Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

3D biplane versus conventional 2D ultrasound imaging for internal jugular vein cannulation

  • Letter
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Data availability

HJS, EHMK and RAB take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analysis. The study protocol is available upon request.

References

  1. Batllori M, Urra M, Uriarte E et al (2016) Randomized comparison of three transducer orientation approaches for ultrasound guided internal jugular venous cannulation. Br J Anaesth 116:370–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blaivas M, Adhikari S (2009) An unseen danger: frequency of posterior vessel wall penetration by needles during attempts to place internal jugular vein central catheters using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med 37:2345–2349. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c0d9bb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. French JLH, Raine-Fenning NJ, Hardman JG, Bedforth NM (2008) Pitfalls of ultrasound guided vascular access: the use of three/four-dimensional ultrasound. Anaesthesia 63:806–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05513.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Panidapu N, Babu S, Koshy T et al (2020) Internal jugular vein cannulation using a 3- dimensional ultrasound probe in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: comparison between biplane view and short-axis view. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.08.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sauro J, Dumas JS (2009) Comparison of three one-question, post-task usability questionnaires. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 1599–1608. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518946

Download references

Acknowledgements

3DUI Study Group: Joris van Houte, M.D., Cecile H. Kicken M.D., Ph.D. Renee J.C. van den Broek M.D., Leontien ter Horst M.D., Veerle Piot M.D. Department of Anaesthesiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

This study was an investigator-initiated study. Funding for acquisition of the Butterfly IQ + system was provided by the Catharina Hospital Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Harm J. Scholten, Michael I. Meesters, Leon J. Montenij, Erik H. M. Korsten & R. Arthur Bouwman

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Harm J. Scholten, Leon J. Montenij, Erik H. M. Korsten & R. Arthur Bouwman

Authors
  1. Harm J. Scholten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael I. Meesters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leon J. Montenij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Erik H. M. Korsten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Arthur Bouwman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the 3DUI Study group

  • Joris van Houte
  • , Cecile H. Kicken
  • , Renee J. C. van den Broek
  • , Leontien ter Horst
  •  & Veerle Piot

Contributions

Study concept and design: HJS, RAB and EHMK. Material preparation and data collection were performed by MIM, RJCvdB, JvH, CHK, LJM, LtH and VP. Data analysis was performed by HJS, RAB and EHMK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HJS and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harm J. Scholten.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

LJM, EHMK and RAB have acted as clinical consultants for Philips Medical Research BV, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the institutional review board MEC-U (NL76278.100.20, Feb 5, 2021).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The members of the 3DUI Study group are listed in the Acknowledgements section.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scholten, H.J., Meesters, M.I., Montenij, L.J. et al. 3D biplane versus conventional 2D ultrasound imaging for internal jugular vein cannulation. Intensive Care Med 48, 236–237 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06579-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06579-9

Search

Navigation