Abstract
Bicircular twisted Laguerre-Gaussian beams possess a definite torus knot angular momentum (TKAM) as an alternative a form of angular momentum. TKAM is conserved in nonlinear atomic processes such as high harmonic generation and can be classified by a time delay parameter and a coordination parameter . These parameters are defined by the respective projected orbital angular momentum and the energy of the two superimposed Laguerre-Gaussian beams. We derive a consistent geometric method to determine and from the driving beam as well as from the high harmonic radiation. The method relates both invariance parameters ( and ) to a torus knot which can be constructed from the emitted high harmonic radiation. These knots are constructed from the spatiotemporal evolution of the electric field of the respective high harmonic radiation or the driving beam. We demonstrate the classification of the invariance parameters for a planar atomic gas target irradiated by bicircular Laguerre-Gaussian beams explicitly. In addition, we demonstrate that the respective torus knots determined by and can be mapped onto each other within minor modifications. The numerical calculations are done within the strong-field approximation and the associated quantum orbit approach. Therefore, we also briefly review high harmonic generation by bicircular twisted light beams. This introduced geometric method is a different approach to interpret the invariance parameters and , as well as their underlying relations, compared to a purely formal derivation. The investigations presented in this work are in good agreement with previous findings and provide insight into the dynamical symmetry of TKAM in the context of high harmonic generation induced by bicircular twisted Laguerre-Gaussian beams.
- Received 9 July 2021
- Accepted 12 November 2021
- Corrected 7 January 2022
- Corrected 20 January 2022
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.053116
©2021 American Physical Society
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Corrections
7 January 2022
Correction: In the front matter, affiliations were not ascribed properly to the second and third authors; the affiliation attributions have now been corrected.
20 January 2022
Second Correction: Minor errors in Eqs. (7b) and (7c) have been fixed.