Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Criminal Justice Practitioners’ Perceptions of Eyewitnesses with Anxiety and Depression

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the UK, witnesses with a mental health disorder are considered ‘vulnerable’ by the Criminal Justice System and consequently eligible for support within the Achieving Best Evidence guidance (recommendations produced in England and Wales to assist criminal justice practitioners in supporting vulnerable, intimidated and significant witnesses during the criminal justice process). However, it is unclear how the evidence and credibility of such witnesses, especially those with anxiety and depression, are perceived by criminal justice practitioners. The present study aimed to explore how practitioners in England and Wales perceive witnesses with anxiety and depression and the current guidance and training on mental health. One hundred and five practitioners including police officers (32), court staff (60) and registered intermediaries (13) completed an online questionnaire which examined their personal perceptions of, and attitudes towards, witnesses with anxiety and depression as well as the level and effectiveness of current guidance and training. Based on previous literature, it was anticipated that practitioners may hold biased perceptions of witnesses with anxiety and depression, and current guidance and training on mental health may be insufficient. The findings revealed that practitioners frequently encountered such witnesses, and prior knowledge of mental health issues influenced their perceptions with many reporting that such knowledge caused them to question the reliability of their evidence. Additionally, practitioners perceived the Achieving Best Evidence guidance including the use of special measures to be appropriate. However, they perceived that training around mental health required improvement. The implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. Although the sample sizes were unequal, this is not necessarily a problem when using a univariate analysis of variance if the variances are equal (Field 2018). Levene’s test was conducted in all analyses, and the results were not significant in all cases which suggests equal variances between groups.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beth Parsons.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Winchester.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for Publication

The authors affirm that all individual participants provided informed consent for publication of the study.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parsons, B., Wilcock, R. & Kneller, W. Criminal Justice Practitioners’ Perceptions of Eyewitnesses with Anxiety and Depression. J Police Crim Psych 38, 117–126 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09492-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09492-5

Keywords

Navigation