Abstract
Male-on-male sexual assaults challenge prevention and response personnel, law enforcement, and the military justice system. Before this study, limited research on military sex offender populations and none specifically on military male-on-male offenders was conducted. In this exploratory study, 171 cases of penetrative male-on-male sexual assaults were examined using criminal investigation files provided by the United States Army. The results yielded a more salient picture of offender and victim dynamics, the criminal and predatory behaviors of the offender, the levels of violence used in these assaults, a better understanding of male victim behaviors, and gave insight into the cognitive distortions used by the offenders which can assist law enforcement with proper investigation and interviewing techniques. Results found that victims were those in the offender’s direct unit and assaults frequently occurred as the victim was asleep, unconscious, or incapacitated through ingesting drugs or alcohol. Offenders performed various acts with their victims through the course of the assault, with offender to victim fellatio or offender to victim fellatio in addition to anal penetration, being the most common. This was an important distinction in military sexual assaults, as offender behavior could be seen as an extension of potential fantasy enactment as motivation for the assault resulting in little to no physical resistance and less of a chance of rejection by the victim. Most assaults were nonviolent in nature. This study also provided the foundation for a more comprehensive military offender behavior project currently ongoing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almond L, McManus MA, Ward L (2014) Male-on-male sexual assaults: an analysis of crime scene actions. J Interpers Violence 29(7):1279–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513506282
Ashley OS, Lane ME, Morgan JK, Charm S, Tharp A, Brown M (2019) Perceptions of high-risk situations for sexual assault: gender differences in the U.S. Air Force. Military Medicine, 184(3/4), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usy350
Beauregard E, Busina I, Healey J (2017) Confessions of sex offenders: extracting offender and victim profiles for investigative interviewing. J Crim Psychol 7(1):13–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-10-2016-0031
Bunch J, Clay-Warner J, Lei M (2015) Demographic characteristics and victimization risk: Testing the mediating effects of routine activities. Crime Delinq 61(9):1181–1205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712466932
Canter D, Youngs D (2009) Investigative psychology: offender profiling and the analysis of criminal action. John Wiley and Sons
Castro CA, Kintzle S, Schulyer AC, Lucas CL, Warner CH (2015) Sexual assaults in the military. Current Psychology Report 17(54):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-015-0596-7
DeLisi M, Caropreso DE, Drury AJ, Elbert MJ, Evans JL, Heinrichs T, Tahja KM (2016) The dark figure of sexual offending: new evidence from federal sex offenders. J Crim Psychol 6(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcp-12-2015-0030
Deslauriers-Varin N, Beauregard E (2010) Victims’ routine activities and sex offenders’ target selection scripts: a latent class analysis. Sex Abuse-J Res Tr 22(3):315–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210375975
Douglas J, Burgess AW, Burgess AG, Ressler RK (2011) Crime classification manual: a standard system for investigating and classifying violent crimes (2nd ed.). John Wiley and Sons
Duchesne S, Seyller M, Chariot P (2018) Male sexual assault in Paris, France area: an observational study over 8 years. Forensic Sci Int 290:16–28. https://doi.org/10.1010/j.forsciint.2018.06.018
Farmer M, McAlinden A, Maruna S (2016) Sex offending and situational motivation: findings from a qualitative analysis of desistance from sexual offending. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 60(15):1756–1775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16668175
Greathouse S, Saunders J, Matthews M, Keller K, and Miller L (2015) A review of the literature on sexual assault perpetrator characteristics and behaviors. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1000/RR1082/RAND_RR1082.pdf
Hazelwood RR, Burgess A (2009) Practical aspects of rape investigation (4th ed.). CRC Press
Hickey E (2015) Serial murderers and their victims (7th ed.). Cengage Learning
Ioannou M, Hammond L, Machin L (2017) Male-on-male sexual assault: victim, offender and offence characteristics. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 14(2):189–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1483
Javid A (2018) Male rape, masculinities, and sexualities. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 52:199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.12.003
Jebb AT, Parrigon S, Woo SE (2017) Exploratory data analysis as a foundation of inductive research. Hum Resour Manag Rev 27:265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.003
Jones MA, Henry LM, Meehan J, Seward JR, Murray NL, Capparelli AL, Moore K (2015) Presentence Investigation Report Data Instrument (PIRCI) [measurement instrument]. Center for Applied Criminal Case Analysis. Melbourne, FL
Komorowski M, Marshall DC, Salciccioli JD, Crusain Y (2016) Exploratory data analysis. In Secondary analysis of electronic health records (pp. 185–203). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43742-2_15
Lin J, Simon W (2016) Examining specialization among sex offenders released from prison. Sex Abuse-J Res Tr 28(3):253–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214547581
Lisak D, Miller PM (2002) Repeat rape and multiple offending among undetected rapists. Violence Vict 17(1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.17.1.73.33638
Lowe M, Rogers P (2017) The scope of male rape: a selective review of research, policy, and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.007Lundrigan, S., and Mueller-Johnson, K. (2013). Male stranger rape: a behavioral model of victim-offender interaction. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(7), 763–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812474451
Lundrigan S, Mueller-Johnson K (2013) Male stranger rape: a behavioral model of victim-offender interaction. Crim Justice Behav 40(7):763–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812474451
Maddan S, Pazzani L (2017) Sex offenders’ crimes and processing in the criminal justice system. Wolters Kluwer
Martinez-Catena A, Redondo S, Frerich N, Beech AR (2016) A dynamic risk factors-based typology of sexual offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16629399
Matthews M, Farris C, Tankard M, Dunbar MS (2018) Needs of male sexual assault victims in the U.S. armed forces. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2167.html
Miller LL, Keller KM, Wagner L, Donohue AG, Marcellino W, Greathouse SM, Matthews M, Ayer L (2018) Air Force sexual assault situations, settings, and offender behavior. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1589.html
O’Brien C, Keith J, Shoemaker L (2015) Don’t tell: military culture and male rape. Psychol Serv 12(4):357–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000049
O’Toole ME, Kilmartin C, Peterson J (2014) Sexual assault in the military: a discussion of the current status and future prevention. Violence and Gender 1(1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2013.1503
Perry LA, Dover TJ, Lancaster SL, Allen NE, Keel TG, Eliopulos LN (2018) Development of a sexual assault event typology based on event attributes. Crim Justice Behav 45(11):1709–1722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818784617
Rosellini AJ, Monahan J, Street AE, Petukhova MV, Sampson NA, Benedek DM, Bliese P, Stein MB, Ursano RJ, Kessler RC (2017) Predicting sexual assault perpetration in the US Army using administration data. American Journal of Preventative Medicine 53(5):661–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.022
Sadler AG, Booth BM, Cook BL, Doebbeling BN (2003) Factors associated with women’s risk of rape in the military environment. Am J Ind Med 43(3):262–273
Savard DM, Kelley TM, Merolla DM (2017) Routine activities and criminal victimization: the significance of gendered spaces. J Interpers Violence 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517721170
Schaffer BJ, Zarilla L (2018) Military veteran sex offenders: visible and on the radar. J Hum Behav Soc Environ 28(1):109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2017.1377135
Schell TL, Cefalu M, Farris C, Morral AR (2021) The relationship between sexual assault and sexual harassment in the U. S. Military: findings from the RAND military workplace study. RAND Corporation. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1124371.pdf
Stander VA, Merrill LL, Thomsen CJ, Crouch JL, Milner JS (2008) Premilitary adult sexual assault victimization and perpetration in a Navy recruit sample. J Interpers Violence 23(11):1636–1653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508314325
Street AE, Hilbert AJ, Eliezer D, Axelrod SH, Dyches KD, Galbreath NW (2018) Sexual assault. In American military life in the 21st century: Social, cultural, and economic issues and trends (pp. 255–269). ABC-CLIO
Tewksbury R, Mustaine EE (2001) Lifestyle factors associated with the sexual assault of men: a routine activity theory analysis. The Journal of Men’s Studies 9(2):153–182. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.092.153
Toates F, Smid W, van den Berg JW (2017) A framework for understanding sexual violence: incentive-motivation and hierarchical control. Aggress Violent Beh 34:238–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.001
Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
Turchik JA, Hebenstrei CL, Judson SS (2015) An examination of the gender inclusiveness of current theories of sexual violence in adulthood: recognizing male victims, female perpetrators, and same-sex violence Trauma Violence Abuse 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014566721
United States Department of Defense (2018) Department of Defense fiscal year 2017 annual report on sexual assaults in the military. Department of Defense Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program. https://www.sapr.mil/public/docs/reports/FY17_Annual/DoD_FY17_Annual_Report_on_Sexual_Assault_in_the_Military.pdf
United States Department of Defense (2019) Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 annual report on sexual assaults in the military. Department of Defense Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program. https://www.sapr.mil/reports
Warner CM, Armstrong MA (2020) The role of military law and systemic issues in the military’s handling of sexual assault cases. Law Soc Rev 54(1):265–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12461
Wojcik ML, Fisher BS (2019) Overview of adult sexual offender typologies. In Handbook of sexual assault and sexual assault prevention (pp. 241–256). Springer
Youngs D (Ed.) (2013) Behavioural analysis of crime: studies in David Canter’s investigative psychology. Ashgate Publishing
Yu CH (2017) Exploratory data analysis. Oxford Bibliographies, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/OBO9780199828340-0200
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was not required for this research as it did not involve human subjects.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This study includes data gathered through the author’s dissertation for Walden University (Cunningham 2021)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cunningham, N. A New Look at Male-on-Male Sexual Assault Offenders. J Police Crim Psych (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09489-0
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09489-0