use of microencapsulated bacterial spores. Cement and Concrete Research, 2014, 56: 139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kanellopoulos A, Giannaros P, Al-Tabbaa A. The effect of varying volume fraction of microcapsules on fresh, mechanical and self-healing properties of mortars. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 122: 577–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lv L, Schlangen E, Yang Z, Xing F. Micromechanical properties of a new polymeric microcapsule for self-healing cementitious materials. Materials (Basel), 2016, 9(12): 1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the support of the RISTEK-DIKTI (Directorate General of Resources for Science, Technology and Higher Education. Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of Indonesia) under funding agreement No: 153.39/E4.4/2014 as well as the project ‘Carl-Zeiss Stiftung’ Durchbrüche—Exzellenz in der Forschung: ‘Funktionalisierung 191 smarter Werkstoffe unter Mehrfeldanforderungen fur die Verkehrsinfrastruktur’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timon Rabczuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mauludin, L.M., Rabczuk, T. Computational modeling of fracture in capsule-based self-healing concrete: A 3D study. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15, 1337–1346 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0781-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0781-1

Keywords

Navigation