Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relative attitude tracking of two satellites in the presence of third-body perturbation and considering actuator saturation

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Geometric method is one of the nonlinear methods for expressing the large-scale relative motion of satellites. In this paper, the equations of the Geometric method for perturbed orbits have been developed in the presence of third-body and \({J}_{2}\) gravitational perturbation. Then, these equations are employed for relative tracking and attitude control of two satellites to apply inter-satellite links. To validate the developed equations, the results obtained from these equations are compared to the main-body-centered-based relative motion (MCRM) model. Also, two control laws are designed to track and control the relative attitude of both satellites with consideration of external disturbances, the inertia uncertainty (due to fuel sloshing), and actuator saturation (due to bounded thrust). To establish inter-orbital links, it is necessary that the payload of satellites (the receiver and transmitter's antennas) are aligned in the same direction (named the reference trajectory). Due to the uncertainty in the attitude dynamics of systems and external disturbances, a robust controller must be applied to obtain control laws. The controller of the base satellite is designed so that the base satellite tracks the desired path (the reference trajectory) obtained from the relative motion equations. Furthermore, simultaneously and continuously, the target satellite control system tracks the base satellite antenna. For this reason, the external disturbances imposed on the base satellite affect the tracking control system of the target satellite. Also, a new definition of modified Rodrigues parameters (MRP) vector is proposed to design the tracking controllers that improve the control effort and convergence rate for the application of the inter-satellite links. Finally, two appropriate control laws for two satellites are designed through sliding mode control (SMC) theory subject to actuator saturation, inertia uncertainties, and external disturbances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bakhtiari M, Daneshjou K, Abbasali E (2017) A new approach to derive a formation flying model in the presence of a perturbing body in inclined elliptical orbit: relative hovering analysis. Astrophys Space Sci 362(2):36

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Schütze D (2016) Measuring Earth: current status of the GRACE follow-on laser ranging interferometer. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. vol 716. IOP Publishing, p 012005

  3. Benzi E, Troendle DC, Shurmer I, James M, Lutzer M, Kuhlmann S (2016) Optical Inter-Satellite Communication: the Alphasat and Sentinel-1A in-orbit experience. In: 14th International Conference on Space Operations. p 2389

  4. Laux O, Poncet D, Mager R, Schoenherr K (2012) Status of the European data relay satellite system. In: International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications (ICSOS)

  5. Li Q, Yuan J, Zhang B, Gao C (2017) Model predictive control for autonomous rendezvous and docking with a tumbling target. Aerosp Sci Technol 69:700–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiltshire R, Clohessy W (1960) Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous. J Aerosp Sci 27(9):653–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li P, Zhu ZH (2018) Model predictive control for spacecraft rendezvous in elliptical orbit. Acta Astronaut 146:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tschauner J, Hempel P (1965) Rendezvous zu einem in elliptischer Bahn umlaufenden Ziel. Astronautica Acta 2:802

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Ji H (2019) Integrated relative position and attitude control for spacecraft rendezvous with ISS and finite-time convergence. Aerosp Sci Technol 85:234–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee SS (2009) Dynamics and control of satellite relative motion: designs and applications. Dissertation, Virginia Tech

  11. Wertz JR (2001) Mission geometry: orbit and constellation design and management: spacecraft orbit and attitude systems. Springer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vadali SR (2002) An analytical solution for relative motion of satellites. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Dynamics and Control of Structures and Systems in Space. pp 1–8

  13. Alfriend K, Yan H (2002) An orbital elements approach to the nonlinear formation flying problem. In: International Formation Flying Symposium. Toulouse, France

  14. Bakhtiari M, Daneshjou K, Fakoor M (2017) Relative hovering analysis about an elliptical perturbed orbit with consideration of dynamic air drag and oblate earth. Aerosp Sci Technol 70:286–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Horri NM, Kristiansen KU, Palmer P, Roberts M (2012) Relative attitude dynamics and control for a satellite inspection mission. Acta Astronaut 71:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu K, Xia Y (2013) Adaptive attitude tracking control for rigid spacecraft with finite-time convergence. Automatica 49(12):3591–3599

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao J, Cai Y (2015) Fixed-time control for spacecraft attitude tracking based on quaternion. Acta Astronaut 115:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cao X, Wu B (2015) Indirect adaptive control for attitude tracking of spacecraft with unknown reaction wheel friction. Aerosp Sci Technol 47:493–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu Y-H, Han F, Zheng M-H, Wang F, Hua B, Chen Z-M, Cheng Y-H (2018) Attitude tracking control for a space moving target with high dynamic performance using hybrid actuator. Aerosp Sci Technol 78:102–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Golzari A, Pishkenari HN, Salarieh H, Abdollahi T (2020) Quaternion based linear time-varying model predictive attitude control for satellites with two reaction wheels. Aerosp Sci Technol 98:105677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hakima H, Emami MR (2020) Concurrent attitude and orbit control for Deorbiter CubeSats. Aerosp Sci Technol 97:105616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bohlouri V, Khodamoradi Z, Jalali-Naini SH (2018) Spacecraft attitude control using model-based disturbance feedback control strategy. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40(12):557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alfriend K, Vadali SR, Gurfil P, How J, Breger L (2009) Spacecraft formation flying: Dynamics, control and navigation. Elsevier, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  24. Curtis HD (2013) Orbital mechanics for engineering students. Elsevier, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xu M, Wang Y, Xu S (2012) On the existence of J 2 invariant relative orbits from the dynamical system point of view. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 112(4):427–444

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee D (2017) Nonlinear disturbance observer-based robust control of attitude tracking of rigid spacecraft. Nonlin Dyn 88(2):1317–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wei C, Park S-Y, Park C (2013) Linearized dynamics model for relative motion under a J2-perturbed elliptical reference orbit. Int J Non-Linear Mech 55:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sidi MJ (1997) Spacecraft dynamics and control: a practical engineering approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Slotine J-JE, Li W (1991) Applied nonlinear control. Prentice hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Bakhtiari M, Daneshjou K, Fakoor M (2017) Long-term effects of main-body’s obliquity on satellite formation perturbed by third-body gravity in elliptical and inclined orbit. Res Astron Astrophys 17(4):039

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Saman Zarei & Kamran Daneshjou

  2. School of Advanced Technologies, Iran University of Science and Technology, P.O.B. 16846-13114, Tehran, Iran

    Majid Bakhtiari

Authors
  1. Saman Zarei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Majid Bakhtiari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kamran Daneshjou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Bakhtiari.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Jader Barbosa Jr.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zarei, S., Bakhtiari, M. & Daneshjou, K. Relative attitude tracking of two satellites in the presence of third-body perturbation and considering actuator saturation. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 43, 545 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03267-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03267-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation