Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theoretical study on the confine-stiffening effect and fractal cracking of square concrete filled steel tubes in tension loads

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tension stress in steel-concrete composite is widely observed in engineering design. Based on an experimental program on tension performance of three square concrete-filled tubes (SCFT), the tension theory of SCFT is proposed using a mechanics-based approach. The tension stiffening effect, the confining strengthening effect and the confining stiffening effect, observed in tests of SCFTs are included in the developed tension theory model. Subsequently, simplified constitutive models of steel and concrete are proposed for the axial tension performance of SCFT. Based on the MSC.MARC software, a special fiber beam-column element is proposed to include the confining effect of SCFTs under tension and verified. The proposed analytical theory, effective formulas, and equivalent constitutive laws are extensively verified against three available tests reported in the literature on both global level (e.g., load-displacement curves) and strain level. The experimental verification proves the accuracy of the proposed theory and formulations in simulating the performance of SCFT members under tension with the capability to accurately predict the tensile strength and stiffness enhancements and realistically simulate the fractal cracking phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

α strength :

strength enhancement ratio of SCFT compared to steel tube

α stiffness :

stiffness enhancement ratio of SCFT compared to steel tube

α, C :

two coefficients introduced for solving ordinary differential equations

ε*p,initial :

initial plastic strain of steel

ε*t,f t*:

cracking strain and cracking stress of concrete in SCFT

ε* y,f*y :

modified yield strain and stress of steel tube in SCFT

ε*resi :

residual strain of cocnrete (defined as the strain corresponding to the time when the primary concrete crack is fully open, i.e., ω =ωu)

f*resi :

residual stress of cocnrete

ε s,l, ε s,t :

longitudinal strain and hoop strain of steel tube εc,l, εc,t, εc,r longitudinal strain, hoop strain, and radial strain of concrete

\({{\bar \varepsilon}_{\rm{l}}}\) :

average longitudinal strain of steel

\({{\bar \varepsilon}_{\rm{t}}},{{\bar \varepsilon}_{\rm{r}}}\) :

average hoop strain of concrete and average radial strain of concrete

σ s,l, σ s,t :

longitudinal stress and hoop stress of steel tube

σ c,l, σ c,t, σrc,r :

longitudinal stress, hoop stress, and radial stress of concrete

\({{\bar \sigma}_{{\rm{c,l}}}},{{\bar \sigma}_{{\rm{c,r}}}}\) :

average longitudinal stress and average radial stress of concrete

\({{\bar \sigma}_{{\rm{s,l}}}},{{\bar \sigma}_{{\rm{s,t}}}}\) :

average longitudinal stress and average hoop stress of steel

λ :

a coefficient between hoop stress and longitudinal stress of steel tube at crack section

γ :

the ratio between transverse strain increment and longitudinal stress increments of steel tube

\({\bar \tau}\) :

average interface friction stress between steel tube and concrete

k :

friction coefficient for Coulomb’s law

τ 0 :

initial shear strength of interface between steel and concrete for Coulomb’s law

ν c, ν s :

poisson ratio of concrete and steel

ω, ω u :

crack width and ultimate crack width (when concrete fully lost tensile stress).

χ :

a factor for SCFT (which is calibrated as 1.9 based on tests)

D :

section length of SCFT

E c, E s :

elastic modulus of concrete and steel

E h :

modified hardening modulus of steel

f t :

tensile strength of concrete

L min, L max, L m :

minimum crack spacing, maximum crack spacing, and aveerage crack spacing

M :

a coefficient for steel constitutive model (M = 400 is recommended for SCFT based on regression results using test data)

N :

a fractal coefficient (N = 2, 3, or 4 for SCFT based on test results)

n :

ratio of elastic modulus of steel divided by that of concrete

R 0 :

initial value of R (before concrete cracking)

R :

average transverse strain to average longitudinal strain ratio of steel tube

t :

steel tube thickness

References

  1. Nie J G, Wang J J, Gou S K, Zhu Y Y, Fan J S. Technological development and engineering applications of novel steel-concrete composite structures. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(1): 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shao X D, Deng L, Cao J H. Innovative steel-UHPC composite bridge girders for long-span bridges. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(4): 981–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. EN 1994-1-1: 2004. Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures. Part1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2004

  4. Leon R T, Gao Y. Resiliency of steel and composite structures. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2016, 10(3): 239–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng S W, Shao X D, Zhao X D, Wang Y, Wang Y. Precast steel-UHPC lightweight composite bridge foraccelerated bridge construction. Frontiers of Structural and Civl Engieering, 2021, 15(2): 364–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou M, Fan J S, Tao M X, Nie J G. Experimental study on the tensile behaviour of square concrete-filled steel tubes. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 121: 121–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li W, Han L H, Chan T M. Tensile behaviour of concrete-filled double-skin steel tubular members. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 99: 99–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li W, Han L H, Chan T M. Numerical investigation on the performance of concrete-filled double-skin steel tubular members under tension. Thin-walled Structures, 2014, 79: 79–118

    Google Scholar 

  9. Silva A, Jiang Y, Macedo L, Castro J M, Monteiro R, Silvestre N. Seismic performance of composite moment-resisting frames achieved with sustainable CFST members. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2016, 10(3): 312–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shams M, Saadeghvaziri M A. Nonlinear response of concrete-filled steel tubular columns under axial loading. ACI Structural Journal, 1999, 96(6): 1009–1017

    Google Scholar 

  11. Susantha K A S, Ge H, Usami T. Uniaxial stress-strain relationship of concrete confined by various shaped steel tubes. Engineering Structures, 2001, 23(10): 1331–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hajjar J F, Gourley B C. Representation of concrete-filled steel tube cross-section strength. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1996, 122(11): 1327–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Inai E, Mukai A, Kai M, Tokinoya H, Fukumoto T, Mori K. Behavior of concrete-filled steel tube beam columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130(2): 189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vecchio F J, Collins M P. The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear. ACI Structural Journal, 1986, 83(2): 219–231

    Google Scholar 

  15. Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ). Recommendations for design and construction of concrete filled steel tubular structures. Study on Concrete Properties Subjected Impact Loading, 2008, 12: 12–10 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. ANSI/AISC 360-05. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. Chicago: American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), 2005

    Google Scholar 

  17. JGJ 138-2016. Code for Design of Composite Structures. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MOHURD), 2016 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou M, Xu L Y, Tao M X, Fan J S, Hajjar J F, Nie J G. Experimental study on confining-strengthening, confining-stiffening, and fractal cracking of circular concrete filled steel tubes under axial tension. Engineering Structures, 2017, 133: 133–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu L Y, Tao M X, Zhou M. Analytical model and design formulae of circular CFSTs under axial tension. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 133: 133–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rabczuk T, Zi G, Gerstenberger A, Wall W A. A new crack tip element for the phantom-node method with arbitrary cohesive cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2008, 75(5): 577–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Cracking particles: A simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 2316–2343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Y M, Lackner R, Zeiml M, Mang H A. Strong discontinuity embedded approach with standard SOS formulation: Element formulation, energy-based crack-tracking strategy, and validations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 287: 287–366

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Y M, Zhuang X Y. Cracking elements: A self-propagating strong discontinuity embedded Approach for quasi-brittle fracture. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2018, 144: 144–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Y M, Zhuang X Y. Cracking elements method for dynamic brittle fracture. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2019, 102: 102–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Y M, Mang H A. Global cracking elements: A novel tool for Garlerkin-based approaches simulating quasi-brittle fracture. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2020, 121(11): 2462–2480

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Y M, Gao Z R, Li Y Y, Zhuang X Y. On the crack opening and energy dissipation in a continuum based disconnected crack model. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2020, 170: 103333

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang Y M, Huang J G, Yuan Y, Mang H A. Cracking elements method with a dissipation-based arc-length approach. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2021, 195: 103573

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Ren H L, Zhuang X Y, Anitescu C, Rabczuk T. An explicit phase field method for brittle dynamic fracture. Computers & Structures, 2019, 217: 217–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rabczuk T, Ren H L, Zhuang X Y. A nonlocal operator method for partial differential equations with application to electromagnetic waveguide problem. CMC, 2019, 59(1): 31–55

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ren H L, Zhuang X Y, Rabczuk T. A nonlocal operator method for solving partial differential equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 358: 112621

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Hognestad E. High strength bars as concrete reinforcement—Part 2: Control of cracking. Journal of the PCA Research and Development Laboratories, 1962, 4(1): 46–62

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xu LY, Nie X, Zhou M, Tao MX. Whole-process crack width prediction of reinforced concrete structures considering bonding deterioration. Engineering Structures, 2017, 142: 142–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Belarbi A, Hsu T T C. Constitutive laws of concrete intension and reinforcing bars stiffened by concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 1994, 91(4): 465–474

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nie J G, Tao M X, Cai C S, Li S J. Deformation analysis of prestressed continuous steel-concrete composite beams. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2009, 135(11): 1377–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tao M X, Nie J G. Fiber beam-column model considering slab spatial composite effect for nonlinear analysis of composite frame systems. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015, 140(1): 04013039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tao M X, Nie J G. Element mesh, section discretization and material hysteretic laws for fiber beam-column elements of composite structural members. Materials and Structures, 2014, 48(8): 2521–2544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang Y H, Nie J G, Cai C S. Numerical modeling on concrete structures and steel-concrete composite frames structures. Composite: Part B, 2013, 51(1): 58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Denavit M D, Hajjar J F. Nonlinear seismic analysis of circular concrete-filled steel tube members and frames. NSEL Report No. NSEL-023. 2010

  39. Tort C, Hajjar J F. Reliability-based performance-based design of rectangular concrete-filled steel tube (SCFT) members and frames. Structural Engineering Report No. ST-07-1. 2007

  40. Hajjar J F, Molodan A, Schiller P H. A distributed plasticity model for cyclic analysis of concrete-filled steel tube beam-columns and composite frames. Engineering Journal (New York), 1998, 20(4–6): 398–412

    Google Scholar 

  41. Legeron F, Paultre P, Mazars J. Damage mechanics modeling of nonlinear seismic behavior of concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2005, 131(6): 946–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou M. Study on basic theory and method of steel-concrete composite tension problem. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2016 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The writers gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51878018). The first author (Meng Zhou) gratefully acknowledges the support provided by Tsinghua Innovation Center in Zhuhai and Zhuhai Institute of Civil Construction-Safety Research Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co., Ltd., MCC, Beijing, 100088, China

    Meng Zhou & Qingrui Yue

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100086, China

    Meng Zhou & Jianguo Nie

  3. Zhuhai Institute of Civil Construction-Safety Research Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, 519000, China

    Meng Zhou

  4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77054, US

    Jiaji Wang

Authors
  1. Meng Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiaji Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jianguo Nie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qingrui Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiaji Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, M., Wang, J., Nie, J. et al. Theoretical study on the confine-stiffening effect and fractal cracking of square concrete filled steel tubes in tension loads. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15, 1317–1336 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0763-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0763-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation